Multi-Year Spectral Structure of 6G Candidate Bands at 2.7 GHz and 4.4 GHz

Mid-band spectrum between 2 and 8 GHz is a critical resource for sixth-generation (6G) systems as it uniquely balances favorable propagation characteristics with scalable bandwidth. Recent U.S. policy highlights candidate bands near 2.7, 4.4, and 7.1 GHz, all of which host substantial federal and non-federal incumbency, including high-power radiolocation and aeronautical telemetry systems. Although these segments are being considered for potential relocation of federal incumbents to enable commercial use, their long-term viability depends on the structural integrity of the spectrum. In such environments, the practical value of spectrum depends on the reliability and contiguity of available spectrum opportunities. This paper presents a measurement-driven feasibility analysis of two representative segments, 2.69-2.9 GHz and 4.4-4.94 GHz, using Software-Defined Radio (SDR) measurements collected during Packapalooza campaigns from 2022 to 2025. Deployment-oriented metrics are introduced to quantify scan-window reliability (SWR), altitude-dependent usable spectrum availability ratio (USAR), largest contiguous clean bandwidth (LCCB), spectral fragmentation, and extreme interference excursions. The results reveal significant year-to-year structural variability. In the 2.69-2.9 GHz band, USAR remains near unity in 2022 and 2023, but drops to approximately 0.65 in 2024 and 0.8 in 2025, accompanied by fragmentation and limited contiguous bandwidth across altitudes. The 4.4-4.94 GHz band exhibits a similar temporal pattern, but with smaller reliability degradation and larger contiguous support, often exceeding several hundred megahertz even during incumbent-dominant periods. The results highlight that wideband feasibility in these candidate bands depends strongly on spectral contiguity and structural stability rather than nominal bandwidth alone.

Gravity Falls: A Comparative Analysis of Domain-Generation Algorithm (DGA) Detection Methods for Mobile Device Spearphishing

Mobile devices are frequent targets of eCrime threat actors through SMS spearphishing (smishing) links that leverage Domain Generation Algorithms (DGA) to rotate hostile infrastructure. Despite this, DGA research and evaluation largely emphasize malware C2 and email phishing datasets, leaving limited evidence on how well detectors generalize to smishing-driven domain tactics outside enterprise perimeters. This work addresses that gap by evaluating traditional and machine-learning DGA detectors against Gravity Falls, a new semi-synthetic dataset derived from smishing links delivered between 2022 and 2025. Gravity Falls captures a single threat actor's evolution across four technique clusters, shifting from short randomized strings to dictionary concatenation and themed combo-squatting variants used for credential theft and fee/fine fraud. Two string-analysis approaches (Shannon entropy and Exp0se) and two ML-based detectors (an LSTM classifier and COSSAS DGAD) are assessed using Top-1M domains as benign baselines. Results are strongly tactic-dependent: performance is highest on randomized-string domains but drops on dictionary concatenation and themed combo-squatting, with low recall across multiple tool/cluster pairings. Overall, both traditional heuristics and recent ML detectors are ill-suited for consistently evolving DGA tactics observed in Gravity Falls, motivating more context-aware approaches and providing a reproducible benchmark for future evaluation.

Is there "Secret Sauce'' in Large Language Model Development?

Do leading LLM developers possess a proprietary ``secret sauce'', or is LLM performance driven by scaling up compute? Using training and benchmark data for 809 models released between 2022 and 2025, we estimate scaling-law regressions with release-date and developer fixed effects. We find clear evidence of developer-specific efficiency advantages, but their importance depends on where models lie in the performance distribution. At the frontier, 80-90% of performance differences are explained by higher training compute, implying that scale--not proprietary technology--drives frontier advances. Away from the frontier, however, proprietary techniques and shared algorithmic progress substantially reduce the compute required to reach fixed capability thresholds. Some companies can systematically produce smaller models more efficiently. Strikingly, we also find substantial variation of model efficiency within companies; a firm can train two models with more than 40x compute efficiency difference. We also discuss the implications for AI leadership and capability diffusion.

What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt?

As large language models (LLMs) have progressed towards more human-like and human--AI communications have become prevalent, prompting has emerged as a decisive component. However, there is limited conceptual consensus on what exactly quantifies natural language prompts. We attempt to address this question by conducting a meta-analysis surveying more than 150 prompting-related papers from leading NLP and AI conferences from 2022 to 2025 and blogs. We propose a property- and human-centric framework for evaluating prompt quality, encompassing 21 properties categorized into six dimensions. We then examine how existing studies assess their impact on LLMs, revealing their imbalanced support across models and tasks, and substantial research gaps. Further, we analyze correlations among properties in high-quality natural language prompts, deriving prompting recommendations. We then empirically explore multi-property prompt enhancements in reasoning tasks, observing that single-property enhancements often have the greatest impact. Finally, we discover that instruction-tuning on property-enhanced prompts can result in better reasoning models. Our findings establish a foundation for property-centric prompt evaluation and optimization, bridging the gaps between human--AI communication and opening new prompting research directions.

Vision-Enabled LLMs in Historical Lexicography: Digitising and Enriching Estonian-German Dictionaries from the 17th and 18th Centuries

This article presents research conducted at the Institute of the Estonian Language between 2022 and 2025 on the application of large language models (LLMs) to the study of 17th and 18th century Estonian dictionaries. The authors address three main areas: enriching historical dictionaries with modern word forms and meanings; using vision-enabled LLMs to perform text recognition on sources printed in Gothic script (Fraktur); and preparing for the creation of a unified, cross-source dataset. Initial experiments with J. Gutslaff's 1648 dictionary indicate that LLMs have significant potential for semi-automatic enrichment of dictionary information. When provided with sufficient context, Claude 3.7 Sonnet accurately provided meanings and modern equivalents for 81% of headword entries. In a text recognition experiment with A. T. Helle's 1732 dictionary, a zero-shot method successfully identified and structured 41% of headword entries into error-free JSON-formatted output. For digitising the Estonian-German dictionary section of A. W. Hupel's 1780 grammar, overlapping tiling of scanned image files is employed, with one LLM being used for text recognition and a second for merging the structured output. These findings demonstrate that even for minor languages LLMs have a significant potential for saving time and financial resources.

