Safe-Subspace Pseudo-Label Refinement for Source-Free Graph Domain Adaptation

Source-free graph domain adaptation (SF-GDA) aims to adapt source-trained graph models to unlabeled target graphs when source graphs are no longer accessible. A central obstacle is pseudo-label reliability: under feature and topological shifts, source-induced predictions may become confidently wrong, and indiscriminate self-training can amplify systematic errors through graph message passing. This paper studies SF-GDA from a selective pseudo-labeling perspective. Instead of assuming globally bounded pseudo-label noise over the entire target domain, we identify a confidence-consistent safe subspace on which pseudo-label noise can be controlled under restricted posterior discrepancy, and derive a target-risk decomposition that separates safe-subspace fitting error, selected-label noise, and uncertain-set risk. Guided by this analysis, we propose SafeSubspace Pseudo-Label Refinement (S$^2$PLR), a source-free graph adaptation framework that applies hard pseudo-label supervision only to target graphs supported by both semantic and structural evidence. Specifically, S$^2$PLR estimates semantic reliability using source-committee confidence and disagreement, learns a targetintrinsic structural representation via graph contrastive learning, verifies pseudo-labels through neighborhood consistency, and exploits the remaining uncertain samples with noise-tolerant soft regularization rather than unreliable hard labels. Experiments on image and real-world graph benchmarks under different domain shifts demonstrate that S$^2$PLR achieves robust and competitive performance across diverse source-free transfer settings.

Unifying Value Alignment and Assignment in Cross-Domain Offline Reinforcement Learning with Heterogeneous Datasets

Cross-domain offline reinforcement learning (RL) aims to learn a policy in the target domain with a limited target domain dataset and a source domain dataset that exhibits a dynamics shift. Training directly on the original source dataset typically leads to performance collapse. Recent studies perform data filtering from the perspective of dynamics alignment or value alignment to enable efficient policy transfer. However, these studies are typically validated on single-domain or single-behavior-policy source datasets. In this work, we explore a more general heterogeneous cross-domain offline RL setting, where the source datasets may be collected from multiple source domains by diverse behavior policies. We first uncover a critical yet overlooked issue in this setting: value misassignment. Empirically and theoretically, we demonstrate that value misassignment can undermine value alignment, mislead data filtering toward selecting suboptimal samples, and loosen the suboptimality gap, thereby degrading the agent's performance. To address this issue, we propose V2A, which integrates dynamics alignment, value alignment, and value assignment. V2A first employs temporally-consistent modality representation learning to extract dynamics modalities from the source dataset, followed by modality-aware advantage learning to rectify value alignment. Finally, it adopts a data filtering paradigm to selectively share source data for policy learning. Empirical results show that V2A significantly outperforms strong baseline methods under general heterogeneous cross-domain offline RL settings.

When Brain Networks Travel: Learning Beyond Site

Graph-based learning on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has shown strong potential for brain network analysis. However, existing methods degrade under cross-site out-of-distribution (OOD) settings because site-conditioned confounders induce non-pathological shortcuts, while functional connectivity constructed by temporal averaging obscures transient neurodynamics, limiting generalization to unseen sites. In this paper, we propose Cross-site OOD Robust brain nEtwork (CORE), a unified framework for brain network learning across unseen sites. CORE first performs site-aware confounder decoupling to mitigate site-conditioned bias and extract a cross-site population scaffold of reproducible diagnostic connectivity edges. It then profiles transient pathway dynamics over this scaffold using lightweight temporal descriptors and organizes scaffold edges into a line graph for transferable pathway-level modeling. Finally, CORE introduces a prior-guided subject-adaptive gating mechanism that leverages scaffold-derived population priors while preserving subject-specific connectivity variability. Extensive experiments under leave-one-site-out evaluation on real-world datasets (ABIDE, REST-meta-MDD, SRPBS, and ABCD) show that CORE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, with up to 6.7% relative gain. Furthermore, CORE remains robust to atlas variations, maintaining performance gains across different brain parcellation schemes.

