Abstract:Trajectory planning for autonomous driving requires both high-level reasoning and precise low-level control. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer semantic-rich planning capabilities, however, their application is limited by hallucinated reasoning, poor grounding in environment dynamics, and limited numerical precision in control. We propose GAPL (Grounded Action-effect Policy Learning), a unified framework that integrates LLM-based effect estimation, simulation-based effect grounding, and policy optimization into a closed-loop system. GAPL consists of three modules: (1) an LLM-based Effect Evaluator for structured multi-dimensional action-effect estimation; (2) a Simulation-based Effect Grounder that predicts dynamics-consistent effects from simulator rollouts; and (3) an Effect-Aware Decision Maker that grounds LLM effect estimates against simulation via a distiller to guide Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)-based policy learning. Experiments on four Highway-env scenarios demonstrate that GAPL consistently outperforms baselines, achieving average reductions of {0.76, 0.86, 2.00} in collision rate, average displacement error (ADE), and final displacement error (FDE), and an average reward gain of 1.44.
Abstract:Shared memory helps language-model agents reuse information across long workflows, yet relevant evidence may not be admissible for a particular agent or action. Because restrictions propagate through derivations, summaries can conceal private, poisoned, untrusted, or revoked sources, enabling unauthorized reads or unsafe actions. Existing approaches provide semantic retrieval, scoped access, or lineage tracking, but do not clearly separate hard authorization from graded trust or adapt evidence requirements to action risk. We introduce MAP-Graph, a provenance-aware memory layer that represents agents, sources, memories, claims, and actions in a typed execution graph. It traces ancestry, excludes permission-ineligible records, reranks eligible memories by semantic similarity and multiplicative path trust, and applies a risk-sensitive gate before action execution while retaining affected lineage for audit. On a controlled benchmark of 2,700 synthetic tasks per method across three domains, MAP-Graph achieves 94.96\% overall task success, 72.70\% exact decision accuracy, and 90.22\% in the clean setting, where success requires a correct \textsc{Allow} rather than a safe intervention. Ablations isolate the roles of permission filtering, path trust, and action gating, while transfer tests with two additional backbones preserve the exact-decision and access-control advantages. These results support provenance as an operational control signal, rather than only post-hoc audit metadata, within the evaluated setting.
Abstract:Persistent memory lets language-model agents reuse information across sessions, but it also makes errors durable: a poisoned, stale, or misattributed record can alter reasoning, tool use, answers, and subsequent memory writes. Existing defenses mainly detect or delete suspicious memories, or revise the current response. Deleting the source leaves already propagated claims, actions, and derived memories active, whereas resetting the store or replaying the full trace destroys benign state and repeats unnecessary computation. We therefore formulate \textbf{post-failure memory recovery: } \textit{given a failed execution and diagnosed faulty memories, recover both the answer and persistent state while retaining unaffected work.} Our \textbf{dependency-guided rollback repair} builds a typed memory-to-action graph from runtime provenance, traces explicit downstream dependencies, preserves candidates with independent trusted support, deactivates unsupported memory state, and selectively replays only answer-relevant affected computation. We evaluate this approach on a 150-case controlled benchmark spanning three tool-use domains and four memory failure types, and on a 50-case trajectory-derived stress test adapted from LongMemEval-V2. On the controlled benchmark, it achieves 85.3\% recovery versus 77.3\% for the best competing recovery method, removes all diagnosed faulty memories, preserves all benign memories, and requires only selective replay with modest LLM-call cost. On the adapted subset, it reaches 68.0\% recovery versus 54.0\% for the next best method, while also achieving the highest claim invalidation F1, 0.669 versus 0.603. Overall, the results do not imply uniformly better trace reconstruction, but show that dependency-guided rollback repair provides a strong recovery--cost trade-off while repairing faulty memory state and preserving benign memory.
Abstract:Autoregressive decoders emit flat token sequences and cannot enforce hierarchical constraints across output segments, a limitation that becomes acute in patent claim generation, where a claim set forms a dependency forest whose scope must narrow monotonically with depth. Topology and content are mutually dependent: a dependent claim's wording must reflect its parent's scope, yet the parent must be chosen before that wording exists, so neither post-hoc parsing nor grammar-constrained decoding suffices. We propose SPG (Structure-aware Patent Generation), which predicts topology inside the autoregressive pass. A pointer head selects each dependent claim's parent, and its gradients, together with a depth-adaptive scope regularizer, reshape the shared decoder's representations during training. A second stage then applies a violation-weighted preference objective over self-generated deficient candidates, supplying the negative signal that granted-patent corpora lack. On HUPD-DCG, SPG on Llama-3-8B-Instruct recovers 79.0\% of gold parent links, a quantity its training reward never supervises, and raises antecedent consistency from 0.292 to 0.478 over a supervised baseline of equal scale, with expert evaluation corroborating these gains.
Abstract:Large language model (LLM)-based agents increasingly solve complex tasks by interacting with external tools, retrieval systems, memory modules, environments, and other agents. These capabilities expand agent autonomy, but also make agent behavior harder to verify, debug, and audit. Final-answer accuracy alone cannot explain how an output was produced, which evidence supported each claim, whether tool calls were justified, how memory influenced later decisions, or where execution failures originated. Evidence tracing and execution provenance address this gap by modeling how retrieved evidence, tool outputs, memory items, environment observations, intermediate claims, actions, and final answers are connected throughout agent execution. This survey provides a systematic review and conceptual framework for evidence tracing and execution provenance in LLM agents. We organize related work around a unified provenance perspective that connects retrieval grounding, claim support, tool-use safety, memory lineage, observability, debugging, audit, and recovery. We introduce a taxonomy covering trace sources, evidence and execution units, provenance relations, tracing granularity and timing, representation forms, and trust functions. We review key methodological directions, including provenance representation, evidence attribution, tool-use provenance, runtime guardrails, provenance-bearing memory, trace-based observability, and failure diagnosis. We also map existing benchmarks, datasets, and evaluation metrics to provenance-related capabilities, and discuss how evaluation can move from final-answer correctness toward process-level accountability. Finally, we outline open challenges, including unified trace schemas, claim-level and semantic provenance, provenance-aware safety mechanisms, realistic execution-trace benchmarks, recovery-oriented evaluation, and privacy-aware audit infrastructure.
