Alert button
Picture for Shuolin Liu

Shuolin Liu

Alert button

CoNIC Challenge: Pushing the Frontiers of Nuclear Detection, Segmentation, Classification and Counting

Mar 14, 2023
Simon Graham, Quoc Dang Vu, Mostafa Jahanifar, Martin Weigert, Uwe Schmidt, Wenhua Zhang, Jun Zhang, Sen Yang, Jinxi Xiang, Xiyue Wang, Josef Lorenz Rumberger, Elias Baumann, Peter Hirsch, Lihao Liu, Chenyang Hong, Angelica I. Aviles-Rivero, Ayushi Jain, Heeyoung Ahn, Yiyu Hong, Hussam Azzuni, Min Xu, Mohammad Yaqub, Marie-Claire Blache, Benoît Piégu, Bertrand Vernay, Tim Scherr, Moritz Böhland, Katharina Löffler, Jiachen Li, Weiqin Ying, Chixin Wang, Dagmar Kainmueller, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Shuolin Liu, Dhairya Talsania, Yughender Meda, Prakash Mishra, Muhammad Ridzuan, Oliver Neumann, Marcel P. Schilling, Markus Reischl, Ralf Mikut, Banban Huang, Hsiang-Chin Chien, Ching-Ping Wang, Chia-Yen Lee, Hong-Kun Lin, Zaiyi Liu, Xipeng Pan, Chu Han, Jijun Cheng, Muhammad Dawood, Srijay Deshpande, Raja Muhammad Saad Bashir, Adam Shephard, Pedro Costa, João D. Nunes, Aurélio Campilho, Jaime S. Cardoso, Hrishikesh P S, Densen Puthussery, Devika R G, Jiji C V, Ye Zhang, Zijie Fang, Zhifan Lin, Yongbing Zhang, Chunhui Lin, Liukun Zhang, Lijian Mao, Min Wu, Vi Thi-Tuong Vo, Soo-Hyung Kim, Taebum Lee, Satoshi Kondo, Satoshi Kasai, Pranay Dumbhare, Vedant Phuse, Yash Dubey, Ankush Jamthikar, Trinh Thi Le Vuong, Jin Tae Kwak, Dorsa Ziaei, Hyun Jung, Tianyi Miao, David Snead, Shan E Ahmed Raza, Fayyaz Minhas, Nasir M. Rajpoot

Figure 1 for CoNIC Challenge: Pushing the Frontiers of Nuclear Detection, Segmentation, Classification and Counting
Figure 2 for CoNIC Challenge: Pushing the Frontiers of Nuclear Detection, Segmentation, Classification and Counting
Figure 3 for CoNIC Challenge: Pushing the Frontiers of Nuclear Detection, Segmentation, Classification and Counting
Figure 4 for CoNIC Challenge: Pushing the Frontiers of Nuclear Detection, Segmentation, Classification and Counting

Nuclear detection, segmentation and morphometric profiling are essential in helping us further understand the relationship between histology and patient outcome. To drive innovation in this area, we setup a community-wide challenge using the largest available dataset of its kind to assess nuclear segmentation and cellular composition. Our challenge, named CoNIC, stimulated the development of reproducible algorithms for cellular recognition with real-time result inspection on public leaderboards. We conducted an extensive post-challenge analysis based on the top-performing models using 1,658 whole-slide images of colon tissue. With around 700 million detected nuclei per model, associated features were used for dysplasia grading and survival analysis, where we demonstrated that the challenge's improvement over the previous state-of-the-art led to significant boosts in downstream performance. Our findings also suggest that eosinophils and neutrophils play an important role in the tumour microevironment. We release challenge models and WSI-level results to foster the development of further methods for biomarker discovery.

Viaarxiv icon

OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines

Feb 16, 2022
Aaron Babier, Rafid Mahmood, Binghao Zhang, Victor G. L. Alves, Ana Maria Barragán-Montero, Joel Beaudry, Carlos E. Cardenas, Yankui Chang, Zijie Chen, Jaehee Chun, Kelly Diaz, Harold David Eraso, Erik Faustmann, Sibaji Gaj, Skylar Gay, Mary Gronberg, Bingqi Guo, Junjun He, Gerd Heilemann, Sanchit Hira, Yuliang Huang, Fuxin Ji, Dashan Jiang, Jean Carlo Jimenez Giraldo, Hoyeon Lee, Jun Lian, Shuolin Liu, Keng-Chi Liu, José Marrugo, Kentaro Miki, Kunio Nakamura, Tucker Netherton, Dan Nguyen, Hamidreza Nourzadeh, Alexander F. I. Osman, Zhao Peng, José Darío Quinto Muñoz, Christian Ramsl, Dong Joo Rhee, Juan David Rodriguez, Hongming Shan, Jeffrey V. Siebers, Mumtaz H. Soomro, Kay Sun, Andrés Usuga Hoyos, Carlos Valderrama, Rob Verbeek, Enpei Wang, Siri Willems, Qi Wu, Xuanang Xu, Sen Yang, Lulin Yuan, Simeng Zhu, Lukas Zimmermann, Kevin L. Moore, Thomas G. Purdie, Andrea L. McNiven, Timothy C. Y. Chan

Figure 1 for OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines
Figure 2 for OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines
Figure 3 for OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines
Figure 4 for OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines

We establish an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiotherapy. Our framework includes reference plans for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer and high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four optimization models to form 76 unique KBP pipelines that generated 7600 plans. The predictions and plans were compared to the reference plans via: dose score, which is the average mean absolute voxel-by-voxel difference in dose a model achieved; the deviation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) criterion; and the frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. We also performed a theoretical investigation to justify our dose mimicking models. The range in rank order correlation of the dose score between predictions and their KBP pipelines was 0.50 to 0.62, which indicates that the quality of the predictions is generally positively correlated with the quality of the plans. Additionally, compared to the input predictions, the KBP-generated plans performed significantly better (P<0.05; one-sided Wilcoxon test) on 18 of 23 DVH criteria. Similarly, each optimization model generated plans that satisfied a higher percentage of criteria than the reference plans. Lastly, our theoretical investigation demonstrated that the dose mimicking models generated plans that are also optimal for a conventional planning model. This was the largest international effort to date for evaluating the combination of KBP prediction and optimization models. In the interest of reproducibility, our data and code is freely available at https://github.com/ababier/open-kbp-opt.

* 19 pages, 7 tables, 6 figures 
Viaarxiv icon