Do Generative Recommenders Deepen the Information Cocoon? A Closed-Loop Simulation with LLM-powered User Simulators

Recommender systems alleviate information overload, yet repeated feedback between recommendations and user interactions can reinforce existing preferences and narrow users' exposure, forming information cocoons. While this phenomenon has been widely studied in traditional sequential recommendation, its impact on generative recommendation remains unclear. By replacing atomic item IDs with Semantic ID (SID) sequences, generative recommenders introduce a different recommendation mechanism whose role in information cocoon formation is not yet understood. To investigate whether generative recommenders deepen information cocoons, we propose \textsc{RecLoop}, a closed-loop simulation framework with LLM-driven user agents. We compare two generative recommenders and two traditional sequential baselines on two Amazon datasets across multiple feedback cycles. In addition to standard exposure-level metrics, we introduce \emph{Code-Space Structural Cocoon}, a model-level metric that measures concentration in the generated SID space. Experimental results show that generative recommenders are generally less prone to exposure-level cocoon formation than traditional baselines, preserving broader exposure diversity and slowing cross-user homogenization. However, feedback loops can still induce concentration within the generated SID space. We further find that cocoon severity depends strongly on tokenization strategy and model scale: collaborative-signal tokenization produces stronger cocoon effects than semantic tokenization, whereas larger models maintain greater code-space diversity and better retain access to niche content. These findings suggest that information cocoons in generative recommendation are shaped not only by recommendation behavior, but also by item tokenization and model capacity. Our code is available at https://github.com/Dregen-Yor/RecLoop.

Divergence Meets Consensus: A Multi-Source Negative Sampling Framework for Sequential Recommendation

Negative sampling is significant for training sequential recommendation models under implicit feedback. The predominant strategy, self-guided hard negative sampling, selects negatives based on the model's current state but suffers from three limitations: (1) the coupling between sampling and model updates triggers a vicious cycle that drives the model into local optima; (2) relying on current model parameters narrows sampling to a small region of the item space, reducing diversity and harming generalization; (3) identifying a hard negative requires scoring the entire candidate pool, causing substantial computational overhead with minimal information gain. To address these challenges, we propose MDCNS (Multi-source Divergence-Consensus for Negative Sampling), a novel "Teacher-Peer-Self" framework inspired by Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) theory. The proposed method comprises three components, including multi-source scoring, divergence re-ranking, and consensus distillation. Firstly, multi-source scoring incorporates peer and ensemble teacher models to inject external negative signals and break the self-reinforcement loop. Then, divergence re-ranking exploits prediction discrepancy between self and peer models to enhance sampling diversity. Finally, consensus distillation aligns the self model with the teacher via KL divergence, simultaneously improving computational cost utilization. Extensive experiments on six real-world datasets and five backbone models show that MDCNS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art negative sampling methods, demonstrating strong effectiveness and generalization.

Bridging the Capability Gap: Joint Alignment Tuning for Harmonizing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems

The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has enabled the construction of multi-agent systems to solve complex tasks by dividing responsibilities among specialized agents, such as a planning agent for subgoal generation and a grounding agent for executing tool-use actions. Most existing methods typically fine-tune these agents independently, leading to capability gaps among them with poor coordination. To address this, we propose MOAT, a Multi-Agent Joint Alignment Tuning framework that improves agents collaboration through iterative alignment. MOAT alternates between two key stages: (1) Planning Agent Alignment, which optimizes the planning agent to generate subgoal sequences that better guide the grounding agent; and (2) Grounding Agent Improving, which fine-tunes the grounding agent using diverse subgoal-action pairs generated by the agent itself to enhance its generalization capablity. Theoretical analysis proves that MOAT ensures a non-decreasing and progressively convergent training process. Experiments across six benchmarks demonstrate that MOAT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving average improvements of 3.1% on held-in tasks and 4.4% on held-out tasks.