Efficient Dataset Selection for Continual Adaptation of Generative Recommenders

Recommendation systems must continuously adapt to evolving user behavior, yet the volume of data generated in large-scale streaming environments makes frequent full retraining impractical. This work investigates how targeted data selection can mitigate performance degradation caused by temporal distributional drift while maintaining scalability. We evaluate a range of representation choices and sampling strategies for curating small but informative subsets of user interaction data. Our results demonstrate that gradient-based representations, coupled with distribution-matching, improve downstream model performance, achieving training efficiency gains while preserving robustness to drift. These findings highlight data curation as a practical mechanism for scalable monitoring and adaptive model updates in production-scale recommendation systems.

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data for Recommender Systems

In recommender systems, collecting, storing, and processing large-scale interaction data is increasingly costly in terms of time, energy, and computation, yet it remains unclear when additional data stops providing meaningful gains. This paper investigates how offline recommendation performance evolves as the size of the training dataset increases and whether a saturation point can be observed. We implemented a reproducible Python evaluation workflow with two established toolkits, LensKit and RecBole, included 11 large public datasets with at least 7 million interactions, and evaluated 10 tool-algorithm combinations. Using absolute stratified user sampling, we trained models on nine sample sizes from 100,000 to 100,000,000 interactions and measured NDCG@10. Overall, raw NDCG usually increased with sample size, with no observable saturation point. To make result groups comparable, we applied min-max normalization within each group, revealing a clear positive trend in which around 75% of the points at the largest completed sample size also achieved the group's best observed performance. A late-stage slope analysis over the final 10-30% of each group further supported this upward trend: the interquartile range remained entirely non-negative with a median near 1.0. In summary, for traditional recommender systems on typical user-item interaction data, incorporating more training data remains primarily beneficial, while weaker scaling behavior is concentrated in atypical dataset cases and in the algorithmic outlier RecBole BPR under our setup.

Quantifying Explanation Consistency: The C-Score Metric for CAM-Based Explainability in Medical Image Classification

Class Activation Mapping (CAM) methods are widely used to generate visual explanations for deep learning classifiers in medical imaging. However, existing evaluation frameworks assess whether explanations are correct, measured by localisation fidelity against radiologist annotations, rather than whether they are consistent: whether the model applies the same spatial reasoning strategy across different patients with the same pathology. We propose the C-Score (Consistency Score), a confidence-weighted, annotation-free metric that quantifies intra-class explanation reproducibility via intensity-emphasised pairwise soft IoU across correctly classified instances. We evaluate six CAM techniques: GradCAM, GradCAM++, LayerCAM, EigenCAM, ScoreCAM, and MS GradCAM++ across three CNN architectures (DenseNet201, InceptionV3, ResNet50V2) over thirty training epochs on the Kermany chest X-ray dataset, covering transfer learning and fine-tuning phases. We identify three distinct mechanisms of AUC-consistency dissociation, invisible to standard classification metrics: threshold-mediated gold list collapse, technique-specific attribution collapse at peak AUC, and class-level consistency masking in global aggregation. C-Score provides an early warning signal of impending model instability. ScoreCAM deterioration on ResNet50V2 is detectable one full checkpoint before catastrophic AUC collapse and yields architecture-specific clinical deployment recommendations grounded in explanation quality rather than predictive ranking alone.

