Framing Migration News with LLMs: Structured CoT as a Support for Human Interpretation

Frame analysis of migration news is a socially consequential task: media scholars and researchers who study how migration is narrated need tools that are not only accurate, but transparent, auditable, and accessible within the resource constraints typical of academic research groups. Existing LLM-based approaches rely on proprietary APIs and large models that raise concerns about data privacy, reproducibility and equitable access among media researchers. This work studies how a locally deployable open-source LLM can support interpretable frame analysis as an assistive tool. We introduce a Structured Chain-of-Thought (SCoT) prompting approach using Llama3-8B, enabling step-by-step justifications grounded in predefined framing categories. This structured design allows users to audit model outputs and examine alternative interpretations in a task that is inherently subjective. We evaluate our approach on a dataset of migration-related news and show that SCoT improves classification performance over zero-shot and few-shot baselines while remaining feasible on a single GPU. Then, we conduct a human-centered evaluation in which annotators assess the coherence and influence of "the model's reasoning". Results indicate that SCoT explanations are generally perceived as logical (mean score 4.1/5, though with notable variation across texts) and can prompt reflection on initial interpretations, even when disagreement persists. Our findings highlight both the potential and risks of LLM-assisted frame analysis. While structured reasoning can increase the traceability of model outputs and support critical interpretation, it can also influence human judgment in subtle ways. By enabling local deployment and emphasizing human-in-the-loop interaction, this work contributes to discussions on responsible and accessible computational tools for the study of socially impactful media narratives.

Machine Learning for Coding Retail Product Names to Consumer-Price Categories: A Rule-plus-Bag-of-Words Pipeline with Reliability-Weighted Human-in-the-Loop Labeling

Consumer-price measurement increasingly draws on alternative data sources -- scanner, web-scraped, and transaction/receipt data. A recurring obstacle is that product descriptions in such sources are short, noisy, and abbreviated, with no standard product code, so each item must first be mapped to a consumption classification (e.g., the UN COICOP scheme) before prices can be compared. This paper studies that mapping as a general, reproducible method. The pipeline is: (i) text normalization and tokenization of noisy item names; (ii) a prefix-tree (trie) rule-based pre-classifier driven by per-category key-phrases and stop-phrases; and (iii) a per-category binary confirmation model deciding whether an item belongs to a tentatively assigned category. For labels at scale we use a human-in-the-loop protocol in which annotators give a binary valid/reject judgment, aggregated by a dynamically updated reliability weight; the model joins the same rule, enabling continual fine-tuning. Our empirical finding is deflationary: in a controlled, leakage-free study (one category, real positives vs. hard negatives, five seeds), bag-of-words models essentially saturate the task (F1 about 0.99) -- a linear classifier matches a multilayer perceptron, explicit word-order (n-gram) features add nothing, and about 67 labeled examples already suffice. A Monte-Carlo study of the labeling protocol shows the reliability-weighted vote barely beats plain majority (its additive weights saturate) while Dawid-Skene recovers labels markedly better. We also discuss price-level quality control and design lessons for statistical offices considering transaction data. All figures are illustrative; no confidential data, code, or documentation is reproduced.

Density-Aware Translation of Spurious Correlations in Zero-Shot VLMs

Vision-Language models (VLMs), such as CLIP, achieve powerful zero-shot classification. However, their predictions remain sensitive to spurious correlations, where contextual cues dominate over semantic content. Earlier solutions typically rely on fine-tuning or prompt engineering, which either undermine the advantages of pre-trained models or are prone to hallucination. In this work, we propose Density-Aware Translation (DAT) that refines image-text similarity scores using a local geometric density term derived from group reference sets. Our approach is motivated by the phenomenon that CLIP embeddings exhibit a modality gap and lie on an anisotropic shell in the feature space: common patterns cluster near the mean, while rare patterns are pushed outward. This geometry creates uneven alignment, where spurious correlations are amplified while semantically meaningful but rare cues are marginalised. To address this, we employ a relative measure to rescale similarities based on embedding density, suppressing overconfident scores in diffuse regions while preserving dense, semantically consistent matches. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in worst-group and average accuracy, highlighting density-aware translation as a simple and effective calibration mechanism for reliable zero-shot classification using multimodal models.

