A Closer Look at Debiased Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos: Dataset, Metric, and Approach

Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos (TSGV), which aims to ground a natural language sentence in an untrimmed video, has drawn widespread attention over the past few years. However, recent studies have found that current benchmark datasets may have obvious moment annotation biases, enabling several simple baselines even without training to achieve SOTA performance. In this paper, we take a closer look at existing evaluation protocols, and find both the prevailing dataset and evaluation metrics are the devils that lead to untrustworthy benchmarking. Therefore, we propose to re-organize the two widely-used datasets, making the ground-truth moment distributions different in the training and test splits, i.e., out-of-distribution (OOD) test. Meanwhile, we introduce a new evaluation metric "dR@n,IoU@m" that discounts the basic recall scores to alleviate the inflating evaluation caused by biased datasets. New benchmarking results indicate that our proposed evaluation protocols can better monitor the research progress. Furthermore, we propose a novel causality-based Multi-branch Deconfounding Debiasing (MDD) framework for unbiased moment prediction. Specifically, we design a multi-branch deconfounder to eliminate the effects caused by multiple confounders with causal intervention. In order to help the model better align the semantics between sentence queries and video moments, we enhance the representations during feature encoding. Specifically, for textual information, the query is parsed into several verb-centered phrases to obtain a more fine-grained textual feature. For visual information, the positional information has been decomposed from moment features to enhance representations of moments with diverse locations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed approach can achieve competitive results among existing SOTA approaches and outperform the base model with great gains.

A Survey on Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos

Temporal sentence grounding in videos(TSGV), which aims to localize one target segment from an untrimmed video with respect to a given sentence query, has drawn increasing attentions in the research community over the past few years. Different from the task of temporal action localization, TSGV is more flexible since it can locate complicated activities via natural languages, without restrictions from predefined action categories. Meanwhile, TSGV is more challenging since it requires both textual and visual understanding for semantic alignment between two modalities(i.e., text and video). In this survey, we give a comprehensive overview for TSGV, which i) summarizes the taxonomy of existing methods, ii) provides a detailed description of the evaluation protocols(i.e., datasets and metrics) to be used in TSGV, and iii) in-depth discusses potential problems of current benchmarking designs and research directions for further investigations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic survey on temporal sentence grounding. More specifically, we first discuss existing TSGV approaches by grouping them into four categories, i.e., two-stage methods, end-to-end methods, reinforcement learning-based methods, and weakly supervised methods. Then we present the benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics to assess current research progress. Finally, we discuss some limitations in TSGV through pointing out potential problems improperly resolved in the current evaluation protocols, which may push forwards more cutting edge research in TSGV. Besides, we also share our insights on several promising directions, including three typical tasks with new and practical settings based on TSGV.

A Closer Look at Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos: Datasets and Metrics

Despite Temporal Sentence Grounding in Videos (TSGV) has realized impressive progress over the last few years, current TSGV models tend to capture the moment annotation biases and fail to take full advantage of multi-modal inputs. Miraculously, some extremely simple TSGV baselines even without training can also achieve state-of-the-art performance. In this paper, we first take a closer look at the existing evaluation protocol, and argue that both the prevailing datasets and metrics are the devils to cause the unreliable benchmarking. To this end, we propose to re-organize two widely-used TSGV datasets (Charades-STA and ActivityNet Captions), and deliberately \textbf{C}hange the moment annotation \textbf{D}istribution of the test split to make it different from the training split, dubbed as Charades-CD and ActivityNet-CD, respectively. Meanwhile, we further introduce a new evaluation metric "dR@$n$,IoU@$m$" to calibrate the basic IoU scores by penalizing more on the over-long moment predictions and reduce the inflating performance caused by the moment annotation biases. Under this new evaluation protocol, we conduct extensive experiments and ablation studies on eight state-of-the-art TSGV models. All the results demonstrate that the re-organized datasets and new metric can better monitor the progress in TSGV, which is still far from satisfactory. The repository of this work is at \url{https://github.com/yytzsy/grounding_changing_distribution}.