AECNav: Active Evidence Consolidation for Efficient Zero-Shot Open-Vocabulary Object Navigation

Zero-shot object-goal navigation (ZSON) in open-vocabulary scenarios is challenging, as it requires a robot to locate an arbitrarily specified object in an unseen environment without task-specific training. Currently, the task still suffers from high latency and limited accuracy due to redundant perception pipelines and insufficient evidence for reliable target confirmation. In this letter, we reframe ZSON as an evidence-driven perception-to-decision problem and present AECNav, a training-free pipeline built on three components: i) Evidence-gated perception, which utilizes a shared encoding across all reasoning stages to establish a unified semantic basis and eliminate redundant computations; ii) Evidence consolidation, which aggregates detections into cluster-level log-odds beliefs. This explicitly separates genuine target support from the false confidence of visually similar distractors, while treating the absence of expected detections as negative evidence; and iii) Active evidence acquisition, which sustains productive exploration under weak semantic cues by selecting frontiers that maximize information gain at minimal traversal cost. As a result, AECNav significantly outperforms previous methods and achieves state-of-the-art success rates of 84.7%, 57.3%, and 51.3% on HM3D-v2, HM3D-OVON, and MP3D, respectively, with substantially lower inference overhead, and attains 95% success across 40 trials on a physical quadruped robot at roughly 5Hz. Code will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

DexTele: A Dual-Arm Dexterous Teleoperation System Based on Motion Retargeting and Adaptive Force Control

In dual-arm dexterous teleoperation, cross-platform generalization of motion retargeting and interactivity of grasping are crucial. However, the heterogeneity of robotic architectures and the wide variety of grasping objects pose significant challenges to achieving precise motion retargeting and compliant grasping in dual-arm dexterous teleoperation. To address these challenges, a dual-arm dexterous teleoperation system (DexTele) is proposed based on motion retargeting and adaptive force control. First, a vision-based motion retargeting module is designed to generate preliminary robot motions from human images. In this module, a motion-graph encoder and latent optimization are proposed for precise and convenient cross-platform motion retargeting. Second, an adaptive grasping module is designed to achieve compliant grasping. This module combines a vision-language model (VLM) with model predictive control (MPC), allowing the system to predict the required grasping force for a target object and perform gradient-based online optimization. Finally, extensive experiments demonstrate that the DexTele achieves precise motion retargeting and compliant grasping with generalization across multiple robot platforms.

ObjRetarget: An Object-Aware Motion Retargeting Framework with Anthropomorphic Arm Constraints and Polyhedral Hand Modeling

Learning robot dexterous manipulation from human manipulation videos requires reliably retargeting human intent to executable robot actions while maintaining stable hand-object contact, which remains a key challenge in embodied intelligence. Existing retargeting methods often ignore explicit contact modeling or rely on reinforcement learning, resulting in limited accuracy and generalization. To address this, we propose ObjRetarget, a human-to-robot motion retargeting framework for learning robot dexterous manipulation from human videos, which integrates anthropomorphic arm trajectory constraints with structured hand-object geometric modeling. For arm motion, reference trajectories extracted from human videos are used for initialization, followed by anthropomorphic constraints and redundancy-aware optimization to generate natural and accurate movements. For hand manipulation, ObjRetarget represents multi-finger contacts using polytope clusters and preserves contact structure through geometric invariants to improve stability. Experiments on real robots show that ObjRetarget improves manipulation success rates and contact stability across multiple dexterous tasks, and generalizes well to different demonstrations, object poses, and task settings.

OpenSafeIntent: Evaluating Intent-Calibrated Safe Completion Across Dual-Use Prompt Sets

Safe completion requires models to provide useful assistance without enabling harm, but this behavior is difficult to evaluate with isolated prompts. We introduce OpenSafeIntent, a benchmark of controlled prompt-sets that vary intent while holding the underlying task fixed. Each datapoint contains benign, dual-use, and malicious variants of the same task. This design lets us evaluate whether models calibrate assistance across intent shifts, rather than merely appearing safe on average. Across a broad model suite, we find that prompt-level safety hides important failures: models often fail to remain safe across matched intent variants, dual-use behavior is brittle under paraphrase, high-level answers on risky topics are not reliably safe, and responses that reframe ambiguous requests into safer tasks are substantially less likely to cross the safety boundary. Our results suggest that safe completion should be evaluated as intent-calibrated behavior over controlled task variants, not as a single safety-helpfulness tradeoff over independent prompts.

