From Token to Item: Enhancing Large Language Models for Recommendation via Item-aware Attention Mechanism

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently gained increasing attention in the field of recommendation. Existing LLM-based methods typically represent items as token sequences, and apply attention layers on these tokens to generate recommendations. However, by inheriting the standard attention mechanism, these methods focus on modeling token-level relations. This token-centric focus overlooks the item as the fundamental unit of recommendation, preventing existing methods from effectively capturing collaborative relations at the item level. In this work, we revisit the role of tokens in LLM-driven recommendation and categorize their relations into two types: (1) intra-item token relations, which present the content semantics of an item, e.g., name, color, and size; and (2) inter-item token relations, which encode collaborative relations across items. Building on these insights, we propose a novel framework with an item-aware attention mechanism (IAM) to enhance LLMs for recommendation. Specifically, IAM devises two complementary attention layers: (1) an intra-item attention layer, which restricts attention to tokens within the same item, modeling item content semantics; and (2) an inter-item attention layer, which attends exclusively to token relations across items, capturing item collaborative relations. Through this stacked design, IAM explicitly emphasizes items as the fundamental units in recommendation, enabling LLMs to effectively exploit item-level collaborative relations. Extensive experiments on several public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of IAM in enhancing LLMs for personalized recommendation.

Stochastic Sequential Decision Making over Expanding Networks with Graph Filtering

Graph filters leverage topological information to process networked data with existing methods mainly studying fixed graphs, ignoring that graphs often expand as nodes continually attach with an unknown pattern. The latter requires developing filter-based decision-making paradigms that take evolution and uncertainty into account. Existing approaches rely on either pre-designed filters or online learning, limited to a myopic view considering only past or present information. To account for future impacts, we propose a stochastic sequential decision-making framework for filtering networked data with a policy that adapts filtering to expanding graphs. By representing filter shifts as agents, we model the filter as a multi-agent system and train the policy following multi-agent reinforcement learning. This accounts for long-term rewards and captures expansion dynamics through sequential decision-making. Moreover, we develop a context-aware graph neural network to parameterize the policy, which tunes filter parameters based on information of both the graph and agents. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets from cold-start recommendation to COVID prediction highlight the benefits of using a sequential decision-making perspective over batch and online filtering alternatives.

An Onto-Relational-Sophic Framework for Governing Synthetic Minds

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, from task-specific systems to foundation models exhibiting broad, flexible competence across reasoning, creative synthesis, and social interaction, has outpaced the conceptual and governance frameworks designed to manage it. Current regulatory paradigms, anchored in a tool-centric worldview, address algorithmic bias and transparency but leave unanswered foundational questions about what increasingly capable synthetic minds are, how societies should relate to them, and the normative principles that should guide their development. Here we introduce the Onto-Relational-Sophic (ORS) framework, grounded in Cyberism philosophy, which offers integrated answers to these challenges through three pillars: (1) a Cyber-Physical-Social-Thinking (CPST) ontology that defines the mode of being for synthetic minds as irreducibly multi-dimensional rather than purely computational; (2) a graded spectrum of digital personhood providing a pragmatic relational taxonomy beyond binary person-or-tool classifications; and (3) Cybersophy, a wisdom-oriented axiology synthesizing virtue ethics, consequentialism, and relational approaches to guide governance. We apply the framework to emergent scenarios including autonomous research agents, AI-mediated healthcare, and agentic AI ecosystems, demonstrating its capacity to generate proportionate, adaptive governance recommendations. The ORS framework charts a path from narrow technical alignment toward comprehensive philosophical foundations for the synthetic minds already among us.

