RORA: Robust Free-Text Rationale Evaluation

Free-text rationales play a pivotal role in explainable NLP, bridging the knowledge and reasoning gaps behind a model's decision-making. However, due to the diversity of potential reasoning paths and a corresponding lack of definitive ground truth, their evaluation remains a challenge. Existing evaluation metrics rely on the degree to which a rationale supports a target label, but we find these fall short in evaluating rationales that inadvertently leak the labels. To address this problem, we propose RORA, a Robust free-text Rationale evaluation against label leakage. RORA quantifies the new information supplied by a rationale to justify the label. This is achieved by assessing the conditional V-information \citep{hewitt-etal-2021-conditional} with a predictive family robust against leaky features that can be exploited by a small model. RORA consistently outperforms existing approaches in evaluating human-written, synthetic, or model-generated rationales, particularly demonstrating robustness against label leakage. We also show that RORA aligns well with human judgment, providing a more reliable and accurate measurement across diverse free-text rationales.

AnaloBench: Benchmarking the Identification of Abstract and Long-context Analogies

Humans regularly engage in analogical thinking, relating personal experiences to current situations ($X$ is analogous to $Y$ because of $Z$). Analogical thinking allows humans to solve problems in creative ways, grasp difficult concepts, and articulate ideas more effectively. Can language models (LMs) do the same? To answer this question, we propose ANALOBENCH, a benchmark to determine analogical reasoning ability in LMs. Our benchmarking approach focuses on aspects of this ability that are common among humans: (i) recalling related experiences from a large amount of information, and (ii) applying analogical reasoning to complex and lengthy scenarios. We test a broad collection of proprietary models (e.g., GPT family, Claude V2) and open source models such as LLaMA2. As in prior results, scaling up LMs results in some performance boosts. Surprisingly, scale offers minimal gains when, (i) analogies involve lengthy scenarios, or (ii) recalling relevant scenarios from a large pool of information, a process analogous to finding a needle in a haystack. We hope these observations encourage further research in this field.

GEAR: Augmenting Language Models with Generalizable and Efficient Tool Resolution

Augmenting large language models (LLM) to use external tools enhances their performance across a variety of tasks. However, prior works over-rely on task-specific demonstration of tool use that limits their generalizability and computational cost due to making many calls to large-scale LLMs. We introduce GEAR, a computationally efficient query-tool grounding algorithm that is generalizable to various tasks that require tool use while not relying on task-specific demonstrations. GEAR achieves better efficiency by delegating tool grounding and execution to small language models (SLM) and LLM, respectively; while leveraging semantic and pattern-based evaluation at both question and answer levels for generalizable tool grounding. We evaluate GEAR on 14 datasets across 6 downstream tasks, demonstrating its strong generalizability to novel tasks, tools and different SLMs. Despite offering more efficiency, GEAR achieves higher precision in tool grounding compared to prior strategies using LLM prompting, thus improving downstream accuracy at a reduced computational cost. For example, we demonstrate that GEAR-augmented GPT-J and GPT-3 outperform counterpart tool-augmented baselines because of better tool use.

ProtSi: Prototypical Siamese Network with Data Augmentation for Few-Shot Subjective Answer Evaluation

Subjective answer evaluation is a time-consuming and tedious task, and the quality of the evaluation is heavily influenced by a variety of subjective personal characteristics. Instead, machine evaluation can effectively assist educators in saving time while also ensuring that evaluations are fair and realistic. However, most existing methods using regular machine learning and natural language processing techniques are generally hampered by a lack of annotated answers and poor model interpretability, making them unsuitable for real-world use. To solve these challenges, we propose ProtSi Network, a unique semi-supervised architecture that for the first time uses few-shot learning to subjective answer evaluation. To evaluate students' answers by similarity prototypes, ProtSi Network simulates the natural process of evaluator scoring answers by combining Siamese Network which consists of BERT and encoder layers with Prototypical Network. We employed an unsupervised diverse paraphrasing model ProtAugment, in order to prevent overfitting for effective few-shot text classification. By integrating contrastive learning, the discriminative text issue can be mitigated. Experiments on the Kaggle Short Scoring Dataset demonstrate that the ProtSi Network outperforms the most recent baseline models in terms of accuracy and quadratic weighted kappa.

Functional Optimization Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time Bidding

Real-time bidding is the new paradigm of programmatic advertising. An advertiser wants to make the intelligent choice of utilizing a \textbf{Demand-Side Platform} to improve the performance of their ad campaigns. Existing approaches are struggling to provide a satisfactory solution for bidding optimization due to stochastic bidding behavior. In this paper, we proposed a multi-agent reinforcement learning architecture for RTB with functional optimization. We designed four agents bidding environment: three Lagrange-multiplier based functional optimization agents and one baseline agent (without any attribute of functional optimization) First, numerous attributes have been assigned to each agent, including biased or unbiased win probability, Lagrange multiplier, and click-through rate. In order to evaluate the proposed RTB strategy's performance, we demonstrate the results on ten sequential simulated auction campaigns. The results show that agents with functional actions and rewards had the most significant average winning rate and winning surplus, given biased and unbiased winning information respectively. The experimental evaluations show that our approach significantly improve the campaign's efficacy and profitability.