Ensembles at Any Cost? Accuracy-Energy Trade-offs in Recommender Systems

Ensemble methods are frequently used in recommender systems to improve accuracy by combining multiple models. Recent work reports sizable performance gains, but most studies still optimize primarily for accuracy and robustness rather than for energy efficiency. This paper measures accuracy energy trade offs of ensemble techniques relative to strong single models. We run 93 controlled experiments in two pipelines: 1. explicit rating prediction with Surprise (RMSE) and 2. implicit feedback ranking with LensKit (NDCG@10). We evaluate four datasets ranging from 100,000 to 7.8 million interactions (MovieLens 100K, MovieLens 1M, ModCloth, Anime). We compare four ensemble strategies (Average, Weighted, Stacking or Rank Fusion, Top Performers) against baselines and optimized single models. Whole system energy is measured with EMERS using a smart plug and converted to CO2 equivalents. Across settings, ensembles improve accuracy by 0.3% to 5.7% while increasing energy by 19% to 2,549%. On MovieLens 1M, a Top Performers ensemble improves RMSE by 0.96% at an 18.8% energy overhead over SVD++. On MovieLens 100K, an averaging ensemble improves NDCG@10 by 5.7% with 103% additional energy. On Anime, a Surprise Top Performers ensemble improves RMSE by 1.2% but consumes 2,005% more energy (0.21 vs. 0.01 Wh), increasing emissions from 2.6 to 53.8 mg CO2 equivalents, and LensKit ensembles fail due to memory limits. Overall, selective ensembles are more energy efficient than exhaustive averaging,

Long-Term Embeddings for Balanced Personalization

Modern transformer-based sequential recommenders excel at capturing short-term intent but often suffer from recency bias, overlooking stable long-term preferences. While extending sequence lengths is an intuitive fix, it is computationally inefficient, and recent interactions tend to dominate the model's attention. We propose Long-Term Embeddings (LTE) as a high-inertia contextual anchor to bridge this gap. We address a critical production challenge: the point-in-time consistency problem caused by infrastructure constraints, as feature stores typically host only a single "live" version of features. This leads to an offline-online mismatch during model deployments and rollbacks, as models are forced to process evolved representations they never saw during training. To resolve this, we introduce an LTE framework that constrains embeddings to a fixed semantic basis of content-based item representations, ensuring cross-version compatibility. Furthermore, we investigate integration strategies for causal language modeling, considering the data leakage issue that occurs when the LTE and the transformer's short-term sequence share a temporal horizon. We evaluate two representations: a heuristic average and an asymmetric autoencoder with a fixed decoder grounded in the semantic basis to enable behavioral fine-tuning while maintaining stability. Online A/B tests on Zalando demonstrate that integrating LTE as a contextual prefix token using a lagged window yields significant uplifts in both user engagement and financial metrics.

CASE: Cadence-Aware Set Encoding for Large-Scale Next Basket Repurchase Recommendation

Repurchase behavior is a primary signal in large-scale retail recommendation, particularly in categories with frequent replenishment: many items in a user's next basket were previously purchased and their timing follows stable, item-specific cadences. Yet most next basket repurchase recommendation models represent history as a sequence of discrete basket events indexed by visit order, which cannot explicitly model elapsed calendar time or update item rankings as days pass between purchases. We present CASE (Cadence-Aware Set Encoding for next basket repurchase recommendation), which decouples item-level cadence learning from cross-item interaction, enabling explicit calendar-time modeling while remaining production-scalable. CASE represents each item's purchase history as a calendar-time signal over a fixed horizon, applies shared multi-scale temporal convolutions to capture recurring rhythms, and uses induced set attention to model cross-item dependencies with sub-quadratic complexity, allowing efficient batch inference at scale. Across three public benchmarks and a proprietary dataset, CASE consistently improves Precision, Recall, and NDCG at multiple cutoffs compared to strong next basket prediction baselines. In a production-scale evaluation with tens of millions of users and a large item catalog, CASE achieves up to 8.6% relative Precision and 9.9% Recall lift at top-5, demonstrating that scalable cadence-aware modeling yields measurable gains in both benchmark and industrial settings.

