Semi-Supervised Conformal Prediction With Unlabeled Nonconformity Score

Conformal prediction (CP) is a powerful framework for uncertainty quantification, providing prediction sets with coverage guarantees when calibrated on sufficient labeled data. However, in real-world applications where labeled data is often limited, standard CP can lead to coverage deviation and output overly large prediction sets. In this paper, we extend CP to the semi-supervised setting and propose SemiCP, leveraging both labeled data and unlabeled data for calibration. Specifically, we introduce a novel nonconformity score function, NNM, designed for unlabeled data. This function selects labeled data with similar pseudo-label scores to estimate nonconformity scores, integrating them into the calibration process to overcome sample size limitations. We theoretically demonstrate that, under mild assumptions, SemiCP provide asymptotically coverage guarantee for prediction sets. Extensive experiments further validate that our approach effectively reduces instability and inefficiency under limited calibration data, can be adapted to conditional coverage settings, and integrates seamlessly with existing CP methods.

Exploring Imbalanced Annotations for Effective In-Context Learning

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on downstream tasks through in-context learning (ICL), which heavily relies on the demonstrations selected from annotated datasets. Existing selection methods may hinge on the distribution of annotated datasets, which can often be long-tailed in real-world scenarios. In this work, we show that imbalanced class distributions in annotated datasets significantly degrade the performance of ICL across various tasks and selection methods. Moreover, traditional rebalance methods fail to ameliorate the issue of class imbalance in ICL. Our method is motivated by decomposing the distributional differences between annotated and test datasets into two-component weights: class-wise weights and conditional bias. The key idea behind our method is to estimate the conditional bias by minimizing the empirical error on a balanced validation dataset and to employ the two-component weights to modify the original scoring functions during selection. Our approach can prevent selecting too many demonstrations from a single class while preserving the effectiveness of the original selection methods. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, improving the average accuracy by up to 5.46 on common benchmarks with imbalanced datasets.

Parametric Scaling Law of Tuning Bias in Conformal Prediction

Conformal prediction is a popular framework of uncertainty quantification that constructs prediction sets with coverage guarantees. To uphold the exchangeability assumption, many conformal prediction methods necessitate an additional holdout set for parameter tuning. Yet, the impact of violating this principle on coverage remains underexplored, making it ambiguous in practical applications. In this work, we empirically find that the tuning bias - the coverage gap introduced by leveraging the same dataset for tuning and calibration, is negligible for simple parameter tuning in many conformal prediction methods. In particular, we observe the scaling law of the tuning bias: this bias increases with parameter space complexity and decreases with calibration set size. Formally, we establish a theoretical framework to quantify the tuning bias and provide rigorous proof for the scaling law of the tuning bias by deriving its upper bound. In the end, we discuss how to reduce the tuning bias, guided by the theories we developed.

ChineseSafe: A Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Safety in Large Language Models

With the rapid development of Large language models (LLMs), understanding the capabilities of LLMs in identifying unsafe content has become increasingly important. While previous works have introduced several benchmarks to evaluate the safety risk of LLMs, the community still has a limited understanding of current LLMs' capability to recognize illegal and unsafe content in Chinese contexts. In this work, we present a Chinese safety benchmark (ChineseSafe) to facilitate research on the content safety of large language models. To align with the regulations for Chinese Internet content moderation, our ChineseSafe contains 205,034 examples across 4 classes and 10 sub-classes of safety issues. For Chinese contexts, we add several special types of illegal content: political sensitivity, pornography, and variant/homophonic words. Moreover, we employ two methods to evaluate the legal risks of popular LLMs, including open-sourced models and APIs. The results reveal that many LLMs exhibit vulnerability to certain types of safety issues, leading to legal risks in China. Our work provides a guideline for developers and researchers to facilitate the safety of LLMs. Our results are also available at https://huggingface.co/spaces/SUSTech/ChineseSafe-Benchmark.

Fine-tuning can Help Detect Pretraining Data from Large Language Models

In the era of large language models (LLMs), detecting pretraining data has been increasingly important due to concerns about fair evaluation and ethical risks. Current methods differentiate members and non-members by designing scoring functions, like Perplexity and Min-k%. However, the diversity and complexity of training data magnifies the difficulty of distinguishing, leading to suboptimal performance in detecting pretraining data. In this paper, we first explore the benefits of unseen data, which can be easily collected after the release of the LLM. We find that the perplexities of LLMs perform differently for members and non-members, after fine-tuning with a small amount of previously unseen data. In light of this, we introduce a novel and effective method termed Fine-tuned Score Deviation (FSD), which improves the performance of current scoring functions for pretraining data detection. In particular, we propose to measure the deviation distance of current scores after fine-tuning on a small amount of unseen data within the same domain. In effect, using a few unseen data can largely decrease the scores of all non-members, leading to a larger deviation distance than members. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, significantly improving the AUC score on common benchmark datasets across various models.