Attack by Unlearning: Unlearning-Induced Adversarial Attacks on Graph Neural Networks

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used for learning from graph-structured data in domains such as social networks, recommender systems, and financial platforms. To comply with privacy regulations like the GDPR, CCPA, and PIPEDA, approximate graph unlearning, which aims to remove the influence of specific data points from trained models without full retraining, has become an increasingly important component of trustworthy graph learning. However, approximate unlearning often incurs subtle performance degradation, which may incur negative and unintended side effects. In this work, we show that such degradations can be amplified into adversarial attacks. We introduce the notion of \textbf{unlearning corruption attacks}, where an adversary injects carefully chosen nodes into the training graph and later requests their deletion. Because deletion requests are legally mandated and cannot be denied, this attack surface is both unavoidable and stealthy: the model performs normally during training, but accuracy collapses only after unlearning is applied. Technically, we formulate this attack as a bi-level optimization problem: to overcome the challenges of black-box unlearning and label scarcity, we approximate the unlearning process via gradient-based updates and employ a surrogate model to generate pseudo-labels for the optimization. Extensive experiments across benchmarks and unlearning algorithms demonstrate that small, carefully designed unlearning requests can induce significant accuracy degradation, raising urgent concerns about the robustness of GNN unlearning under real-world regulatory demands. The source code will be released upon paper acceptance.

Implicit Grading Bias in Large Language Models: How Writing Style Affects Automated Assessment Across Math, Programming, and Essay Tasks

As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as automated graders in educational settings, concerns about fairness and bias in their evaluations have become critical. This study investigates whether LLMs exhibit implicit grading bias based on writing style when the underlying content correctness remains constant. We constructed a controlled dataset of 180 student responses across three subjects (Mathematics, Programming, and Essay/Writing), each with three surface-level perturbation types: grammar errors, informal language, and non-native phrasing. Two state-of-the-art open-source LLMs -- LLaMA 3.3 70B (Meta) and Qwen 2.5 72B (Alibaba) -- were prompted to grade responses on a 1-10 scale with explicit instructions to evaluate content correctness only and to disregard writing style. Our results reveal statistically significant grading bias in Essay/Writing tasks across both models and all perturbation types (p < 0.05), with effect sizes ranging from medium (Cohen's d = 0.64) to very large (d = 4.25). Informal language received the heaviest penalty, with LLaMA deducting an average of 1.90 points and Qwen deducting 1.20 points on a 10-point scale -- penalties comparable to the difference between a B+ and C+ letter grade. Non-native phrasing was penalized 1.35 and 0.90 points respectively. In sharp contrast, Mathematics and Programming tasks showed minimal bias, with most conditions failing to reach statistical significance. These findings demonstrate that LLM grading bias is subject-dependent, style-sensitive, and persists despite explicit counter-bias instructions in the grading prompt. We discuss implications for equitable deployment of LLM-based grading systems and recommend bias auditing protocols before institutional adoption.

HypeMed: Enhancing Medication Recommendations with Hypergraph-Based Patient Relationships

Medication recommendations aim to generate safe and effective medication sets from health records. However, accurately recommending medications hinges on inferring a patient's latent clinical condition from sparse and noisy observations, which requires both (i) preserving the visit-level combinatorial semantics of co-occurring entities and (ii) leveraging informative historical references through effective, visit-conditioned retrieval. Most existing methods fall short in one of both aspects: graph-based modeling often fragments higher-order intra-visit patterns into pairwise relations, while inter-visit augmentation methods commonly exhibit an imbalance between learning a globally stable representation space and performing dynamic retrieval within it. To address these limitations, this paper proposes HypeMed, a two-stage hypergraph-based framework unifying intra-visit coherence modeling and inter-visit augmentation. HypeMed consists of two core modules: MedRep for representation pre-training, and SimMR for similarity-enhanced recommendation. In the first stage, MedRep encodes clinical visits as hyperedges via knowledge-aware contrastive pre-training, creating a globally consistent, retrieval-friendly embedding space. In the second stage, SimMR performs dynamic retrieval within this space, fusing retrieved references with the patient's longitudinal data to refine medication prediction. Evaluation on real-world benchmarks shows that HypeMed outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both recommendation precision and DDI reduction, simultaneously enhancing the effectiveness and safety of clinical decision support.

