Structured Prompt Optimization for Few-Shot Text Classification via Semantic Alignment in Latent Space

This study addresses the issues of semantic entanglement, unclear label structure, and insufficient feature representation in few-shot text classification, and proposes an optimization framework based on structured prompts to enhance semantic understanding and task adaptation under low-resource conditions. The framework first uses a pretrained language model to encode the input text and obtain basic semantic representations. It then introduces structured prompts composed of multi-dimensional semantic factors and integrates them with text features through a learnable combination mechanism, which forms task-related representations with clear boundaries in the latent space. To further strengthen the consistency between text representations and label semantics, the method constructs a structured label embedding matrix and employs a cross-space alignment mechanism to ensure stable matching between textual features and label attributes. In addition, the model applies prompt orthogonality constraints and a joint optimization objective to maintain independence across different semantic factors in the prompts, allowing the structured prompts to provide transparent and controllable guidance for classification decisions. Three types of sensitivity experiments, including learning rate sensitivity, prompt length sensitivity, and data scale sensitivity, are designed to evaluate the stability and robustness of the framework under different conditions. Experimental results show that the proposed structured prompt optimization framework effectively alleviates semantic conflicts and label ambiguity in few-shot text classification. It significantly improves performance on accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC, and demonstrates strong cross-task applicability.

Inter-Speaker Relative Cues for Two-Stage Text-Guided Target Speech Extraction

This paper investigates the use of relative cues for text-based target speech extraction (TSE). We first provide a theoretical justification for relative cues from the perspectives of human perception and label quantization, showing that relative cues preserve fine-grained distinctions often lost in absolute categorical representations. Building on this analysis, we propose a two-stage TSE framework, in which a speech separation model generates candidate sources, followed by a text-guided classifier that selects the target speaker based on embedding similarity. Using this framework, we train two separate classification models to evaluate the advantages of relative cues over independent cues in terms of both classification accuracy and TSE performance. Experimental results demonstrate that (i) relative cues achieve higher overall classification accuracy and improved TSE performance compared with independent cues, (ii) the two-stage framework substantially outperforms single-stage text-conditioned extraction methods on both signal-level and objective perceptual metrics, and (iii) certain relative cues (language, gender, loudness, distance, temporal order, speaking duration, random cue and all cue) can surpass the performance of an audio-based TSE system. Further analysis reveals notable differences in discriminative power across cue types, providing insights into the effectiveness of different relative cues for TSE.

Asymmetric Idiosyncrasies in Multimodal Models

In this work, we study idiosyncrasies in the caption models and their downstream impact on text-to-image models. We design a systematic analysis: given either a generated caption or the corresponding image, we train neural networks to predict the originating caption model. Our results show that text classification yields very high accuracy (99.70\%), indicating that captioning models embed distinctive stylistic signatures. In contrast, these signatures largely disappear in the generated images, with classification accuracy dropping to at most 50\% even for the state-of-the-art Flux model. To better understand this cross-modal discrepancy, we further analyze the data and find that the generated images fail to preserve key variations present in captions, such as differences in the level of detail, emphasis on color and texture, and the distribution of objects within a scene. Overall, our classification-based framework provides a novel methodology for quantifying both the stylistic idiosyncrasies of caption models and the prompt-following ability of text-to-image systems.

Can Thinking Models Think to Detect Hateful Memes?

Hateful memes often require compositional multimodal reasoning: the image and text may appear benign in isolation, yet their interaction conveys harmful intent. Although thinking-based multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently advanced vision-language understanding, their capabilities remain underexplored for hateful meme analysis. We propose a reinforcement learning based post-training framework that improves reasoning in thinking-based MLLMs through task-specific rewards and a novel Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) objective. Specifically, we (i) conduct a systematic empirical study of off-the-shelf MLLMs for hateful meme understanding, (ii) extend an existing hateful meme dataset by generating weakly or pseudo-supervised chain-of-thought rationales via distillation, and (iii) introduce a GRPO-based objective that jointly optimizes meme classification and explanation quality to encourage fine-grained, step-by-step reasoning. Experiments on the Hateful Memes benchmark show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving accuracy and F1 by approximately 1 percent and explanation quality by approximately 3 percent. We will publicly release our code, dataset extensions, and evaluation resources to support reproducibility.

