Semi-Supervised Learning with Balanced Deep Representation Distributions

Semi-Supervised Text Classification (SSTC) mainly works under the spirit of self-training. They initialize the deep classifier by training over labeled texts; and then alternatively predict unlabeled texts as their pseudo-labels and train the deep classifier over the mixture of labeled and pseudo-labeled texts. Naturally, their performance is largely affected by the accuracy of pseudo-labels for unlabeled texts. Unfortunately, they often suffer from low accuracy because of the margin bias problem caused by the large difference between representation distributions of labels in SSTC. To alleviate this problem, we apply the angular margin loss, and perform several Gaussian linear transformations to achieve balanced label angle variances, i.e., the variance of label angles of texts within the same label. More accuracy of predicted pseudo-labels can be achieved by constraining all label angle variances balanced, where they are estimated over both labeled and pseudo-labeled texts during self-training loops. With this insight, we propose a novel SSTC method, namely Semi-Supervised Text Classification with Balanced Deep representation Distributions (S2TC-BDD). We implement both multi-class classification and multi-label classification versions of S2TC-BDD by introducing some pseudo-labeling tricks and regularization terms. To evaluate S2 TC-BDD, we compare it against the state-of-the-art SSTC methods. Empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of S2 TC-BDD, especially when the labeled texts are scarce.

An Experimental Comparison of the Most Popular Approaches to Fake News Detection

In recent years, fake news detection has received increasing attention in public debate and scientific research. Despite advances in detection techniques, the production and spread of false information have become more sophisticated, driven by Large Language Models (LLMs) and the amplification power of social media. We present a critical assessment of 12 representative fake news detection approaches, spanning traditional machine learning, deep learning, transformers, and specialized cross-domain architectures. We evaluate these methods on 10 publicly available datasets differing in genre, source, topic, and labeling rationale. We address text-only English fake news detection as a binary classification task by harmonizing labels into "Real" and "Fake" to ensure a consistent evaluation protocol. We acknowledge that label semantics vary across datasets and that harmonization inevitably removes such semantic nuances. Each dataset is treated as a distinct domain. We conduct in-domain, multi-domain and cross-domain experiments to simulate real-world scenarios involving domain shift and out-of-distribution data. Fine-tuned models perform well in-domain but struggle to generalize. Cross-domain architectures can reduce this gap but are data-hungry, while LLMs offer a promising alternative through zero- and few-shot learning. Given inherent dataset confounds and possible pre-training exposure, results should be interpreted as robustness evaluations within this English, text-only protocol.

LGSE: Lexically Grounded Subword Embedding Initialization for Low-Resource Language Adaptation

Adapting pretrained language models to low-resource, morphologically rich languages remains a significant challenge. Existing vocabulary expansion methods typically rely on arbitrarily segmented subword units, resulting in fragmented lexical representations and loss of critical morphological information. To address this limitation, we propose the Lexically Grounded Subword Embedding Initialization (LGSE) framework, which introduces morphologically informed segmentation for initializing embeddings of novel tokens. Instead of using random vectors or arbitrary subwords, LGSE decomposes words into their constituent morphemes and constructs semantically coherent embeddings by averaging pretrained subword or FastText-based morpheme representations. When a token cannot be segmented into meaningful morphemes, its embedding is constructed using character n-gram representations to capture structural information. During Language-Adaptive Pretraining, we apply a regularization term that penalizes large deviations of newly introduced embeddings from their initialized values, preserving alignment with the original pretrained embedding space while enabling adaptation to the target language. To isolate the effect of initialization, we retain the original pre-trained model vocabulary and tokenizer and update only the new embeddings during adaptation. We evaluate LGSE on three NLP tasks: Question Answering, Named Entity Recognition, and Text Classification, in two morphologically rich, low-resource languages: Amharic and Tigrinya, where morphological segmentation resources are available. Experimental results show that LGSE consistently outperforms baseline methods across all tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of morphologically grounded embedding initialization for improving representation quality in underrepresented languages. Project resources are available in the GitHub link.

