Can we generate portable representations for clinical time series data using LLMs?

Deploying clinical ML is slow and brittle: models that work at one hospital often degrade under distribution shifts at the next. In this work, we study a simple question -- can large language models (LLMs) create portable patient embeddings i.e. representations of patients enable a downstream predictor built on one hospital to be used elsewhere with minimal-to-no retraining and fine-tuning. To do so, we map from irregular ICU time series onto concise natural language summaries using a frozen LLM, then embed each summary with a frozen text embedding model to obtain a fixed length vector capable of serving as input to a variety of downstream predictors. Across three cohorts (MIMIC-IV, HIRID, PPICU), on multiple clinically grounded forecasting and classification tasks, we find that our approach is simple, easy to use and competitive with in-distribution with grid imputation, self-supervised representation learning, and time series foundation models, while exhibiting smaller relative performance drops when transferring to new hospitals. We study the variation in performance across prompt design, with structured prompts being crucial to reducing the variance of the predictive models without altering mean accuracy. We find that using these portable representations improves few-shot learning and does not increase demographic recoverability of age or sex relative to baselines, suggesting little additional privacy risk. Our work points to the potential that LLMs hold as tools to enable the scalable deployment of production grade predictive models by reducing the engineering overhead.

AlignMamba-2: Enhancing Multimodal Fusion and Sentiment Analysis with Modality-Aware Mamba

In the era of large-scale pre-trained models, effectively adapting general knowledge to specific affective computing tasks remains a challenge, particularly regarding computational efficiency and multimodal heterogeneity. While Transformer-based methods have excelled at modeling inter-modal dependencies, their quadratic computational complexity limits their use with long-sequence data. Mamba-based models have emerged as a computationally efficient alternative; however, their inherent sequential scanning mechanism struggles to capture the global, non-sequential relationships that are crucial for effective cross-modal alignment. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{AlignMamba-2}, an effective and efficient framework for multimodal fusion and sentiment analysis. Our approach introduces a dual alignment strategy that regularizes the model using both Optimal Transport distance and Maximum Mean Discrepancy, promoting geometric and statistical consistency between modalities without incurring any inference-time overhead. More importantly, we design a Modality-Aware Mamba layer, which employs a Mixture-of-Experts architecture with modality-specific and modality-shared experts to explicitly handle data heterogeneity during the fusion process. Extensive experiments on four challenging benchmarks, including dynamic time-series (on the CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI datasets) and static image-related tasks (on the NYU-Depth V2 and MVSA-Single datasets), demonstrate that AlignMamba-2 establishes a new state-of-the-art in both effectiveness and efficiency across diverse pattern recognition tasks, ranging from dynamic time-series analysis to static image-text classification.

Mitigating Objectness Bias and Region-to-Text Misalignment for Open-Vocabulary Panoptic Segmentation

Open-vocabulary panoptic segmentation remains hindered by two coupled issues: (i) mask selection bias, where objectness heads trained on closed vocabularies suppress masks of categories not observed in training, and (ii) limited regional understanding in vision-language models such as CLIP, which were optimized for global image classification rather than localized segmentation. We introduce OVRCOAT, a simple, modular framework that tackles both. First, a CLIP-conditioned objectness adjustment (COAT) updates background/foreground probabilities, preserving high-quality masks for out-of-vocabulary objects. Second, an open-vocabulary mask-to-text refinement (OVR) strengthens CLIP's region-level alignment to improve classification of both seen and unseen classes with markedly lower memory cost than prior fine-tuning schemes. The two components combine to jointly improve objectness estimation and mask recognition, yielding consistent panoptic gains. Despite its simplicity, OVRCOAT sets a new state of the art on ADE20K (+5.5% PQ) and delivers clear gains on Mapillary Vistas and Cityscapes (+7.1% and +3% PQ, respectively). The code is available at: https://github.com/nickormushev/OVRCOAT

Selective Fine-Tuning of GPT Architectures for Parameter-Efficient Clinical Text Classification

