Get our free extension to see links to code for papers anywhere online!

Chrome logo Add to Chrome

Firefox logo Add to Firefox
Picture for Tal Arbel

Tal Arbel

*: shared first/last authors

Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation


Aug 02, 2021
Brennan Nichyporuk, Jillian Cardinell, Justin Szeto, Raghav Mehta, Sotirios Tsaftaris, Douglas L. Arnold, Tal Arbel

Figure 1 for Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation
Figure 2 for Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation
Figure 3 for Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation
Figure 4 for Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation
* Accepted at DART 2021 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Optimizing Operating Points for High Performance Lesion Detection and Segmentation Using Lesion Size Reweighting


Jul 27, 2021
Brennan Nichyporuk, Justin Szeto, Douglas L. Arnold, Tal Arbel

Figure 1 for Optimizing Operating Points for High Performance Lesion Detection and Segmentation Using Lesion Size Reweighting
* Accepted at MIDL 2021 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story


Apr 13, 2021
Annika Reinke, Matthias Eisenmann, Minu D. Tizabi, Carole H. Sudre, Tim Rädsch, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, M. Jorge Cardoso, Veronika Cheplygina, Keyvan Farahani, Ben Glocker, Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel, Fabian Isensee, Pierre Jannin, Charles E. Kahn, Jens Kleesiek, Tahsin Kurc, Michal Kozubek, Bennett A. Landman, Geert Litjens, Klaus Maier-Hein, Bjoern Menze, Henning Müller, Jens Petersen, Mauricio Reyes, Nicola Rieke, Bram Stieltjes, Ronald M. Summers, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris, Bram van Ginneken, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Paul Jäger, Lena Maier-Hein

Figure 1 for Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story
Figure 2 for Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story
Figure 3 for Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story
Figure 4 for Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story
* This is a dynamic paper on limitations of commonly used metrics. The current version discusses segmentation metrics only, while future versions will also include metrics for classification and detection. For missing use cases, comments or questions, please contact [email protected] or [email protected]. Substantial contributions to this document will be acknowledged with a co-authorship 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

HAD-Net: A Hierarchical Adversarial Knowledge Distillation Network for Improved Enhanced Tumour Segmentation Without Post-Contrast Images


Apr 09, 2021
Saverio Vadacchino, Raghav Mehta, Nazanin Mohammadi Sepahvand, Brennan Nichyporuk, James J. Clark, Tal Arbel

Figure 1 for HAD-Net: A Hierarchical Adversarial Knowledge Distillation Network for Improved Enhanced Tumour Segmentation Without Post-Contrast Images
Figure 2 for HAD-Net: A Hierarchical Adversarial Knowledge Distillation Network for Improved Enhanced Tumour Segmentation Without Post-Contrast Images
Figure 3 for HAD-Net: A Hierarchical Adversarial Knowledge Distillation Network for Improved Enhanced Tumour Segmentation Without Post-Contrast Images
Figure 4 for HAD-Net: A Hierarchical Adversarial Knowledge Distillation Network for Improved Enhanced Tumour Segmentation Without Post-Contrast Images
* Accepted at Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (MIDL) 2021 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarks


Mar 01, 2021
Xavier Bouthillier, Pierre Delaunay, Mirko Bronzi, Assya Trofimov, Brennan Nichyporuk, Justin Szeto, Naz Sepah, Edward Raff, Kanika Madan, Vikram Voleti, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Vincent Michalski, Dmitriy Serdyuk, Tal Arbel, Chris Pal, Gaël Varoquaux, Pascal Vincent

Figure 1 for Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarks
Figure 2 for Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarks
Figure 3 for Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarks
Figure 4 for Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarks
* Submitted to MLSys2021 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Optimization over Random and Gradient Probabilistic Pixel Sampling for Fast, Robust Multi-Resolution Image Registration


Oct 02, 2020
Boris N. Oreshkin, Tal Arbel

Figure 1 for Optimization over Random and Gradient Probabilistic Pixel Sampling for Fast, Robust Multi-Resolution Image Registration
Figure 2 for Optimization over Random and Gradient Probabilistic Pixel Sampling for Fast, Robust Multi-Resolution Image Registration
Figure 3 for Optimization over Random and Gradient Probabilistic Pixel Sampling for Fast, Robust Multi-Resolution Image Registration
* WBIR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7359. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 
 * arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2010.00988 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Uncertainty driven probabilistic voxel selection for image registration


Oct 02, 2020
Boris N. Oreshkin, Tal Arbel

Figure 1 for Uncertainty driven probabilistic voxel selection for image registration
Figure 2 for Uncertainty driven probabilistic voxel selection for image registration
Figure 3 for Uncertainty driven probabilistic voxel selection for image registration
* in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1777-1790, Oct. 2013 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Deep discriminant analysis for task-dependent compact network search


Sep 29, 2020
Qing Tian, Tal Arbel, James J. Clark

Figure 1 for Deep discriminant analysis for task-dependent compact network search
Figure 2 for Deep discriminant analysis for task-dependent compact network search
Figure 3 for Deep discriminant analysis for task-dependent compact network search
Figure 4 for Deep discriminant analysis for task-dependent compact network search

