Autonomous FAIR Digital Objects: From Passive Assertions to Active Knowledge

Scientific knowledge on the Web is published as passive assertions and cannot decide when to validate evidence, reconcile contradictions, or update confidence as findings accumulate. Curation depends on centralised middleware and institutional continuity, but when registries close, active stewardship stops even when data remain online. We advance the concept of Autonomous FAIR Digital Objects (aFDOs) from an abstract idea to an operational model, to offer a route from passive scientific publication toward accountable, standards-aligned automation that can outlive its publishing institutions. aFDO augments FDOs with three capabilities anchored in Semantic Web standards, namely 1) a policy layer over RDF-star aligned with PROV-O, SHACL, and ODRL for portable condition-action rules, 2) an announcement layer over ActivityStreams 2.0 that bounds per-announcement evaluation cost, and 3) an agreement layer that resolves multi-source contradictions through reputation and confidence weighted agreement under a bounded adversarial model. We provide a formal definition that distinguishes policy specifications, event handlers, and communication interfaces. We evaluate an open reference implementation on 4,305 FDOs grounded in rare-disease ontologies, namely ClinVar, HPO, and Orphanet, combined with controlled synthetic observations. The consensus mechanism resolves 56.3% of 3,914 naturally occurring ClinVar conflicts where multiple submitters disagree and an expert panel has subsequently adjudicated. Under Sybil, collusion, and poisoning attacks, the mechanism degrades gracefully within its design Byzantine-tolerance bound (f < n/5), and fails as predicted beyond that bound.

Enhancing RL Generalizability in Robotics through SHAP Analysis of Algorithms and Hyperparameters

Despite significant advances in Reinforcement Learning (RL), model performance remains highly sensitive to algorithm and hyperparameter configurations, while generalization gaps across environments complicate real-world deployment. Although prior work has studied RL generalization, the relative contribution of specific configurations to the generalization gap has not been quantitatively decomposed and systematically leveraged for configuration selection. To address this limitation, we propose an explainable framework that evaluates RL performance across robotic environments using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify configuration impacts. We establish a theoretical foundation connecting Shapley values to generalizability, empirically analyze configuration impact patterns, and introduce SHAP-guided configuration selection to enhance generalization. Our results reveal distinct patterns across algorithms and hyperparameters, with consistent configuration impacts across diverse tasks and environments. By applying these insights to configuration selection, we achieve improved RL generalizability and provide actionable guidance for practitioners.

Federated Single-Agent Robotics: Multi-Robot Coordination Without Intra-Robot Multi-Agent Fragmentation

As embodied robots move toward fleet-scale operation, multi-robot coordination is becoming a central systems challenge. Existing approaches often treat this as motivation for increasing internal multi-agent decomposition within each robot. We argue for a different principle: multi-robot coordination does not require intra-robot multi-agent fragmentation. Each robot should remain a single embodied agent with its own persistent runtime, local policy scope, capability state, and recovery authority, while coordination emerges through federation across robots at the fleet level. We present Federated Single-Agent Robotics (FSAR), a runtime architecture for multi-robot coordination built on single-agent robot runtimes. Each robot exposes a governed capability surface rather than an internally fragmented agent society. Fleet coordination is achieved through shared capability registries, cross-robot task delegation, policy-aware authority assignment, trust-scoped interaction, and layered recovery protocols. We formalize key coordination relations including authority delegation, inter-robot capability requests, local-versus-fleet recovery boundaries, and hierarchical human supervision, and describe a fleet runtime architecture supporting shared Embodied Capability Module (ECM) discovery, contract-aware cross-robot coordination, and fleet-level governance. We evaluate FSAR on representative multi-robot coordination scenarios against decomposition-heavy baselines. Results show statistically significant gains in governance locality (d=2.91, p<.001 vs. centralized control) and recovery containment (d=4.88, p<.001 vs. decomposition-heavy), while reducing authority conflicts and policy violations across all scenarios. Our results support the view that the path from embodied agents to embodied fleets is better served by federation across coherent robot runtimes than by fragmentation within them.