Abstract:Patent claims form a directed dependency structure in which dependent claims inherit and refine the scope of earlier claims; however, existing patent encoders linearize claims as text and discard this hierarchy. Directly encoding this structure into self-attention poses two challenges: claim dependencies mix relation types that differ in semantics and extraction reliability, and the dependency graph is defined over claims while Transformers attend over tokens. PHAGE addresses the first challenge through a deterministic graph construction pipeline that separates near-deterministic legal citations from noisier rule-based technical relations, preserving type distinctions as heterogeneous edges. It addresses the second through a connectivity mask and learnable relation-aware biases that lift claim-level topology into token-level attention, allowing the encoder to differentially weight each relation type. A dual-granularity contrastive objective then aligns representations with both inter-patent taxonomy and intra-patent topology. PHAGE outperforms all baselines on classification, retrieval, and clustering, showing that intra-document claim topology is a stronger inductive bias than inter-document structure and that this bias persists in the encoder weights after training.
Abstract:This position paper argues that reliable AI requires infrastructure for human validation of implicit knowledge. AI learns from both explicit knowledge (papers, documentation, structured databases) and implicit knowledge (reasoning patterns, debugging processes, intermediate steps). Implicit knowledge remains unexternalized because documentation cost exceeds perceived value -- yet AI learns from it indiscriminately, acquiring both beneficial patterns and harmful biases. Current reliability methods can only verify explicit knowledge against sources, creating a fundamental gap: the most valuable AI capabilities (reasoning, judgment, intuition) are precisely those we cannot verify. We propose Knowledge Objects (KOs) -- structured artifacts that externalize implicit knowledge into forms humans can inspect, verify, and endorse. KOs transform verification economics: what was previously too costly to verify becomes feasible, enabling accumulated human validation to improve reliability over time.
Abstract:AutoRegressive (AR) models have demonstrated competitive performance in image generation, achieving results comparable to those of diffusion models. However, their token-by-token image generation mechanism remains computationally intensive and existing solutions such as VAR often lead to limited sample diversity. In this work, we propose a Nested AutoRegressive~(NestAR) model, which proposes nested AutoRegressive architectures in generating images. NestAR designs multi-scale modules in a hierarchical order. These different scaled modules are constructed in an AR architecture, where one larger-scale module is conditioned on outputs from its previous smaller-scale module. Within each module, NestAR uses another AR structure to generate ``patches'' of tokens. The proposed nested AR architecture reduces the overall complexity from $\mathcal{O}(n)$ to $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ in generating $n$ image tokens, as well as increases image diversities. NestAR further incorporates flow matching loss to use continuous tokens, and develops objectives to coordinate these multi-scale modules in model training. NestAR achieves competitive image generation performance while significantly lowering computational cost.
Abstract:Training-free video editing (VE) models tend to fall back on gender stereotypes when rendering profession-related prompts. We propose \textbf{FAME} for \textit{Fairness-aware Attention-modulated Video Editing} that mitigates profession-related gender biases while preserving prompt alignment and temporal consistency for coherent VE. We derive fairness embeddings from existing minority representations by softly injecting debiasing tokens into the text encoder. Simultaneously, FAME integrates fairness modulation into both temporal self attention and prompt-to-region cross attention to mitigate the motion corruption and temporal inconsistency caused by directly introducing fairness cues. For temporal self attention, FAME introduces a region constrained attention mask combined with time decay weighting, which enhances intra-region coherence while suppressing irrelevant inter-region interactions. For cross attention, it reweights tokens to region matching scores by incorporating fairness sensitive similarity masks derived from debiasing prompt embeddings. Together, these modulations keep fairness-sensitive semantics tied to the right visual regions and prevent temporal drift across frames. Extensive experiments on new VE fairness-oriented benchmark \textit{FairVE} demonstrate that FAME achieves stronger fairness alignment and semantic fidelity, surpassing existing VE baselines.
Abstract:Recent advances in training-free video editing have enabled lightweight and precise cross-frame generation by leveraging pre-trained text-to-image diffusion models. However, existing methods often rely on heuristic frame selection to maintain temporal consistency during DDIM inversion, which introduces manual bias and reduces the scalability of end-to-end inference. In this paper, we propose~\textbf{VALA} (\textbf{V}ariational \textbf{A}lignment for \textbf{L}atent \textbf{A}nchors), a variational alignment module that adaptively selects key frames and compresses their latent features into semantic anchors for consistent video editing. To learn meaningful assignments, VALA propose a variational framework with a contrastive learning objective. Therefore, it can transform cross-frame latent representations into compressed latent anchors that preserve both content and temporal coherence. Our method can be fully integrated into training-free text-to-image based video editing models. Extensive experiments on real-world video editing benchmarks show that VALA achieves state-of-the-art performance in inversion fidelity, editing quality, and temporal consistency, while offering improved efficiency over prior methods.