Where and What: Reasoning Dynamic and Implicit Preferences in Situated Conversational Recommendation

Situated conversational recommendation (SCR), which utilizes visual scenes grounded in specific environments and natural language dialogue to deliver contextually appropriate recommendations, has emerged as a promising research direction due to its close alignment with real-world scenarios. Compared to traditional recommendations, SCR requires a deeper understanding of dynamic and implicit user preferences, as the surrounding scene often influences users' underlying interests, while both may evolve across conversations. This complexity significantly impacts the timing and relevance of recommendations. To address this, we propose situated preference reasoning (SiPeR), a novel framework that integrates two core mechanisms: (1) Scene transition estimation, which estimates whether the current scene satisfies user needs, and guides the user toward a more suitable scene when necessary; and (2) Bayesian inverse inference, which leverages the likelihood of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to predict user preferences about candidate items within the scene. Extensive experiments on two representative benchmarks demonstrate SiPeR's superiority in both recommendation accuracy and response generation quality. The code and data are available at https://github.com/DongdingLin/SiPeR.

Break the Optimization Barrier of LLM-Enhanced Recommenders: A Theoretical Analysis and Practical Framework

Large language model (LLM)-enhanced recommendation models inject LLM representations into backbone recommenders to exploit rich item text without inference-time LLM cost. However, we find that existing LLM-enhanced methods significantly hinder the optimization of backbone models, resulting in high training losses that are difficult to reduce. To address it, we establish a comprehensive theoretical analysis of local optimization curvature and identify two key causes: 1) large norm disparity and 2) semantic-collaboration misaligned angular clustering of LLM representations. Guided by these insights, we propose Training-Friendly LLM-Enhanced Recommender (TF-LLMER), a lightweight framework with two key components. First, we highlight the necessity of item embedding normalization to eliminate norm-driven instability and achieve provable control over optimization conditioning. Second, we introduce Rec-PCA, a recommendation-aware dimensionality reduction method that injects collaborative structure into the representation transformation to resolve semantic-collaboration misaligned angular clustering. It jointly optimizes semantic information retention and alignment with an item-item co-occurrence graph constructed from interaction histories. The graph captures collaborative structure, and alignment is promoted by penalizing total variation over the graph. Both theory and extensive experiments demonstrate that TF-LLMER significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/woriazzc/TF-LLMER.

Modular Representation Compression: Adapting LLMs for Efficient and Effective Recommendations

Recently, large language models (LLMs) have advanced recommendation systems (RSs), and recent works have begun to explore how to integrate LLMs into industrial RSs. While most approaches deploy LLMs offline to generate and pre-cache augmented representations for RSs, high-dimensional representations from LLMs introduce substantial storage and computational costs. Thus, it is crucial to compress LLM representations effectively. However, we identify a counterintuitive phenomenon during representation compression: Mid-layer Representation Advantage (MRA), where representations from middle layers of LLMs outperform those from final layers in recommendation tasks. This degraded final layer renders existing compression methods, which typically compress on the final layer, suboptimal. We interpret this based on modularity theory that LLMs develop spontaneous internal functional modularity and force the final layer to specialize in the proxy training task. Thus, we propose \underline{M}odul\underline{a}r \underline{R}epresentation \underline{C}ompression (MARC) to explicitly control the modularity of LLMs. First, Modular Adjustment explicitly introduces compression and task adaptation modules, enabling the LLM to operate strictly as a representation-learning module. Next, to ground each module to its specific task, Modular Task Decoupling uses information constraints and different network structures to decouple tasks. Extensive experiments validate that MARC addresses MRA and produces efficient representations. Notably, MARC achieved a 2.82% eCPM lift in an online A/B test within a large-scale commercial search advertising scenario.

RankUp: Towards High-rank Representations for Large Scale Advertising Recommender Systems

The scaling laws for recommender systems have been increasingly validated, where MetaFormer-based architectures consistently benefit from increased model depth, hidden dimensionality, and user behavior sequence length. However, whether representation capacity scales proportionally with parameter growth remains largely unexplored. Prior studies on RankMixer reveal that the effective rank of token representations exhibits a damped oscillatory trajectory across layers, failing to increase consistently with depth and even degrading in deeper layers. Motivated by this observation, we propose \textbf{RankUp}, an architecture designed to mitigate representation collapse and enhance expressive capacity through randomized permutation splitting over sparse features, a multi-embedding paradigm, global token integration, crossed pretrained embedding tokens and task-specific token decoupling. RankUp has been fully deployed in large-scale production across Weixin Video Accounts, Official Accounts and Moments, yielding GMV improvements of 3.41\%, 4.81\% and 2.21\%, respectively.