Beyond Dense Connectivity: Explicit Sparsity for Scalable Recommendation

Recent progress in scaling large models has motivated recommender systems to increase model depth and capacity to better leverage massive behavioral data. However, recommendation inputs are high-dimensional and extremely sparse, and simply scaling dense backbones (e.g., deep MLPs) often yields diminishing returns or even performance degradation. Our analysis of industrial CTR models reveals a phenomenon of implicit connection sparsity: most learned connection weights tend towards zero, while only a small fraction remain prominent. This indicates a structural mismatch between dense connectivity and sparse recommendation data; by compelling the model to process vast low-utility connections instead of valid signals, the dense architecture itself becomes the primary bottleneck to effective pattern modeling. We propose \textbf{SSR} (Explicit \textbf{S}parsity for \textbf{S}calable \textbf{R}ecommendation), a framework that incorporates sparsity explicitly into the architecture. SSR employs a multi-view "filter-then-fuse" mechanism, decomposing inputs into parallel views for dimension-level sparse filtering followed by dense fusion. Specifically, we realize the sparsity via two strategies: a Static Random Filter that achieves efficient structural sparsity via fixed dimension subsets, and Iterative Competitive Sparse (ICS), a differentiable dynamic mechanism that employs bio-inspired competition to adaptively retain high-response dimensions. Experiments on three public datasets and a billion-scale industrial dataset from AliExpress (a global e-commerce platform) show that SSR outperforms state-of-the-art baselines under similar budgets. Crucially, SSR exhibits superior scalability, delivering continuous performance gains where dense models saturate.

From Universal to Individualized Actionability: Revisiting Personalization in Algorithmic Recourse

Algorithmic recourse aims to provide actionable recommendations that enable individuals to change unfavorable model outcomes, and prior work has extensively studied properties such as efficiency, robustness, and fairness. However, the role of personalization in recourse remains largely implicit and underexplored. While existing approaches incorporate elements of personalization through user interactions, they typically lack an explicit definition of personalization and do not systematically analyze its downstream effects on other recourse desiderata. In this paper, we formalize personalization as individual actionability, characterized along two dimensions: hard constraints that specify which features are individually actionable, and soft, individualized constraints that capture preferences over action values and costs. We operationalize these dimensions within the causal algorithmic recourse framework, adopting a pre-hoc user-prompting approach in which individuals express preferences via rankings or scores prior to the generation of any recourse recommendation. Through extensive empirical evaluation, we investigate how personalization interacts with key recourse desiderata, including validity, cost, and plausibility. Our results highlight important trade-offs: individual actionability constraints, particularly hard ones, can substantially degrade the plausibility and validity of recourse recommendations across amortized and non-amortized approaches. Notably, we also find that incorporating individual actionability can reveal disparities in the cost and plausibility of recourse actions across socio-demographic groups. These findings underscore the need for principled definitions, careful operationalization, and rigorous evaluation of personalization in algorithmic recourse.

Context-Aware Disentanglement for Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation: A Causal View

Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation (CDSR) aims to en-hance recommendation quality by transferring knowledge across domains, offering effective solutions to data sparsity and cold-start issues. However, existing methods face three major limitations: (1) they overlook varying contexts in user interaction sequences, resulting in spurious correlations that obscure the true causal relationships driving user preferences; (2) the learning of domain- shared and domain-specific preferences is hindered by gradient conflicts between domains, leading to a seesaw effect where performance in one domain improves at the expense of the other; (3) most methods rely on the unrealistic assumption of substantial user overlap across domains. To address these issues, we propose CoDiS, a context-aware disentanglement framework grounded in a causal view to accurately disentangle domain-shared and domain-specific preferences. Specifically, Our approach includes a variational context adjustment method to reduce confounding effects of contexts, expert isolation and selection strategies to resolve gradient conflict, and a variational adversarial disentangling module for the thorough disentanglement of domain-shared and domain-specific representations. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that CoDiS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art CDSR baselines with statistical significance. Code is available at:https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CoDiS-6FA0.

DialBGM: A Benchmark for Background Music Recommendation from Everyday Multi-Turn Dialogues

Selecting an appropriate background music (BGM) that supports natural human conversation is a common production step in media and interactive systems. In this paper, we introduce dialogue-conditioned BGM recommendation, where a model should select non-intrusive, fitting music for a multi-turn conversation that often contains no music descriptors. To study this novel problem, we present DialBGM, a benchmark of 1,200 open-domain daily dialogues, each paired with four candidate music clips and annotated with human preference rankings. Rankings are determined by background suitability criteria, including contextual relevance, non-intrusiveness, and consistency. We evaluate a wide range of open-source and proprietary models, including audio-language models and multimodal LLMs, and show that current models fall far short of human judgments; no model exceeds 35% Hit@1 when selecting the top-ranked clip. DialBGM provides a standardized benchmark for developing discourse-aware methods for BGM selection and for evaluating both retrieval-based and generative models.