DataCLUE: A Benchmark Suite for Data-centric NLP

Data-centric AI has recently proven to be more effective and high-performance, while traditional model-centric AI delivers fewer and fewer benefits. It emphasizes improving the quality of datasets to achieve better model performance. This field has significant potential because of its great practicability and getting more and more attention. However, we have not seen significant research progress in this field, especially in NLP. We propose DataCLUE, which is the first Data-Centric benchmark applied in NLP field. We also provide three simple but effective baselines to foster research in this field (improve Macro-F1 up to 5.7% point). In addition, we conduct comprehensive experiments with human annotators and show the hardness of DataCLUE. We also try an advanced method: the forgetting informed bootstrapping label correction method. All the resources related to DataCLUE, including datasets, toolkit, leaderboard, and baselines, is available online at https://github.com/CLUEbenchmark/DataCLUE

FewCLUE: A Chinese Few-shot Learning Evaluation Benchmark

Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) have achieved tremendous success in natural language understanding tasks. While different learning schemes -- fine-tuning, zero-shot and few-shot learning -- have been widely explored and compared for languages such as English, there is comparatively little work in Chinese to fairly and comprehensively evaluate and compare these methods. This work first introduces Chinese Few-shot Learning Evaluation Benchmark (FewCLUE), the first comprehensive small sample evaluation benchmark in Chinese. It includes nine tasks, ranging from single-sentence and sentence-pair classification tasks to machine reading comprehension tasks. Given the high variance of the few-shot learning performance, we provide multiple training/validation sets to facilitate a more accurate and stable evaluation of few-shot modeling. An unlabeled training set with up to 20,000 additional samples per task is provided, allowing researchers to explore better ways of using unlabeled samples. Next, we implement a set of state-of-the-art (SOTA) few-shot learning methods (including PET, ADAPET, LM-BFF, P-tuning and EFL), and compare their performance with fine-tuning and zero-shot learning schemes on the newly constructed FewCLUE benchmark.Our results show that: 1) all five few-shot learning methods exhibit better performance than fine-tuning or zero-shot learning; 2) among the five methods, PET is the best performing few-shot method; 3) few-shot learning performance is highly dependent on the specific task. Our benchmark and code are available at https://github.com/CLUEbenchmark/FewCLUE