CrossHGL: A Text-Free Foundation Model for Cross-Domain Heterogeneous Graph Learning

Heterogeneous graph representation learning (HGRL) is essential for modeling complex systems with diverse node and edge types. However, most existing methods are limited to closed-world settings with shared schemas and feature spaces, hindering cross-domain generalization. While recent graph foundation models improve transferability, they often target homogeneous graphs, rely on domain-specific schemas, or require rich textual attributes. Consequently, text-free and few-shot cross-domain HGRL remains underexplored. To address this, we propose CrossHGL, a foundation framework that preserves and transfers multi-relational structural semantics without external textual supervision. Specifically, a semantic-preserving transformation strategy homogenizes heterogeneous graphs while encoding interaction semantics into edge features. Based on this, a prompt-aware multi-domain pre-training framework with a Tri-Prompt mechanism captures transferable knowledge across feature, edge, and structure perspectives via self-supervised contrastive learning. For target-domain adaptation, we develop a parameter-efficient fine-tuning strategy that freezes the pre-trained backbone and performs few-shot classification via prompt composition and prototypical learning. Experiments on node-level and graph-level tasks show that CrossHGL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, yielding average relative improvements of 25.1% and 7.6% in Micro-F1 for node and graph classification, respectively, while remaining competitive in challenging feature-degenerated settings.

Argument Mining as a Text-to-Text Generation Task

Argument Mining(AM) aims to uncover the argumentative structures within a text. Previous methods require several subtasks, such as span identification, component classification, and relation classification. Consequently, these methods need rule-based postprocessing to derive argumentative structures from the output of each subtask. This approach adds to the complexity of the model and expands the search space of the hyperparameters. To address this difficulty, we propose a simple yet strong method based on a text-to-text generation approach using a pretrained encoder-decoder language model. Our method simultaneously generates argumentatively annotated text for spans, components, and relations, eliminating the need for task-specific postprocessing and hyperparameter tuning. Furthermore, because it is a straightforward text-to-text generation method, we can easily adapt our approach to various types of argumentative structures. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, as it achieves state-of-the-art performance on three different types of benchmark datasets: the Argument-annotated Essays Corpus(AAEC), AbstRCT, and the Cornell eRulemaking Corpus(CDCP)

TextReasoningBench: Does Reasoning Really Improve Text Classification in Large Language Models?

Eliciting explicit, step-by-step reasoning traces from large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a dominant paradigm for enhancing model capabilities. Although such reasoning strategies were originally designed for problems requiring explicit multi-step reasoning, they have increasingly been applied to a broad range of NLP tasks. This expansion implicitly assumes that deliberative reasoning uniformly benefits heterogeneous tasks. However, whether such reasoning mechanisms truly benefit classification tasks remains largely underexplored, especially considering their substantial token and time costs. To fill this gap, we introduce TextReasoningBench, a systematic benchmark designed to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of reasoning strategies for text classification with LLMs. We compare seven reasoning strategies, namely IO, CoT, SC-CoT, ToT, GoT, BoC, and long-CoT across ten LLMs on five text classification datasets. Beyond traditional metrics such as accuracy and macro-F1, we introduce two cost-aware evaluation metrics that quantify the performance gain per reasoning token and the efficiency of performance improvement relative to token cost growth. Experimental results reveal three notable findings: (1) Reasoning does not universally improve classification performance: while moderate strategies such as CoT and SC-CoT yield consistent but limited gains (typically +1% to +3% on big models), more complex methods (e.g., ToT and GoT) often fail to outperform simpler baselines and can even degrade performance, especially on small models; (2) Reasoning is often inefficient: many reasoning strategies increase token consumption by 10$\times$ to 100$\times$ (e.g., SC-CoT and ToT) while providing only marginal performance improvements.

Clash of the models: Comparing performance of BERT-based variants for generic news frame detection

Framing continues to remain one of the most extensively applied theories in political communication. Developments in computation, particularly with the introduction of transformer architecture and more so with large language models (LLMs), have naturally prompted scholars to explore various novel computational approaches, especially for deductive frame detection, in recent years. While many studies have shown that different transformer models outperform their preceding models that use bag-of-words features, the debate continues to evolve regarding how these models compare with each other on classification tasks. By placing itself at this juncture, this study makes three key contributions: First, it comparatively performs generic news frame detection and compares the performance of five BERT-based variants (BERT, RoBERTa, DeBERTa, DistilBERT and ALBERT) to add to the debate on best practices around employing computational text analysis for political communication studies. Second, it introduces various fine-tuned models capable of robustly performing generic news frame detection. Third, building upon numerous previous studies that work with US-centric data, this study provides the scholarly community with a labelled generic news frames dataset based on the Swiss electoral context that aids in testing the contextual robustness of these computational approaches to framing analysis.

