FashionStylist: An Expert Knowledge-enhanced Multimodal Dataset for Fashion Understanding

Fashion understanding requires both visual perception and expert-level reasoning about style, occasion, compatibility, and outfit rationale. However, existing fashion datasets remain fragmented and task-specific, often focusing on item attributes, outfit co-occurrence, or weak textual supervision, and thus provide limited support for holistic outfit understanding. In this paper, we introduce FashionStylist, an expert-annotated benchmark for holistic and expert-level fashion understanding. Constructed through a dedicated fashion-expert annotation pipeline, FashionStylist provides professionally grounded annotations at both the item and outfit levels. It supports three representative tasks: outfit-to-item grounding, outfit completion, and outfit evaluation. These tasks cover realistic item recovery from complex outfits with layering and accessories, compatibility-aware composition beyond co-occurrence matching, and expert-level assessment of style, season, occasion, and overall coherence. Experimental results show that FashionStylist serves not only as a unified benchmark for multiple fashion tasks, but also as an effective training resource for improving grounding, completion, and outfit-level semantic evaluation in MLLM-based fashion systems.

Through Their Eyes: Fixation-aligned Tuning for Personalized User Emulation

Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed as scalable user simulators for recommender system evaluation. Yet existing simulators perceive recommendations through text or structured metadata rather than the visual interfaces real users browse-a critical gap, since attention over recommendation layouts is both visually driven and highly personalized. We investigate whether aligning a vision-language model's (VLM's) visual attention with user-specific gaze patterns can improve simulation fidelity. Analysis of a real-world eye-tracking dataset collected in a carousel-based recommendation setting reveals that users exhibit stable individual gaze patterns strongly predictive of click behavior. Building on this finding, we propose Fixation-Aligned Tuning for user Emulation (FixATE). Our approach first probes the VLM's internal visual attention via interpretability operators to obtain a slot-level relevance distribution comparable with human fixation, and then learns personalized soft prompts to steer the model's attention toward each user's characteristic fixation pattern. Experiments across three interpretability-based probing operators and two architecturally distinct VLM backbones demonstrate consistent improvements in both attention alignment and click prediction accuracy. These results suggest that making the model "see like the user" is a viable path toward simulators that more faithfully reproduce how users perceive and act in recommendation interfaces.

Pay Attention to Sequence Split: Uncovering the Impacts of Sub-Sequence Splitting on Sequential Recommendation Models

Sub-sequence splitting (SSS) has been demonstrated as an effective approach to mitigate data sparsity in sequential recommendation (SR) by splitting a raw user interaction sequence into multiple sub-sequences. Previous studies have demonstrated its ability to enhance the performance of SR models significantly. However, in this work, we discover that \textbf{(i). SSS may interfere with the evaluation of the model's actual performance.} We observed that many recent state-of-the-art SR models employ SSS during the data reading stage (not mentioned in the papers). When we removed this operation, performance significantly declined, even falling below that of earlier classical SR models. The varying improvements achieved by SSS and different splitting methods across different models prompt us to analyze further when SSS proves effective. We find that \textbf{(ii). SSS demonstrates strong capabilities only when specific splitting methods, target strategies, and loss functions are used together.} Inappropriate combinations may even harm performance. Furthermore, we analyze why sub-sequence splitting yields such remarkable performance gains and find that \textbf{(iii). it evens out the distribution of training data while increasing the likelihood that different items are targeted.} Finally, we provide suggestions for overcoming SSS interference, along with a discussion on data augmentation methods and future directions. We hope this work will prompt the broader community to re-examine the impact of data splitting on SR and promote fairer, more rigorous model evaluation. All analysis code and data will be made available upon acceptance. We provide a simple, anonymous implementation at https://github.com/KingGugu/SSS4SR.