Test-Time Training with Next-Token Prediction

Next-token prediction is the self-supervised signal that trains language models, and every observed prompt token provides the same signal at test time. We study whether this signal can define the inner-loop objective for test-time training (TTT) in pretrained long-context language models. Many TTT architectures require models to be trained with test-time adaptation in mind, limiting their direct applicability to released LLM checkpoints. While recent in-place TTT methods make fast-weight adaptation possible for pretrained LLMs without redesigning the backbone, they leave a central question unresolved: what should each test-time write store? Existing recipes train the fast weight to match a learned local value proxy but they are not directly tied to the self-supervised next-token prediction signal. We introduce Test-Time Training with Next-Token Prediction (TTT-NTP), a drop-in fast-weight adaptation method for pretrained LLMs that instead supervises updates using the model's own next contextual hidden state. This makes each local write follow the same causal computation that supports next-token prediction: the value target is a pointwise linear projection of a single next-position contextual state. On RULER Full-13 (averaged over 4k, 8k, 16k, and 32k context lengths), TTT-NTP is the only method that consistently improves the released backbone across four models spanning three families and a 0.6--8B size range: Llama-3.1-8B (+3.9), Mistral-7B-v0.3 (+3.0), and the Qwen3 series (Qwen3-4B +4.1, Qwen3-0.6B +2.9). On the real-world LongBench-v2 long-document QA benchmark, TTT-NTP improves over the base model on both Llama-3.1-8B (+5.6) and Mistral-7B-v0.3 (+3.7), while preserving commonsense and knowledge performance.

PaSBench-Video: A Streaming Video Benchmark for Proactive Safety Warning

Between the first visible sign of danger and the moment an accident occurs, there is often a window where intervention remains possible. Video-capable multimodal large language models (MLLMs) could serve as always-on safety monitors that issue warnings during this window. Yet current benchmarks do not test this ability: they rely on static inputs, ignore timing precision, and omit false-positive measurement on safe scenes. We present PaSBench-Video, a 740-video benchmark with 481 risk and 259 no-risk videos across four domains: driving, healthcare, daily life, and industrial production. Risk videos are annotated with frame-level risk onset and accident boundaries. A model must observe the video causally and produce a warning that is both temporally calibrated and content-correct. Testing 13 MLLMs, we find that no model exceeds 20.0% on our strictest metric, and recall is tightly coupled with false-positive rate, with Pearson correlation 0.64: higher detection comes only at the cost of triggering warnings on the majority of safe clips. Performance splits sharply by domain: models achieve moderate recall at low false-positive rates in daily life, where risks are inherently anomalous, yet fire indiscriminately in driving, where routine and hazardous scenes look alike. These results indicate that current models rely on scene-level activity cues rather than reasoning about emerging harm.

CodeClinic: Evaluating Automation of Coding Skills for Clinical Reasoning Agents

Clinical reasoning agents based on large language models (LLMs) aim to automate tasks such as intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring and patient state tracking from electronic health records (EHRs). Existing systems typically rely on manually curated clinical tools or skills for concepts such as sepsis detection and organ failure assessment. However, maintaining these tool libraries requires substantial expert effort, while zero-shot querying or code generation often produces inefficient and unreliable reasoning chains, especially under institution-specific clinical policies. We introduce CodeClinic, a benchmark built on MIMIC-IV for evaluating whether LLM agents can synthesize and compose reusable clinical skills instead of relying on fixed toolboxes. The benchmark contains two complementary tasks: longitudinal ICU surveillance and compositional information seeking. The longitudinal setting simulates monitoring patient trajectories with structured decisions every four hours across 25 findings and eight clinical families, while the compositional setting spans 63k instances across 259 tasks in nine domains and is stratified by compositional dependency depth to evaluate increasingly complex multi-step reasoning. We further propose an offline autoformalization pipeline that converts natural-language clinical guidelines into reusable and verified Python skill libraries through iterative LLM refinement. Compared with zero-shot code generation, the resulting libraries improve consistency while reducing per-query token usage by up to 40%.

