Knowledge-Guided Cross-Modal Fusion for Adult-to-Pediatric ECG Transfer via Label-Conditioned Contrastive Alignment

Adult and pediatric electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation relies on age-sensitive criteria, and models pretrained mainly on adult ECGs often transfer poorly to pediatric populations when pediatric labels are scarce. Existing multimodal ECG--text methods typically align waveforms and text at the global sample level, entangling evidence from co-occurring diagnoses and limiting transfer under this gap. We propose Pediatric-Adult ECG Alignment via Cross-modal Enhancement (PEACE), a knowledge-guided framework pretrained on the largely adult MIMIC-IV ECG corpus. PEACE describes each diagnosis along rhythm, morphology, and ST--T axes and, per recording, composes only positive-label descriptors into three axis tokens and a fused embedding. A label query network (LQN) uses diagnostic labels as queries to cross-attend over ECG tokens and axis tokens, while label set aware bidirectional contrastive learning (LSBC) aligns pooled ECG features with the fused embedding when recordings share diagnoses. Curriculum adaptive fusion (CAF) gates alignment strength according to smoothed classification loss and training progress, limiting disruption during early optimization. The knowledge branch is used only for training supervision; inference uses ECG signals alone. On ZZU-pECG, PEACE reaches macro average AUCs of 59.39%, 81.74%, and 91.56% under zero-shot, 50-shot, and full fine-tuning, with the clearest gains over foundation and knowledge-pretraining baselines under limited supervision; versus domain adaptation initializations, zero-shot improves substantially while 50-shot AUC is comparable to DANN. After fine-tuning on PTB-XL, PEACE reaches 96.90% macro average AUC over nine harmonized labels. Ablations confirm that label-conditioned knowledge alignment, rather than global text fusion, is the key driver of pediatric transfer gains.

Explanatory Instructions: Towards Unified Vision Tasks Understanding and Zero-shot Generalization

Computer Vision (CV) has yet to fully achieve the zero-shot task generalization observed in Natural Language Processing (NLP), despite following many of the milestones established in NLP, such as large transformer models, extensive pre-training, and the auto-regression paradigm, among others. In this paper, we explore the idea that CV adopts discrete and terminological task definitions (\eg, ``image segmentation''), which may be a key barrier to zero-shot task generalization. Our hypothesis is that without truly understanding previously-seen tasks--due to these terminological definitions--deep models struggle to generalize to novel tasks. To verify this, we introduce Explanatory Instructions, which provide an intuitive way to define CV task objectives through detailed linguistic transformations from input images to outputs. We create a large-scale dataset comprising 12 million ``image input $\to$ explanatory instruction $\to$ output'' triplets, and train an auto-regressive-based vision-language model (AR-based VLM) that takes both images and explanatory instructions as input. By learning to follow these instructions, the AR-based VLM achieves instruction-level zero-shot capabilities for previously-seen tasks and demonstrates strong zero-shot generalization for unseen CV tasks. Code and dataset will be openly available on our GitHub repository.

The Key of Understanding Vision Tasks: Explanatory Instructions

Computer Vision (CV) has yet to fully achieve the zero-shot task generalization observed in Natural Language Processing (NLP), despite following many of the milestones established in NLP, such as large transformer models, extensive pre-training, and the auto-regression paradigm, among others. In this paper, we explore the idea that CV adopts discrete and terminological task definitions (\eg, ``image segmentation''), which may be a key barrier to zero-shot task generalization. Our hypothesis is that without truly understanding previously-seen tasks--due to these terminological definitions--deep models struggle to generalize to novel tasks. To verify this, we introduce Explanatory Instructions, which provide an intuitive way to define CV task objectives through detailed linguistic transformations from input images to outputs. We create a large-scale dataset comprising 12 million ``image input $\to$ explanatory instruction $\to$ output'' triplets, and train an auto-regressive-based vision-language model (AR-based VLM) that takes both images and explanatory instructions as input. By learning to follow these instructions, the AR-based VLM achieves instruction-level zero-shot capabilities for previously-seen tasks and demonstrates strong zero-shot generalization for unseen CV tasks. Code and dataset will be openly available on our GitHub repository.

How Do Your Code LLMs Perform? Empowering Code Instruction Tuning with High-Quality Data

Recently, there has been a growing interest in studying how to construct better code instruction tuning data. However, we observe Code models trained with these datasets exhibit high performance on HumanEval but perform worse on other benchmarks such as LiveCodeBench. Upon further investigation, we find that many datasets suffer from severe data leakage. After cleaning up most of the leaked data, some well-known high-quality datasets perform poorly. This discovery reveals a new challenge: identifying which dataset genuinely qualify as high-quality code instruction data. To address this, we propose an efficient code data pruning strategy for selecting good samples. Our approach is based on three dimensions: instruction complexity, response quality, and instruction diversity. Based on our selected data, we present XCoder, a family of models finetuned from LLaMA3. Our experiments show XCoder achieves new state-of-the-art performance using fewer training data, which verify the effectiveness of our data strategy. Moreover, we perform a comprehensive analysis on the data composition and find existing code datasets have different characteristics according to their construction methods, which provide new insights for future code LLMs. Our models and dataset are released in https://github.com/banksy23/XCoder