When Pretty Isn't Useful: Investigating Why Modern Text-to-Image Models Fail as Reliable Training Data Generators

Recent text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models produce visually stunning images and demonstrate excellent prompt following. But do they perform well as synthetic vision data generators? In this work, we revisit the promise of synthetic data as a scalable substitute for real training sets and uncover a surprising performance regression. We generate large-scale synthetic datasets using state-of-the-art T2I models released between 2022 and 2025, train standard classifiers solely on this synthetic data, and evaluate them on real test data. Despite observable advances in visual fidelity and prompt adherence, classification accuracy on real test data consistently declines with newer T2I models as training data generators. Our analysis reveals a hidden trend: These models collapse to a narrow, aesthetic-centric distribution that undermines diversity and label-image alignment. Overall, our findings challenge a growing assumption in vision research, namely that progress in generative realism implies progress in data realism. We thus highlight an urgent need to rethink the capabilities of modern T2I models as reliable training data generators.

A Scoping Review of Large Language Model-Based Pedagogical Agents

This scoping review examines the emerging field of Large Language Model (LLM)-based pedagogical agents in educational settings. While traditional pedagogical agents have been extensively studied, the integration of LLMs represents a transformative advancement with unprecedented capabilities in natural language understanding, reasoning, and adaptation. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we analyzed 52 studies across five major databases from November 2022 to January 2025. Our findings reveal diverse LLM-based agents spanning K-12, higher education, and informal learning contexts across multiple subject domains. We identified four key design dimensions characterizing these agents: interaction approach (reactive vs. proactive), domain scope (domain-specific vs. general-purpose), role complexity (single-role vs. multi-role), and system integration (standalone vs. integrated). Emerging trends include multi-agent systems that simulate naturalistic learning environments, virtual student simulation for agent evaluation, integration with immersive technologies, and combinations with learning analytics. We also discuss significant research gaps and ethical considerations regarding privacy, accuracy, and student autonomy. This review provides researchers and practitioners with a comprehensive understanding of LLM-based pedagogical agents while identifying crucial areas for future development in this rapidly evolving field.

Agreement Between Large Language Models and Human Raters in Essay Scoring: A Research Synthesis

Despite the growing promise of large language models (LLMs) in automatic essay scoring (AES), empirical findings regarding their reliability compared to human raters remain mixed. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we synthesized 65 published and unpublished studies from January 2022 to August 2025 that examined agreement between LLMs and human raters in AES. Across studies, reported LLM-human agreement was generally moderate to good, with agreement indices (e.g., Quadratic Weighted Kappa, Pearson correlation, and Spearman's rho) mostly ranging between 0.30 and 0.80. Substantial variability in agreement levels was observed across studies, reflecting differences in study-specific factors as well as the lack of standardized reporting practices. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

LLMs Outperform Experts on Challenging Biology Benchmarks

This study systematically evaluates 27 frontier Large Language Models on eight diverse biology benchmarks spanning molecular biology, genetics, cloning, virology, and biosecurity. Models from major AI developers released between November 2022 and April 2025 were assessed through ten independent runs per benchmark. The findings reveal dramatic improvements in biological capabilities. Top model performance increased more than 4-fold on the challenging text-only subset of the Virology Capabilities Test over the study period, with the top model now performing twice as well as expert virologists. Several models now match or exceed expert-level performance on other challenging benchmarks, including LAB-Bench CloningScenarios and the biology subsets of GPQA and WMDP. Contrary to expectations, chain-of-thought did not substantially improve performance over zero-shot evaluation, while extended reasoning features in o3-mini and Claude 3.7 Sonnet typically improved performance as predicted by inference scaling. Benchmarks such as PubMedQA and the MMLU and WMDP biology subsets exhibited performance plateaus well below 100%, suggesting benchmark saturation and errors in the underlying benchmark data. The analysis highlights the need for more sophisticated evaluation methodologies as AI systems continue to advance.

Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit

Large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as promising tools for augmenting Security Operations Center (SOC) workflows, with vendors increasingly marketing autonomous AI solutions for SOCs. However, there remains a limited empirical understanding of how such tools are used, perceived, and adopted by real-world security practitioners. To address this gap, we conduct a mixed-methods analysis of discussions in cybersecurity-focused forums to learn how a diverse group of practitioners use and perceive modern LLM tools for security operations. More specifically, we analyzed 892 posts between December 2022 and September 2025 from three cybersecurity-focused forums on Reddit, and, using a combination of qualitative coding and statistical analysis, examined how security practitioners discuss LLM tools across three dimensions: (1) their stated tools and use cases, (2) the perceived pros and cons of each tool across a set of critical factors, and (3) their adoption of such tools and the expected impacts on the cybersecurity industry and individual analysts. Overall, our findings reveal nuanced patterns in LLM tools adoption, highlighting independent use of LLMs for low-risk, productivity-oriented tasks, alongside active interest around enterprise-grade, security-focused LLM platforms. Although practitioners report meaningful gains in efficiency and effectiveness in LLM-assisted workflows, persistent issues with reliability, verification overheads, and security risks sharply constrain the autonomy granted to LLM tools. Based on these results, we also provide recommendations for developing and adopting LLM tools to ensure the security of organizations and the safety of cybersecurity practitioners.