A Closer Look at In-Distribution vs. Out-of-Distribution Accuracy for Open-Set Test-time Adaptation

Open-set test-time adaptation (TTA) updates models on new data in the presence of input shifts and unknown output classes. While recent methods have made progress on improving in-distribution (InD) accuracy for known classes, their ability to accurately detect out-of-distribution (OOD) unknown classes remains underexplored. We benchmark robust and open-set TTA methods (SAR, OSTTA, UniEnt, and SoTTA) on the standard corruption benchmarks of CIFAR-10-C at the small scale and ImageNet-C at the large scale. For CIFAR-10-C, we use OOD data from SVHN and CIFAR-100 in their respective corrupted forms of SVHN-C and CIFAR-100-C. For ImageNet-C, we use OOD data from ImageNet-O and Textures in their respective corrupted forms of ImageNet-O-C and Textures-C. ImageNet-O is nearer to ImageNet, as unknown but related object classes (like ''garlic bread'' vs. ''hot dog'' for food, or ''highway'' vs. ''dam'' for infrastructure), while Textures is farther from ImageNet, as non-object patterns (like ''cracked'' mud, ''porous'' sponge, ''veined'' leaves). We evaluate the accuracy and confidence of TTA methods for InD vs. OOD recognition on CIFAR-10-C and ImageNet-C. We verify the accuracy of each method's own OOD detection technique on CIFAR-10-C. We also evaluate on ImageNet-C and report both accuracy and standard OOD detection metrics. We further examine more realistic settings, in which the proportions and rates of OOD data can vary. To explore the trade-off between InD recognition and OOD rejection, we propose a new baseline that replaces softmax/multi-class output with sigmoid/multi-label output. Our analysis shows for the first time that current open-set TTA methods struggle to balance InD and OOD accuracy and that they only imperfectly filter OOD data for their own adaptation updates.

SOCO: Benchmarking Semantic Object Correspondence in Vision Foundation Models

Measuring structured object understanding in vision foundation models remains challenging due to inconsistent evaluation protocols and limited part-level supervision. Semantic correspondence (SC) evaluates this capability by testing whether object parts can be matched across instances and categories under large variations in appearance, viewpoint, and geometry. To enable a systematic SC evaluation, we introduce SOCO, a new benchmark for Semantic Object Correspondence that introduces a taxonomy of correspondence types and provides consistent, functionally meaningful keypoint annotations across 100 categories and over 1M correspondence pairs. In addition, SOCO includes keypoint language descriptions, enabling the evaluation of large vision-language models (LVLMs) and their fine-grained part-level understanding. Comprehensive experiments reveal that (i) vision foundation backbones encode strong semantic structure but transfer correspondences poorly across related categories and only partially capture object-part position, (ii) LVLMs are stronger at text-prompted part localization than at visual-reference cross-image matching, exposing a gap between language-grounded localization and fine-grained visual correspondence, and (iii) correspondence performance predicts performance on dense downstream tasks, including segmentation, tracking, 3D pose estimation, and 3D detection, more strongly than ImageNet classification. Together, these findings position SOCO as a benchmark for structured, part-level representation quality in vision and multimodal foundation models.

A Structured Benchmark for Text-Guided Anomaly Detection: When Language Stops Conditioning the Decision

Industrial anomaly detection has historically been a unimodal task. Recent multimodal vision-language models have produced systems that admit textual input alongside the image and are presented as enabling text-guided zero- and few-shot inspection. Yet these methods are evaluated with protocols inherited from unimodal benchmarks that hold the textual condition constant and therefore cannot measure whether language conditions the decision; whether reported gains reflect text guidance or strong pretrained visual features remains open. We introduce Text-Guided Anomaly Detection (TGAD), a structured benchmark that progressively increases the functional role of language across three scenarios: a controlled prompt-sensitivity setting on MVTec AD; a component-tagged extension of MVTec AD that requires the model to restrict its assessment to an instructed part; and the new Assembled Panel Dataset (APD), a realistic industrial setting that requires both defect-type and component-location knowledge. We evaluate one representative model per paradigm: generative large vision-language, training-free discriminative, and embedding-adaptive discriminative. In all three, the textual interface conditions the decision only superficially: prompt content is absorbed unless the object noun is removed (the generative model's I-AUROC drops from 97.4 to 82.6); component-level instructions do not constrain the decision once defects outside the instructed part are admitted as normal (from 90.3 to 66.3); and when both combine on APD, image-level discrimination collapses below the MVTec level, in one case below chance (71.2, 50.5, 31.5). These results suggest that standard benchmarks overstate the text-guided capabilities of current multimodal anomaly detection systems, and that a protocol of this kind is a prerequisite for models that can be reliably controlled through language for industrial deployment.

