PEANUT: Perturbations by Eigenvalue Alignment for Attacking GNNs Under Topology-Driven Message Passing

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable performance on tasks involving relational data. However, small perturbations to the graph structure can significantly alter GNN outputs, raising concerns about their robustness in real-world deployments. In this work, we explore the core vulnerability of GNNs which explicitly consume graph topology in the form of the adjacency matrix or Laplacian as a means for message passing, and propose PEANUT, a simple, gradient-free, restricted black-box attack that injects virtual nodes to capitalize on this vulnerability. PEANUT is a injection based attack, which is widely considered to be more practical and realistic scenario than graph modification attacks, where the attacker is able to modify the original graph structure directly. Our method works at the inference phase, making it an evasion attack, and is applicable almost immediately, since it does not involve lengthy iterative optimizations or parameter learning, which add computational and time overhead, or training surrogate models, which are susceptible to failure due to differences in model priors and generalization capabilities. PEANUT also does not require any features on the injected node and consequently demonstrates that GNN performance can be significantly deteriorated even with injected nodes with zeros for features, highlighting the significance of effectively designed connectivity in such attacks. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets across three graph tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our attack despite its simplicity.

H-Node Attack and Defense in Large Language Models

We present H-Node Adversarial Noise Cancellation (H-Node ANC), a mechanistic framework that identifies, exploits, and defends hallucination representations in transformer-based large language models (LLMs) at the level of individual hidden-state dimensions. A logistic regression probe trained on last-token hidden states localizes hallucination signal to a small set of high-variance dimensions -- termed Hallucination Nodes (H-Nodes) -- with probe AUC reaching 0.90 across four architectures. A white-box adversarial attack amplifies these dimensions at inference time via a real-time forward hook, achieving a selectivity of 3.02x with less than 10% visibility to the defender. Adaptive ANC defense suppresses H-Node excess in-pass using confidence-weighted cancellation, reducing grounded activation drift by 33-42% over static cancellation. A dynamic iterative extension that re-ranks cancellation targets across successive passes recovers up to 0.69 robustness from a single-pass baseline of 8%. All contributions are validated on OPT-125M, Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct, LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct, and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 (125M-8B parameters). Perplexity impact is surgical (<5%) and MMLU degradation is at most 3%, confirming that the defense does not impair general reasoning capability.

Uncovering Memorization in Timeseries Imputation models: LBRM Membership Inference and its link to attribute Leakage

Deep learning models for time series imputation are now essential in fields such as healthcare, the Internet of Things (IoT), and finance. However, their deployment raises critical privacy concerns. Beyond the well-known issue of unintended memorization, which has been extensively studied in generative models, we demonstrate that time series models are vulnerable to inference attacks in a black-box setting. In this work, we introduce a two-stage attack framework comprising: (1) a novel membership inference attack based on a reference model that improves detection accuracy, even for models robust to overfitting-based attacks, and (2) the first attribute inference attack that predicts sensitive characteristics of the training data for timeseries imputation model. We evaluate these attacks on attention-based and autoencoder architectures in two scenarios: models that are trained from scratch, and fine-tuned models where the adversary has access to the initial weights. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed membership attack retrieves a significant portion of the training data with a tpr@top25% score significantly higher than a naive attack baseline. We show that our membership attack also provides a good insight of whether attribute inference will work (with a precision of 90% instead of 78% in the genral case).

A Critical Review on the Effectiveness and Privacy Threats of Membership Inference Attacks

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) aim to determine whether a data sample was included in a machine learning (ML) model's training set and have become the de facto standard for measuring privacy leakages in ML. We propose an evaluation framework that defines the conditions under which MIAs constitute a genuine privacy threat, and review representative MIAs against it. We find that, under the realistic conditions defined in our framework, MIAs represent weak privacy threats. Thus, relying on them as a privacy metric in ML can lead to an overestimation of risk and to unnecessary sacrifices in model utility as a consequence of employing too strong defenses.

Synthetic Cardiac MRI Image Generation using Deep Generative Models

Synthetic cardiac MRI (CMRI) generation has emerged as a promising strategy to overcome the scarcity of annotated medical imaging data. Recent advances in GANs, VAEs, diffusion probabilistic models, and flow-matching techniques aim to generate anatomically accurate images while addressing challenges such as limited labeled datasets, vendor variability, and risks of privacy leakage through model memorization. Maskconditioned generation improves structural fidelity by guiding synthesis with segmentation maps, while diffusion and flowmatching models offer strong boundary preservation and efficient deterministic transformations. Cross-domain generalization is further supported through vendor-style conditioning and preprocessing steps like intensity normalization. To ensure privacy, studies increasingly incorporate membership inference attacks, nearest-neighbor analyses, and differential privacy mechanisms. Utility evaluations commonly measure downstream segmentation performance, with evidence showing that anatomically constrained synthetic data can enhance accuracy and robustness across multi-vendor settings. This review aims to compare existing CMRI generation approaches through the lenses of fidelity, utility, and privacy, highlighting current limitations and the need for integrated, evaluation-driven frameworks for reliable clinical workflows.

