WALA Learning Executable Latent Actions from Action-Labeled Demonstrations and Action-Free Videos

Generalizable robot policies typically rely on action-labeled robot demonstrations, which are expensive to collect and difficult to scale. In contrast, large-scale human and robot videos contain rich physical interactions but often lack executable robot action labels. We present WALA, a framework for learning executable latent actions from both action-labeled demonstrations and action-free videos. WALA first pretrains a semantic-geometric latent action model from videos by modeling the evolution between current observations and sparsely sampled future observations. Instead of reconstructing raw pixels, WALA predicts future deltas in the DINOv3 feature space and dense depth space, preserving task-relevant semantic and geometric structure while reducing sensitivity to appearance details. During policy training, the pretrained encoder provides stable latent action targets, and the decoder serves as a trainable latent world model. The latent actions generated by the vision-language backbone are jointly supervised by robot action prediction, latent action target matching, and future dynamics prediction. This enables action-labeled demonstrations to provide executable control supervision, while action-free videos contribute dynamics supervision without requiring robot action annotations. Experiments show that WALA achieves strong performance on RoboTwin, sets a new state-of-the-art result on RoboCasa with 75.2% average success, and improves both policy performance and generalization in real-world manipulation tasks.

ForesightSafety-VLA: A Unified Diagnostic Safety Benchmark for Vision-Language-Action Models

In embodied intelligence, safety is a prerequisite for reliable robot deployment in the physical world. Current vision-language-action (VLA) models continue to advance toward general-purpose task capability, yet their embodied safety limits remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we introduce ForesightSafety-VLA, a diagnostic benchmark that makes safety the primary evaluation target for VLA systems. We define a 13-category safety taxonomy covering physical interaction safety (Safe-Core), instruction-side safety (Safe-Lang), and perception-side safety (Safe-Vis), and evaluate policies under three controlled dimensions of variation -- scene structure, language command, and visual observation -- so that failure sources can be diagnosed rather than hidden in a single aggregate score. Beyond binary task success, ForesightSafety-VLA measures process-level risk through cumulative safety cost (CC) and risk exposure time (RET), together with a four-quadrant decomposition of safe/unsafe success and failure. We instantiate 66 safety-augmented base scenarios in RoboTwin across 5 embodiments and report results on representative VLA baselines. Across the evaluated baselines, even the strongest policy incurs non-trivial safety cost and unsafe nominal success, while structure and visual variation induce substantially stronger safety degradation than ordinary language variation. These results suggest that embodied safety is tightly coupled to perception, grounding, and control competence rather than being reducible to post-hoc safety filtering alone.

ForesightSafety Bench: A Frontier Risk Evaluation and Governance Framework towards Safe AI

Rapidly evolving AI exhibits increasingly strong autonomy and goal-directed capabilities, accompanied by derivative systemic risks that are more unpredictable, difficult to control, and potentially irreversible. However, current AI safety evaluation systems suffer from critical limitations such as restricted risk dimensions and failed frontier risk detection. The lagging safety benchmarks and alignment technologies can hardly address the complex challenges posed by cutting-edge AI models. To bridge this gap, we propose the "ForesightSafety Bench" AI Safety Evaluation Framework, beginning with 7 major Fundamental Safety pillars and progressively extends to advanced Embodied AI Safety, AI4Science Safety, Social and Environmental AI risks, Catastrophic and Existential Risks, as well as 8 critical industrial safety domains, forming a total of 94 refined risk dimensions. To date, the benchmark has accumulated tens of thousands of structured risk data points and assessment results, establishing a widely encompassing, hierarchically clear, and dynamically evolving AI safety evaluation framework. Based on this benchmark, we conduct systematic evaluation and in-depth analysis of over twenty mainstream advanced large models, identifying key risk patterns and their capability boundaries. The safety capability evaluation results reveals the widespread safety vulnerabilities of frontier AI across multiple pillars, particularly focusing on Risky Agentic Autonomy, AI4Science Safety, Embodied AI Safety, Social AI Safety and Catastrophic and Existential Risks. Our benchmark is released at https://github.com/Beijing-AISI/ForesightSafety-Bench. The project website is available at https://foresightsafety-bench.beijing-aisi.ac.cn/.