Learning Hyperspherical Time-Frequency Representations for Time-Series Out-of-Distribution Detection

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection for time-series data remains comparatively underexplored compared to vision and language, with a limited principled understanding of how supervised time-series representations can be leveraged for reliable detection under distributional shifts. This work formulates time-series OOD detection as representation learning with hyperspherical embeddings, where class-conditional structure is induced by a von Mises-Fisher (vMF) likelihood-based objective on the unit sphere. The learned representation combines time- and frequency-domain views of the input signal via domain-specific encoders, integrating them into a joint embedding space for OOD detection. Detection uses distance-based scores over the learned embeddings, including k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) and Mahalanobis scores. We evaluate the approach at scale on the complete UCR and UEA time-series archives under a cross-dataset protocol. Empirical results show consistent improvements under both k-NN and Mahalanobis scoring over strong contrastive learning and post-hoc baselines in the same setting. Code is available at https://github.com/tiiuae/hypertf-time-series-ood.

Hide-and-Seek in Trajectories: Discovering Failure Signals for VLA Runtime Monitoring

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable robots to follow natural language instructions and generalize across diverse tasks, but they remain vulnerable to execution failures that compromise reliability in real-world deployment. Detecting such failures during execution is therefore critical for the robust deployment of embodied systems. Existing failure detection methods either rely on expensive action resampling or external models, while alternatives propagate trajectory-level labels uniformly across every timestep, obscuring localized failure signals. In this paper, we propose \textbf{Hide-and-Seek}, a framework that formulates VLA failure detection as a coarsely supervised learning problem. By combining inter-trajectory and intra-trajectory contrastive objectives, Hide-and-Seek localizes failure-indicative actions and induces temporally structured failure signals from trajectory-level supervision alone, without any step-level annotation. We evaluate Hide-and-Seek on LIBERO, VLABench, and a real-world robotic platform across three representative VLA policies: OpenVLA, $π_0$, and $π_{0.5}$.Our method achieves state-of-the-art multi-task failure detection performance with a practical accuracy--timeliness trade-off under conformal prediction, and generalizes well to both seen and unseen tasks.

SoftPINCH: EMG-Driven Soft Exoskeleton Assistance for Finger Flexion and Grasping

Surface electromyography (sEMG) provides a non-invasive interface for detecting hand-movement intention and controlling wearable assistive devices. However, reliable EMG-driven hand assistance remains challenging because EMG signals are affected by noise, motion artifacts, electrode placement, muscle fatigue, and inter-subject variability. At the same time, many hand exoskeletons remain mechanically restrictive or bulky, limiting comfort and natural hand motion. This work presents SoftPINCH, an EMG-driven soft wearable exoskeleton for thumb-index finger flexion and pinch grasp assistance. The system combines a tendon-driven soft exoskeleton, fingertip magnetic contact sensing, and neural EMG decoding for intention-based assistance. Surface EMG was recorded from forearm muscles during index and thumb movements, and three subject-independent decoding architectures were evaluated: LSTM, CNN+LSTM, and CNN+LSTM with attention. The CNN+LSTM and CNN+LSTM-attention models both achieved 99.4% LOSO test accuracy, outperforming the standalone LSTM, which reached 97.8%. However, the attention mechanism did not provide a significant improvement over CNN+LSTM, indicating that CNN-based feature extraction was sufficient for robust EMG representation. The CNN+LSTM model was therefore selected for real-time deployment due to its high accuracy and lower architectural complexity. Functional evaluation showed that active exoskeleton assistance reduced muscular effort during isolated finger flexion and object grasping. During weighted grasping, assistance reduced muscular effort across all tested loads, with a 92.6% reduction at the highest load. These results demonstrate the potential of SoftPINCH for intuitive, low-effort pinch assistance using real-time EMG-driven soft robotic control.