Unified Precision-Guaranteed Stopping Rules for Contextual Learning

Contextual learning seeks to learn a decision policy that maps an individual's characteristics to an action through data collection. In operations management, such data may come from various sources, and a central question is when data collection can stop while still guaranteeing that the learned policy is sufficiently accurate. We study this question under two precision criteria: a context-wise criterion and an aggregate policy-value criterion. We develop unified stopping rules for contextual learning with unknown sampling variances in both unstructured and structured linear settings. Our approach is based on generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) statistics for pairwise action comparisons. To calibrate the corresponding sequential boundaries, we derive new time-uniform deviation inequalities that directly control the self-normalized GLR evidence and thus avoid the conservativeness caused by decoupling mean and variance uncertainty. Under the Gaussian sampling model, we establish finite-sample precision guarantees for both criteria. Numerical experiments on synthetic instances and two case studies demonstrate that the proposed stopping rules achieve the target precision with substantially fewer samples than benchmark methods. The proposed framework provides a practical way to determine when enough information has been collected in personalized decision problems. It applies across multiple data-collection environments, including historical datasets, simulation models, and real systems, enabling practitioners to reduce unnecessary sampling while maintaining a desired level of decision quality.

Adaptive Simulation Experiment for LLM Policy Optimization

Large language models (LLMs) have significant potential to improve operational efficiency in operations management. Deploying these models requires specifying a policy that governs response quality, shapes user experience, and influences operational value. In this research, we treat LLMs as stochastic simulators and propose a pairwise comparison-based adaptive simulation experiment framework for identifying the optimal policy from a finite set of candidates. We consider two policy spaces: an unstructured space with no parametric assumption, and a structured space in which the data are generated from a preference model. For both settings, we characterize the fundamental data requirements for identifying the optimal policy with high probability. In the unstructured case, we derive a closed-form expression for the optimal sampling proportions, together with a clear operational interpretation. In the structured case, we formulate a regularized convex program to compute the optimal proportions. We then develop an adaptive experimental procedure, termed LLM-PO, for both policy spaces, and prove that it identifies the optimal policy with the desired statistical guarantee while asymptotically attaining the fundamental data requirements. Numerical experiments demonstrate that LLM-PO consistently outperforms benchmark methods and improves LLM performance.

DSBD: Dual-Aligned Structural Basis Distillation for Graph Domain Adaptation

Graph domain adaptation (GDA) aims to transfer knowledge from a labeled source graph to an unlabeled target graph under distribution shifts. However, existing methods are largely feature-centric and overlook structural discrepancies, which become particularly detrimental under significant topology shifts. Such discrepancies alter both geometric relationships and spectral properties, leading to unreliable transfer of graph neural networks (GNNs). To address this limitation, we propose Dual-Aligned Structural Basis Distillation (DSBD) for GDA, a novel framework that explicitly models and adapts cross-domain structural variation. DSBD constructs a differentiable structural basis by synthesizing continuous probabilistic prototype graphs, enabling gradient-based optimization over graph topology. The basis is learned under source-domain supervision to preserve semantic discriminability, while being explicitly aligned to the target domain through a dual-alignment objective. Specifically, geometric consistency is enforced via permutation-invariant topological moment matching, and spectral consistency is achieved through Dirichlet energy calibration, jointly capturing structural characteristics across domains. Furthermore, we introduce a decoupled inference paradigm that mitigates source-specific structural bias by training a new GNN on the distilled structural basis. Extensive experiments on graph and image benchmarks demonstrate that DSBD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

On the Reliability Limits of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Planning

This technical note studies the reliability limits of LLM-based multi-agent planning as a delegated decision problem. We model the LLM-based multi-agent architecture as a finite acyclic decision network in which multiple stages process shared model-context information, communicate through language interfaces with limited capacity, and may invoke human review. We show that, without new exogenous signals, any delegated network is decision-theoretically dominated by a centralized Bayes decision maker with access to the same information. In the common-evidence regime, this implies that optimizing over multi-agent directed acyclic graphs under a finite communication budget can be recast as choosing a budget-constrained stochastic experiment on the shared signal. We also characterize the loss induced by communication and information compression. Under proper scoring rules, the gap between the centralized Bayes value and the value after communication admits an expected posterior divergence representation, which reduces to conditional mutual information under logarithmic loss and to expected squared posterior error under the Brier score. These results characterize the fundamental reliability limits of delegated LLM planning. Experiments with LLMs on a controlled problem set further demonstrate these characterizations.