Shape and Substance: Dual-Layer Side-Channel Attacks on Local Vision-Language Models

On-device Vision-Language Models (VLMs) promise data privacy via local execution. However, we show that the architectural shift toward Dynamic High-Resolution preprocessing (e.g., AnyRes) introduces an inherent algorithmic side-channel. Unlike static models, dynamic preprocessing decomposes images into a variable number of patches based on their aspect ratio, creating workload-dependent inputs. We demonstrate a dual-layer attack framework against local VLMs. In Tier 1, an unprivileged attacker can exploit significant execution-time variations using standard unprivileged OS metrics to reliably fingerprint the input's geometry. In Tier 2, by profiling Last-Level Cache (LLC) contention, the attacker can resolve semantic ambiguity within identical geometries, distinguishing between visually dense (e.g., medical X-rays) and sparse (e.g., text documents) content. By evaluating state-of-the-art models such as LLaVA-NeXT and Qwen2-VL, we show that combining these signals enables reliable inference of privacy-sensitive contexts. Finally, we analyze the security engineering trade-offs of mitigating this vulnerability, reveal substantial performance overhead with constant-work padding, and propose practical design recommendations for secure Edge AI deployments.

AI Security in the Foundation Model Era: A Comprehensive Survey from a Unified Perspective

As machine learning (ML) systems expand in both scale and functionality, the security landscape has become increasingly complex, with a proliferation of attacks and defenses. However, existing studies largely treat these threats in isolation, lacking a coherent framework to expose their shared principles and interdependencies. This fragmented view hinders systematic understanding and limits the design of comprehensive defenses. Crucially, the two foundational assets of ML -- \textbf{data} and \textbf{models} -- are no longer independent; vulnerabilities in one directly compromise the other. The absence of a holistic framework leaves open questions about how these bidirectional risks propagate across the ML pipeline. To address this critical gap, we propose a \emph{unified closed-loop threat taxonomy} that explicitly frames model-data interactions along four directional axes. Our framework offers a principled lens for analyzing and defending foundation models. The resulting four classes of security threats represent distinct but interrelated categories of attacks: (1) Data$\rightarrow$Data (D$\rightarrow$D): including \emph{data decryption attacks and watermark removal attacks}; (2) Data$\rightarrow$Model (D$\rightarrow$M): including \emph{poisoning, harmful fine-tuning attacks, and jailbreak attacks}; (3) Model$\rightarrow$Data (M$\rightarrow$D): including \emph{model inversion, membership inference attacks, and training data extraction attacks}; (4) Model$\rightarrow$Model (M$\rightarrow$M): including \emph{model extraction attacks}. Our unified framework elucidates the underlying connections among these security threats and establishes a foundation for developing scalable, transferable, and cross-modal security strategies, particularly within the landscape of foundation models.

PIDP-Attack: Combining Prompt Injection with Database Poisoning Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of applications. However, their practical deployment is often hindered by issues such as outdated knowledge and the tendency to generate hallucinations. To address these limitations, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have been introduced, enhancing LLMs with external, up-to-date knowledge sources. Despite their advantages, RAG systems remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, with data poisoning emerging as a prominent threat. Existing poisoning-based attacks typically require prior knowledge of the user's specific queries, limiting their flexibility and real-world applicability. In this work, we propose PIDP-Attack, a novel compound attack that integrates prompt injection with database poisoning in RAG. By appending malicious characters to queries at inference time and injecting a limited number of poisoned passages into the retrieval database, our method can effectively manipulate LLM response to arbitrary query without prior knowledge of the user's actual query. Experimental evaluations across three benchmark datasets (Natural Questions, HotpotQA, MS-MARCO) and eight LLMs demonstrate that PIDP-Attack consistently outperforms the original PoisonedRAG. Specifically, our method improves attack success rates by 4% to 16% on open-domain QA tasks while maintaining high retrieval precision, proving that the compound attack strategy is both necessary and highly effective.

Robust Safety Monitoring of Language Models via Activation Watermarking

Large language models (LLMs) can be misused to reveal sensitive information, such as weapon-making instructions or writing malware. LLM providers rely on $\emph{monitoring}$ to detect and flag unsafe behavior during inference. An open security challenge is $\emph{adaptive}$ adversaries who craft attacks that simultaneously (i) evade detection while (ii) eliciting unsafe behavior. Adaptive attackers are a major concern as LLM providers cannot patch their security mechanisms, since they are unaware of how their models are being misused. We cast $\emph{robust}$ LLM monitoring as a security game, where adversaries who know about the monitor try to extract sensitive information, while a provider must accurately detect these adversarial queries at low false positive rates. Our work (i) shows that existing LLM monitors are vulnerable to adaptive attackers and (ii) designs improved defenses through $\emph{activation watermarking}$ by carefully introducing uncertainty for the attacker during inference. We find that $\emph{activation watermarking}$ outperforms guard baselines by up to $52\%$ under adaptive attackers who know the monitoring algorithm but not the secret key.

Sovereign AI at the Front Door of Care: A Physically Unidirectional Architecture for Secure Clinical Intelligence

We present a Sovereign AI architecture for clinical triage in which all inference is performed on-device and inbound data is delivered via a physically unidirectional channel, implemented using receive-only broadcast infrastructure or certified hardware data diodes, with no return path to any external network. This design removes the network-mediated attack surface by construction, rather than attempting to secure it through software controls. The system performs conversational symptom intake, integrates device-captured vitals, and produces structured, triage-aligned clinical records at the point of care. We formalize the security properties of receiver-side unidirectionality and show that the architecture is transport-agnostic across broadcast and diode-enforced deployments. We further analyze threat models, enforcement mechanisms, and deployment configurations, demonstrating how physical one-way data flow enables high-assurance operation in both resource-constrained and high-risk environments. This work positions physically unidirectional channels as a foundational primitive for sovereign, on-device clinical intelligence at the front door of care.