Enhancing Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL) Representations via Attention-Based Pooling for Text Classification

The Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL) model relies on global word co-occurrence matrices to construct distributional semantic representations. While these representations capture lexical relationships effectively, aggregating them into sentence-level embeddings via standard mean pooling often results in information loss. Mean pooling assigns equal weight to all tokens, thereby diluting the impact of contextually salient words with uninformative structural tokens. In this paper, we address this limitation by integrating a learnable, temperature-scaled additive attention mechanism into the HAL representation pipeline. To mitigate the sparsity and high dimensionality of the raw co-occurrence matrices, we apply Truncated Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to project the vectors into a dense latent space prior to the attention layer. We evaluate the proposed architecture on the IMDB sentiment analysis dataset. Empirical results demonstrate that the attention-based pooling approach achieves a test accuracy of 82.38%, yielding an absolute improvement of 6.74 percentage points over the traditional mean pooling baseline (75.64%). Furthermore, qualitative analysis of the attention weights indicates that the mechanism successfully suppresses stop-words and selectively attends to sentiment-bearing tokens, improving both classification performance and model interpretability.

Hybrid Diffusion Model for Breast Ultrasound Image Augmentation

We propose a hybrid diffusion-based augmentation framework to overcome the critical challenge of ultrasound data augmentation in breast ultrasound (BUS) datasets. Unlike conventional diffusion-based augmentations, our approach improves visual fidelity and preserves ultrasound texture by combining text-to-image generation with image-to-image (img2img) refinement, as well as fine-tuning with low-rank adaptation (LoRA) and textual inversion (TI). Our method generated realistic, class-consistent images on an open-source Kaggle breast ultrasound image dataset (BUSI). Compared to the Stable Diffusion v1.5 baseline, incorporating TI and img2img refinement reduced the Frechet Inception Distance (FID) from 45.97 to 33.29, demonstrating a substantial gain in fidelity while maintaining comparable downstream classification performance. Overall, the proposed framework effectively mitigates the low-fidelity limitations of synthetic ultrasound images and enhances the quality of augmentation for robust diagnostic modeling.

Is AI Catching Up to Human Expression? Exploring Emotion, Personality, Authorship, and Linguistic Style in English and Arabic with Six Large Language Models

The advancing fluency of LLMs raises important questions about their ability to emulate complex human traits, including emotional expression and personality, across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. This study investigates whether LLMs can convincingly mimic emotional nuance in English and personality markers in Arabic, a critical under-resourced language with unique linguistic and cultural characteristics. We conduct two tasks across six models:Jais, Mistral, LLaMA, GPT-4o, Gemini, and DeepSeek. First, we evaluate whether machine classifiers can reliably distinguish between human-authored and AI-generated texts. Second, we assess the extent to which LLM-generated texts exhibit emotional or personality traits comparable to those of humans. Our results demonstrate that AI-generated texts are distinguishable from human-authored ones (F1>0.95), though classification performance deteriorates on paraphrased samples, indicating a reliance on superficial stylistic cues. Emotion and personality classification experiments reveal significant generalization gaps: classifiers trained on human data perform poorly on AI-generated texts and vice versa, suggesting LLMs encode affective signals differently from humans. Importantly, augmenting training with AI-generated data enhances performance in the Arabic personality classification task, highlighting the potential of synthetic data to address challenges in under-resourced languages. Model-specific analyses show that GPT-4o and Gemini exhibit superior affective coherence. Linguistic and psycholinguistic analyses reveal measurable divergences in tone, authenticity, and textual complexity between human and AI texts. These findings have implications for affective computing, authorship attribution, and responsible AI deployment, particularly within underresourced language contexts where generative AI detection and alignment pose unique challenges.