On Uni-Modal Feature Learning in Supervised Multi-Modal Learning

We abstract the features (i.e. learned representations) of multi-modal data into 1) uni-modal features, which can be learned from uni-modal training, and 2) paired features, which can only be learned from cross-modal interactions. Multi-modal models are expected to benefit from cross-modal interactions on the basis of ensuring uni-modal feature learning. However, recent supervised multi-modal late-fusion training approaches still suffer from insufficient learning of uni-modal features on each modality. We prove that this phenomenon does hurt the model's generalization ability. To this end, we propose to choose a targeted late-fusion learning method for the given supervised multi-modal task from Uni-Modal Ensemble(UME) and the proposed Uni-Modal Teacher(UMT), according to the distribution of uni-modal and paired features. We demonstrate that, under a simple guiding strategy, we can achieve comparable results to other complex late-fusion or intermediate-fusion methods on various multi-modal datasets, including VGG-Sound, Kinetics-400, UCF101, and ModelNet40.

Lower Generalization Bounds for GD and SGD in Smooth Stochastic Convex Optimization

Recent progress was made in characterizing the generalization error of gradient methods for general convex loss by the learning theory community. In this work, we focus on how training longer might affect generalization in smooth stochastic convex optimization (SCO) problems. We first provide tight lower bounds for general non-realizable SCO problems. Furthermore, existing upper bound results suggest that sample complexity can be improved by assuming the loss is realizable, i.e. an optimal solution simultaneously minimizes all the data points. However, this improvement is compromised when training time is long and lower bounds are lacking. Our paper examines this observation by providing excess risk lower bounds for gradient descent (GD) and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) in two realizable settings: 1) realizable with $T = O(n)$, and (2) realizable with $T = \Omega(n)$, where $T$ denotes the number of training iterations and $n$ is the size of the training dataset. These bounds are novel and informative in characterizing the relationship between $T$ and $n$. In the first small training horizon case, our lower bounds almost tightly match and provide the first optimal certificates for the corresponding upper bounds. However, for the realizable case with $T = \Omega(n)$, a gap exists between the lower and upper bounds. We provide a conjecture to address this problem, that the gap can be closed by improving upper bounds, which is supported by our analyses in one-dimensional and linear regression scenarios.

Predictive Inference with Feature Conformal Prediction

Conformal prediction is a distribution-free technique for establishing valid prediction intervals. Although conventionally people conduct conformal prediction in the output space, this is not the only possibility. In this paper, we propose feature conformal prediction, which extends the scope of conformal prediction to semantic feature spaces by leveraging the inductive bias of deep representation learning. From a theoretical perspective, we demonstrate that feature conformal prediction provably outperforms regular conformal prediction under mild assumptions. Our approach could be combined with not only vanilla conformal prediction, but also other adaptive conformal prediction methods. Experiments on various predictive inference tasks corroborate the efficacy of our method.

Fighting Fire with Fire: Avoiding DNN Shortcuts through Priming

Across applications spanning supervised classification and sequential control, deep learning has been reported to find "shortcut" solutions that fail catastrophically under minor changes in the data distribution. In this paper, we show empirically that DNNs can be coaxed to avoid poor shortcuts by providing an additional "priming" feature computed from key input features, usually a coarse output estimate. Priming relies on approximate domain knowledge of these task-relevant key input features, which is often easy to obtain in practical settings. For example, one might prioritize recent frames over past frames in a video input for visual imitation learning, or salient foreground over background pixels for image classification. On NICO image classification, MuJoCo continuous control, and CARLA autonomous driving, our priming strategy works significantly better than several popular state-of-the-art approaches for feature selection and data augmentation. We connect these empirical findings to recent theoretical results on DNN optimization, and argue theoretically that priming distracts the optimizer away from poor shortcuts by creating better, simpler shortcuts.

Anomaly Detection with Test Time Augmentation and Consistency Evaluation

Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to unseen data: they may wrongly assign high confidence stcores to out-distribuion samples. Recent works try to solve the problem using representation learning methods and specific metrics. In this paper, we propose a simple, yet effective post-hoc anomaly detection algorithm named Test Time Augmentation Anomaly Detection (TTA-AD), inspired by a novel observation. Specifically, we observe that in-distribution data enjoy more consistent predictions for its original and augmented versions on a trained network than out-distribution data, which separates in-distribution and out-distribution samples. Experiments on various high-resolution image benchmark datasets demonstrate that TTA-AD achieves comparable or better detection performance under dataset-vs-dataset anomaly detection settings with a 60%~90\% running time reduction of existing classifier-based algorithms. We provide empirical verification that the key to TTA-AD lies in the remaining classes between augmented features, which has long been partially ignored by previous works. Additionally, we use RUNS as a surrogate to analyze our algorithm theoretically.

