Alert button
Picture for Clara I. Sánchez

Clara I. Sánchez

Alert button

JSSL: Joint Supervised and Self-supervised Learning for MRI Reconstruction

Nov 27, 2023
George Yiasemis, Nikita Moriakov, Clara I. Sánchez, Jan-Jakob Sonke, Jonas Teuwen

Magnetic Resonance Imaging represents an important diagnostic modality; however, its inherently slow acquisition process poses challenges in obtaining fully sampled k-space data under motion in clinical scenarios such as abdominal, cardiac, and prostate imaging. In the absence of fully sampled acquisitions, which can serve as ground truth data, training deep learning algorithms in a supervised manner to predict the underlying ground truth image becomes an impossible task. To address this limitation, self-supervised methods have emerged as a viable alternative, leveraging available subsampled k-space data to train deep learning networks for MRI reconstruction. Nevertheless, these self-supervised approaches often fall short when compared to supervised methodologies. In this paper, we introduce JSSL (Joint Supervised and Self-supervised Learning), a novel training approach for deep learning-based MRI reconstruction algorithms aimed at enhancing reconstruction quality in scenarios where target dataset(s) containing fully sampled k-space measurements are unavailable. Our proposed method operates by simultaneously training a model in a self-supervised learning setting, using subsampled data from the target dataset(s), and in a supervised learning manner, utilizing data from other datasets, referred to as proxy datasets, where fully sampled k-space data is accessible. To demonstrate the efficacy of JSSL, we utilized subsampled prostate parallel MRI measurements as the target dataset, while employing fully sampled brain and knee k-space acquisitions as proxy datasets. Our results showcase a substantial improvement over conventional self-supervised training methods, thereby underscoring the effectiveness of our joint approach. We provide a theoretical motivation for JSSL and establish a practical "rule-of-thumb" for selecting the most appropriate training approach for deep MRI reconstruction.

* 26 pages, 11 figures, 6 tables 
Viaarxiv icon

AIROGS: Artificial Intelligence for RObust Glaucoma Screening Challenge

Feb 10, 2023
Coen de Vente, Koenraad A. Vermeer, Nicolas Jaccard, He Wang, Hongyi Sun, Firas Khader, Daniel Truhn, Temirgali Aimyshev, Yerkebulan Zhanibekuly, Tien-Dung Le, Adrian Galdran, Miguel Ángel González Ballester, Gustavo Carneiro, Devika R G, Hrishikesh P S, Densen Puthussery, Hong Liu, Zekang Yang, Satoshi Kondo, Satoshi Kasai, Edward Wang, Ashritha Durvasula, Jónathan Heras, Miguel Ángel Zapata, Teresa Araújo, Guilherme Aresta, Hrvoje Bogunović, Mustafa Arikan, Yeong Chan Lee, Hyun Bin Cho, Yoon Ho Choi, Abdul Qayyum, Imran Razzak, Bram van Ginneken, Hans G. Lemij, Clara I. Sánchez

Figure 1 for AIROGS: Artificial Intelligence for RObust Glaucoma Screening Challenge
Figure 2 for AIROGS: Artificial Intelligence for RObust Glaucoma Screening Challenge
Figure 3 for AIROGS: Artificial Intelligence for RObust Glaucoma Screening Challenge
Figure 4 for AIROGS: Artificial Intelligence for RObust Glaucoma Screening Challenge

The early detection of glaucoma is essential in preventing visual impairment. Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to analyze color fundus photographs (CFPs) in a cost-effective manner, making glaucoma screening more accessible. While AI models for glaucoma screening from CFPs have shown promising results in laboratory settings, their performance decreases significantly in real-world scenarios due to the presence of out-of-distribution and low-quality images. To address this issue, we propose the Artificial Intelligence for Robust Glaucoma Screening (AIROGS) challenge. This challenge includes a large dataset of around 113,000 images from about 60,000 patients and 500 different screening centers, and encourages the development of algorithms that are robust to ungradable and unexpected input data. We evaluated solutions from 14 teams in this paper, and found that the best teams performed similarly to a set of 20 expert ophthalmologists and optometrists. The highest-scoring team achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99) for detecting ungradable images on-the-fly. Additionally, many of the algorithms showed robust performance when tested on three other publicly available datasets. These results demonstrate the feasibility of robust AI-enabled glaucoma screening.

