Abstract:Post-training with evaluator feedback on policy-induced samples serves as a major mechanism for improving large language models. As policies improve, these sampled responses become close in quality. These close candidates create a bottleneck for policy optimization: collapsed relative evaluator score gaps yield weak or misleading policy supervision. We theoretically characterize why these gaps matter through a probability allocation view, showing that the directional gain of shifting probability mass from one response to another is exactly the evaluator score gap between them. This identifies relative score gaps as the policy optimization signals that guide updates. Motivated by this view, we propose DynamicRubric, a response-set-conditioned evaluator--policy co-evolution framework that generates weighted binary rubric items for each candidate set and aggregates the resulting judgments into response-level scores. In our experiments with 8B backbones, DynamicRubric improves evaluator performance and provides stronger policy supervision than baselines using a 70B reward model or a 235B static rubric generator. DynamicRubric-optimized policies also show gains on verifiable reasoning and coding tasks. A DynamicRubric-optimized model is fully deployed in WeChat Search's AI answering scenario, where it serves all online traffic across tens of millions of requests per day and improves key online metrics. These results suggest a principle for evaluator-guided post-training: evaluators should evolve with the policies they supervise.
Abstract:Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is a default recipe for process-supervised reinforcement learning of LLM reasoners, and dense process supervision -- via learned process reward models (PRMs) or on-policy-distillation KL signals -- is a common way to densify its otherwise weak outcome reward. Layering such a step-level signal on top of GRPO's group-standardized advantage, however, exposes three structural pathologies: \emph{channel contamination} between the pooled process, outcome, and format streams at group standardization; \emph{resolution mismatch} between the granularity of the process signal and the granularity of the logical decisions being credited; and a \emph{cumulative trap} by which GRPO's return-to-go sum surfaces either length inflation or truncated exploration depending on the sign regime of the signal. We propose \textbf{PASS} (\emph{Process Advantage Signal Shaping}), a compact middleware that sits between any scalar step-level process signal and GRPO's clipped surrogate and addresses the three pathologies in turn: \emph{Advantage Fusion} standardizes the three streams independently within each group, \emph{Chunk-by-Value} derives value-homogeneous chunks from the signal itself and broadcasts credit within each chunk, and \emph{Divide-Length} converts the cumulative objective into an average-value-density score. We validate PASS across two domains and two process-signal paradigms -- a learned PRM on mathematical reasoning and an on-policy-distillation KL signal (with a generalized variant) on multi-hop question answering -- and under two group-standardization operators. In every regime PASS delivers a consistent pass@1 gain over the corresponding GRPO baseline.
Abstract:Critic-free methods like GRPO reduce memory demands by estimating advantages from multiple rollouts but tend to converge slowly, as critical learning signals are diluted by an abundance of uninformative samples and tokens. To tackle this challenge, we propose the \textbf{Dynamic Dual-Level Down-Sampling (D$^3$S)} framework that prioritizes the most informative samples and tokens across groups to improve the efficient of policy optimization. D$^3$S operates along two levels: (1) the sample-level, which selects a subset of rollouts to maximize advantage variance ($\text{Var}(A)$). We theoretically proven that this selection is positively correlated with the upper bound of the policy gradient norms, yielding higher policy gradients. (2) the token-level, which prioritizes tokens with a high product of advantage magnitude and policy entropy ($|A_{i,t}|\times H_{i,t}$), focusing updates on tokens where the policy is both uncertain and impactful. Moreover, to prevent overfitting to high-signal data, D$^3$S employs a dynamic down-sampling schedule inspired by curriculum learning. This schedule starts with aggressive down-sampling to accelerate early learning and gradually relaxes to promote robust generalization. Extensive experiments on Qwen2.5 and Llama3.1 demonstrate that integrating D$^3$S into advanced RL algorithms achieves state-of-the-art performance and generalization while requiring \textit{fewer} samples and tokens across diverse reasoning benchmarks. Our code is added in the supplementary materials and will be made publicly available.
Abstract:Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become an increasingly popular paradigm for training large language models (LLMs) and diffusion models. While existing RLHF training systems have enabled significant progress, they often face challenges in scaling to multi-modal and diffusion workflows and adapting to dynamic workloads. In particular, current approaches may encounter limitations in controller scalability, flexible resource placement, and efficient orchestration when handling complex RLHF pipelines, especially in scenarios involving dynamic sampling or generative reward modeling. In this paper, we present \textbf{G-Core}, a simple, scalable, and balanced RLHF training framework designed to address these challenges. G-Core introduces a parallel controller programming model, enabling flexible and efficient orchestration of complex RLHF workflows without the bottlenecks of a single centralized controller. Furthermore, we propose a dynamic placement schema that adaptively partitions resources and schedules workloads, significantly reducing hardware idle time and improving utilization, even under highly variable training conditions. G-Core has successfully trained models that support WeChat product features serving a large-scale user base, demonstrating its effectiveness and robustness in real-world scenarios. Our results show that G-Core advances the state of the art in RLHF training, providing a solid foundation for future research and deployment of large-scale, human-aligned models.
Abstract:Process reward models (PRMs) provide more nuanced supervision compared to outcome reward models (ORMs) for optimizing policy models, positioning them as a promising approach to enhancing the capabilities of LLMs in complex reasoning tasks. Recent efforts have advanced PRMs from step-level to token-level granularity by integrating reward modeling into the training of generative models, with reward scores derived from token generation probabilities. However, the conflict between generative language modeling and reward modeling may introduce instability and lead to inaccurate credit assignments. To address this challenge, we revisit token-level reward assignment by decoupling reward modeling from language generation and derive a token-level reward model through the optimization of a discriminative policy, termed the Q-function Reward Model (Q-RM). We theoretically demonstrate that Q-RM explicitly learns token-level Q-functions from preference data without relying on fine-grained annotations. In our experiments, Q-RM consistently outperforms all baseline methods across various benchmarks. For example, when integrated into PPO/REINFORCE algorithms, Q-RM enhances the average Pass@1 score by 5.85/4.70 points on mathematical reasoning tasks compared to the ORM baseline, and by 4.56/5.73 points compared to the token-level PRM counterpart. Moreover, reinforcement learning with Q-RM significantly enhances training efficiency, achieving convergence 12 times faster than ORM on GSM8K and 11 times faster than step-level PRM on MATH. Code and data are available at https://github.com/homzer/Q-RM.




Abstract:Conversational information seeking (CIS) is playing an increasingly important role in connecting people to information. Due to the lack of suitable resource, previous studies on CIS are limited to the study of theoretical/conceptual frameworks, laboratory-based user studies, or a particular aspect of CIS (e.g., asking clarifying questions). In this work, we make efforts to facilitate research on CIS from three aspects. (1) We formulate a pipeline for CIS with six sub-tasks: intent detection (ID), keyphrase extraction (KE), action prediction (AP), query selection (QS), passage selection (PS), and response generation (RG). (2) We release a benchmark dataset, called wizard of search engine (WISE), which allows for comprehensive and in-depth research on all aspects of CIS. (3) We design a neural architecture capable of training and evaluating both jointly and separately on the six sub-tasks, and devise a pre-train/fine-tune learning scheme, that can reduce the requirements of WISE in scale by making full use of available data. We report some useful characteristics of CIS based on statistics of WISE. We also show that our best performing model variant isable to achieve effective CIS as indicated by several metrics. We release the dataset, the code, as well as the evaluation scripts to facilitate future research by measuring further improvements in this important research direction.