Tracking the Behavioral Trajectories of Adapting Agents

Text files such as skill files, memory files, and behavioral configuration files play a central role in defining how modern agents act. Through edits by humans or the agents themselves, these files may evolve over time, directly steering the agent's behavior in future interactions. We present a methodology and framework for measuring agent $traits$ by defining traits as directions in the embedding space of a text embedding model. We train a linear model on labeled "before" versus "after" skill file diffs to learn a trait vector, then score arbitrary skill edits by projecting their embedding diffs onto this vector. Evaluated on 68 labeled skill diff pairs for the trait of propensity to seek sensitive data, our method achieves 91.2% sign classification accuracy and a Spearman rank correlation of $ρ= 0.82$ under leave-one-out cross-validation. We build this trait evaluation into a broader agent-to-agent protocol that enables one agent to evaluate another's skill file updates through a trusted intermediary.

Variational Adapter for Cross-modal Similarity Representation

The core of vision-language models lies in measuring cross-modal similarity within a unified representation space. However, most image-text matching or multi-class image classification datasets lack fine-grained cross-modal matching annotations, forcing the continuous similarity space into binary classification boundaries. This compression induces false negative samples and significantly impairs the generalization performance of cross-modal tasks. While prior research has attempted to mitigate this by modeling intra-modal ambiguity, it often overlooks inherent annotation flaws, leading to suboptimal uncertainty allocation. To address these challenges, we propose a Variational Adapter for Cross-modal Similarity Representation (VACSR). This approach reformulates image-text matching with fine-grained semantic scarcity as a variational inference problem. It constructs a latent space for cross-modal similarity and uses regularization techniques to mitigate overfitting to binary annotations. Experiments on image-text retrieval, domain generalization, and base-to-novel generalization demonstrate the proposed method's effectiveness and robust generalization ability.

Challenger at MultiPRIDE: Is It Hate Speech or Reclaimed?

The spread of hate speech has become increasingly harmful in modern digital environments, particularly on social networking platforms. While recent advances have shown promising results in automatic hate speech detection, a key challenge remains: distinguishing genuine hate speech from reclaimed language. Accurate labeling is difficult due to the nuanced and context-dependent nature of reclaimed expressions. In this paper, we present a simple and interpretable approach for distinguishing hate speech from reclaimed language, developed for the MultiPride Shared Task. Our method generates dense semantic text embeddings and incorporates a label-noise filtering stage using Cleanlab with logistic regression, followed by a Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network for final classification. The system is designed to operate under limited computational resources while maintaining strong performance. We evaluate our approach using precision, recall, and F1-score, including macro-averaged metrics. Experimental results demonstrate robust performance despite extreme class imbalance in the dataset. Overall, the findings highlight the potential for further improvements through larger embedding models and more advanced preprocessing techniques while preserving interpretability.

EvoPool: Evolutionary Programmatic Annotation for Label-Efficient Specialized Supervision

Large language models excel at general tasks but underperform smaller supervised models in specialized, high-stakes domains where training labels are costly. We address this regime with EvoPool, an evolutionary multi-agent framework inspired by Darwinian evolution. Three specialized agents iteratively propose executable annotator code, a small validation set provides a fitness signal, and a deterministic gate keeps only annotators that pass viability, diversity, and marginal-contribution checks across generations. Pool votes are mapped to soft training labels by EvoAgg, a text-aware aggregator combining semantic features with annotator-vote features. The authored pool runs at near-zero per-example cost and is 4500 to 31000x faster than LLM annotation on 100K examples. Across 7 of 8 LLM-weak specialized and complex tasks spanning biomedical relation extraction, legal-clause classification, complex reasoning, and dense multi-label biomedical classification, EvoPool beats the strongest LLM annotation baseline by an average +0.141 macro-F1, peaking at +0.301 on ChemProt and +0.265 on PubMed. Code is available at: https://github.com/tianyi0216/EvoPool