Toward AI That Understands Self and Others: A World-Model Theory of Cognitive Diversity and Alignment

Modern societies possess more information than ever before, yet they do not converge toward a single shared understanding. The same events, facts, laws, technologies, or risks can be interpreted as evidence of freedom, danger, exclusion, injustice, responsibility, or unrealized possibility. Existing discussions often treat such disagreement as a conflict of values, preferences, or beliefs. This paper argues that disagreement is already a late-stage phenomenon. The central premise is simple but not trivial: observation is not yet inference. Not every observation becomes inferentially relevant, and not every possible object in an observation sequence becomes an estimation target. A possible target becomes admissible only when a state representation can be constructed that is approximately sufficient for prediction, evaluation, or action with respect to that target. This paper develops a world-model theory of cognitive diversity and alignment by reconstructing recognition as the construction of such approximate sufficient statistics under finite informational, representational, observational, and action constraints. It formulates this position as the Multi-Phase Inference Assumption (MIA) and defines its core internal mechanism as the Multi-Phase Inference Mechanism (MIM). The framework introduces alignment maps and transformation loss to analyze how heterogeneous world models communicate without being collapsed into a single representation. World-model alignment is therefore processability, not agreement: the design of AI systems that help heterogeneous forms of intelligence remain mutually processable while preserving their distinct error-detection capacities.

Prior Availability in Industrial Visual Sim-to-Real: A Review of CAD-Guided and CAD-Unavailable Regimes

Industrial visual sim-to-real is often described as transferring from synthetic images to real images, but industrial deployment usually involves a broader mismatch between available evidence and required decisions. A system may be built from CAD renderings, simulated RGB-D observations, normal reference images, synthetic defects, pretrained feature spaces, or language prompts, yet deployed under different sensors, lighting, materials, fixtures, calibration, production variation, and rare defect modes. This review reframes industrial visual sim-to-real as a domain-gap problem organized by prior availability. We distinguish CAD-available settings, where explicit object geometry can support rendering, calibration, pose estimation, segmentation, and test-time geometric verification; CAD-unavailable settings, where geometry is replaced by normal-reference appearance, feature distributions, teacher-student residuals, synthetic anomaly assumptions, foundation features, or vision-language priors; and boundary-prior settings, where approximate models, templates, reference views, or semantic correspondences preserve only part of the CAD role. This framing connects CAD-based detection and 6D pose-estimation literature with industrial anomaly and surface-inspection literature that is usually reviewed separately. To make the taxonomy concrete, we use empirical anchors on T-LESS/BOP, MVTec AD, and VisA. The anchors show that CAD render count alone does not close transfer; source-distribution design, detector capacity, and small real calibration can matter more. They also show that CAD at test time creates a distinct verification channel through mask, pose, and depth consistency, whereas CAD-unavailable inspection relies on calibrated normality and feature deviation. The review therefore argues against a single cross-task leaderboard and instead asks what prior grounds the deployment decision.

Giving Sensors a Voice: Multimodal JEPA for Semantic Time-Series Embeddings

Transformer-based architectures have advanced sequence modeling in language and vision, yet general-purpose representation learning for heterogeneous multivariate time series remains underexplored. We introduce CHARM (Channel-Aware Representation Model), which incorporates channel-level textual descriptions into a Transformer encoder equivariant to channel order. CHARM is trained with a Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) and a novel loss promoting informative, temporally stable embeddings; latent-space prediction encourages robustness to sensor noise while description-aware gating provides interpretability through learned inter-channel relationships. Across anomaly detection, classification, and short- and long-term forecasting, the learned embeddings achieve strong performance using only a linear probe. Performance is driven primarily by the JEPA objective and conditioning architecture, with text descriptions serving as channel identifiers for cross-dataset generalization.

Generating Reports or Repeating Templates? Measuring and Mitigating Template Collapse in 3D CT Report Generation

Modern 3D medical vision-language models (VLMs) can generate fluent radiology-style text while exhibit critically low pathology detection and output diversity, collapsing to generic templates that under-report rare yet critical findings. We identify this failure mode as Template Collapse. This failure stems from the unique constraints of 3D medical imaging, e.g., limited data, severe label imbalance, and weak signals from volumetric encoders. Under these constraints, text-generation objectives encourage shortcut learning and fluent but weakly grounded reports. We systematically diagnose the Template Collapse through clinical fidelity, output diversity, normal-template bias, and rare-finding survival. To mitigate it, we propose CLarGen, a decoupled framework that separates what to say (clinical detection) from how to say it (language synthesis). CLarGen uses (i) a Latent Query Transformer for multi-label pathology detection, (ii) pathology-guided retrieval for clinically matched exemplars, and (iii) a medical language model to synthesize the final report from detected findings and retrieved context. Across state-of-the-art 3D CT report generation baselines, CLarGen mitigates Template Collapse and substantially improves clinical accuracy (macro-F1 0.487 vs. 0.189; CRG 0.472 vs. 0.368) while maintaining fluent reporting. Our results suggest that explicit, measurable clinical grounding is essential for template-collapse-resistant 3D CT report generation. Code will be released upon acceptance.