Polarity is all you need to learn and transfer faster

Natural intelligences (NIs) thrive in a dynamic world - they learn quickly, sometimes with only a few samples. In contrast, Artificial intelligences (AIs) typically learn with prohibitive amount of training samples and computational power. What design principle difference between NI and AI could contribute to such a discrepancy? Here, we propose an angle from weight polarity: development processes initialize NIs with advantageous polarity configurations; as NIs grow and learn, synapse magnitudes update yet polarities are largely kept unchanged. We demonstrate with simulation and image classification tasks that if weight polarities are adequately set $\textit{a priori}$, then networks learn with less time and data. We also explicitly illustrate situations in which $\textit{a priori}$ setting the weight polarities is disadvantageous for networks. Our work illustrates the value of weight polarities from the perspective of statistical and computational efficiency during learning.

Towards Robust Recommender Systems via Triple Cooperative Defense

Recommender systems are often susceptible to well-crafted fake profiles, leading to biased recommendations. The wide application of recommender systems makes studying the defense against attack necessary. Among existing defense methods, data-processing-based methods inevitably exclude normal samples, while model-based methods struggle to enjoy both generalization and robustness. Considering the above limitations, we suggest integrating data processing and robust model and propose a general framework, Triple Cooperative Defense (TCD), which cooperates to improve model robustness through the co-training of three models. Specifically, in each round of training, we sequentially use the high-confidence prediction ratings (consistent ratings) of any two models as auxiliary training data for the remaining model, and the three models cooperatively improve recommendation robustness. Notably, TCD adds pseudo label data instead of deleting abnormal data, which avoids the cleaning of normal data, and the cooperative training of the three models is also beneficial to model generalization. Through extensive experiments with five poisoning attacks on three real-world datasets, the results show that the robustness improvement of TCD significantly outperforms baselines. It is worth mentioning that TCD is also beneficial for model generalizations.

Why Do Networks Need Negative Weights?

Why do networks have negative weights at all? The answer is: to learn more functions. We mathematically prove that deep neural networks with all non-negative weights are not universal approximators. This fundamental result is assumed by much of the deep learning literature without previously proving the result and demonstrating its necessity.