Designing Service Systems from Textual Evidence

Designing service systems requires selecting among alternative configurations -- choosing the best chatbot variant, the optimal routing policy, or the most effective quality control procedure. In many service systems, the primary evidence of performance quality is textual -- customer support transcripts, complaint narratives, compliance review reports -- rather than the scalar measurements assumed by classical optimization methods. Large language models (LLMs) can read such textual evidence and produce standardized quality scores, but these automated judges exhibit systematic biases that vary across alternatives and evaluation instances. Human expert review remains accurate but costly. We study how to identify the best service configuration with high confidence while minimizing expensive human audits, given that automated evaluation is cheap but biased. We formalize this as a sequential decision problem where a biased proxy score is observed for every evaluation, and a verified outcome can be acquired selectively at additional cost. We prove that LLM-only selection fails under arm-dependent bias, and that naive selective-audit estimators can be asymptotically biased. We develop an estimator combining proxy scores with inverse-propensity-weighted residuals and construct anytime-valid confidence sequences. Our algorithm, PP-LUCB, jointly decides which alternatives to evaluate and whether to request human audits, concentrating reviews where the LLM judge is least reliable. We prove correctness and establish instance-dependent cost bounds showing near-optimal efficiency. On a customer support ticket classification task, our algorithm correctly identifies the best model in 40/40 trials while achieving 90\% audit cost reduction.

Model-based Offline RL via Robust Value-Aware Model Learning with Implicitly Differentiable Adaptive Weighting

Model-based offline reinforcement learning (RL) aims to enhance offline RL with a dynamics model that facilitates policy exploration. However, \textit{model exploitation} could occur due to inevitable model errors, degrading algorithm performance. Adversarial model learning offers a theoretical framework to mitigate model exploitation by solving a maximin formulation. Within such a paradigm, RAMBO~\citep{rigter2022rambo} has emerged as a representative and most popular method that provides a practical implementation with model gradient. However, we empirically reveal that severe Q-value underestimation and gradient explosion can occur in RAMBO with only slight hyperparameter tuning, suggesting that it tends to be overly conservative and suffers from unstable model updates. To address these issues, we propose \textbf{RO}bust value-aware \textbf{M}odel learning with \textbf{I}mplicitly differentiable adaptive weighting (ROMI). Instead of updating the dynamics model with model gradient, ROMI introduces a novel robust value-aware model learning approach. This approach requires the dynamics model to predict future states with values close to the minimum Q-value within a scale-adjustable state uncertainty set, enabling controllable conservatism and stable model updates. To further improve out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization during multi-step rollouts, we propose implicitly differentiable adaptive weighting, a bi-level optimization scheme that adaptively achieves dynamics- and value-aware model learning. Empirical results on D4RL and NeoRL datasets show that ROMI significantly outperforms RAMBO and achieves competitive or superior performance compared to other state-of-the-art methods on datasets where RAMBO typically underperforms. Code is available at https://github.com/zq2r/ROMI.git.

SkillCraft: Can LLM Agents Learn to Use Tools Skillfully?

Real-world tool-using agents operate over long-horizon workflows with recurring structure and diverse demands, where effective behavior requires not only invoking atomic tools but also abstracting, and reusing higher-level tool compositions. However, existing benchmarks mainly measure instance-level success under static tool sets, offering limited insight into agents' ability to acquire such reusable skills. We address this gap by introducing SkillCraft, a benchmark explicitly stress-test agent ability to form and reuse higher-level tool compositions, where we call Skills. SkillCraft features realistic, highly compositional tool-use scenarios with difficulty scaled along both quantitative and structural dimensions, designed to elicit skill abstraction and cross-task reuse. We further propose a lightweight evaluation protocol that enables agents to auto-compose atomic tools into executable Skills, cache and reuse them inside and across tasks, thereby improving efficiency while accumulating a persistent library of reusable skills. Evaluating state-of-the-art agents on SkillCraft, we observe substantial efficiency gains, with token usage reduced by up to 80% by skill saving and reuse. Moreover, success rate strongly correlates with tool composition ability at test time, underscoring compositional skill acquisition as a core capability.