CAST: Modeling Semantic-Level Transitions for Complementary-Aware Sequential Recommendation

Sequential Recommendation (SR) aims to predict the next interaction of a user based on their behavior sequence, where complementary relations often provide essential signals for predicting the next item. However, mainstream models relying on sparse co-purchase statistics often mistake spurious correlations (e.g., due to popularity bias) for true complementary relations. Identifying true complementary relations requires capturing the fine-grained item semantics (e.g., specifications) that simple cooccurrence statistics would be unable to model. While recent semantics-based methods utilize discrete semantic codes to represent items, they typically aggregate semantic codes into coarse item representations. This aggregation process blurs specific semantic details required to identify complementarity. To address these critical limitations and effectively leverage semantics for capturing reliable complementary relations, we propose a Complementary-Aware Semantic Transition (CAST) framework that introduces a new modeling paradigm built upon semantic-level transitions. Specifically, a semantic-level transition module is designed to model dynamic transitions directly in the discrete semantic code space, effectively capturing fine-grained semantic dependencies often lost in aggregated item representations. Then, a complementary prior injection module is designed to incorporate LLM-verified complementary priors into the attention mechanism, thereby prioritizing complementary patterns over co-occurrence statistics. Experiments on multiple e-commerce datasets demonstrate that CAST consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches, achieving up to 17.6% Recall and 16.0% NDCG gains with 65x training acceleration. This validates its effectiveness and efficiency in uncovering latent item complementarity beyond statistics. The code will be released upon acceptance.

GraphRAG-IRL: Personalized Recommendation with Graph-Grounded Inverse Reinforcement Learning and LLM Re-ranking

Personalized recommendation requires models that capture sequential user preferences while remaining robust to sparse feedback and semantic ambiguity. Recent work has explored large language models (LLMs) as recommenders and re-rankers, but pure prompt-based ranking often suffers from poor calibration, sensitivity to candidate ordering, and popularity bias. These limitations make LLMs useful semantic reasoners, but unreliable as standalone ranking engines. We present \textbf{GraphRAG-IRL}, a hybrid recommendation framework that combines graph-grounded feature construction, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), and persona-guided LLM re-ranking. Our method constructs a heterogeneous knowledge graph over items, categories, and concepts, retrieves both individual and community preference context, and uses these signals to train a Maximum Entropy IRL model for calibrated pre-ranking. An LLM is then applied only to a short candidate list, where persona-guided prompts provide complementary semantic judgments that are fused with IRL rankings. Experiments show that GraphRAG-IRL is a strong standalone recommender: IRL-MLP with GraphRAG improves NDCG@10 by 15.7\% on MovieLens and 16.6\% on KuaiRand over supervised baselines. The results also show that IRL and GraphRAG are superadditive, with the combined gain exceeding the sum of their individual improvements. Persona-guided LLM fusion further improves ranking quality, yielding up to 16.8\% NDCG@10 improvement over the IRL-only baseline on MovieLens ml-1m, while score fusion on KuaiRand provides consistent gains of 4--6\% across LLM providers.

Bias in the Tails: How Name-conditioned Evaluative Framing in Resume Summaries Destabilizes LLM-based Hiring

Research has documented LLMs' name-based bias in hiring and salary recommendations. In this paper, we instead consider a setting where LLMs generate candidate summaries for downstream assessment. In a large-scale controlled study, we analyze nearly one million resume summaries produced by 4 models under systematic race-gender name perturbations, using synthetic resumes and real-world job postings. By decomposing each summary into resume-grounded factual content and evaluative framing, we find that factual content remains largely stable, while evaluative language exhibits subtle name-conditioned variation concentrated in the extremes of the distribution, especially in open-source models. Our hiring simulation demonstrates how evaluative summary transforms directional harm into symmetric instability that might evade conventional fairness audit, highlighting a potential pathway for LLM-to-LLM automation bias.