Fusion and Alignment Enhancement with Large Language Models for Tail-item Sequential Recommendation

Sequential Recommendation (SR) learns user preferences from their historical interaction sequences and provides personalized suggestions. In real-world scenarios, most items exhibit sparse interactions, known as the tail-item problem. This issue limits the model's ability to accurately capture item transition patterns. To tackle this, large language models (LLMs) offer a promising solution by capturing semantic relationships between items. Despite previous efforts to leverage LLM-derived embeddings for enriching tail items, they still face the following limitations: 1) They struggle to effectively fuse collaborative signals with semantic knowledge, leading to suboptimal item embedding quality. 2) Existing methods overlook the structural inconsistency between the ID and LLM embedding spaces, causing conflicting signals that degrade recommendation accuracy. In this work, we propose a Fusion and Alignment Enhancement framework with LLMs for Tail-item Sequential Recommendation (FAERec), which improves item representations by generating coherently-fused and structurally consistent embeddings. For the information fusion challenge, we design an adaptive gating mechanism that dynamically fuses ID and LLM embeddings. Then, we propose a dual-level alignment approach to mitigate structural inconsistency. The item-level alignment establishes correspondences between ID and LLM embeddings of the same item through contrastive learning, while the feature-level alignment constrains the correlation patterns between corresponding dimensions across the two embedding spaces. Furthermore, the weights of the two alignments are adjusted by a curriculum learning scheduler to avoid premature optimization of the complex feature-level objective. Extensive experiments across three widely used datasets with multiple representative SR backbones demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of our framework.

VulReaD: Knowledge-Graph-guided Software Vulnerability Reasoning and Detection

Software vulnerability detection (SVD) is a critical challenge in modern systems. Large language models (LLMs) offer natural-language explanations alongside predictions, but most work focuses on binary evaluation, and explanations often lack semantic consistency with Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) categories. We propose VulReaD, a knowledge-graph-guided approach for vulnerability reasoning and detection that moves beyond binary classification toward CWE-level reasoning. VulReaD leverages a security knowledge graph (KG) as a semantic backbone and uses a strong teacher LLM to generate CWE-consistent contrastive reasoning supervision, enabling student model training without manual annotations. Students are fine-tuned with Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) to encourage taxonomy-aligned reasoning while suppressing unsupported explanations. Across three real-world datasets, VulReaD improves binary F1 by 8-10% and multi-class classification by 30% Macro-F1 and 18% Micro-F1 compared to state-of-the-art baselines. Results show that LLMs outperform deep learning baselines in binary detection and that KG-guided reasoning enhances CWE coverage and interpretability.

Think When Needed: Model-Aware Reasoning Routing for LLM-based Ranking

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to ranking tasks in retrieval and recommendation. Although reasoning prompting can enhance ranking utility, our preliminary exploration reveals that its benefits are inconsistent and come at a substantial computational cost, suggesting that when to reason is as crucial as how to reason. To address this issue, we propose a reasoning routing framework that employs a lightweight, plug-and-play router head to decide whether to use direct inference (Non-Think) or reasoning (Think) for each instance before generation. The router head relies solely on pre-generation signals: i) compact ranking-aware features (e.g., candidate dispersion) and ii) model-aware difficulty signals derived from a diagnostic checklist reflecting the model's estimated need for reasoning. By leveraging these features before generation, the router outputs a controllable token that determines whether to apply the Think mode. Furthermore, the router can adaptively select its operating policy along the validation Pareto frontier during deployment, enabling dynamic allocation of computational resources toward instances most likely to benefit from Think under varying system constraints. Experiments on three public ranking datasets with different scales of open-source LLMs show consistent improvements in ranking utility with reduced token consumption (e.g., +6.3\% NDCG@10 with -49.5\% tokens on MovieLens with Qwen3-4B), demonstrating reasoning routing as a practical solution to the accuracy-efficiency trade-off.

