OCP: Orthogonal Constrained Projection for Sparse Scaling in Industrial Commodity Recommendation

In industrial commodity recommendation systems, the representation quality of Item-Id vocabularies directly impacts the scalability and generalization ability of recommendation models. A key challenge is that traditional Item-Id vocabularies, when subjected to sparse scaling, suffer from low-frequency information interference, which restricts their expressive power for massive item sets and leads to representation collapse. To address this issue, we propose an Orthogonal Constrained Projection method to optimize embedding representation. By enforcing orthogonality, the projection constrains the backpropagation manifold, aligning the singular value spectrum of the learned embeddings with the orthogonal basis. This alignment ensures high singular entropy, thereby preserving isotropic generalized features while suppressing spurious correlations and overfitting to rare items. Empirical results demonstrate that OCP accelerates loss convergence and enhances the model's scalability; notably, it enables consistent performance gains when scaling up dense layers. Large-scale industrial deployment on JD.com further confirms its efficacy, yielding a 12.97% increase in UCXR and an 8.9% uplift in GMV, highlighting its robust utility for scaling up both sparse vocabularies and dense architectures.

Interplay: Training Independent Simulators for Reference-Free Conversational Recommendation

Training conversational recommender systems (CRS) requires extensive dialogue data, which is challenging to collect at scale. To address this, researchers have used simulated user-recommender conversations. Traditional simulation approaches often utilize a single large language model (LLM) that generates entire conversations with prior knowledge of the target items, leading to scripted and artificial dialogues. We propose a reference-free simulation framework that trains two independent LLMs, one as the user and one as the conversational recommender. These models interact in real-time without access to predetermined target items, but preference summaries and target attributes, enabling the recommender to genuinely infer user preferences through dialogue. This approach produces more realistic and diverse conversations that closely mirror authentic human-AI interactions. Our reference-free simulators match or exceed existing methods in quality, while offering a scalable solution for generating high-quality conversational recommendation data without constraining conversations to pre-defined target items. We conduct both quantitative and human evaluations to confirm the effectiveness of our reference-free approach.

Man and machine: artificial intelligence and judicial decision making

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into judicial decision-making - particularly in pretrial, sentencing, and parole contexts - has generated substantial concerns about transparency, reliability, and accountability. At the same time, these developments have brought the limitations of human judgment into sharper relief and underscored the importance of understanding how judges interact with AI-based decision aids. Using criminal justice risk assessment as a focal case, we conduct a synthetic review connecting three intertwined aspects of AI's role in judicial decision-making: the performance and fairness of AI tools, the strengths and biases of human judges, and the nature of AI+human interactions. Across the fields of computer science, economics, law, criminology and psychology, researchers have made significant progress in evaluating the predictive validity of automated risk assessment instruments, documenting biases in judicial decision-making, and, to a more limited extent, examining how judges use algorithmic recommendations. While the existing empirical evidence indicates that the impact of AI decision aid tools on pretrial and sentencing decisions is modest or inexistent, our review also reveals important gaps in the canvassed literatures. Further research is needed to evaluate the performance of AI risk assessment instruments, understand how judges navigate noisy decision making environments and how individual characteristics influence judges' responses to AI advice. We argue that AI vs Human comparisons have the potential to yield new insights into both algorithmic tools and human decision-makers and advocate greater interdisciplinary integration and cross-fertilization in future research.

Best-of-Both-Worlds Multi-Dueling Bandits: Unified Algorithms for Stochastic and Adversarial Preferences under Condorcet and Borda Objectives