When Tabular Foundation Models Transfer Across Modalities: A Systematic Evaluation Across 95 Datasets, 7 Modalities, and Two Regimes

We present a single classification pipeline that combines an Equiangular Tight Frame (ETF) preprocessing stage with a tabular foundation model for in-context inference, applied identically across modalities once data is mapped to fixed vector representations. We evaluate it on 95 datasets spanning seven signal modalities -- vision, audio, speech, text, molecular, time-series, and tabular. The main methodological contribution is to fix the comparison object: throughout the paper, performance is judged against the strongest lightweight tuned baseline on the same frozen features, while oracle selection, deployed selection, and specialized fine-tuning are reported separately. The pipeline is broadly competitive with strong lightweight tuned baselines on the same frozen features. It does not match the very best specialized models or heavily tuned pipelines on every task, but it stays close, and it runs much faster -- typically 4 to 200 times faster than full backbone fine-tuning, often at comparable quality. We describe how to deploy the pipeline in practice: when to apply ETF preprocessing, how to stop its training without a validation split, how to set up the in-context classifier, and how to calibrate the resulting probabilities. The calibration step is non-cosmetic: TabICL produces well-calibrated probabilities by construction, ETF preprocessing initially disrupts that calibration, and the post-hoc rescaling restores it -- yielding a per-prediction confidence signal that practitioners can use as a trust threshold for confidence-gated deployment. We also report where the pipeline should not be expected to help, and how to identify those cases in advance.

SOCO: Benchmarking Semantic Object Correspondence in Vision Foundation Models

Measuring structured object understanding in vision foundation models remains challenging due to inconsistent evaluation protocols and limited part-level supervision. Semantic correspondence (SC) evaluates this capability by testing whether object parts can be matched across instances and categories under large variations in appearance, viewpoint, and geometry. To enable a systematic SC evaluation, we introduce SOCO, a new benchmark for Semantic Object Correspondence that introduces a taxonomy of correspondence types and provides consistent, functionally meaningful keypoint annotations across 100 categories and over 1M correspondence pairs. In addition, SOCO includes keypoint language descriptions, enabling the evaluation of large vision-language models (LVLMs) and their fine-grained part-level understanding. Comprehensive experiments reveal that (i) vision foundation backbones encode strong semantic structure but transfer correspondences poorly across related categories and only partially capture object-part position, (ii) LVLMs are stronger at text-prompted part localization than at visual-reference cross-image matching, exposing a gap between language-grounded localization and fine-grained visual correspondence, and (iii) correspondence performance predicts performance on dense downstream tasks, including segmentation, tracking, 3D pose estimation, and 3D detection, more strongly than ImageNet classification. Together, these findings position SOCO as a benchmark for structured, part-level representation quality in vision and multimodal foundation models.

WhoSaidIt: Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation for Text-Based Multilingual Speaker-Attribute Classification

Annotating speaker attributes from text is inherently ambiguous, particularly in multilingual settings where demographic and social cues are implicit and culturally variable. We propose a human-large language model (LLM) collaborative re-annotation framework for stabilizing multilingual speaker-attribute labels under practical resource constraints. Starting from a noisy corpus, we use LLMs to surface recurring annotation rationales through iterative interaction with experts, and apply disagreement-focused sampling for targeted re-annotation. Using this framework, we construct WhoSaidIt, a multilingual dataset covering nine speaker-attribute labels. We quantify divergence between original and revised annotations, benchmark recent LLMs, and analyze the effect of explicit rationales on model behavior. Our results reveal substantial cross-lingual differences in annotation decisions and demonstrate both the strengths and limitations of LLMs in speaker-attribute classification.