ASAP: An Azimuth-Priority Strip-Based Search Approach to Planar Microphone Array DOA Estimation in 3D

Direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation is an important task in microphone array processing and many downstream applications. The steered response power with phase transform (SRP-PHAT) method has been widely adopted for DOA estimation in recent years. However, accurate SRP-PHAT estimation in 3D scenarios requires evaluating steering responses over thousands of candidate directions, severely limiting real-time performance on resource-constrained platforms. This challenge becomes even more critical for planar arrays, which are widely used in robotics due to their structural simplicity. Motivated by the fact that azimuth estimation is usually more reliable than elevation estimation for most arrays, we propose ASAP, an azimuth-priority strip-based search approach to planar microphone array DOA estimation in 3D. In the first stage, ASAP performs coarse-to-fine region contraction within azimuthal strips to lock azimuth angles while retaining multiple maxima through spherical caps. In the second stage, it refines elevation along the great-circle arc between two close candidates. Extensive simulations and real-world experiments validate the efficiency and merits of the proposed method over existing approaches.

QuarkMedBench: A Real-World Scenario Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models

While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel on standardized medical exams, high scores often fail to translate to high-quality responses for real-world medical queries. Current evaluations rely heavily on multiple-choice questions, failing to capture the unstructured, ambiguous, and long-tail complexities inherent in genuine user inquiries. To bridge this gap, we introduce QuarkMedBench, an ecologically valid benchmark tailored for real-world medical LLM assessment. We compiled a massive dataset spanning Clinical Care, Wellness Health, and Professional Inquiry, comprising 20,821 single-turn queries and 3,853 multi-turn sessions. To objectively evaluate open-ended answers, we propose an automated scoring framework that integrates multi-model consensus with evidence-based retrieval to dynamically generate 220,617 fine-grained scoring rubrics (~9.8 per query). During evaluation, hierarchical weighting and safety constraints structurally quantify medical accuracy, key-point coverage, and risk interception, effectively mitigating the high costs and subjectivity of human grading. Experimental results demonstrate that the generated rubrics achieve a 91.8% concordance rate with clinical expert blind audits, establishing highly dependable medical reliability. Crucially, baseline evaluations on this benchmark reveal significant performance disparities among state-of-the-art models when navigating real-world clinical nuances, highlighting the limitations of conventional exam-based metrics. Ultimately, QuarkMedBench establishes a rigorous, reproducible yardstick for measuring LLM performance on complex health issues, while its framework inherently supports dynamic knowledge updates to prevent benchmark obsolescence.