Employing Label Models on ChatGPT Answers Improves Legal Text Entailment Performance

The objective of legal text entailment is to ascertain whether the assertions in a legal query logically follow from the information provided in one or multiple legal articles. ChatGPT, a large language model, is robust in many natural language processing tasks, including legal text entailment: when we set the temperature = 0 (the ChatGPT answers are deterministic) and prompt the model, it achieves 70.64% accuracy on COLIEE 2022 dataset, which outperforms the previous SOTA of 67.89%. On the other hand, if the temperature is larger than zero, ChatGPT answers are not deterministic, leading to inconsistent answers and fluctuating results. We propose to leverage label models (a fundamental component of weak supervision techniques) to integrate the provisional answers by ChatGPT into consolidated labels. By that way, we treat ChatGPT provisional answers as noisy predictions which can be consolidated by label models. The experimental results demonstrate that this approach can attain an accuracy of 76.15%, marking a significant improvement of 8.26% over the prior state-of-the-art benchmark. Additionally, we perform an analysis of the instances where ChatGPT produces incorrect answers, then we classify the errors, offering insights that could guide potential enhancements for future research endeavors.

CAPTAIN at COLIEE 2023: Efficient Methods for Legal Information Retrieval and Entailment Tasks

The Competition on Legal Information Extraction/Entailment (COLIEE) is held annually to encourage advancements in the automatic processing of legal texts. Processing legal documents is challenging due to the intricate structure and meaning of legal language. In this paper, we outline our strategies for tackling Task 2, Task 3, and Task 4 in the COLIEE 2023 competition. Our approach involved utilizing appropriate state-of-the-art deep learning methods, designing methods based on domain characteristics observation, and applying meticulous engineering practices and methodologies to the competition. As a result, our performance in these tasks has been outstanding, with first places in Task 2 and Task 3, and promising results in Task 4. Our source code is available at https://github.com/Nguyen2015/CAPTAIN-COLIEE2023/tree/coliee2023.

Real-Time Magnetic Tracking and Diagnosis of COVID-19 via Machine Learning

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of reliable, noninvasive diagnostic tools for robust public health interventions. In this work, we fused magnetic respiratory sensing technology (MRST) with machine learning (ML) to create a diagnostic platform for real-time tracking and diagnosis of COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases. The MRST precisely captures breathing patterns through three specific breath testing protocols: normal breath, holding breath, and deep breath. We collected breath data from both COVID-19 patients and healthy subjects in Vietnam using this platform, which then served to train and validate ML models. Our evaluation encompassed multiple ML algorithms, including support vector machines and deep learning models, assessing their ability to diagnose COVID-19. Our multi-model validation methodology ensures a thorough comparison and grants the adaptability to select the most optimal model, striking a balance between diagnostic precision with model interpretability. The findings highlight the exceptional potential of our diagnostic tool in pinpointing respiratory anomalies, achieving over 90% accuracy. This innovative sensor technology can be seamlessly integrated into healthcare settings for patient monitoring, marking a significant enhancement for the healthcare infrastructure.

A Summary of the ALQAC 2021 Competition

We summarize the evaluation of the first Automated Legal Question Answering Competition (ALQAC 2021). The competition this year contains three tasks, which aims at processing the statute law document, which are Legal Text Information Retrieval (Task 1), Legal Text Entailment Prediction (Task 2), and Legal Text Question Answering (Task 3). The final goal of these tasks is to build a system that can automatically determine whether a particular statement is lawful. There is no limit to the approaches of the participating teams. This year, there are 5 teams participating in Task 1, 6 teams participating in Task 2, and 5 teams participating in Task 3. There are in total 36 runs submitted to the organizer. In this paper, we summarize each team's approaches, official results, and some discussion about the competition. Only results of the teams who successfully submit their approach description paper are reported in this paper.