Advancing Geometric Problem Solving: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Model Evaluation

In this work, we present the MM-MATH dataset, a novel benchmark developed to rigorously evaluate the performance of advanced large language and multimodal models - including but not limited to GPT-4, GPT-4V, and Claude - within the domain of geometric computation. This dataset comprises 5,929 meticulously crafted geometric problems, each paired with a corresponding image, aimed at mirroring the complexity and requirements typical of ninth-grade mathematics. The motivation behind MM-MATH stems from the burgeoning interest and significant strides in multimodal technology, which necessitates a paradigm shift in assessment methodologies from mere outcome analysis to a more holistic evaluation encompassing reasoning and procedural correctness. Despite impressive gains in various benchmark performances, our analysis uncovers a persistent and notable deficiency in these models' ability to parse and interpret geometric information accurately from images, accounting for over 60% of observed errors. By deploying a dual-focused evaluation approach, examining both the end results and the underlying problem-solving processes, we unearthed a marked discrepancy between the capabilities of current multimodal models and human-level proficiency. The introduction of MM-MATH represents a tripartite contribution to the field: it not only serves as a comprehensive and challenging benchmark for assessing geometric problem-solving prowess but also illuminates critical gaps in textual and visual comprehension that current models exhibit. Through this endeavor, we aspire to catalyze further research and development aimed at bridging these gaps, thereby advancing the state of multimodal model capabilities to new heights.

Reverse That Number! Decoding Order Matters in Arithmetic Learning

Recent advancements in pretraining have demonstrated that modern Large Language Models (LLMs) possess the capability to effectively learn arithmetic operations. However, despite acknowledging the significance of digit order in arithmetic computation, current methodologies predominantly rely on sequential, step-by-step approaches for teaching LLMs arithmetic, resulting in a conclusion where obtaining better performance involves fine-grained step-by-step. Diverging from this conventional path, our work introduces a novel strategy that not only reevaluates the digit order by prioritizing output from the least significant digit but also incorporates a step-by-step methodology to substantially reduce complexity. We have developed and applied this method in a comprehensive set of experiments. Compared to the previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) method, our findings reveal an overall improvement of in accuracy while requiring only a third of the tokens typically used during training. For the purpose of facilitating replication and further research, we have made our code and dataset publicly available at \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RAIT-9FB7/}.

KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models

The unprecedented performance of large language models (LLMs) necessitates improvements in evaluations. Rather than merely exploring the breadth of LLM abilities, we believe meticulous and thoughtful designs are essential to thorough, unbiased, and applicable evaluations. Given the importance of world knowledge to LLMs, we construct a Knowledge-oriented LLM Assessment benchmark (KoLA), in which we carefully design three crucial factors: (1) For ability modeling, we mimic human cognition to form a four-level taxonomy of knowledge-related abilities, covering $19$ tasks. (2) For data, to ensure fair comparisons, we use both Wikipedia, a corpus prevalently pre-trained by LLMs, along with continuously collected emerging corpora, aiming to evaluate the capacity to handle unseen data and evolving knowledge. (3) For evaluation criteria, we adopt a contrastive system, including overall standard scores for better numerical comparability across tasks and models and a unique self-contrast metric for automatically evaluating knowledge hallucination. We evaluate $21$ open-source and commercial LLMs and obtain some intriguing findings. The KoLA dataset and open-participation leaderboard are publicly released at https://kola.xlore.cn and will be continuously updated to provide references for developing LLMs and knowledge-related systems.

GLM-Dialog: Noise-tolerant Pre-training for Knowledge-grounded Dialogue Generation

We present GLM-Dialog, a large-scale language model (LLM) with 10B parameters capable of knowledge-grounded conversation in Chinese using a search engine to access the Internet knowledge. GLM-Dialog offers a series of applicable techniques for exploiting various external knowledge including both helpful and noisy knowledge, enabling the creation of robust knowledge-grounded dialogue LLMs with limited proper datasets. To evaluate the GLM-Dialog more fairly, we also propose a novel evaluation method to allow humans to converse with multiple deployed bots simultaneously and compare their performance implicitly instead of explicitly rating using multidimensional metrics.Comprehensive evaluations from automatic to human perspective demonstrate the advantages of GLM-Dialog comparing with existing open source Chinese dialogue models. We release both the model checkpoint and source code, and also deploy it as a WeChat application to interact with users. We offer our evaluation platform online in an effort to prompt the development of open source models and reliable dialogue evaluation systems. The additional easy-to-use toolkit that consists of short text entity linking, query generation, and helpful knowledge classification is also released to enable diverse applications. All the source code is available on Github.