The Fourth International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2023): Summary and Results

This report summarizes the 4th International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2023), held as a part of the 6th Workshop on Formal Methods for ML-Enabled Autonomous Systems (FoMLAS), that was collocated with the 35th International Conference on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). VNN-COMP is held annually to facilitate the fair and objective comparison of state-of-the-art neural network verification tools, encourage the standardization of tool interfaces, and bring together the neural network verification community. To this end, standardized formats for networks (ONNX) and specification (VNN-LIB) were defined, tools were evaluated on equal-cost hardware (using an automatic evaluation pipeline based on AWS instances), and tool parameters were chosen by the participants before the final test sets were made public. In the 2023 iteration, 7 teams participated on a diverse set of 10 scored and 4 unscored benchmarks. This report summarizes the rules, benchmarks, participating tools, results, and lessons learned from this iteration of this competition.

Real-Time Capable Decision Making for Autonomous Driving Using Reachable Sets

Despite large advances in recent years, real-time capable motion planning for autonomous road vehicles remains a huge challenge. In this work, we present a decision module that is based on set-based reachability analysis: First, we identify all possible driving corridors by computing the reachable set for the longitudinal position of the vehicle along the lanelets of the road network, where lane changes are modeled as discrete events. Next, we select the best driving corridor based on a cost function that penalizes lane changes and deviations from a desired velocity profile. Finally, we generate a reference trajectory inside the selected driving corridor, which can be used to guide or warm start low-level trajectory planners. For the numerical evaluation we combine our decision module with a motion-primitive-based and an optimization-based planner and evaluate the performance on 2000 challenging CommonRoad traffic scenarios as well in the realistic CARLA simulator. The results demonstrate that our decision module is real-time capable and yields significant speed-ups compared to executing a motion planner standalone without a decision module.

First Three Years of the International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP)

This paper presents a summary and meta-analysis of the first three iterations of the annual International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP) held in 2020, 2021, and 2022. In the VNN-COMP, participants submit software tools that analyze whether given neural networks satisfy specifications describing their input-output behavior. These neural networks and specifications cover a variety of problem classes and tasks, corresponding to safety and robustness properties in image classification, neural control, reinforcement learning, and autonomous systems. We summarize the key processes, rules, and results, present trends observed over the last three years, and provide an outlook into possible future developments.

The Third International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2022): Summary and Results

This report summarizes the 3rd International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2022), held as a part of the 5th Workshop on Formal Methods for ML-Enabled Autonomous Systems (FoMLAS), which was collocated with the 34th International Conference on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). VNN-COMP is held annually to facilitate the fair and objective comparison of state-of-the-art neural network verification tools, encourage the standardization of tool interfaces, and bring together the neural network verification community. To this end, standardized formats for networks (ONNX) and specification (VNN-LIB) were defined, tools were evaluated on equal-cost hardware (using an automatic evaluation pipeline based on AWS instances), and tool parameters were chosen by the participants before the final test sets were made public. In the 2022 iteration, 11 teams participated on a diverse set of 12 scored benchmarks. This report summarizes the rules, benchmarks, participating tools, results, and lessons learned from this iteration of this competition.

Provable Fairness for Neural Network Models using Formal Verification

Machine learning models are increasingly deployed for critical decision-making tasks, making it important to verify that they do not contain gender or racial biases picked up from training data. Typical approaches to achieve fairness revolve around efforts to clean or curate training data, with post-hoc statistical evaluation of the fairness of the model on evaluation data. In contrast, we propose techniques to \emph{prove} fairness using recently developed formal methods that verify properties of neural network models.Beyond the strength of guarantee implied by a formal proof, our methods have the advantage that we do not need explicit training or evaluation data (which is often proprietary) in order to analyze a given trained model. In experiments on two familiar datasets in the fairness literature (COMPAS and ADULTS), we show that through proper training, we can reduce unfairness by an average of 65.4\% at a cost of less than 1\% in AUC score.

Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning via Action Projection using Reachability Analysis and Polynomial Zonotopes

While reinforcement learning produces very promising results for many applications, its main disadvantage is the lack of safety guarantees, which prevents its use in safety-critical systems. In this work, we address this issue by a safety shield for nonlinear continuous systems that solve reach-avoid tasks. Our safety shield prevents applying potentially unsafe actions from a reinforcement learning agent by projecting the proposed action to the closest safe action. This approach is called action projection and is implemented via mixed-integer optimization. The safety constraints for action projection are obtained by applying parameterized reachability analysis using polynomial zonotopes, which enables to accurately capture the nonlinear effects of the actions on the system. In contrast to other state of the art approaches for action projection, our safety shield can efficiently handle input constraints and dynamic obstacles, eases incorporation of the spatial robot dimensions into the safety constraints, guarantees robust safety despite process noise and measurement errors, and is well suited for high-dimensional systems, as we demonstrate on several challenging benchmark systems.

Open- and Closed-Loop Neural Network Verification using Polynomial Zonotopes

We present a novel approach to efficiently compute tight non-convex enclosures of the image through neural networks with ReLU, sigmoid, or hyperbolic tangent activation functions. In particular, we abstract the input-output relation of each neuron by a polynomial approximation, which is evaluated in a set-based manner using polynomial zonotopes. Our proposed method is especially well suited for reachability analysis of neural network controlled systems since polynomial zonotopes are able to capture the non-convexity in both, the image through the neural network as well as the reachable set. We demonstrate the superior performance of our approach compared to other state of the art methods on various benchmark systems.

Neural Network Compression of ACAS Xu is Unsafe: Closed-Loop Verification through Quantized State Backreachability

ACAS Xu is an air-to-air collision avoidance system designed for unmanned aircraft that issues horizontal turn advisories to avoid an intruder aircraft. Due the use of a large lookup table in the design, a neural network compression of the policy was proposed. Analysis of this system has spurred a significant body of research in the formal methods community on neural network verification. While many powerful methods have been developed, most work focuses on open-loop properties of the networks, rather than the main point of the system -- collision avoidance -- which requires closed-loop analysis. In this work, we develop a technique to verify a closed-loop approximation of ACAS Xu using state quantization and backreachability. We use favorable assumptions for the analysis -- perfect sensor information, instant following of advisories, ideal aircraft maneuvers and an intruder that only flies straight. When the method fails to prove the system is safe, we refine the quantization parameters until generating counterexamples where the original (non-quantized) system also has collisions.

Closed-Loop ACAS Xu NNCS is Unsafe: Quantized State Backreachability for Verification

ACAS Xu is an air-to-air collision avoidance system designed for unmanned aircraft that issues horizontal turn advisories to avoid an intruder aircraft. Due the use of a large lookup table in the design, a neural network compression of the policy was proposed. Analysis of this system has spurred a significant body of research in the formal methods community on neural network verification. While many powerful methods have been developed, most work focuses on open-loop properties of the networks, rather than the main point of the system -- collision avoidance -- which requires closed-loop analysis. In this work, we develop a technique to verify a closed-loop approximation of ACAS Xu using state quantization and backreachability. We use favorable assumptions for the analysis -- perfect sensor information, instant following of advisories, ideal aircraft maneuvers and an intruder that only flies straight. When the method fails to prove the system is safe, we refine the quantization parameters until generating counterexamples where the original (non-quantized) system also has collisions.

Stress Testing Autonomous Racing Overtake Maneuvers with RRT

High-performance autonomy often must operate at the boundaries of safety. When external agents are present in a system, the process of ensuring safety without sacrificing performance becomes extremely difficult. In this paper, we present an approach to stress test such systems based on the rapidly exploring random tree (RRT) algorithm. We propose to find faults in such systems through adversarial agent perturbations, where the behaviors of other agents in an otherwise fixed scenario are modified. This creates a large search space of possibilities, which we explore both randomly and with a focused strategy that runs RRT in a bounded projection of the observable states that we call the objective space. The approach is applied to generate tests for evaluating overtaking logic and path planning algorithms in autonomous racing, where the vehicles are driving at high speed in an adversarial environment. We evaluate several autonomous racing path planners, finding numerous collisions during overtake maneuvers in all planners. The focused RRT search finds several times more crashes than the random strategy, and, for certain planners, tens to hundreds of times more crashes in the second half of the track.