Realistic Deep Learning May Not Fit Benignly

Studies on benign overfitting provide insights for the success of overparameterized deep learning models. In this work, we examine the benign overfitting phenomena in real-world settings. We found that for tasks such as training a ResNet model on ImageNet dataset, the model does not fit benignly. To understand why benign overfitting fails in the ImageNet experiment, we analyze previous benign overfitting models under a more restrictive setup where the number of parameters is not significantly larger than the number of data points. Under this mild overparameterization setup, our analysis identifies a phase change: unlike in the heavy overparameterization setting, benign overfitting can now fail in the presence of label noise. Our study explains our empirical observations, and naturally leads to a simple technique known as self-training that can boost the model's generalization performances. Furthermore, our work highlights the importance of understanding implicit bias in underfitting regimes as a future direction.

Relaxing the Feature Covariance Assumption: Time-Variant Bounds for Benign Overfitting in Linear Regression

Benign overfitting demonstrates that overparameterized models can perform well on test data while fitting noisy training data. However, it only considers the final min-norm solution in linear regression, which ignores the algorithm information and the corresponding training procedure. In this paper, we generalize the idea of benign overfitting to the whole training trajectory instead of the min-norm solution and derive a time-variant bound based on the trajectory analysis. Starting from the time-variant bound, we further derive a time interval that suffices to guarantee a consistent generalization error for a given feature covariance. Unlike existing approaches, the newly proposed generalization bound is characterized by a time-variant effective dimension of feature covariance. By introducing the time factor, we relax the strict assumption on the feature covariance matrix required in previous benign overfitting under the regimes of overparameterized linear regression with gradient descent. This paper extends the scope of benign overfitting, and experiment results indicate that the proposed bound accords better with empirical evidence.

Towards Understanding Generalization via Decomposing Excess Risk Dynamics

Generalization is one of the critical issues in machine learning. However, traditional methods like uniform convergence are not powerful enough to fully explain generalization because they may yield vacuous bounds even in overparameterized linear regression regimes. An alternative solution is to analyze the generalization dynamics to derive algorithm-dependent bounds, e.g., stability. Unfortunately, the stability-based bound is still far from explaining the remarkable generalization ability of neural networks due to the coarse-grained analysis of the signal and noise. Inspired by the observation that neural networks show a slow convergence rate when fitting noise, we propose decomposing the excess risk dynamics and applying stability-based bound only on the variance part (which measures how the model performs on pure noise). We provide two applications for the framework, including a linear case (overparameterized linear regression with gradient descent) and a non-linear case (matrix recovery with gradient flow). Under the decomposition framework, the new bound accords better with the theoretical and empirical evidence compared to the stability-based bound and uniform convergence bound.

T-SCI: A Two-Stage Conformal Inference Algorithm with Guaranteed Coverage for Cox-MLP

It is challenging to deal with censored data, where we only have access to the incomplete information of survival time instead of its exact value. Fortunately, under linear predictor assumption, people can obtain guaranteed coverage for the confidence band of survival time using methods like Cox Regression. However, when relaxing the linear assumption with neural networks (e.g., Cox-MLP \citep{katzman2018deepsurv,kvamme2019time}), we lose the guaranteed coverage. To recover the guaranteed coverage without linear assumption, we propose two algorithms based on conformal inference. In the first algorithm \emph{WCCI}, we revisit weighted conformal inference and introduce a new non-conformity score based on partial likelihood. We then propose a two-stage algorithm \emph{T-SCI}, where we run WCCI in the first stage and apply quantile conformal inference to calibrate the results in the second stage. Theoretical analysis shows that T-SCI returns guaranteed coverage under milder assumptions than WCCI. We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic data and real data using different methods, which validate our analysis.

Can Pretext-Based Self-Supervised Learning Be Boosted by Downstream Data? A Theoretical Analysis

Pretext-based self-supervised learning aims to learn the semantic representation via a handcrafted pretext task over unlabeled data and then use the learned representation for downstream prediction tasks. \citet{lee2020predicting} prove that pretext-based self-supervised learning can effectively reduce the sample complexity of downstream tasks under Conditional Independence (CI) between the components of the pretext task conditional on the downstream label. However, the CI condition rarely holds in practice, and the downstream sample complexity will get much worse if the CI condition does not hold. In this paper, we explore the idea of applying a learnable function to the input to make the CI condition hold. In particular, we first rigorously formulate the criteria that the function needs to satisfy. We then design an ingenious loss function for learning such a function and prove that the function minimizing the proposed loss satisfies the above criteria. We theoretically study the number of labeled data required, and give a model-free lower bound showing that taking limited downstream data will hurt the performance of self-supervised learning. Furthermore, we take the model structure into account and give a model-dependent lower bound, which gets higher when the model capacity gets larger. Moreover, we conduct several numerical experiments to verify our theoretical results.