From Top-1 to Top-K: A Reproducibility Study and Benchmarking of Counterfactual Explanations for Recommender Systems

Counterfactual explanations (CEs) provide an intuitive way to understand recommender systems by identifying minimal modifications to user-item interactions that alter recommendation outcomes. Existing CE methods for recommender systems, however, have been evaluated under heterogeneous protocols, using different datasets, recommenders, metrics, and even explanation formats, which hampers reproducibility and fair comparison. Our paper systematically reproduces, re-implement, and re-evaluate eleven state-of-the-art CE methods for recommender systems, covering both native explainers (e.g., LIME-RS, SHAP, PRINCE, ACCENT, LXR, GREASE) and specific graph-based explainers originally proposed for GNNs. Here, a unified benchmarking framework is proposed to assess explainers along three dimensions: explanation format (implicit vs. explicit), evaluation level (item-level vs. list-level), and perturbation scope (user interaction vectors vs. user-item interaction graphs). Our evaluation protocol includes effectiveness, sparsity, and computational complexity metrics, and extends existing item-level assessments to top-K list-level explanations. Through extensive experiments on three real-world datasets and six representative recommender models, we analyze how well previously reported strengths of CE methods generalize across diverse setups. We observe that the trade-off between effectiveness and sparsity depends strongly on the specific method and evaluation setting, particularly under the explicit format; in addition, explainer performance remains largely consistent across item level and list level evaluations, and several graph-based explainers exhibit notable scalability limitations on large recommender graphs. Our results refine and challenge earlier conclusions about the robustness and practicality of CE generation methods in recommender systems: https://github.com/L2R-UET/CFExpRec.

Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI

With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs), the academic community has faced unprecedented disruptions, particularly in the realm of academic communication. The primary function of peer review is improving the quality of academic manuscripts, such as clarity, originality and other evaluation aspects. Although prior studies suggest that LLMs are beginning to influence peer review, it remains unclear whether they are altering its core evaluative functions. Moreover, the extent to which LLMs affect the linguistic form, evaluative focus, and recommendation-related signals of peer-review reports has yet to be systematically examined. In this study, we examine the changes in peer review reports for academic articles following the emergence of LLMs, emphasizing variations at fine-grained level. Specifically, we investigate linguistic features such as the length and complexity of words and sentences in review comments, while also automatically annotating the evaluation aspects of individual review sentences. We also use a maximum likelihood estimation method, previously established, to identify review reports that potentially have modified or generated by LLMs. Finally, we assess the impact of evaluation aspects mentioned in LLM-assisted review reports on the informativeness of recommendation for paper decision-making. The results indicate that following the emergence of LLMs, peer review texts have become longer and more fluent, with increased emphasis on summaries and surface-level clarity, as well as more standardized linguistic patterns, particularly reviewers with lower confidence score. At the same time, attention to deeper evaluative dimensions, such as originality, replicability, and nuanced critical reasoning, has declined.

CS3: Efficient Online Capability Synergy for Two-Tower Recommendation

To balance effectiveness and efficiency in recommender systems, multi-stage pipelines commonly use lightweight two-tower models for large-scale candidate retrieval. However, the isolated two-tower architecture restricts representation capacity, embedding-space alignment, and cross-feature interactions. Existing solutions such as late interaction and knowledge distillation can mitigate these issues, but often increase latency or are difficult to deploy in online learning settings. We propose Capability Synergy (CS3), an efficient online framework that strengthens two-tower retrievers while preserving real-time constraints. CS3 introduces three mechanisms: (1) Cycle-Adaptive Structure for self-revision via adaptive feature denoising within each tower; (2) Cross-Tower Synchronization to improve alignment through lightweight mutual awareness between towers; and (3) Cascade-Model Sharing to enhance cross-stage consistency by reusing knowledge from downstream models. CS3 is plug-and-play with diverse two-tower backbones and compatible with online learning. Experiments on three public datasets show consistent gains over strong baselines, and deployment in a largescale advertising system yields up to 8.36% revenue improvement across three scenarios while maintaining ms-level latency.