Multi-dueling bandits, where a learner selects $m \geq 2$ arms per round and observes only the winner, arise naturally in many applications including ranking and recommendation systems, yet a fundamental question has remained open: can a single algorithm perform optimally in both stochastic and adversarial environments, without knowing which regime it faces? We answer this affirmatively, providing the first best-of-both-worlds algorithms for multi-dueling bandits under both Condorcet and Borda objectives. For the Condorcet setting, we propose \texttt{MetaDueling}, a black-box reduction that converts any dueling bandit algorithm into a multi-dueling bandit algorithm by transforming multi-way winner feedback into an unbiased pairwise signal. Instantiating our reduction with \texttt{Versatile-DB} yields the first best-of-both-worlds algorithm for multi-dueling bandits: it achieves $O(\sqrt{KT})$ pseudo-regret against adversarial preferences and the instance-optimal $O\!\left(\sum_{i \neq a^\star} \frac{\log T}{Δ_i}\right)$ pseudo-regret under stochastic preferences, both simultaneously and without prior knowledge of the regime. For the Borda setting, we propose \AlgBorda, a stochastic-and-adversarial algorithm that achieves $O\left(K^2 \log KT + K \log^2 T + \sum_{i: Δ_i^{\mathrm{B}} > 0} \frac{K\log KT}{(Δ_i^{\mathrm{B}})^2}\right)$ regret in stochastic environments and $O\left(K \sqrt{T \log KT} + K^{1/3} T^{2/3} (\log K)^{1/3}\right)$ regret against adversaries, again without prior knowledge of the regime. We complement our upper bounds with matching lower bounds for the Condorcet setting. For the Borda setting, our upper bounds are near-optimal with respect to the lower bounds (within a factor of $K$) and match the best-known results in the literature.

Off-Policy Learning with Limited Supply

We study off-policy learning (OPL) in contextual bandits, which plays a key role in a wide range of real-world applications such as recommendation systems and online advertising. Typical OPL in contextual bandits assumes an unconstrained environment where a policy can select the same item infinitely. However, in many practical applications, including coupon allocation and e-commerce, limited supply constrains items through budget limits on distributed coupons or inventory restrictions on products. In these settings, greedily selecting the item with the highest expected reward for the current user may lead to early depletion of that item, making it unavailable for future users who could potentially generate higher expected rewards. As a result, OPL methods that are optimal in unconstrained settings may become suboptimal in limited supply settings. To address the issue, we provide a theoretical analysis showing that conventional greedy OPL approaches may fail to maximize the policy performance, and demonstrate that policies with superior performance must exist in limited supply settings. Based on this insight, we introduce a novel method called Off-Policy learning with Limited Supply (OPLS). Rather than simply selecting the item with the highest expected reward, OPLS focuses on items with relatively higher expected rewards compared to the other users, enabling more efficient allocation of items with limited supply. Our empirical results on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that OPLS outperforms existing OPL methods in contextual bandit problems with limited supply.

Stochastic Sequential Decision Making over Expanding Networks with Graph Filtering

Graph filters leverage topological information to process networked data with existing methods mainly studying fixed graphs, ignoring that graphs often expand as nodes continually attach with an unknown pattern. The latter requires developing filter-based decision-making paradigms that take evolution and uncertainty into account. Existing approaches rely on either pre-designed filters or online learning, limited to a myopic view considering only past or present information. To account for future impacts, we propose a stochastic sequential decision-making framework for filtering networked data with a policy that adapts filtering to expanding graphs. By representing filter shifts as agents, we model the filter as a multi-agent system and train the policy following multi-agent reinforcement learning. This accounts for long-term rewards and captures expansion dynamics through sequential decision-making. Moreover, we develop a context-aware graph neural network to parameterize the policy, which tunes filter parameters based on information of both the graph and agents. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets from cold-start recommendation to COVID prediction highlight the benefits of using a sequential decision-making perspective over batch and online filtering alternatives.

An Onto-Relational-Sophic Framework for Governing Synthetic Minds

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, from task-specific systems to foundation models exhibiting broad, flexible competence across reasoning, creative synthesis, and social interaction, has outpaced the conceptual and governance frameworks designed to manage it. Current regulatory paradigms, anchored in a tool-centric worldview, address algorithmic bias and transparency but leave unanswered foundational questions about what increasingly capable synthetic minds are, how societies should relate to them, and the normative principles that should guide their development. Here we introduce the Onto-Relational-Sophic (ORS) framework, grounded in Cyberism philosophy, which offers integrated answers to these challenges through three pillars: (1) a Cyber-Physical-Social-Thinking (CPST) ontology that defines the mode of being for synthetic minds as irreducibly multi-dimensional rather than purely computational; (2) a graded spectrum of digital personhood providing a pragmatic relational taxonomy beyond binary person-or-tool classifications; and (3) Cybersophy, a wisdom-oriented axiology synthesizing virtue ethics, consequentialism, and relational approaches to guide governance. We apply the framework to emergent scenarios including autonomous research agents, AI-mediated healthcare, and agentic AI ecosystems, demonstrating its capacity to generate proportionate, adaptive governance recommendations. The ORS framework charts a path from narrow technical alignment toward comprehensive philosophical foundations for the synthetic minds already among us.

