The Effect of Data Dimensionality on Neural Network Prunability

Practitioners prune neural networks for efficiency gains and generalization improvements, but few scrutinize the factors determining the prunability of a neural network the maximum fraction of weights that pruning can remove without compromising the model's test accuracy. In this work, we study the properties of input data that may contribute to the prunability of a neural network. For high dimensional input data such as images, text, and audio, the manifold hypothesis suggests that these high dimensional inputs approximately lie on or near a significantly lower dimensional manifold. Prior work demonstrates that the underlying low dimensional structure of the input data may affect the sample efficiency of learning. In this paper, we investigate whether the low dimensional structure of the input data affects the prunability of a neural network.

Pruning's Effect on Generalization Through the Lens of Training and Regularization

Practitioners frequently observe that pruning improves model generalization. A long-standing hypothesis based on bias-variance trade-off attributes this generalization improvement to model size reduction. However, recent studies on over-parameterization characterize a new model size regime, in which larger models achieve better generalization. Pruning models in this over-parameterized regime leads to a contradiction -- while theory predicts that reducing model size harms generalization, pruning to a range of sparsities nonetheless improves it. Motivated by this contradiction, we re-examine pruning's effect on generalization empirically. We show that size reduction cannot fully account for the generalization-improving effect of standard pruning algorithms. Instead, we find that pruning leads to better training at specific sparsities, improving the training loss over the dense model. We find that pruning also leads to additional regularization at other sparsities, reducing the accuracy degradation due to noisy examples over the dense model. Pruning extends model training time and reduces model size. These two factors improve training and add regularization respectively. We empirically demonstrate that both factors are essential to fully explaining pruning's impact on generalization.

Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?

Modern deep learning involves training costly, highly overparameterized networks, thus motivating the search for sparser networks that can still be trained to the same accuracy as the full network (i.e. matching). Iterative magnitude pruning (IMP) is a state of the art algorithm that can find such highly sparse matching subnetworks, known as winning tickets. IMP operates by iterative cycles of training, masking smallest magnitude weights, rewinding back to an early training point, and repeating. Despite its simplicity, the underlying principles for when and how IMP finds winning tickets remain elusive. In particular, what useful information does an IMP mask found at the end of training convey to a rewound network near the beginning of training? How does SGD allow the network to extract this information? And why is iterative pruning needed? We develop answers in terms of the geometry of the error landscape. First, we find that$\unicode{x2014}$at higher sparsities$\unicode{x2014}$pairs of pruned networks at successive pruning iterations are connected by a linear path with zero error barrier if and only if they are matching. This indicates that masks found at the end of training convey the identity of an axial subspace that intersects a desired linearly connected mode of a matching sublevel set. Second, we show SGD can exploit this information due to a strong form of robustness: it can return to this mode despite strong perturbations early in training. Third, we show how the flatness of the error landscape at the end of training determines a limit on the fraction of weights that can be pruned at each iteration of IMP. Finally, we show that the role of retraining in IMP is to find a network with new small weights to prune. Overall, these results make progress toward demystifying the existence of winning tickets by revealing the fundamental role of error landscape geometry.

Understanding Generalization via Leave-One-Out Conditional Mutual Information

We study the mutual information between (certain summaries of) the output of a learning algorithm and its $n$ training data, conditional on a supersample of $n+1$ i.i.d. data from which the training data is chosen at random without replacement. These leave-one-out variants of the conditional mutual information (CMI) of an algorithm (Steinke and Zakynthinou, 2020) are also seen to control the mean generalization error of learning algorithms with bounded loss functions. For learning algorithms achieving zero empirical risk under 0-1 loss (i.e., interpolating algorithms), we provide an explicit connection between leave-one-out CMI and the classical leave-one-out error estimate of the risk. Using this connection, we obtain upper and lower bounds on risk in terms of the (evaluated) leave-one-out CMI. When the limiting risk is constant or decays polynomially, the bounds converge to within a constant factor of two. As an application, we analyze the population risk of the one-inclusion graph algorithm, a general-purpose transductive learning algorithm for VC classes in the realizable setting. Using leave-one-out CMI, we match the optimal bound for learning VC classes in the realizable setting, answering an open challenge raised by Steinke and Zakynthinou (2020). Finally, in order to understand the role of leave-one-out CMI in studying generalization, we place leave-one-out CMI in a hierarchy of measures, with a novel unconditional mutual information at the root. For 0-1 loss and interpolating learning algorithms, this mutual information is observed to be precisely the risk.

Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable Networks

A striking observation about iterative magnitude pruning (IMP; Frankle et al. 2020) is that $\unicode{x2014}$ after just a few hundred steps of dense training $\unicode{x2014}$ the method can find a sparse sub-network that can be trained to the same accuracy as the dense network. However, the same does not hold at step 0, i.e. random initialization. In this work, we seek to understand how this early phase of pre-training leads to a good initialization for IMP both through the lens of the data distribution and the loss landscape geometry. Empirically we observe that, holding the number of pre-training iterations constant, training on a small fraction of (randomly chosen) data suffices to obtain an equally good initialization for IMP. We additionally observe that by pre-training only on "easy" training data, we can decrease the number of steps necessary to find a good initialization for IMP compared to training on the full dataset or a randomly chosen subset. Finally, we identify novel properties of the loss landscape of dense networks that are predictive of IMP performance, showing in particular that more examples being linearly mode connected in the dense network correlates well with good initializations for IMP. Combined, these results provide new insight into the role played by the early phase training in IMP.

Towards a Unified Information-Theoretic Framework for Generalization

In this work, we investigate the expressiveness of the "conditional mutual information" (CMI) framework of Steinke and Zakynthinou (2020) and the prospect of using it to provide a unified framework for proving generalization bounds in the realizable setting. We first demonstrate that one can use this framework to express non-trivial (but sub-optimal) bounds for any learning algorithm that outputs hypotheses from a class of bounded VC dimension. We prove that the CMI framework yields the optimal bound on the expected risk of Support Vector Machines (SVMs) for learning halfspaces. This result is an application of our general result showing that stable compression schemes Bousquet al. (2020) of size $k$ have uniformly bounded CMI of order $O(k)$. We further show that an inherent limitation of proper learning of VC classes contradicts the existence of a proper learner with constant CMI, and it implies a negative resolution to an open problem of Steinke and Zakynthinou (2020). We further study the CMI of empirical risk minimizers (ERMs) of class $H$ and show that it is possible to output all consistent classifiers (version space) with bounded CMI if and only if $H$ has a bounded star number (Hanneke and Yang (2015)). Moreover, we prove a general reduction showing that "leave-one-out" analysis is expressible via the CMI framework. As a corollary we investigate the CMI of the one-inclusion-graph algorithm proposed by Haussler et al. (1994). More generally, we show that the CMI framework is universal in the sense that for every consistent algorithm and data distribution, the expected risk vanishes as the number of samples diverges if and only if its evaluated CMI has sublinear growth with the number of samples.

Probabilistic fine-tuning of pruning masks and PAC-Bayes self-bounded learning

We study an approach to learning pruning masks by optimizing the expected loss of stochastic pruning masks, i.e., masks which zero out each weight independently with some weight-specific probability. We analyze the training dynamics of the induced stochastic predictor in the setting of linear regression, and observe a data-adaptive L1 regularization term, in contrast to the dataadaptive L2 regularization term known to underlie dropout in linear regression. We also observe a preference to prune weights that are less well-aligned with the data labels. We evaluate probabilistic fine-tuning for optimizing stochastic pruning masks for neural networks, starting from masks produced by several baselines. In each case, we see improvements in test error over baselines, even after we threshold fine-tuned stochastic pruning masks. Finally, since a stochastic pruning mask induces a stochastic neural network, we consider training the weights and/or pruning probabilities simultaneously to minimize a PAC-Bayes bound on generalization error. Using data-dependent priors, we obtain a selfbounded learning algorithm with strong performance and numerically tight bounds. In the linear model, we show that a PAC-Bayes generalization error bound is controlled by the magnitude of the change in feature alignment between the 'prior' and 'posterior' data.

Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Training

The recent success of deep learning has partially been driven by training increasingly overparametrized networks on ever larger datasets. It is therefore natural to ask: how much of the data is superfluous, which examples are important for generalization, and how do we find them? In this work, we make the striking observation that, on standard vision benchmarks, the initial loss gradient norm of individual training examples, averaged over several weight initializations, can be used to identify a smaller set of training data that is important for generalization. Furthermore, after only a few epochs of training, the information in gradient norms is reflected in the normed error--L2 distance between the predicted probabilities and one hot labels--which can be used to prune a significant fraction of the dataset without sacrificing test accuracy. Based on this, we propose data pruning methods which use only local information early in training, and connect them to recent work that prunes data by discarding examples that are rarely forgotten over the course of training. Our methods also shed light on how the underlying data distribution shapes the training dynamics: they rank examples based on their importance for generalization, detect noisy examples and identify subspaces of the model's data representation that are relatively stable over training.

NeurIPS 2020 Competition: Predicting Generalization in Deep Learning

Understanding generalization in deep learning is arguably one of the most important questions in deep learning. Deep learning has been successfully adopted to a large number of problems ranging from pattern recognition to complex decision making, but many recent researchers have raised many concerns about deep learning, among which the most important is generalization. Despite numerous attempts, conventional statistical learning approaches have yet been able to provide a satisfactory explanation on why deep learning works. A recent line of works aims to address the problem by trying to predict the generalization performance through complexity measures. In this competition, we invite the community to propose complexity measures that can accurately predict generalization of models. A robust and general complexity measure would potentially lead to a better understanding of deep learning's underlying mechanism and behavior of deep models on unseen data, or shed light on better generalization bounds. All these outcomes will be important for making deep learning more robust and reliable.