Out-of-Distribution Generalization Analysis via Influence Function

The mismatch between training and target data is one major challenge for current machine learning systems. When training data is collected from multiple domains and the target domains include all training domains and other new domains, we are facing an Out-of-Distribution (OOD) generalization problem that aims to find a model with the best OOD accuracy. One of the definitions of OOD accuracy is worst-domain accuracy. In general, the set of target domains is unknown, and the worst over target domains may be unseen when the number of observed domains is limited. In this paper, we show that the worst accuracy over the observed domains may dramatically fail to identify the OOD accuracy. To this end, we introduce Influence Function, a classical tool from robust statistics, into the OOD generalization problem and suggest the variance of influence function to monitor the stability of a model on training domains. We show that the accuracy on test domains and the proposed index together can help us discern whether OOD algorithms are needed and whether a model achieves good OOD generalization.

MetaAugment: Sample-Aware Data Augmentation Policy Learning

Automated data augmentation has shown superior performance in image recognition. Existing works search for dataset-level augmentation policies without considering individual sample variations, which are likely to be sub-optimal. On the other hand, learning different policies for different samples naively could greatly increase the computing cost. In this paper, we learn a sample-aware data augmentation policy efficiently by formulating it as a sample reweighting problem. Specifically, an augmentation policy network takes a transformation and the corresponding augmented image as inputs, and outputs a weight to adjust the augmented image loss computed by a task network. At training stage, the task network minimizes the weighted losses of augmented training images, while the policy network minimizes the loss of the task network on a validation set via meta-learning. We theoretically prove the convergence of the training procedure and further derive the exact convergence rate. Superior performance is achieved on widely-used benchmarks including CIFAR-10/100, Omniglot, and ImageNet.

Provable More Data Hurt in High Dimensional Least Squares Estimator

This paper investigates the finite-sample prediction risk of the high-dimensional least squares estimator. We derive the central limit theorem for the prediction risk when both the sample size and the number of features tend to infinity. Furthermore, the finite-sample distribution and the confidence interval of the prediction risk are provided. Our theoretical results demonstrate the sample-wise nonmonotonicity of the prediction risk and confirm "more data hurt" phenomenon.

Risk Variance Penalization: From Distributional Robustness to Causality

Learning under multi-environments often requires the ability of out-of-distribution generalization for the worst-environment performance guarantee. Some novel algorithms, e.g. Invariant Risk Minimization and Risk Extrapolation, build stable models by extracting invariant (causal) feature. However, it remains unclear how these methods learn to remove the environmental features. In this paper, we focus on the Risk Extrapolation (REx) and make attempts to fill this gap. We first propose a framework, Quasi-Distributional Robustness, to unify the Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM), the Robust Optimization (RO) and the Risk Extrapolation. Then, under this framework, we show that, comparing to ERM and RO, REx has a much larger robust region. Furthermore, based on our analysis, we propose a novel regularization method, Risk Variance Penalization (RVP), which is derived from REx. The proposed method is easy to implement, and has proper degree of penalization, and enjoys an interpretable tuning parameter. Finally, our experiments show that under certain conditions, the regularization strategy that encourages the equality of training risks has ability to discover relationships which do not exist in the training data. This provides important evidence to support that RVP is useful to discover causal models.