MMGRid: Navigating Temporal-aware and Cross-domain Generative Recommendation via Model Merging

Model merging (MM) offers an efficient mechanism for integrating multiple specialized models without access to original training data or costly retraining. While MM has demonstrated success in domains like computer vision, its role in recommender systems (RSs) remains largely unexplored. Recently, Generative Recommendation (GR) has emerged as a new paradigm in RSs, characterized by rapidly growing model scales and substantial computational costs, making MM particularly appealing for cost-sensitive deployment scenarios. In this work, we present the first systematic study of MM in GR through a contextual lens. We focus on a fundamental yet underexplored challenge in real-world: how to merge generative recommenders specialized to different real-world contexts, arising from temporal evolving user behaviors and heterogeneous application domains. To this end, we propose a unified framework MMGRid, a structured contextual grid of GR checkpoints that organizes models trained under diverse contexts induced by temporal evolution and domain diversity. All checkpoints are derived from a shared base LLM but fine-tuned on context-specific data, forming a realistic and controlled model space for systematically analyzing MM across GR paradigms and merging algorithms. Our investigation reveals several key insights. First, training GR models from LLMs can introduce parameter conflicts during merging due to token distribution shifts and objective disparities; such conflicts can be alleviated by disentangling task-aware and context-specific parameter changes via base model replacement. Second, incremental training across contexts induces recency bias, which can be effectively balanced through weighted contextual merging. Notably, we observe that optimal merging weights correlate with context-dependent interaction characteristics, offering practical guidance for weight selection in real-world deployments.

iTIMO: An LLM-empowered Synthesis Dataset for Travel Itinerary Modification

Addressing itinerary modification is crucial for enhancing the travel experience as it is a frequent requirement during traveling. However, existing research mainly focuses on fixed itinerary planning, leaving modification underexplored. To bridge this gap, we formally define the itinerary modification task and introduce iTIMO, a dataset specifically tailored for this purpose. We identify the lack of {\itshape need-to-modify} itinerary data as the critical bottleneck hindering research on this task and propose a general pipeline to overcome it. This pipeline frames the generation of such data as an intent-driven perturbation task. It instructs large language models to perturb real world itineraries using three atomic editing operations: REPLACE, ADD, and DELETE. Each perturbation is grounded in three intents, including disruptions of popularity, spatial distance, and category diversity. Furthermore, a hybrid evaluation metric is designed to ensure perturbation effectiveness. We conduct comprehensive experiments on iTIMO, revealing the limitations of current LLMs and lead to several valuable directions for future research. Dataset and corresponding code are available at https://github.com/zelo2/iTIMO.

A Comparative Study of Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Large Language Models for Mental Health Forecasting using Smartphone Sensing Data

Smartphone sensing offers an unobtrusive and scalable way to track daily behaviors linked to mental health, capturing changes in sleep, mobility, and phone use that often precede symptoms of stress, anxiety, or depression. While most prior studies focus on detection that responds to existing conditions, forecasting mental health enables proactive support through Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive benchmarking study comparing traditional machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and large language model (LLM) approaches for mental health forecasting using the College Experience Sensing (CES) dataset, the most extensive longitudinal dataset of college student mental health to date. We systematically evaluate models across temporal windows, feature granularities, personalization strategies, and class imbalance handling. Our results show that DL models, particularly Transformer (Macro-F1 = 0.58), achieve the best overall performance, while LLMs show strength in contextual reasoning but weaker temporal modeling. Personalization substantially improves forecasts of severe mental health states. By revealing how different modeling approaches interpret phone sensing behavioral data over time, this work lays the groundwork for next-generation, adaptive, and human-centered mental health technologies that can advance both research and real-world well-being.

Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process

We propose LLM-PeerReview, an unsupervised LLM Ensemble method that selects the most ideal response from multiple LLM-generated candidates for each query, harnessing the collective wisdom of multiple models with diverse strengths. LLM-PeerReview is built on a novel, peer-review-inspired framework that offers a clear and interpretable mechanism, while remaining fully unsupervised for flexible adaptability and generalization. Specifically, it operates in three stages: For scoring, we use the emerging LLM-as-a-Judge technique to evaluate each response by reusing multiple LLMs at hand; For reasoning, we can apply a principled graphical model-based truth inference algorithm or a straightforward averaging strategy to aggregate multiple scores to produce a final score for each response; Finally, the highest-scoring response is selected as the best ensemble output. LLM-PeerReview is conceptually simple and empirically powerful. The two variants of the proposed approach obtain strong results across four datasets, including outperforming the recent advanced model Smoothie-Global by 6.9% and 7.3% points, respectively.