The rapid expansion of electronic health record (EHR) systems has generated large volumes of unstructured clinical narratives that contain valuable information for disease identification, patient cohort discovery, and clinical decision support. Extracting structured knowledge from these free-text documents remains challenging because clinical language is highly specialized, labeled datasets are limited, and full fine-tuning of large pretrained language models can require substantial computational resources. Efficient adaptation strategies are therefore essential for practical clinical natural language processing applications. This study proposes a parameter-efficient selective fine-tuning framework for adapting GPT-2 to clinical text classification tasks. Instead of updating the entire pretrained model, the majority of network parameters are frozen, and only the final Transformer block, the final layer normalization module, and a lightweight classification head are updated during training. This design substantially reduces the number of trainable parameters while preserving the contextual representation capabilities learned during pretraining. The proposed approach is evaluated using radiology reports from the MIMIC-IV-Note dataset with automatically derived CheXpert-style labels. Experiments on 50,000 radiology reports demonstrate that selective fine-tuning achieves approximately 91% classification accuracy while updating fewer than 6% of the model parameters. Comparative experiments with head-only training and full-model fine-tuning show that the proposed method provides a favorable balance between predictive performance and computational efficiency. These results indicate that selective fine-tuning offers an efficient and scalable framework for clinical text classification.

Noise-Response Calibration: A Causal Intervention Protocol for LLM-Judges

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges and synthetic labelers, especially in low-label settings. Yet these systems are stochastic and often overconfident, which makes deployment decisions difficult when external ground truth is limited. We propose a practical calibration protocol based on controlled input interventions: if noise severity increases, task performance should exhibit a statistically significant deterioration trend. We operationalize this with a slope-based hypothesis test over repeated trials, using signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) perturbations for tabular data and lexical perturbations for text data. Across UCI tabular benchmarks and four text classification datasets, we find clear modality-dependent behavior. Our results reveal a modality gap: while text-based judges degrade predictably, the majority of tabular datasets show a lack of statistically significant performance deterioration even under significant signal-to-noise reduction. Interestingly we find that model performance is lower on datasets that are insensitive to noise interventions. We present a reproducible methodology and reporting protocol for robust LLM-judge calibration under distribution shift.

Decoding AI Authorship: Can LLMs Truly Mimic Human Style Across Literature and Politics?

Amidst the rising capabilities of generative AI to mimic specific human styles, this study investigates the ability of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs), including GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Claude Sonnet 3.5, to emulate the authorial signatures of prominent literary and political figures: Walt Whitman, William Wordsworth, Donald Trump, and Barack Obama. Utilizing a zero-shot prompting framework with strict thematic alignment, we generated synthetic corpora evaluated through a complementary framework combining transformer-based classification (BERT) and interpretable machine learning (XGBoost). Our methodology integrates Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) markers, perplexity, and readability indices to assess the divergence between AI-generated and human-authored text. Results demonstrate that AI-generated mimicry remains highly detectable, with XGBoost models trained on a restricted set of eight stylometric features achieving accuracy comparable to high-dimensional neural classifiers. Feature importance analyses identify perplexity as the primary discriminative metric, revealing a significant divergence in the stochastic regularity of AI outputs compared to the higher variability of human writing. While LLMs exhibit distributional convergence with human authors on low-dimensional heuristic features, such as syntactic complexity and readability, they do not yet fully replicate the nuanced affective density and stylistic variance inherent in the human-authored corpus. By isolating the specific statistical gaps in current generative mimicry, this study provides a comprehensive benchmark for LLM stylistic behavior and offers critical insights for authorship attribution in the digital humanities and social media.

Cross-Modal Rationale Transfer for Explainable Humanitarian Classification on Social Media