DashengTokenizer: One layer is enough for unified audio understanding and generation

This paper introduces DashengTokenizer, a continuous audio tokenizer engineered for joint use in both understanding and generation tasks. Unlike conventional approaches, which train acoustic tokenizers and subsequently integrate frozen semantic knowledge, our method inverts this paradigm: we leverage frozen semantic features and inject acoustic information. In linear evaluation across 22 diverse tasks, our method outperforms previous audio codec and audio encoder baselines by a significant margin while maintaining competitive audio reconstruction quality. Notably, we demonstrate that this acoustic injection improves performance for tasks such as speech emotion recognition, music understanding, and acoustic scene classification. We further evaluate the tokenizer's generative performance on text-to-audio (TTA), text-to-music (TTM), and speech enhancement (SE). Our approach surpasses standard variational autoencoder (VAE)-based methods on TTA and TTM tasks, while its effectiveness on SE underscores its capabilities as a general-purpose audio encoder. Finally, our results challenge the prevailing assumption that VAE-based architectures are a prerequisite for audio synthesis. Checkpoints are available at https://huggingface.co/mispeech/dashengtokenizer.

Improving Neural Argumentative Stance Classification in Controversial Topics with Emotion-Lexicon Features

Argumentation mining comprises several subtasks, among which stance classification focuses on identifying the standpoint expressed in an argumentative text toward a specific target topic. While arguments-especially about controversial topics-often appeal to emotions, most prior work has not systematically incorporated explicit, fine-grained emotion analysis to improve performance on this task. In particular, prior research on stance classification has predominantly utilized non-argumentative texts and has been restricted to specific domains or topics, limiting generalizability. We work on five datasets from diverse domains encompassing a range of controversial topics and present an approach for expanding the Bias-Corrected NRC Emotion Lexicon using DistilBERT embeddings, which we feed into a Neural Argumentative Stance Classification model. Our method systematically expands the emotion lexicon through contextualized embeddings to identify emotionally charged terms not previously captured in the lexicon. Our expanded NRC lexicon (eNRC) improves over the baseline across all five datasets (up to +6.2 percentage points in F1 score), outperforms the original NRC on four datasets (up to +3.0), and surpasses the LLM-based approach on nearly all corpora. We provide all resources-including eNRC, the adapted corpora, and model architecture-to enable other researchers to build upon our work.

Beyond the Star Rating: A Scalable Framework for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Using LLMs and Text Classification

Customer-provided reviews have become an important source of information for business owners and other customers alike. However, effectively analyzing millions of unstructured reviews remains challenging. While large language models (LLMs) show promise for natural language understanding, their application to large-scale review analysis has been limited by computational costs and scalability concerns. This study proposes a hybrid approach that uses LLMs for aspect identification while employing classic machine-learning methods for sentiment classification at scale. Using ChatGPT to analyze sampled restaurant reviews, we identified key aspects of dining experiences and developed sentiment classifiers using human-labeled reviews, which we subsequently applied to 4.7 million reviews collected over 17 years from a major online platform. Regression analysis reveals that our machine-labeled aspects significantly explain variance in overall restaurant ratings across different aspects of dining experiences, cuisines, and geographical regions. Our findings demonstrate that combining LLMs with traditional machine learning approaches can effectively automate aspect-based sentiment analysis of large-scale customer feedback, suggesting a practical framework for both researchers and practitioners in the hospitality industry and potentially, other service sectors.