  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Medical Imaging with Deep Learning: MIDL 2020 -- Short Paper Track


Jun 29, 2020
Tal Arbel, Ismail Ben Ayed, Marleen de Bruijne, Maxime Descoteaux, Herve Lombaert, Chris Pal

* Accepted extended abstracts can also be found at https://openreview.net/group?id=MIDL.io/2020/Conference#abstract-accept-papers 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Uncertainty Evaluation Metric for Brain Tumour Segmentation


May 28, 2020
Raghav Mehta, Angelos Filos, Yarin Gal, Tal Arbel

Figure 1 for Uncertainty Evaluation Metric for Brain Tumour Segmentation
Figure 2 for Uncertainty Evaluation Metric for Brain Tumour Segmentation
Figure 3 for Uncertainty Evaluation Metric for Brain Tumour Segmentation

  Access Paper or Ask Questions

BIAS: Transparent reporting of biomedical image analysis challenges


Oct 23, 2019
Lena Maier-Hein, Annika Reinke, Michal Kozubek, Anne L. Martel, Tal Arbel, Matthias Eisenmann, Allan Hanbuary, Pierre Jannin, Henning Müller, Sinan Onogur, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Bram van Ginneken, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Bennett Landman

* 4 Supplements: Suppl 1: Reviewer checklist Suppl 2: Gloassary Suppl 3: Form for summarizing information on challenge organization Suppl 4: Structured description of a challenge design 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Efficient Gender Classification Using a Deep LDA-Pruned Net


Oct 23, 2018
Qing Tian, Tal Arbel, James J. Clark

Figure 1 for Efficient Gender Classification Using a Deep LDA-Pruned Net
Figure 2 for Efficient Gender Classification Using a Deep LDA-Pruned Net
Figure 3 for Efficient Gender Classification Using a Deep LDA-Pruned Net
Figure 4 for Efficient Gender Classification Using a Deep LDA-Pruned Net
* The only difference with the previous version v2 is the title on the arxiv page. I am changing it back to the original title in v1 because otherwise google scholar cannot track the citations to this arxiv paper correctly. You could cite either the conference version or this arxiv version. They are equivalent 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentation


Oct 16, 2018
Tanya Nair, Doina Precup, Douglas L. Arnold, Tal Arbel

Figure 1 for Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentation
Figure 2 for Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentation
Figure 3 for Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentation
* Updated references in Introduction; Accepted to the 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2018) 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

RS-Net: Regression-Segmentation 3D CNN for Synthesis of Full Resolution Missing Brain MRI in the Presence of Tumours


Jul 28, 2018
Raghav Mehta, Tal Arbel

Figure 1 for RS-Net: Regression-Segmentation 3D CNN for Synthesis of Full Resolution Missing Brain MRI in the Presence of Tumours
Figure 2 for RS-Net: Regression-Segmentation 3D CNN for Synthesis of Full Resolution Missing Brain MRI in the Presence of Tumours
Figure 3 for RS-Net: Regression-Segmentation 3D CNN for Synthesis of Full Resolution Missing Brain MRI in the Presence of Tumours
* Accepted at Workshop on Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging - SASHIMI2018 held in conjunction with the 21st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2018) 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions


Jun 06, 2018
Lena Maier-Hein*, Matthias Eisenmann*, Annika Reinke, Sinan Onogur, Marko Stankovic, Patrick Scholz, Tal Arbel, Hrvoje Bogunovic, Andrew P. Bradley, Aaron Carass, Carolin Feldmann, Alejandro F. Frangi, Peter M. Full, Bram van Ginneken, Allan Hanbury, Katrin Honauer, Michal Kozubek, Bennett A. Landman, Keno März, Oskar Maier, Klaus Maier-Hein, Bjoern H. Menze, Henning Müller, Peter F. Neher, Wiro Niessen, Nasir Rajpoot, Gregory C. Sharp, Korsuk Sirinukunwattana, Stefanie Speidel, Christian Stock, Danail Stoyanov, Abdel Aziz Taha, Fons van der Sommen, Ching-Wei Wang, Marc-André Weber, Guoyan Zheng, Pierre Jannin*, Annette Kopp-Schneider*

Figure 1 for Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions
Figure 2 for Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions
Figure 3 for Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions
Figure 4 for Is the winner really the best? A critical analysis of common research practice in biomedical image analysis competitions
* 48 pages, under review in Nature Methods 
  Access Paper or Ask Questions

Fisher Pruning of Deep Nets for Facial Trait Classification


Mar 21, 2018
Qing Tian, Tal Arbel, James J. Clark

Figure 1 for Fisher Pruning of Deep Nets for Facial Trait Classification
Figure 2 for Fisher Pruning of Deep Nets for Facial Trait Classification
Figure 3 for Fisher Pruning of Deep Nets for Facial Trait Classification
Figure 4 for Fisher Pruning of Deep Nets for Facial Trait Classification

  Access Paper or Ask Questions