EffiBench: Benchmarking the Efficiency of Automatically Generated Code

Code generation models have increasingly become integral to aiding software development, offering assistance in tasks such as code completion, debugging, and code translation. Although current research has thoroughly examined the correctness of code produced by code generation models, a vital aspect, i.e., the efficiency of the generated code, has often been neglected. This paper presents EffiBench, a benchmark with 1,000 efficiency-critical coding problems for assessing the efficiency of code generated by code generation models. EffiBench contains a diverse set of LeetCode coding problems. Each problem is paired with an executable human-written canonical solution. With EffiBench, we empirically examine the capability of 21 Large Language Models (13 open-sourced and 8 closed-sourced) in generating efficient code. The results demonstrate that GPT-4-turbo generates the most efficient code, significantly outperforming Palm-2-chat-bison, Claude-instant-1, Gemini-pro, GPT-4, and GPT-3.5. Nevertheless, its code efficiency is still worse than the efficiency of human-written canonical solutions. In particular, the average and worst execution time of GPT-4-turbo generated code is 1.69 and 45.49 times that of the canonical solutions.

Neuron Sensitivity Guided Test Case Selection for Deep Learning Testing

Deep Neural Networks~(DNNs) have been widely deployed in software to address various tasks~(e.g., autonomous driving, medical diagnosis). However, they could also produce incorrect behaviors that result in financial losses and even threaten human safety. To reveal the incorrect behaviors in DNN and repair them, DNN developers often collect rich unlabeled datasets from the natural world and label them to test the DNN models. However, properly labeling a large number of unlabeled datasets is a highly expensive and time-consuming task. To address the above-mentioned problem, we propose NSS, Neuron Sensitivity guided test case Selection, which can reduce the labeling time by selecting valuable test cases from unlabeled datasets. NSS leverages the internal neuron's information induced by test cases to select valuable test cases, which have high confidence in causing the model to behave incorrectly. We evaluate NSS with four widely used datasets and four well-designed DNN models compared to SOTA baseline methods. The results show that NSS performs well in assessing the test cases' probability of fault triggering and model improvement capabilities. Specifically, compared with baseline approaches, NSS obtains a higher fault detection rate~(e.g., when selecting 5\% test case from the unlabeled dataset in MNIST \& LeNet1 experiment, NSS can obtain 81.8\% fault detection rate, 20\% higher than baselines).

Two Heads are Better than One: Robust Learning Meets Multi-branch Models

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples, in which DNNs are misled to false outputs due to inputs containing imperceptible perturbations. Adversarial training, a reliable and effective method of defense, may significantly reduce the vulnerability of neural networks and becomes the de facto standard for robust learning. While many recent works practice the data-centric philosophy, such as how to generate better adversarial examples or use generative models to produce additional training data, we look back to the models themselves and revisit the adversarial robustness from the perspective of deep feature distribution as an insightful complementarity. In this paper, we propose Branch Orthogonality adveRsarial Training (BORT) to obtain state-of-the-art performance with solely the original dataset for adversarial training. To practice our design idea of integrating multiple orthogonal solution spaces, we leverage a simple and straightforward multi-branch neural network that eclipses adversarial attacks with no increase in inference time. We heuristically propose a corresponding loss function, branch-orthogonal loss, to make each solution space of the multi-branch model orthogonal. We evaluate our approach on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and SVHN against \ell_{\infty} norm-bounded perturbations of size \epsilon = 8/255, respectively. Exhaustive experiments are conducted to show that our method goes beyond all state-of-the-art methods without any tricks. Compared to all methods that do not use additional data for training, our models achieve 67.3% and 41.5% robust accuracy on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 (improving upon the state-of-the-art by +7.23% and +9.07%). We also outperform methods using a training set with a far larger scale than ours. All our models and codes are available online at https://github.com/huangd1999/BORT.