Tal Arbel

Heatmap Regression for Lesion Detection using Pointwise Annotations

Aug 11, 2022
Chelsea Myers-Colet, Julien Schroeter, Douglas L. Arnold, Tal Arbel

Figure 2 for Heatmap Regression for Lesion Detection using Pointwise Annotations

Figure 3 for Heatmap Regression for Lesion Detection using Pointwise Annotations

Figure 4 for Heatmap Regression for Lesion Detection using Pointwise Annotations

* Accepted at Medical Image Learning with Limited & Noisy Data (MILLanD), a workshop hosted with the conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI) 2022

Access Paper or Ask Questions

Counterfactual Image Synthesis for Discovery of Personalized Predictive Image Markers

Aug 03, 2022
Amar Kumar, Anjun Hu, Brennan Nichyporuk, Jean-Pierre R. Falet, Douglas L. Arnold, Sotirios Tsaftaris, Tal Arbel

Figure 2 for Counterfactual Image Synthesis for Discovery of Personalized Predictive Image Markers

Figure 3 for Counterfactual Image Synthesis for Discovery of Personalized Predictive Image Markers

Figure 4 for Counterfactual Image Synthesis for Discovery of Personalized Predictive Image Markers

* Accepted to the MIABID workshop at MICCAI 2022

Access Paper or Ask Questions

Information Gain Sampling for Active Learning in Medical Image Classification

Aug 01, 2022
Raghav Mehta, Changjian Shui, Brennan Nichyporuk, Tal Arbel

Figure 2 for Information Gain Sampling for Active Learning in Medical Image Classification

Figure 3 for Information Gain Sampling for Active Learning in Medical Image Classification

Figure 4 for Information Gain Sampling for Active Learning in Medical Image Classification

* Paper accepted at UNSURE 2022 workshop at MICCAI 2022

Access Paper or Ask Questions

Metrics reloaded: Pitfalls and recommendations for image analysis validation

Jun 03, 2022
Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke, Evangelia Christodoulou, Ben Glocker, Patrick Godau, Fabian Isensee, Jens Kleesiek, Michal Kozubek, Mauricio Reyes, Michael A. Riegler, Manuel Wiesenfarth, Michael Baumgartner, Matthias Eisenmann, Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel, A. Emre Kavur, Tim Rädsch, Minu D. Tizabi, Laura Acion, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, Peter Bankhead, Arriel Benis, M. Jorge Cardoso, Veronika Cheplygina, Beth Cimini, Gary S. Collins, Keyvan Farahani, Bram van Ginneken, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Michael M. Hoffman, Merel Huisman, Pierre Jannin, Charles E. Kahn, Alexandros Karargyris, Alan Karthikesalingam, Hannes Kenngott, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Anna Kreshuk, Tahsin Kurc, Bennett A. Landman, Geert Litjens, Amin Madani, Klaus Maier-Hein, Anne L. Martel, Peter Mattson, Erik Meijering, Bjoern Menze, David Moher, Karel G. M. Moons, Henning Müller, Felix Nickel, Brennan Nichyporuk, Jens Petersen, Nasir Rajpoot, Nicola Rieke, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Clarisa Sánchez Gutiérrez, Shravya Shetty, Maarten van Smeden, Carole H. Sudre, Ronald M. Summers, Abdel A. Taha, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris, Ben Van Calster, Gaël Varoquaux, Paul F. Jäger

Figure 2 for Metrics reloaded: Pitfalls and recommendations for image analysis validation

Figure 3 for Metrics reloaded: Pitfalls and recommendations for image analysis validation

Figure 4 for Metrics reloaded: Pitfalls and recommendations for image analysis validation

* Shared first authors: Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2104.05642

Access Paper or Ask Questions

Segmentation-Consistent Probabilistic Lesion Counting

Apr 11, 2022
Julien Schroeter, Chelsea Myers-Colet, Douglas L Arnold, Tal Arbel

Figure 2 for Segmentation-Consistent Probabilistic Lesion Counting

Figure 3 for Segmentation-Consistent Probabilistic Lesion Counting

Figure 4 for Segmentation-Consistent Probabilistic Lesion Counting

* Accepted at Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (MIDL) 2022

Access Paper or Ask Questions

Personalized Prediction of Future Lesion Activity and Treatment Effect in Multiple Sclerosis from Baseline MRI

Apr 01, 2022
Joshua Durso-Finley, Jean-Pierre R. Falet, Brennan Nichyporuk, Douglas L. Arnold, Tal Arbel

Figure 2 for Personalized Prediction of Future Lesion Activity and Treatment Effect in Multiple Sclerosis from Baseline MRI

Figure 3 for Personalized Prediction of Future Lesion Activity and Treatment Effect in Multiple Sclerosis from Baseline MRI

