Abstract:The transition to First-Price Auctions (FPA) in digital advertising has spurred significant research, yet existing work typically assumes access to a valuation oracle, ignoring the reality that values must be inferred from censored data. While Linear Treatment Effect (LTE) models address this by learning value uplift, they have not been adapted to realistic settings with hard Budget constraints or Return-on-Spend (RoS) targets requiring regret and violation control. In this work, we propose a unified primal-dual framework for constrained FPAs that jointly learns the latent LTE valuation parameters and the competitor's bid distribution. This simultaneous learning introduces a critical technical challenge: the estimation error is dynamically scaled by the Lagrangian multiplier, potentially leading to unbounded regret. We resolve this by leveraging a strong Slater condition and a novel adaptive burn-in procedure to stabilize the dual variables. Our approach achieves near-optimal regret guarantees, providing the first theoretically grounded solution for constrained bidding with latent valuations.
Abstract:We study offline-to-online learning in linear contextual bandits with biased offline regression data: the offline parameter need not match the online one, so history should not be treated as a single warm start. We model directional transfer with a shift certificate $(M_{\mathrm{shift}},ρ)$ and offline ridge estimation, yielding a geometry-aware confidence region for the online parameter rather than an isotropic radius. We propose \emph{Ellipsoidal-MINUCB}, which combines a standard online branch with an offline-informed pooled branch and uses offline information only when it tightens uncertainty. With high probability, regret is bounded by the minimum of a standard SupLinUCB-style fallback and a pooled term that separates statistical width from a certificate-weighted shift penalty. Under a simple alignment condition, the pooled term further simplifies to a rate governed by an effective dimension induced by the offline geometry. We also show that a purely Euclidean (scalar) shift bound, by itself, does not determine which feature directions are transferable. Beyond this fixed certificate, we show how to learn a data-driven certificate from data at finitely many refresh times and establish a high-probability regret bound for Ellipsoidal-MINUCB with epoch-wise learned certificates. Experiments match the main prediction: gains are strongest at intermediate horizons when offline coverage and transferability align, while the method otherwise tracks the safe online baseline.
Abstract:Optimization modeling and solving are fundamental to the application of Operations Research (OR) in real-world decision making, yet the process of translating natural language problem descriptions into formal models and solver code remains highly expertise intensive. While recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have opened new opportunities for automation, the generalization ability and data efficiency of existing LLM-based methods are still limited, asmost require vast amounts of annotated or synthetic data, resulting in high costs and scalability barriers. In this work, we present OR-R1, a data-efficient training framework for automated optimization modeling and solving. OR-R1 first employs supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to help the model acquire the essential reasoning patterns for problem formulation and code generation from limited labeled data. In addition, it improves the capability and consistency through Test-Time Group Relative Policy Optimization (TGRPO). This two-stage design enables OR-R1 to leverage both scarce labeled and abundant unlabeled data for effective learning. Experiments show that OR-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance with an average solving accuracy of $67.7\%$, using only $1/10$ the synthetic data required by prior methods such as ORLM, exceeding ORLM's solving accuracy by up to $4.2\%$. Remarkably, OR-R1 outperforms ORLM by over $2.4\%$ with just $100$ synthetic samples. Furthermore, TGRPO contributes an additional $3.1\%-6.4\%$ improvement in accuracy, significantly narrowing the gap between single-attempt (Pass@1) and multi-attempt (Pass@8) performance from $13\%$ to $7\%$. Extensive evaluations across diverse real-world benchmarks demonstrate that OR-R1 provides a robust, scalable, and cost-effective solution for automated OR optimization problem modeling and solving, lowering the expertise and data barriers for industrial OR applications.
Abstract:Learning to Optimize (L2O) enhances optimization efficiency with integrated neural networks. L2O paradigms achieve great outcomes, e.g., refitting optimizer, generating unseen solutions iteratively or directly. However, conventional L2O methods require intricate design and rely on specific optimization processes, limiting scalability and generalization. Our analyses explore general framework for learning optimization, called Diff-L2O, focusing on augmenting sampled solutions from a wider view rather than local updates in real optimization process only. Meanwhile, we give the related generalization bound, showing that the sample diversity of Diff-L2O brings better performance. This bound can be simply applied to other fields, discussing diversity, mean-variance, and different tasks. Diff-L2O's strong compatibility is empirically verified with only minute-level training, comparing with other hour-levels.
Abstract:Dynamic pricing is crucial in sectors like e-commerce and transportation, balancing exploration of demand patterns and exploitation of pricing strategies. Existing methods often require precise knowledge of the demand function, e.g., the H{\"o}lder smoothness level and Lipschitz constant, limiting practical utility. This paper introduces an adaptive approach to address these challenges without prior parameter knowledge. By partitioning the demand function's domain and employing a linear bandit structure, we develop an algorithm that manages regret efficiently, enhancing flexibility and practicality. Our Parameter-Adaptive Dynamic Pricing (PADP) algorithm outperforms existing methods, offering improved regret bounds and extensions for contextual information. Numerical experiments validate our approach, demonstrating its superiority in handling unknown demand parameters.