Explicit Grammar Semantic Feature Fusion for Robust Text Classification

Natural Language Processing enables computers to understand human language by analysing and classifying text efficiently with deep-level grammatical and semantic features. Existing models capture features by learning from large corpora with transformer models, which are computationally intensive and unsuitable for resource-constrained environments. Therefore, our proposed study incorporates comprehensive grammatical rules alongside semantic information to build a robust, lightweight classification model without resorting to full parameterised transformer models or heavy deep learning architectures. The novelty of our approach lies in its explicit encoding of sentence-level grammatical structure, including syntactic composition, phrase patterns, and complexity indicators, into a compact grammar vector, which is then fused with frozen contextual embeddings. These heterogeneous elements unified a single representation that captures both the structural and semantic characteristics of the text. Deep learning models such as Deep Belief Networks (DBNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTMs), BiLSTMs, and transformer-based BERT and XLNET were used to train and evaluate the model, with the number of epochs varied. Based on experimental results, the unified feature representation model captures both the semantic and structural properties of text, outperforming baseline models by 2%-15%, enabling more effective learning across heterogeneous domains. Unlike prior syntax-aware transformer models that inject grammatical structure through additional attention layers, tree encoders, or full fine-tuning, the proposed framework treats grammar as an explicit inductive bias rather than a learnable module, resulting in a very lightweight model that delivers better performance on edge devices

PointAlign: Feature-Level Alignment Regularization for 3D Vision-Language Models

The development of 3D Vision-Language Models (VLMs), crucial for applications in robotics, autonomous driving, and augmented reality, is severely constrained by the scarcity of paired 3D-text data. Existing methods rely solely on next-token prediction loss, using only language tokens for supervision. This results in inefficient utilization of limited 3D data and leads to a significant degradation and loss of valuable geometric information in intermediate representations. To address these limitations, we propose {\mname}, a novel feature-level alignment regularization method. {\mname} explicitly supervises intermediate point cloud tokens to preserve fine-grained 3D geometric-semantic information throughout the language modeling process. Specifically, we constrain the intermediate point cloud tokens within the LLM to align with visual input tokens via a consistency loss. By training only a lightweight alignment projector and LoRA adapters, {\mname} achieves explicit feature-level supervision with minimal computational overhead, effectively preventing geometric degradation. Extensive experiments on ModelNet40 and Objaverse datasets demonstrate that our method achieves \textbf{2.08} pp improvement on average for classification tasks, with a substantial \textbf{7.50} pp gain on the challenging open-vocabulary Objaverse classification task and \textbf{4.88} pp improvement on 3D object captioning evaluated by Qwen2-72B-Instruct, validating the effectiveness of {\mname}. Code is publicly available at \href{https://github.com/yharoldsu0627/PointAlign}{https://github.com/yharoldsu0627/PointAlign}.

Scaling In, Not Up? Testing Thick Citation Context Analysis with GPT-5 and Fragile Prompts

This paper tests whether large language models (LLMs) can support interpretative citation context analysis (CCA) by scaling in thick, text-grounded readings of a single hard case rather than scaling up typological labels. It foregrounds prompt-sensitivity analysis as a methodological issue by varying prompt scaffolding and framing in a balanced 2x3 design. Using footnote 6 in Chubin and Moitra (1975) and Gilbert's (1977) reconstruction as a probe, I implement a two-stage GPT-5 pipeline: a citation-text-only surface classification and expectation pass, followed by cross-document interpretative reconstruction using the citing and cited full texts. Across 90 reconstructions, the model produces 450 distinct hypotheses. Close reading and inductive coding identify 21 recurring interpretative moves, and linear probability models estimate how prompt choices shift their frequencies and lexical repertoire. GPT-5's surface pass is highly stable, consistently classifying the citation as "supplementary". In reconstruction, the model generates a structured space of plausible alternatives, but scaffolding and examples redistribute attention and vocabulary, sometimes toward strained readings. Relative to Gilbert, GPT-5 detects the same textual hinges yet more often resolves them as lineage and positioning than as admonishment. The study outlines opportunities and risks of using LLMs as guided co-analysts for inspectable, contestable interpretative CCA, and it shows that prompt scaffolding and framing systematically tilt which plausible readings and vocabularies the model foregrounds.