Attack by Unlearning: Unlearning-Induced Adversarial Attacks on Graph Neural Networks

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used for learning from graph-structured data in domains such as social networks, recommender systems, and financial platforms. To comply with privacy regulations like the GDPR, CCPA, and PIPEDA, approximate graph unlearning, which aims to remove the influence of specific data points from trained models without full retraining, has become an increasingly important component of trustworthy graph learning. However, approximate unlearning often incurs subtle performance degradation, which may incur negative and unintended side effects. In this work, we show that such degradations can be amplified into adversarial attacks. We introduce the notion of \textbf{unlearning corruption attacks}, where an adversary injects carefully chosen nodes into the training graph and later requests their deletion. Because deletion requests are legally mandated and cannot be denied, this attack surface is both unavoidable and stealthy: the model performs normally during training, but accuracy collapses only after unlearning is applied. Technically, we formulate this attack as a bi-level optimization problem: to overcome the challenges of black-box unlearning and label scarcity, we approximate the unlearning process via gradient-based updates and employ a surrogate model to generate pseudo-labels for the optimization. Extensive experiments across benchmarks and unlearning algorithms demonstrate that small, carefully designed unlearning requests can induce significant accuracy degradation, raising urgent concerns about the robustness of GNN unlearning under real-world regulatory demands. The source code will be released upon paper acceptance.

Implicit Grading Bias in Large Language Models: How Writing Style Affects Automated Assessment Across Math, Programming, and Essay Tasks

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as automated graders in educational settings, concerns about fairness and bias in their evaluations have become critical. This study investigates whether LLMs exhibit implicit grading bias based on writing style when the underlying content correctness remains constant. We constructed a controlled dataset of 180 student responses across three subjects (Mathematics, Programming, and Essay/Writing), each with three surface-level perturbation types: grammar errors, informal language, and non-native phrasing. Two state-of-the-art open-source LLMs -- LLaMA 3.3 70B (Meta) and Qwen 2.5 72B (Alibaba) -- were prompted to grade responses on a 1-10 scale with explicit instructions to evaluate content correctness only and to disregard writing style. Our results reveal statistically significant grading bias in Essay/Writing tasks across both models and all perturbation types (p < 0.05), with effect sizes ranging from medium (Cohen's d = 0.64) to very large (d = 4.25). Informal language received the heaviest penalty, with LLaMA deducting an average of 1.90 points and Qwen deducting 1.20 points on a 10-point scale -- penalties comparable to the difference between a B+ and C+ letter grade. Non-native phrasing was penalized 1.35 and 0.90 points respectively. In sharp contrast, Mathematics and Programming tasks showed minimal bias, with most conditions failing to reach statistical significance. These findings demonstrate that LLM grading bias is subject-dependent, style-sensitive, and persists despite explicit counter-bias instructions in the grading prompt. We discuss implications for equitable deployment of LLM-based grading systems and recommend bias auditing protocols before institutional adoption.

HypeMed: Enhancing Medication Recommendations with Hypergraph-Based Patient Relationships

Medication recommendations aim to generate safe and effective medication sets from health records. However, accurately recommending medications hinges on inferring a patient's latent clinical condition from sparse and noisy observations, which requires both (i) preserving the visit-level combinatorial semantics of co-occurring entities and (ii) leveraging informative historical references through effective, visit-conditioned retrieval. Most existing methods fall short in one of both aspects: graph-based modeling often fragments higher-order intra-visit patterns into pairwise relations, while inter-visit augmentation methods commonly exhibit an imbalance between learning a globally stable representation space and performing dynamic retrieval within it. To address these limitations, this paper proposes HypeMed, a two-stage hypergraph-based framework unifying intra-visit coherence modeling and inter-visit augmentation. HypeMed consists of two core modules: MedRep for representation pre-training, and SimMR for similarity-enhanced recommendation. In the first stage, MedRep encodes clinical visits as hyperedges via knowledge-aware contrastive pre-training, creating a globally consistent, retrieval-friendly embedding space. In the second stage, SimMR performs dynamic retrieval within this space, fusing retrieved references with the patient's longitudinal data to refine medication prediction. Evaluation on real-world benchmarks shows that HypeMed outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both recommendation precision and DDI reduction, simultaneously enhancing the effectiveness and safety of clinical decision support.