Abstract:Dynamic pricing, the practice of adjusting prices based on contextual factors, has gained significant attention due to its impact on revenue maximization. In this paper, we address the contextual dynamic pricing problem, which involves pricing decisions based on observable product features and customer characteristics. We propose a novel algorithm that achieves improved regret bounds while minimizing assumptions about the problem. Our algorithm discretizes the unknown noise distribution and combines the upper confidence bounds with a layered data partitioning technique to effectively regulate regret in each episode. These techniques effectively control the regret associated with pricing decisions, leading to the minimax optimality. Specifically, our algorithm achieves a regret upper bound of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\rho_{\mathcal{V}}^{\frac{1}{3}}(\delta) T^{\frac{2}{3}})$, where $\rho_{\mathcal{V}}(\delta)$ represents the estimation error of the valuation function. Importantly, this bound matches the lower bound up to logarithmic terms, demonstrating the minimax optimality of our approach. Furthermore, our method extends beyond linear valuation models commonly used in dynamic pricing by considering general function spaces. We simplify the estimation process by reducing it to general offline regression oracles, making implementation more straightforward.
Abstract:Efficiently learning equilibria with large state and action spaces in general-sum Markov games while overcoming the curse of multi-agency is a challenging problem. Recent works have attempted to solve this problem by employing independent linear function classes to approximate the marginal $Q$-value for each agent. However, existing sample complexity bounds under such a framework have a suboptimal dependency on the desired accuracy $\varepsilon$ or the action space. In this work, we introduce a new algorithm, Lin-Confident-FTRL, for learning coarse correlated equilibria (CCE) with local access to the simulator, i.e., one can interact with the underlying environment on the visited states. Up to a logarithmic dependence on the size of the state space, Lin-Confident-FTRL learns $\epsilon$-CCE with a provable optimal accuracy bound $O(\epsilon^{-2})$ and gets rids of the linear dependency on the action space, while scaling polynomially with relevant problem parameters (such as the number of agents and time horizon). Moreover, our analysis of Linear-Confident-FTRL generalizes the virtual policy iteration technique in the single-agent local planning literature, which yields a new computationally efficient algorithm with a tighter sample complexity bound when assuming random access to the simulator.
Abstract:In this paper, we investigate the stochastic contextual bandit with general function space and graph feedback. We propose an algorithm that addresses this problem by adapting to both the underlying graph structures and reward gaps. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithm is the first to provide a gap-dependent upper bound in this stochastic setting, bridging the research gap left by the work in [35]. In comparison to [31,33,35], our method offers improved regret upper bounds and does not require knowledge of graphical quantities. We conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the computational efficiency and effectiveness of our approach in terms of regret upper bounds. These findings highlight the significance of our algorithm in advancing the field of stochastic contextual bandits with graph feedback, opening up avenues for practical applications in various domains.
Abstract:In this paper, we investigate transfer learning in partially observable contextual bandits, where agents have limited knowledge from other agents and partial information about hidden confounders. We first convert the problem to identifying or partially identifying causal effects between actions and rewards through optimization problems. To solve these optimization problems, we discretize the original functional constraints of unknown distributions into linear constraints, and sample compatible causal models via sequentially solving linear programmings to obtain causal bounds with the consideration of estimation error. Our sampling algorithms provide desirable convergence results for suitable sampling distributions. We then show how causal bounds can be applied to improving classical bandit algorithms and affect the regrets with respect to the size of action sets and function spaces. Notably, in the task with function approximation which allows us to handle general context distributions, our method improves the order dependence on function space size compared with previous literatures. We formally prove that our causally enhanced algorithms outperform classical bandit algorithms and achieve orders of magnitude faster convergence rates. Finally, we perform simulations that demonstrate the efficiency of our strategy compared to the current state-of-the-art methods. This research has the potential to enhance the performance of contextual bandit agents in real-world applications where data is scarce and costly to obtain.
Abstract:Recommendation systems aim to predict users' feedback on items not exposed to them. Confounding bias arises due to the presence of unmeasured variables (e.g., the socio-economic status of a user) that can affect both a user's exposure and feedback. Existing methods either (1) make untenable assumptions about these unmeasured variables or (2) directly infer latent confounders from users' exposure. However, they cannot guarantee the identification of counterfactual feedback, which can lead to biased predictions. In this work, we propose a novel method, i.e., identifiable deconfounder (iDCF), which leverages a set of proxy variables (e.g., observed user features) to resolve the aforementioned non-identification issue. The proposed iDCF is a general deconfounded recommendation framework that applies proximal causal inference to infer the unmeasured confounders and identify the counterfactual feedback with theoretical guarantees. Extensive experiments on various real-world and synthetic datasets verify the proposed method's effectiveness and robustness.