Explainability plays an increasingly important role in machine learning. Because reinforcement learning (RL) involves interactions between states and actions over time, explaining an RL policy is more challenging than that of supervised learning. Furthermore, humans view the world from causal lens and thus prefer causal explanations over associational ones. Therefore, in this paper, we develop a causal explanation mechanism that quantifies the causal importance of states on actions and such importance over time. Moreover, via a series of simulation studies including crop irrigation, Blackjack, collision avoidance, and lunar lander, we demonstrate the advantages of our mechanism over state-of-the-art associational methods in terms of RL policy explanation.
Previous dialogue summarization datasets mainly focus on open-domain chitchat dialogues, while summarization datasets for the broadly used task-oriented dialogue haven't been explored yet. Automatically summarizing such task-oriented dialogues can help a business collect and review needs to improve the service. Besides, previous datasets pay more attention to generate good summaries with higher ROUGE scores, but they hardly understand the structured information of dialogues and ignore the factuality of summaries. In this paper, we introduce a large-scale public Task-Oriented Dialogue Summarization dataset, TODSum, which aims to summarize the key points of the agent completing certain tasks with the user. Compared to existing work, TODSum suffers from severe scattered information issues and requires strict factual consistency, which makes it hard to directly apply recent dialogue summarization models. Therefore, we introduce additional dialogue state knowledge for TODSum to enhance the faithfulness of generated summaries. We hope a better understanding of conversational content helps summarization models generate concise and coherent summaries. Meanwhile, we establish a comprehensive benchmark for TODSum and propose a state-aware structured dialogue summarization model to integrate dialogue state information and dialogue history. Exhaustive experiments and qualitative analysis prove the effectiveness of dialogue structure guidance. Finally, we discuss the current issues of TODSum and potential development directions for future work.