EmbodiedGovBench: A Benchmark for Governance, Recovery, and Upgrade Safety in Embodied Agent Systems

Recent progress in embodied AI has produced a growing ecosystem of robot policies, foundation models, and modular runtimes. However, current evaluation remains dominated by task success metrics such as completion rate or manipulation accuracy. These metrics leave a critical gap: they do not measure whether embodied systems are governable -- whether they respect capability boundaries, enforce policies, recover safely, maintain audit trails, and respond to human oversight. We present EmbodiedGovBench, a benchmark for governance-oriented evaluation of embodied agent systems. Rather than asking only whether a robot can complete a task, EmbodiedGovBench evaluates whether the system remains controllable, policy-bounded, recoverable, auditable, and evolution-safe under realistic perturbations. The benchmark covers seven governance dimensions: unauthorized capability invocation, runtime drift robustness, recovery success, policy portability, version upgrade safety, human override responsiveness, and audit completeness. We define a benchmark structure spanning single-robot and fleet settings, with scenario templates, perturbation operators, governance metrics, and baseline evaluation protocols. We describe how the benchmark can be instantiated over embodied capability runtimes with modular interfaces and contract-aware upgrade workflows. Our analysis suggests that embodied governance should become a first-class evaluation target. EmbodiedGovBench provides the initial measurement framework for that shift.

ECM Contracts: Contract-Aware, Versioned, and Governable Capability Interfaces for Embodied Agents

Embodied agents increasingly rely on modular capabilities that can be installed, upgraded, composed, and governed at runtime. Prior work has introduced embodied capability modules (ECMs) as reusable units of embodied functionality, and recent research has explored their runtime governance and controlled evolution. However, a key systems question remains unresolved: how can ECMs be composed and released as a stable software ecosystem rather than as ad hoc skill bundles? We present ECM Contracts, a contract-based interface model for embodied capability modules. Unlike conventional software interfaces that specify only input and output types, ECM Contracts encode six dimensions essential for embodied execution: functional signature, behavioral assumptions, resource requirements, permission boundaries, recovery semantics, and version compatibility. Based on this model, we introduce a compatibility framework for ECM installation, composition, and upgrade, enabling static and pre-deployment checks for type mismatches, dependency conflicts, policy violations, resource contention, and recovery incompatibilities. We further propose a release discipline for embodied capabilities, including version-aware compatibility classes, deprecation rules, migration constraints, and policy-sensitive upgrade checks. We implement a prototype ECM registry, resolver, and contract checker, and evaluate the approach on modular embodied tasks in a robotics runtime setting. Results show that contract-aware composition substantially reduces unsafe or invalid module combinations, and that contract-guided release checks improve upgrade safety and rollback readiness compared with schema-only or ad hoc baselines. Our findings suggest that stable embodied software ecosystems require more than modular packaging: they require explicit contracts that connect capability composition, governance, and evolution.

Learning Without Losing Identity: Capability Evolution for Embodied Agents

Embodied agents are expected to operate persistently in dynamic physical environments, continuously acquiring new capabilities over time. Existing approaches to improving agent performance often rely on modifying the agent itself -- through prompt engineering, policy updates, or structural redesign -- leading to instability and loss of identity in long-lived systems. In this work, we propose a capability-centric evolution paradigm for embodied agents. We argue that a robot should maintain a persistent agent as its cognitive identity, while enabling continuous improvement through the evolution of its capabilities. Specifically, we introduce the concept of Embodied Capability Modules (ECMs), which represent modular, versioned units of embodied functionality that can be learned, refined, and composed over time. We present a unified framework in which capability evolution is decoupled from agent identity. Capabilities evolve through a closed-loop process involving task execution, experience collection, model refinement, and module updating, while all executions are governed by a runtime layer that enforces safety and policy constraints. We demonstrate through simulated embodied tasks that capability evolution improves task success rates from 32.4% to 91.3% over 20 iterations, outperforming both agent-modification baselines and established skill-learning methods (SPiRL, SkiMo), while preserving zero policy drift and zero safety violations. Our results suggest that separating agent identity from capability evolution provides a scalable and safe foundation for long-term embodied intelligence.

Governed Capability Evolution for Embodied Agents: Safe Upgrade, Compatibility Checking, and Runtime Rollback for Embodied Capability Modules

Embodied agents are increasingly expected to improve over time by updating their executable capabilities rather than rewriting the agent itself. Prior work has separately studied modular capability packaging, capability evolution, and runtime governance. However, a key systems problem remains underexplored: once an embodied capability module evolves into a new version, how can the hosting system deploy it safely without breaking policy constraints, execution assumptions, or recovery guarantees? We formulate governed capability evolution as a first-class systems problem for embodied agents. We propose a lifecycle-aware upgrade framework in which every new capability version is treated as a governed deployment candidate rather than an immediately executable replacement. The framework introduces four upgrade compatibility checks -- interface, policy, behavioral, and recovery -- and organizes them into a staged runtime pipeline comprising candidate validation, sandbox evaluation, shadow deployment, gated activation, online monitoring, and rollback. We evaluate over 6 rounds of capability upgrade with 15 random seeds. Naive upgrade achieves 72.9% task success but drives unsafe activation to 60% by the final round; governed upgrade retains comparable success (67.4%) while maintaining zero unsafe activations across all rounds (Wilcoxon p=0.003). Shadow deployment reveals 40% of regressions invisible to sandbox evaluation alone, and rollback succeeds in 79.8% of post-activation drift scenarios.

