Manifold learning (ML), known also as non-linear dimension reduction, is a set of methods to find the low dimensional structure of data. Dimension reduction for large, high dimensional data is not merely a way to reduce the data; the new representations and descriptors obtained by ML reveal the geometric shape of high dimensional point clouds, and allow one to visualize, de-noise and interpret them. This survey presents the principles underlying ML, the representative methods, as well as their statistical foundations from a practicing statistician's perspective. It describes the trade-offs, and what theory tells us about the parameter and algorithmic choices we make in order to obtain reliable conclusions.
The growing penetration of intermittent, renewable generation in US power grids, especially wind and solar generation, results in increased operational uncertainty. In that context, accurate forecasts are critical, especially for wind generation, which exhibits large variability and is historically harder to predict. To overcome this challenge, this work proposes a novel Bundle-Predict-Reconcile (BPR) framework that integrates asset bundling, machine learning, and forecast reconciliation techniques. The BPR framework first learns an intermediate hierarchy level (the bundles), then predicts wind power at the asset, bundle, and fleet level, and finally reconciles all forecasts to ensure consistency. This approach effectively introduces an auxiliary learning task (predicting the bundle-level time series) to help the main learning tasks. The paper also introduces new asset-bundling criteria that capture the spatio-temporal dynamics of wind power time series. Extensive numerical experiments are conducted on an industry-size dataset of 283 wind farms in the MISO footprint. The experiments consider short-term and day-ahead forecasts, and evaluates a large variety of forecasting models that include weather predictions as covariates. The results demonstrate the benefits of BPR, which consistently and significantly improves forecast accuracy over baselines, especially at the fleet level.
The load planning problem is a critical challenge in service network design for parcel carriers: it decides how many trailers (or loads) to assign for dispatch over time between pairs of terminals. Another key challenge is to determine a flow plan, which specifies how parcel volumes are assigned to planned loads. This paper considers the Dynamic Load Planning Problem (DLPP) that considers both flow and load planning challenges jointly to adjust loads and flows as the demand forecast changes over time before the day of operations. The paper aims at developing a decision-support tool to inform planners making these decisions at terminals across the network. The paper formulates the DLPP as a MIP and shows that it admits a large number of symmetries in a network where each commodity can be routed through primary and alternate paths. As a result, an optimization solver may return fundamentally different solutions to closely related problems, confusing planners and reducing trust in optimization. To remedy this limitation, the paper proposes a Goal-Directed Optimization that eliminates those symmetries by generating optimal solutions staying close to a reference plan. The paper also proposes an optimization proxy to address the computational challenges of the optimization models. The proxy combines a machine learning model and a feasibility restoration model and finds solutions that satisfy real-time constraints imposed by planners-in-the-loop. An extensive computational study on industrial instances shows that the optimization proxy is around 10 times faster than the commercial solver in obtaining the same quality solutions and orders of magnitude faster for generating solutions that are consistent with each other. The proposed approach also demonstrates the benefits of the DLPP for load consolidation, and the significant savings obtained from combining machine learning and optimization.
A novel problem of improving causal effect estimation accuracy with the help of knowledge transfer under the same covariate (or feature) space setting, i.e., homogeneous transfer learning (TL), is studied, referred to as the Transfer Causal Learning (TCL) problem. While most recent efforts in adapting TL techniques to estimate average causal effect (ACE) have been focused on the heterogeneous covariate space setting, those methods are inadequate for tackling the TCL problem since their algorithm designs are based on the decomposition into shared and domain-specific covariate spaces. To address this issue, we propose a generic framework called $\ell_1$-TCL, which incorporates $\ell_1$ regularized TL for nuisance parameter estimation and downstream plug-in ACE estimators, including outcome regression, inverse probability weighted, and doubly robust estimators. Most importantly, with the help of Lasso for high-dimensional regression, we establish non-asymptotic recovery guarantees for the generalized linear model (GLM) under the sparsity assumption for the proposed $\ell_1$-TCL. From an empirical perspective, $\ell_1$-TCL is a generic learning framework that can incorporate not only GLM but also many recently developed non-parametric methods, which can enhance robustness to model mis-specification. We demonstrate this empirical benefit through extensive numerical simulation by incorporating both GLM and recent neural network-based approaches in $\ell_1$-TCL, which shows improved performance compared with existing TL approaches for ACE estimation. Furthermore, our $\ell_1$-TCL framework is subsequently applied to a real study, revealing that vasopressor therapy could prevent 28-day mortality within septic patients, which all baseline approaches fail to show.