Latent Factor Modeling with Expert Network for Multi-Behavior Recommendation

Traditional recommendation methods, which typically focus on modeling a single user behavior (e.g., purchase), often face severe data sparsity issues. Multi-behavior recommendation methods offer a promising solution by leveraging user data from diverse behaviors. However, most existing approaches entangle multiple behavioral factors, learning holistic but imprecise representations that fail to capture specific user intents. To address this issue, we propose a multi-behavior method by modeling latent factors with an expert network (MBLFE). In our approach, we design a gating expert network, where the expert network models all latent factors within the entire recommendation scenario, with each expert specializing in a specific latent factor. The gating network dynamically selects the optimal combination of experts for each user, enabling a more accurate representation of user preferences. To ensure independence among experts and factor consistency of a particular expert, we incorporate self-supervised learning during the training process. Furthermore, we enrich embeddings with multi-behavior data to provide the expert network with more comprehensive collaborative information for factor extraction. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, validating its effectiveness.

OCP: Orthogonal Constrained Projection for Sparse Scaling in Industrial Commodity Recommendation

In industrial commodity recommendation systems, the representation quality of Item-Id vocabularies directly impacts the scalability and generalization ability of recommendation models. A key challenge is that traditional Item-Id vocabularies, when subjected to sparse scaling, suffer from low-frequency information interference, which restricts their expressive power for massive item sets and leads to representation collapse. To address this issue, we propose an Orthogonal Constrained Projection method to optimize embedding representation. By enforcing orthogonality, the projection constrains the backpropagation manifold, aligning the singular value spectrum of the learned embeddings with the orthogonal basis. This alignment ensures high singular entropy, thereby preserving isotropic generalized features while suppressing spurious correlations and overfitting to rare items. Empirical results demonstrate that OCP accelerates loss convergence and enhances the model's scalability; notably, it enables consistent performance gains when scaling up dense layers. Large-scale industrial deployment on JD.com further confirms its efficacy, yielding a 12.97% increase in UCXR and an 8.9% uplift in GMV, highlighting its robust utility for scaling up both sparse vocabularies and dense architectures.

Interplay: Training Independent Simulators for Reference-Free Conversational Recommendation

Training conversational recommender systems (CRS) requires extensive dialogue data, which is challenging to collect at scale. To address this, researchers have used simulated user-recommender conversations. Traditional simulation approaches often utilize a single large language model (LLM) that generates entire conversations with prior knowledge of the target items, leading to scripted and artificial dialogues. We propose a reference-free simulation framework that trains two independent LLMs, one as the user and one as the conversational recommender. These models interact in real-time without access to predetermined target items, but preference summaries and target attributes, enabling the recommender to genuinely infer user preferences through dialogue. This approach produces more realistic and diverse conversations that closely mirror authentic human-AI interactions. Our reference-free simulators match or exceed existing methods in quality, while offering a scalable solution for generating high-quality conversational recommendation data without constraining conversations to pre-defined target items. We conduct both quantitative and human evaluations to confirm the effectiveness of our reference-free approach.

Man and machine: artificial intelligence and judicial decision making

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into judicial decision-making - particularly in pretrial, sentencing, and parole contexts - has generated substantial concerns about transparency, reliability, and accountability. At the same time, these developments have brought the limitations of human judgment into sharper relief and underscored the importance of understanding how judges interact with AI-based decision aids. Using criminal justice risk assessment as a focal case, we conduct a synthetic review connecting three intertwined aspects of AI's role in judicial decision-making: the performance and fairness of AI tools, the strengths and biases of human judges, and the nature of AI+human interactions. Across the fields of computer science, economics, law, criminology and psychology, researchers have made significant progress in evaluating the predictive validity of automated risk assessment instruments, documenting biases in judicial decision-making, and, to a more limited extent, examining how judges use algorithmic recommendations. While the existing empirical evidence indicates that the impact of AI decision aid tools on pretrial and sentencing decisions is modest or inexistent, our review also reveals important gaps in the canvassed literatures. Further research is needed to evaluate the performance of AI risk assessment instruments, understand how judges navigate noisy decision making environments and how individual characteristics influence judges' responses to AI advice. We argue that AI vs Human comparisons have the potential to yield new insights into both algorithmic tools and human decision-makers and advocate greater interdisciplinary integration and cross-fertilization in future research.