Knowledge Distillation with Multi-granularity Mixture of Priors for Image Super-Resolution

Knowledge distillation (KD) is a promising yet challenging model compression technique that transfers rich learning representations from a well-performing but cumbersome teacher model to a compact student model. Previous methods for image super-resolution (SR) mostly compare the feature maps directly or after standardizing the dimensions with basic algebraic operations (e.g. average, dot-product). However, the intrinsic semantic differences among feature maps are overlooked, which are caused by the disparate expressive capacity between the networks. This work presents MiPKD, a multi-granularity mixture of prior KD framework, to facilitate efficient SR model through the feature mixture in a unified latent space and stochastic network block mixture. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed MiPKD method.

Enhanced Bayesian Personalized Ranking for Robust Hard Negative Sampling in Recommender Systems

In implicit collaborative filtering, hard negative mining techniques are developed to accelerate and enhance the recommendation model learning. However, the inadvertent selection of false negatives remains a major concern in hard negative sampling, as these false negatives can provide incorrect information and mislead the model learning. To date, only a small number of studies have been committed to solve the false negative problem, primarily focusing on designing sophisticated sampling algorithms to filter false negatives. In contrast, this paper shifts its focus to refining the loss function. We find that the original Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR), initially designed for uniform negative sampling, is inadequate in adapting to hard sampling scenarios. Hence, we introduce an enhanced Bayesian Personalized Ranking objective, named as Hard-BPR, which is specifically crafted for dynamic hard negative sampling to mitigate the influence of false negatives. This method is simple yet efficient for real-world deployment. Extensive experiments conducted on three real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our approach, along with the enhanced ability to distinguish false negatives.

Exploring Learning Complexity for Downstream Data Pruning

The over-parameterized pre-trained models pose a great challenge to fine-tuning with limited computation resources. An intuitive solution is to prune the less informative samples from the fine-tuning dataset. A series of training-based scoring functions are proposed to quantify the informativeness of the data subset but the pruning cost becomes non-negligible due to the heavy parameter updating. For efficient pruning, it is viable to adapt the similarity scoring function of geometric-based methods from training-based to training-free. However, we empirically show that such adaption distorts the original pruning and results in inferior performance on the downstream tasks. In this paper, we propose to treat the learning complexity (LC) as the scoring function for classification and regression tasks. Specifically, the learning complexity is defined as the average predicted confidence of subnets with different capacities, which encapsulates data processing within a converged model. Then we preserve the diverse and easy samples for fine-tuning. Extensive experiments with vision datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed scoring function for classification tasks. For the instruction fine-tuning of large language models, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance with stable convergence, outperforming the full training with only 10\% of the instruction dataset.

Data Upcycling Knowledge Distillation for Image Super-Resolution

Knowledge distillation (KD) emerges as a challenging yet promising technique for compressing deep learning models, characterized by the transmission of extensive learning representations from proficient and computationally intensive teacher models to compact student models. However, only a handful of studies have endeavored to compress the models for single image super-resolution (SISR) through KD, with their effects on student model enhancement remaining marginal. In this paper, we put forth an approach from the perspective of efficient data utilization, namely, the Data Upcycling Knowledge Distillation (DUKD) which facilitates the student model by the prior knowledge teacher provided via upcycled in-domain data derived from their inputs. This upcycling process is realized through two efficient image zooming operations and invertible data augmentations which introduce the label consistency regularization to the field of KD for SISR and substantially boosts student model's generalization. The DUKD, due to its versatility, can be applied across a broad spectrum of teacher-student architectures. Comprehensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed DUKD method significantly outperforms previous art, exemplified by an increase of up to 0.5dB in PSNR over baselines methods, and a 67% parameters reduced RCAN model's performance remaining on par with that of the RCAN teacher model.

Soft BPR Loss for Dynamic Hard Negative Sampling in Recommender Systems

In recommender systems, leveraging Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to formulate the bipartite relation between users and items is a promising way. However, powerful negative sampling methods that is adapted to GNN-based recommenders still requires a lot of efforts. One critical gap is that it is rather tough to distinguish real negatives from massive unobserved items during hard negative sampling. Towards this problem, this paper develops a novel hard negative sampling method for GNN-based recommendation systems by simply reformulating the loss function. We conduct various experiments on three datasets, demonstrating that the method proposed outperforms a set of state-of-the-art benchmarks.