Harnessing Embodied Agents: Runtime Governance for Policy-Constrained Execution

Embodied agents are evolving from passive reasoning systems into active executors that interact with tools, robots, and physical environments. Once granted execution authority, the central challenge becomes how to keep actions governable at runtime. Existing approaches embed safety and recovery logic inside the agent loop, making execution control difficult to standardize, audit, and adapt. This paper argues that embodied intelligence requires not only stronger agents, but stronger runtime governance. We propose a framework for policy-constrained execution that separates agent cognition from execution oversight. Governance is externalized into a dedicated runtime layer performing policy checking, capability admission, execution monitoring, rollback handling, and human override. We formalize the control boundary among the embodied agent, Embodied Capability Modules (ECMs), and runtime governance layer, and validate through 1000 randomized simulation trials across three governance dimensions. Results show 96.2% interception of unauthorized actions, reduction of unsafe continuation from 100% to 22.2% under runtime drift, and 91.4% recovery success with full policy compliance, substantially outperforming all baselines (p<0.001). By reframing runtime governance as a first-class systems problem, this paper positions policy-constrained execution as a key design principle for embodied agent systems.

AEROS: A Single-Agent Operating Architecture with Embodied Capability Modules

Robotic systems lack a principled abstraction for organizing intelligence, capabilities, and execution in a unified manner. Existing approaches either couple skills within monolithic architectures or decompose functionality into loosely coordinated modules or multiple agents, often without a coherent model of identity and control authority. We argue that a robot should be modeled as a single persistent intelligent subject whose capabilities are extended through installable packages. We formalize this view as AEROS (Agent Execution Runtime Operating System), in which each robot corresponds to one persistent agent and capabilities are provided through Embodied Capability Modules (ECMs). Each ECM encapsulates executable skills, models, and tools, while execution constraints and safety guarantees are enforced by a policy-separated runtime. This separation enables modular extensibility, composable capability execution, and consistent system-level safety. We evaluate a reference implementation in PyBullet simulation with a Franka Panda 7-DOF manipulator across eight experiments covering re-planning, failure recovery, policy enforcement, baseline comparison, cross-task generality, ECM hot-swapping, ablation, and failure boundary analysis. Over 100 randomized trials per condition, AEROS achieves 100% task success across three tasks versus baselines (BehaviorTree.CPP-style and ProgPrompt-style at 92--93%, flat pipeline at 67--73%), the policy layer blocks all invalid actions with zero false acceptances, runtime benefits generalize across tasks without task-specific tuning, and ECMs load at runtime with 100% post-swap success.

RSGen: Enhancing Layout-Driven Remote Sensing Image Generation with Diverse Edge Guidance

Diffusion models have significantly mitigated the impact of annotated data scarcity in remote sensing (RS). Although recent approaches have successfully harnessed these models to enable diverse and controllable Layout-to-Image (L2I) synthesis, they still suffer from limited fine-grained control and fail to strictly adhere to bounding box constraints. To address these limitations, we propose RSGen, a plug-and-play framework that leverages diverse edge guidance to enhance layout-driven RS image generation. Specifically, RSGen employs a progressive enhancement strategy: 1) it first enriches the diversity of edge maps composited from retrieved training instances via Image-to-Image generation; and 2) subsequently utilizes these diverse edge maps as conditioning for existing L2I models to enforce pixel-level control within bounding boxes, ensuring the generated instances strictly adhere to the layout. Extensive experiments across three baseline models demonstrate that RSGen significantly boosts the capabilities of existing L2I models. For instance, with CC-Diff on the DOTA dataset for oriented object detection, we achieve remarkable gains of +9.8/+12.0 in YOLOScore mAP50/mAP50-95 and +1.6 in mAP on the downstream detection task. Our code will be publicly available: https://github.com/D-Robotics-AI-Lab/RSGen