Figure 4 for Personalized Prediction of Future Lesion Activity and Treatment Effect in Multiple Sclerosis from Baseline MRI

* Accepted to MIDL 2022

Access Paper or Ask Questions

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation -- Analysis of Ranking Metrics and Benchmarking Results

Dec 19, 2021
Raghav Mehta, Angelos Filos, Ujjwal Baid, Chiharu Sako, Richard McKinley, Michael Rebsamen, Katrin Dätwyler, Raphael Meier, Piotr Radojewski, Gowtham Krishnan Murugesan, Sahil Nalawade, Chandan Ganesh, Ben Wagner, Fang F. Yu, Baowei Fei, Ananth J. Madhuranthakam, Joseph A. Maldjian, Laura Daza, Catalina Gómez, Pablo Arbeláez, Chengliang Dai, Shuo Wang, Hadrien Raynaud, Yuanhan Mo, Elsa Angelini, Yike Guo, Wenjia Bai, Subhashis Banerjee, Linmin Pei, Murat AK, Sarahi Rosas-González, Illyess Zemmoura, Clovis Tauber, Minh H. Vu, Tufve Nyholm, Tommy Löfstedt, Laura Mora Ballestar, Veronica Vilaplana, Hugh McHugh, Gonzalo Maso Talou, Alan Wang, Jay Patel, Ken Chang, Katharina Hoebel, Mishka Gidwani, Nishanth Arun, Sharut Gupta, Mehak Aggarwal, Praveer Singh, Elizabeth R. Gerstner, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Nicolas Boutry, Alexis Huard, Lasitha Vidyaratne, Md Monibor Rahman, Khan M. Iftekharuddin, Joseph Chazalon, Elodie Puybareau, Guillaume Tochon, Jun Ma, Mariano Cabezas, Xavier Llado, Arnau Oliver, Liliana Valencia, Sergi Valverde, Mehdi Amian, Mohammadreza Soltaninejad, Andriy Myronenko, Ali Hatamizadeh, Xue Feng, Quan Dou, Nicholas Tustison, Craig Meyer, Nisarg A. Shah, Sanjay Talbar, Marc-Andr Weber, Abhishek Mahajan, Andras Jakab, Roland Wiest, Hassan M. Fathallah-Shaykh, Arash Nazeri, Mikhail Milchenko, Daniel Marcus, Aikaterini Kotrotsou, Rivka Colen, John Freymann, Justin Kirby, Christos Davatzikos, Bjoern Menze, Spyridon Bakas, Yarin Gal, Tal Arbel

Figure 1 for QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation -- Analysis of Ranking Metrics and Benchmarking Results

Figure 2 for QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation -- Analysis of Ranking Metrics and Benchmarking Results

Figure 3 for QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation -- Analysis of Ranking Metrics and Benchmarking Results

Figure 4 for QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation -- Analysis of Ranking Metrics and Benchmarking Results

* Under submission at MELBA journal

Access Paper or Ask Questions

Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation

Aug 02, 2021
Brennan Nichyporuk, Jillian Cardinell, Justin Szeto, Raghav Mehta, Sotirios Tsaftaris, Douglas L. Arnold, Tal Arbel

Figure 2 for Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation

Figure 3 for Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation

Figure 4 for Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation

* Accepted at DART 2021

Access Paper or Ask Questions

Optimizing Operating Points for High Performance Lesion Detection and Segmentation Using Lesion Size Reweighting

Jul 27, 2021
Brennan Nichyporuk, Justin Szeto, Douglas L. Arnold, Tal Arbel

* Accepted at MIDL 2021

Access Paper or Ask Questions

Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story

Apr 13, 2021
Annika Reinke, Matthias Eisenmann, Minu D. Tizabi, Carole H. Sudre, Tim Rädsch, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, M. Jorge Cardoso, Veronika Cheplygina, Keyvan Farahani, Ben Glocker, Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel, Fabian Isensee, Pierre Jannin, Charles E. Kahn, Jens Kleesiek, Tahsin Kurc, Michal Kozubek, Bennett A. Landman, Geert Litjens, Klaus Maier-Hein, Bjoern Menze, Henning Müller, Jens Petersen, Mauricio Reyes, Nicola Rieke, Bram Stieltjes, Ronald M. Summers, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris, Bram van Ginneken, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Paul Jäger, Lena Maier-Hein

Figure 2 for Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story

Figure 3 for Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story

Figure 4 for Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story

* This is a dynamic paper on limitations of commonly used metrics. The current version discusses segmentation metrics only, while future versions will also include metrics for classification and detection. For missing use cases, comments or questions, please contact [email protected] or [email protected]. Substantial contributions to this document will be acknowledged with a co-authorship

Access Paper or Ask Questions