Alert button
Picture for Adrien Gaidon

Adrien Gaidon

Alert button

Geometric Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Mar 30, 2021
Vitor Guizilini, Jie Li, Rares Ambrus, Adrien Gaidon

Figure 1 for Geometric Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation
Figure 2 for Geometric Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation
Figure 3 for Geometric Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation
Figure 4 for Geometric Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation
Viaarxiv icon

Sparse Auxiliary Networks for Unified Monocular Depth Prediction and Completion

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Mar 30, 2021
Vitor Guizilini, Rares Ambrus, Wolfram Burgard, Adrien Gaidon

Figure 1 for Sparse Auxiliary Networks for Unified Monocular Depth Prediction and Completion
Figure 2 for Sparse Auxiliary Networks for Unified Monocular Depth Prediction and Completion
Figure 3 for Sparse Auxiliary Networks for Unified Monocular Depth Prediction and Completion
Figure 4 for Sparse Auxiliary Networks for Unified Monocular Depth Prediction and Completion
Viaarxiv icon

Measuring Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning Benchmarks: NeurIPS 2020 Procgen Benchmark

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Mar 29, 2021
Sharada Mohanty, Jyotish Poonganam, Adrien Gaidon, Andrey Kolobov, Blake Wulfe, Dipam Chakraborty, Gražvydas Šemetulskis, João Schapke, Jonas Kubilius, Jurgis Pašukonis, Linas Klimas, Matthew Hausknecht, Patrick MacAlpine, Quang Nhat Tran, Thomas Tumiel, Xiaocheng Tang, Xinwei Chen, Christopher Hesse, Jacob Hilton, William Hebgen Guss, Sahika Genc, John Schulman, Karl Cobbe

Figure 1 for Measuring Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning Benchmarks: NeurIPS 2020 Procgen Benchmark
Figure 2 for Measuring Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning Benchmarks: NeurIPS 2020 Procgen Benchmark
Figure 3 for Measuring Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning Benchmarks: NeurIPS 2020 Procgen Benchmark
Figure 4 for Measuring Sample Efficiency and Generalization in Reinforcement Learning Benchmarks: NeurIPS 2020 Procgen Benchmark
Viaarxiv icon

Learning to Track with Object Permanence

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Mar 26, 2021
Pavel Tokmakov, Jie Li, Wolfram Burgard, Adrien Gaidon

Figure 1 for Learning to Track with Object Permanence
Figure 2 for Learning to Track with Object Permanence
Figure 3 for Learning to Track with Object Permanence
Figure 4 for Learning to Track with Object Permanence
Viaarxiv icon

Monocular Depth Estimation for Soft Visuotactile Sensors

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Jan 05, 2021
Rares Ambrus, Vitor Guizilini, Naveen Kuppuswamy, Andrew Beaulieu, Adrien Gaidon, Alex Alspach

Figure 1 for Monocular Depth Estimation for Soft Visuotactile Sensors
Figure 2 for Monocular Depth Estimation for Soft Visuotactile Sensors
Figure 3 for Monocular Depth Estimation for Soft Visuotactile Sensors
Figure 4 for Monocular Depth Estimation for Soft Visuotactile Sensors
Viaarxiv icon

Discovering Avoidable Planner Failures of Autonomous Vehicles using Counterfactual Analysis in Behaviorally Diverse Simulation

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Nov 24, 2020
Daisuke Nishiyama, Mario Ynocente Castro, Shirou Maruyama, Shinya Shiroshita, Karim Hamzaoui, Yi Ouyang, Guy Rosman, Jonathan DeCastro, Kuan-Hui Lee, Adrien Gaidon

Figure 1 for Discovering Avoidable Planner Failures of Autonomous Vehicles using Counterfactual Analysis in Behaviorally Diverse Simulation
Figure 2 for Discovering Avoidable Planner Failures of Autonomous Vehicles using Counterfactual Analysis in Behaviorally Diverse Simulation
Figure 3 for Discovering Avoidable Planner Failures of Autonomous Vehicles using Counterfactual Analysis in Behaviorally Diverse Simulation
Figure 4 for Discovering Avoidable Planner Failures of Autonomous Vehicles using Counterfactual Analysis in Behaviorally Diverse Simulation
Viaarxiv icon

Behaviorally Diverse Traffic Simulation via Reinforcement Learning

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Nov 11, 2020
Shinya Shiroshita, Shirou Maruyama, Daisuke Nishiyama, Mario Ynocente Castro, Karim Hamzaoui, Guy Rosman, Jonathan DeCastro, Kuan-Hui Lee, Adrien Gaidon

Figure 1 for Behaviorally Diverse Traffic Simulation via Reinforcement Learning
Figure 2 for Behaviorally Diverse Traffic Simulation via Reinforcement Learning
Figure 3 for Behaviorally Diverse Traffic Simulation via Reinforcement Learning
Figure 4 for Behaviorally Diverse Traffic Simulation via Reinforcement Learning
Viaarxiv icon

RAT iLQR: A Risk Auto-Tuning Controller to Optimally Account for Stochastic Model Mismatch

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Oct 16, 2020
Haruki Nishimura, Negar Mehr, Adrien Gaidon, Mac Schwager

Figure 1 for RAT iLQR: A Risk Auto-Tuning Controller to Optimally Account for Stochastic Model Mismatch
Figure 2 for RAT iLQR: A Risk Auto-Tuning Controller to Optimally Account for Stochastic Model Mismatch
Figure 3 for RAT iLQR: A Risk Auto-Tuning Controller to Optimally Account for Stochastic Model Mismatch
Figure 4 for RAT iLQR: A Risk Auto-Tuning Controller to Optimally Account for Stochastic Model Mismatch
Viaarxiv icon

Monocular Differentiable Rendering for Self-Supervised 3D Object Detection

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Sep 30, 2020
Deniz Beker, Hiroharu Kato, Mihai Adrian Morariu, Takahiro Ando, Toru Matsuoka, Wadim Kehl, Adrien Gaidon

Figure 1 for Monocular Differentiable Rendering for Self-Supervised 3D Object Detection
Figure 2 for Monocular Differentiable Rendering for Self-Supervised 3D Object Detection
Figure 3 for Monocular Differentiable Rendering for Self-Supervised 3D Object Detection
Figure 4 for Monocular Differentiable Rendering for Self-Supervised 3D Object Detection
Viaarxiv icon

MATS: An Interpretable Trajectory Forecasting Representation for Planning and Control

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Sep 16, 2020
Boris Ivanovic, Amine Elhafsi, Guy Rosman, Adrien Gaidon, Marco Pavone

Figure 1 for MATS: An Interpretable Trajectory Forecasting Representation for Planning and Control
Figure 2 for MATS: An Interpretable Trajectory Forecasting Representation for Planning and Control
Figure 3 for MATS: An Interpretable Trajectory Forecasting Representation for Planning and Control
Figure 4 for MATS: An Interpretable Trajectory Forecasting Representation for Planning and Control
Viaarxiv icon