KLoB: a Benchmark for Assessing Knowledge Locating Methods in Language Models

Recently, Locate-Then-Edit paradigm has emerged as one of the main approaches in changing factual knowledge stored in the Language models. However, there is a lack of research on whether present locating methods can pinpoint the exact parameters embedding the desired knowledge. Moreover, although many researchers have questioned the validity of locality hypothesis of factual knowledge, no method is provided to test the a hypothesis for more in-depth discussion and research. Therefore, we introduce KLoB, a benchmark examining three essential properties that a reliable knowledge locating method should satisfy. KLoB can serve as a benchmark for evaluating existing locating methods in language models, and can contributes a method to reassessing the validity of locality hypothesis of factual knowledge. Our is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/juyiming/KLoB}.

Unsupervised Text Style Transfer with Deep Generative Models

We present a general framework for unsupervised text style transfer with deep generative models. The framework models each sentence-label pair in the non-parallel corpus as partially observed from a complete quadruplet which additionally contains two latent codes representing the content and style, respectively. These codes are learned by exploiting dependencies inside the observed data. Then a sentence is transferred by manipulating them. Our framework is able to unify previous embedding and prototype methods as two special forms. It also provides a principled perspective to explain previously proposed techniques in the field such as aligned encoder and adversarial training. We further conduct experiments on three benchmarks. Both automatic and human evaluation results show that our methods achieve better or competitive results compared to several strong baselines.

Generating Hierarchical Explanations on Text Classification Without Connecting Rules

The opaqueness of deep NLP models has motivated the development of methods for interpreting how deep models predict. Recently, work has introduced hierarchical attribution, which produces a hierarchical clustering of words, along with an attribution score for each cluster. However, existing work on hierarchical attribution all follows the connecting rule, limiting the cluster to a continuous span in the input text. We argue that the connecting rule as an additional prior may undermine the ability to reflect the model decision process faithfully. To this end, we propose to generate hierarchical explanations without the connecting rule and introduce a framework for generating hierarchical clusters. Experimental results and further analysis show the effectiveness of the proposed method in providing high-quality explanations for reflecting model predicting process.

The Logic Traps in Evaluating Post-hoc Interpretations

Post-hoc interpretation aims to explain a trained model and reveal how the model arrives at a decision. Though research on post-hoc interpretations has developed rapidly, one growing pain in this field is the difficulty in evaluating interpretations. There are some crucial logic traps behind existing evaluation methods, which are ignored by most works. In this opinion piece, we summarize four kinds evaluation methods and point out the corresponding logic traps behind them. We argue that we should be clear about these traps rather than ignore them and draw conclusions assertively.