Advances in social media data dissemination enable the provision of real-time information during a crisis. The information comes from different classes, such as infrastructure damages, persons missing or stranded in the affected zone, etc. Existing methods attempted to classify text and images into various humanitarian categories, but their decision-making process remains largely opaque, which affects their deployment in real-life applications. Recent work has sought to improve transparency by extracting textual rationales from tweets to explain predicted classes. However, such explainable classification methods have mostly focused on text, rather than crisis-related images. In this paper, we propose an interpretable-by-design multimodal classification framework. Our method first learns the joint representation of text and image using a visual language transformer model and extracts text rationales. Next, it extracts the image rationales via the mapping with text rationales. Our approach demonstrates how to learn rationales in one modality from another through cross-modal rationale transfer, which saves annotation effort. Finally, tweets are classified based on extracted rationales. Experiments are conducted over CrisisMMD benchmark dataset, and results show that our proposed method boosts the classification Macro-F1 by 2-35% while extracting accurate text tokens and image patches as rationales. Human evaluation also supports the claim that our proposed method is able to retrieve better image rationale patches (12%) that help to identify humanitarian classes. Our method adapts well to new, unseen datasets in zero-shot mode, achieving an accuracy of 80%.

Detecting Basic Values in A Noisy Russian Social Media Text Data: A Multi-Stage Classification Framework

This study presents a multi-stage classification framework for detecting human values in noisy Russian language social media, validated on a random sample of 7.5 million public text posts. Drawing on Schwartz's theory of basic human values, we design a multi-stage pipeline that includes spam and nonpersonal content filtering, targeted selection of value relevant and politically relevant posts, LLM based annotation, and multi-label classification. Particular attention is given to verifying the quality of LLM annotations and model predictions against human experts. We treat human expert annotations not as ground truth but as an interpretative benchmark with its own uncertainty. To account for annotation subjectivity, we aggregate multiple LLM generated judgments into soft labels that reflect varying levels of agreement. These labels are then used to train transformer based models capable of predicting the probability of each of the ten basic values. The best performing model, XLM RoBERTa large, achieves an F1 macro of 0.83 and an F1 of 0.71 on held out test data. By treating value detection as a multi perspective interpretive task, where expert labels, GPT annotations, and model predictions represent coherent but not identical readings of the same texts, we show that the model generally aligns with human judgments but systematically overestimates the Openness to Change value domain. Empirically, the study reveals distinct patterns of value expression and their co-occurrence in Russian social networks, contributing to a broader research agenda on cultural variation, communicative framing, and value based interpretation in digital environments. All models are released publicly.

An Automatic Text Classification Method Based on Hierarchical Taxonomies, Neural Networks and Document Embedding: The NETHIC Tool

This work describes an automatic text classification method implemented in a software tool called NETHIC, which takes advantage of the inner capabilities of highly-scalable neural networks combined with the expressiveness of hierarchical taxonomies. As such, NETHIC succeeds in bringing about a mechanism for text classification that proves to be significantly effective as well as efficient. The tool had undergone an experimentation process against both a generic and a domain-specific corpus, outputting promising results. On the basis of this experimentation, NETHIC has been now further refined and extended by adding a document embedding mechanism, which has shown improvements in terms of performance on the individual networks and on the whole hierarchical model.

Label What Matters: Modality-Balanced and Difficulty-Aware Multimodal Active Learning

Multimodal learning integrates complementary information from different modalities such as image, text, and audio to improve model performance, but its success relies on large-scale labeled data, which is costly to obtain. Active learning (AL) mitigates this challenge by selectively annotating informative samples. In multimodal settings, many approaches implicitly assume that modality importance is stable across rounds and keep selection rules fixed at the fusion stage, which leaves them insensitive to the dynamic nature of multimodal learning, where the relative value of modalities and the difficulty of instances shift as training proceeds. To address this issue, we propose RL-MBA, a reinforcement-learning framework for modality-balanced, difficulty-aware multimodal active learning. RL-MBA models sample selection as a Markov Decision Process, where the policy adapts to modality contributions, uncertainty, and diversity, and the reward encourages accuracy gains and balance. Two key components drive this adaptability: (1) Adaptive Modality Contribution Balancing (AMCB), which dynamically adjusts modality weights via reinforcement feedback, and (2) Evidential Fusion for DifficultyAware Policy Adjustment (EFDA), which estimates sample difficulty via uncertainty-based evidential fusion to prioritize informative samples. Experiments on Food101, KineticsSound, and VGGSound demonstrate that RL-MBA consistently outperforms strong baselines, improving both classification accuracy and modality fairness under limited labeling budgets.