Correct Is Not Enough: Training Reasoning Planners with Executor-Grounded Rewards

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has become a common way to improve explicit reasoning in large language models, but final-answer correctness alone does not reveal whether the reasoning trace is faithful, reliable, or useful to the model that consumes it. This outcome-only signal can reinforce traces that are right for the wrong reasons, overstate reasoning gains by rewarding shortcuts, and propagate flawed intermediate states in multi-step systems. To this end, we propose TraceLift, a planner-executor training framework that treats reasoning as a consumable intermediate artifact. During planner training, the planner emits tagged reasoning. A frozen executor turns this reasoning into the final artifact for verifier feedback, while an executor-grounded reward shapes the intermediate trace. This reward multiplies a rubric-based Reasoning Reward Model (RM) score by measured uplift on the same frozen executor, crediting traces that are both high-quality and useful. To make reasoning quality directly learnable, we introduce TRACELIFT-GROUPS, a rubric-annotated reason-only dataset built from math and code seed problems. Each example is a same-problem group containing a high-quality reference trace and multiple plausible flawed traces with localized perturbations that reduce reasoning quality or solution support while preserving task relevance. Extensive experiments on code and math benchmarks show that this executor-grounded reasoning reward improves the two-stage planner-executor system over execution-only training, suggesting that reasoning supervision should evaluate not only whether a trace looks good, but also whether it helps the model that consumes it.

When Safety Fails Before the Answer: Benchmarking Harmful Behavior Detection in Reasoning Chains

Large reasoning models (LRMs) produce complex, multi-step reasoning traces, yet safety evaluation remains focused on final outputs, overlooking how harm emerges during reasoning. When jailbroken, harm does not appear instantaneously but unfolds through distinct behavioral steps such as suppressing refusal, rationalizing compliance, decomposing harmful tasks, and concealing risk. However, no existing benchmark captures this process at sentence-level granularity within reasoning traces -- a key step toward reliable safety monitoring, interventions, and systematic failure diagnosis. To address this gap, we introduce HarmThoughts, a benchmark for step-wise safety evaluation of reasoning traces. \ourdataset is built on our proposed harm taxonomy of 16 harmful reasoning behaviors across four functional groups that characterize how harm propagates rather than what harm is produced. The dataset consists of 56,931 sentences from 1,018 reasoning traces generated by four model families, each annotated with fine-grained sentence-level behavioral labels. Using HarmThoughts, we analyze harm propagation patterns across reasoning traces, identifying common behavioral trajectories and drift points where reasoning transitions from safe to unsafe. Finally, we systematically compare white-box and black-box detectors on the task of identifying harmful reasoning behaviours on HarmThoughts. Our results show that existing detectors struggle with fine-grained behavior detection in reasoning traces, particularly for nuanced categories within harm emergence and execution, highlighting a critical gap in process-level safety monitoring. HarmThoughts is available publicly at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ishitakakkar-10/HarmThoughts

From Heads to Neurons: Causal Attribution and Steering in Multi-Task Vision-Language Models

Recent work has increasingly explored neuron-level interpretation in vision-language models (VLMs) to identify neurons critical to final predictions. However, existing neuron analyses generally focus on single tasks, limiting the comparability of neuron importance across tasks. Moreover, ranking strategies tend to score neurons in isolation, overlooking how task-dependent information pathways shape the write-in effects of feed-forward network (FFN) neurons. This oversight can exacerbate neuron polysemanticity in multi-task settings, introducing noise into the identification and intervention of task-critical neurons. In this study, we propose HONES (Head-Oriented Neuron Explanation & Steering), a gradient-free framework for task-aware neuron attribution and steering in multi-task VLMs. HONES ranks FFN neurons by their causal write-in contributions conditioned on task-relevant attention heads, and further modulates salient neurons via lightweight scaling. Experiments on four diverse multimodal tasks and two popular VLMs show that HONES outperforms existing methods in identifying task-critical neurons and improves model performance after steering. Our source code is released at: https://github.com/petergit1/HONES.