This paper analyzes the impact of COVID-19 related lockdowns in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area by examining commuter patterns in three periods: prior to, during, and after the pandemic lockdown. A cellular phone location dataset is utilized in a novel pipeline to infer the home and work locations of thousands of users from the Density-based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) algorithm. The coordinates derived from the clustering are put through a reverse geocoding process from which word embeddings are extracted in order to categorize the industry of each work place based on the workplace name and Point of Interest (POI) mapping. Frequencies of commute from home locations to work locations are analyzed in and across all three time periods. Public health and economic factors are discussed to explain potential reasons for the observed changes in commuter patterns.
We propose a paradigm for interpretable Manifold Learning for scientific data analysis, whereby we parametrize a manifold with $d$ smooth functions from a scientist-provided dictionary of meaningful, domain-related functions. When such a parametrization exists, we provide an algorithm for finding it based on sparse non-linear regression in the manifold tangent bundle, bypassing more standard manifold learning algorithms. We also discuss conditions for the existence of such parameterizations in function space and for successful recovery from finite samples. We demonstrate our method with experimental results from a real scientific domain.
We quantify the parameter stability of a spherical Gaussian Mixture Model (sGMM) under small perturbations in distribution space. Namely, we derive the first explicit bound to show that for a mixture of spherical Gaussian $P$ (sGMM) in a pre-defined model class, all other sGMM close to $P$ in this model class in total variation distance has a small parameter distance to $P$. Further, this upper bound only depends on $P$. The motivation for this work lies in providing guarantees for fitting Gaussian mixtures; with this aim in mind, all the constants involved are well defined and distribution free conditions for fitting mixtures of spherical Gaussians. Our results tighten considerably the existing computable bounds, and asymptotically match the known sharp thresholds for this problem.
The transition of the electrical power grid from fossil fuels to renewable sources of energy raises fundamental challenges to the market-clearing algorithms that drive its operations. Indeed, the increased stochasticity in load and the volatility of renewable energy sources have led to significant increases in prediction errors, affecting the reliability and efficiency of existing deterministic optimization models. The RAMC project was initiated to investigate how to move from this deterministic setting into a risk-aware framework where uncertainty is quantified explicitly and incorporated in the market-clearing optimizations. Risk-aware market-clearing raises challenges on its own, primarily from a computational standpoint. This paper reviews how RAMC approaches risk-aware market clearing and presents some of its innovations in uncertainty quantification, optimization, and machine learning. Experimental results on real networks are presented.
We address the problem of validating the ouput of clustering algorithms. Given data $\mathcal{D}$ and a partition $\mathcal{C}$ of these data into $K$ clusters, when can we say that the clusters obtained are correct or meaningful for the data? This paper introduces a paradigm in which a clustering $\mathcal{C}$ is considered meaningful if it is good with respect to a loss function such as the K-means distortion, and stable, i.e. the only good clustering up to small perturbations. Furthermore, we present a generic method to obtain post-inference guarantees of near-optimality and stability for a clustering $\mathcal{C}$. The method can be instantiated for a variety of clustering criteria (also called loss functions) for which convex relaxations exist. Obtaining the guarantees amounts to solving a convex optimization problem. We demonstrate the practical relevance of this method by obtaining guarantees for the K-means and the Normalized Cut clustering criteria on realistic data sets. We also prove that asymptotic instability implies finite sample instability w.h.p., allowing inferences about the population clusterability from a sample. The guarantees do not depend on any distributional assumptions, but they depend on the data set $\mathcal{D}$ admitting a stable clustering.