Query Expansion by Prompting Large Language Models

Query expansion is a widely used technique to improve the recall of search systems. In this paper, we propose an approach to query expansion that leverages the generative abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Unlike traditional query expansion approaches such as Pseudo-Relevance Feedback (PRF) that relies on retrieving a good set of pseudo-relevant documents to expand queries, we rely on the generative and creative abilities of an LLM and leverage the knowledge inherent in the model. We study a variety of different prompts, including zero-shot, few-shot and Chain-of-Thought (CoT). We find that CoT prompts are especially useful for query expansion as these prompts instruct the model to break queries down step-by-step and can provide a large number of terms related to the original query. Experimental results on MS-MARCO and BEIR demonstrate that query expansions generated by LLMs can be more powerful than traditional query expansion methods.

Metric-agnostic Ranking Optimization

Ranking is at the core of Information Retrieval. Classic ranking optimization studies often treat ranking as a sorting problem with the assumption that the best performance of ranking would be achieved if we rank items according to their individual utility. Accordingly, considerable ranking metrics have been developed and learning-to-rank algorithms that have been designed to optimize these simple performance metrics have been widely used in modern IR systems. As applications evolve, however, people's need for information retrieval have shifted from simply retrieving relevant documents to more advanced information services that satisfy their complex working and entertainment needs. Thus, more complicated and user-centric objectives such as user satisfaction and engagement have been adopted to evaluate modern IR systems today. Those objectives, unfortunately, are difficult to be optimized under existing learning-to-rank frameworks as they are subject to great variance and complicated structures that cannot be explicitly explained or formulated with math equations like those simple performance metrics. This leads to the following research question -- how to optimize result ranking for complex ranking metrics without knowing their internal structures? To address this question, we conduct formal analysis on the limitation of existing ranking optimization techniques and describe three research tasks in \textit{Metric-agnostic Ranking Optimization}. Through the discussion of potential solutions to these tasks, we hope to encourage more people to look into the problem of ranking optimization in complex search and recommendation scenarios.

Towards Disentangling Relevance and Bias in Unbiased Learning to Rank

Unbiased learning to rank (ULTR) studies the problem of mitigating various biases from implicit user feedback data such as clicks, and has been receiving considerable attention recently. A popular ULTR approach for real-world applications uses a two-tower architecture, where click modeling is factorized into a relevance tower with regular input features, and a bias tower with bias-relevant inputs such as the position of a document. A successful factorization will allow the relevance tower to be exempt from biases. In this work, we identify a critical issue that existing ULTR methods ignored - the bias tower can be confounded with the relevance tower via the underlying true relevance. In particular, the positions were determined by the logging policy, i.e., the previous production model, which would possess relevance information. We give both theoretical analysis and empirical results to show the negative effects on relevance tower due to such a correlation. We then propose three methods to mitigate the negative confounding effects by better disentangling relevance and bias. Empirical results on both controlled public datasets and a large-scale industry dataset show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.

Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Ranking

Domain adaptation aims to transfer the knowledge acquired by models trained on (data-rich) source domains to (low-resource) target domains, for which a popular method is invariant representation learning. While they have been studied extensively for classification and regression problems, how they apply to ranking problems, where the data and metrics have a list structure, is not well understood. Theoretically, we establish a domain adaptation generalization bound for ranking under listwise metrics such as MRR and NDCG. The bound suggests an adaptation method via learning list-level domain-invariant feature representations, whose benefits are empirically demonstrated by unsupervised domain adaptation experiments on real-world ranking tasks, including passage reranking. A key message is that for domain adaptation, the representations should be analyzed at the same level at which the metric is computed, as we show that learning invariant representations at the list level is most effective for adaptation on ranking problems.

Regression Compatible Listwise Objectives for Calibrated Ranking

As Learning-to-Rank (LTR) approaches primarily seek to improve ranking quality, their output scores are not scale-calibrated by design -- for example, adding a constant to the score of each item on the list will not affect the list ordering. This fundamentally limits LTR usage in score-sensitive applications. Though a simple multi-objective approach that combines a regression and a ranking objective can effectively learn scale-calibrated scores, we argue that the two objectives can be inherently conflicting, which makes the trade-off far from ideal for both of them. In this paper, we propose a novel regression compatible ranking (RCR) approach to achieve a better trade-off. The advantage of the proposed approach is that the regression and ranking components are well aligned which brings new opportunities for harmonious regression and ranking. Theoretically, we show that the two components share the same minimizer at global minima while the regression component ensures scale calibration. Empirically, we show that the proposed approach performs well on both regression and ranking metrics on several public LTR datasets, and significantly improves the Pareto frontiers in the context of multi-objective optimization. Furthermore, we evaluated the proposed approach on YouTube Search and found that it not only improved the ranking quality of the production pCTR model, but also brought gains to the click prediction accuracy.

RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Losses

Recently, substantial progress has been made in text ranking based on pretrained language models such as BERT. However, there are limited studies on how to leverage more powerful sequence-to-sequence models such as T5. Existing attempts usually formulate text ranking as classification and rely on postprocessing to obtain a ranked list. In this paper, we propose RankT5 and study two T5-based ranking model structures, an encoder-decoder and an encoder-only one, so that they not only can directly output ranking scores for each query-document pair, but also can be fine-tuned with "pairwise" or "listwise" ranking losses to optimize ranking performances. Our experiments show that the proposed models with ranking losses can achieve substantial ranking performance gains on different public text ranking data sets. Moreover, when fine-tuned with listwise ranking losses, the ranking model appears to have better zero-shot ranking performance on out-of-domain data sets compared to the model fine-tuned with classification losses.

Rank4Class: A Ranking Formulation for Multiclass Classification

Multiclass classification (MCC) is a fundamental machine learning problem which aims to classify each instance into one of a predefined set of classes. Given an instance, a classification model computes a score for each class, all of which are then used to sort the classes. The performance of a classification model is usually measured by Top-K Accuracy/Error (e.g., K=1 or 5). In this paper, we do not aim to propose new neural representation learning models as most recent works do, but to show that it is easy to boost MCC performance with a novel formulation through the lens of ranking. In particular, by viewing MCC as to rank classes for an instance, we first argue that ranking metrics, such as Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG), can be more informative than existing Top-K metrics. We further demonstrate that the dominant neural MCC architecture can be formulated as a neural ranking framework with a specific set of design choices. Based on such generalization, we show that it is straightforward and intuitive to leverage techniques from the rich information retrieval literature to improve the MCC performance out of the box. Extensive empirical results on both text and image classification tasks with diverse datasets and backbone models (e.g., BERT and ResNet for text and image classification) show the value of our proposed framework.

Born Again Neural Rankers

We introduce Born Again neural Rankers (BAR) in the Learning to Rank (LTR) setting, where student rankers, trained in the Knowledge Distillation (KD) framework, are parameterized identically to their teachers. Unlike the existing ranking distillation work which pursues a good trade-off between performance and efficiency, BAR adapts the idea of Born Again Networks (BAN) to ranking problems and significantly improves ranking performance of students over the teacher rankers without increasing model capacity. The key differences between BAR and common distillation techniques for classification are: (1) an appropriate teacher score transformation function, and (2) a novel listwise distillation framework. Both techniques are specifically designed for ranking problems and are rarely studied in the knowledge distillation literature. Using the state-of-the-art neural ranking structure, BAR is able to push the limits of neural rankers above a recent rigorous benchmark study and significantly outperforms traditionally strong gradient boosted decision tree based models on 7 out of 9 key metrics, the first time in the literature. In addition to the strong empirical results, we give theoretical explanations on why listwise distillation is effective for neural rankers.

Distilling Interpretable Models into Human-Readable Code

The goal of model distillation is to faithfully transfer teacher model knowledge to a model which is faster, more generalizable, more interpretable, or possesses other desirable characteristics. Human-readability is an important and desirable standard for machine-learned model interpretability. Readable models are transparent and can be reviewed, manipulated, and deployed like traditional source code. As a result, such models can be improved outside the context of machine learning and manually edited if desired. Given that directly training such models is difficult, we propose to train interpretable models using conventional methods, and then distill them into concise, human-readable code. The proposed distillation methodology approximates a model's univariate numerical functions with piecewise-linear curves in a localized manner. The resulting curve model representations are accurate, concise, human-readable, and well-regularized by construction. We describe a piecewise-linear curve-fitting algorithm that produces high-quality results efficiently and reliably across a broad range of use cases. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the overall distillation technique and our curve-fitting algorithm using four datasets across the tasks of classification, regression, and ranking.