* 19 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables 
Viaarxiv icon

Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation

Feb 09, 2023
Annika Reinke, Minu D. Tizabi, Michael Baumgartner, Matthias Eisenmann, Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel, A. Emre Kavur, Tim Rädsch, Carole H. Sudre, Laura Acion, Michela Antonelli, Tal Arbel, Spyridon Bakas, Arriel Benis, Matthew Blaschko, Florian Büttner, M. Jorge Cardoso, Veronika Cheplygina, Jianxu Chen, Evangelia Christodoulou, Beth A. Cimini, Gary S. Collins, Keyvan Farahani, Luciana Ferrer, Adrian Galdran, Bram van Ginneken, Ben Glocker, Patrick Godau, Robert Haase, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Michael M. Hoffman, Merel Huisman, Fabian Isensee, Pierre Jannin, Charles E. Kahn, Dagmar Kainmueller, Bernhard Kainz, Alexandros Karargyris, Alan Karthikesalingam, Hannes Kenngott, Jens Kleesiek, Florian Kofler, Thijs Kooi, Annette Kopp-Schneider, Michal Kozubek, Anna Kreshuk, Tahsin Kurc, Bennett A. Landman, Geert Litjens, Amin Madani, Klaus Maier-Hein, Anne L. Martel, Peter Mattson, Erik Meijering, Bjoern Menze, Karel G. M. Moons, Henning Müller, Brennan Nichyporuk, Felix Nickel, Jens Petersen, Susanne M. Rafelski, Nasir Rajpoot, Mauricio Reyes, Michael A. Riegler, Nicola Rieke, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Clara I. Sánchez, Shravya Shetty, Maarten van Smeden, Ronald M. Summers, Abdel A. Taha, Aleksei Tiulpin, Sotirios A. Tsaftaris, Ben Van Calster, Gaël Varoquaux, Manuel Wiesenfarth, Ziv R. Yaniv, Paul F. Jäger, Lena Maier-Hein

Figure 1 for Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation
Figure 2 for Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation
Figure 3 for Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation
Figure 4 for Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation

Validation metrics are key for the reliable tracking of scientific progress and for bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence (AI) research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately in relation to the underlying research problem. This could be attributed to a lack of accessibility of metric-related knowledge: While taking into account the individual strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of validation metrics is a critical prerequisite to making educated choices, the relevant knowledge is currently scattered and poorly accessible to individual researchers. Based on a multi-stage Delphi process conducted by a multidisciplinary expert consortium as well as extensive community feedback, the present work provides the first reliable and comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Focusing on biomedical image analysis but with the potential of transfer to other fields, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy. To facilitate comprehension, illustrations and specific examples accompany each pitfall. As a structured body of information accessible to researchers of all levels of expertise, this work enhances global comprehension of a key topic in image analysis validation.

Viaarxiv icon

Uncertainty-Aware Multiple-Instance Learning for Reliable Classification: Application to Optical Coherence Tomography

Feb 06, 2023
Coen de Vente, Bram van Ginneken, Carel B. Hoyng, Caroline C. W. Klaver, Clara I. Sánchez

Figure 1 for Uncertainty-Aware Multiple-Instance Learning for Reliable Classification: Application to Optical Coherence Tomography
Figure 2 for Uncertainty-Aware Multiple-Instance Learning for Reliable Classification: Application to Optical Coherence Tomography
Figure 3 for Uncertainty-Aware Multiple-Instance Learning for Reliable Classification: Application to Optical Coherence Tomography
Figure 4 for Uncertainty-Aware Multiple-Instance Learning for Reliable Classification: Application to Optical Coherence Tomography

Deep learning classification models for medical image analysis often perform well on data from scanners that were used during training. However, when these models are applied to data from different vendors, their performance tends to drop substantially. Artifacts that only occur within scans from specific scanners are major causes of this poor generalizability. We aimed to improve the reliability of deep learning classification models by proposing Uncertainty-Based Instance eXclusion (UBIX). This technique, based on multiple-instance learning, reduces the effect of corrupted instances on the bag-classification by seamlessly integrating out-of-distribution (OOD) instance detection during inference. Although UBIX is generally applicable to different medical images and diverse classification tasks, we focused on staging of age-related macular degeneration in optical coherence tomography. After being trained using images from one vendor, UBIX showed a reliable behavior, with a slight decrease in performance (a decrease of the quadratic weighted kappa ($\kappa_w$) from 0.861 to 0.708), when applied to images from different vendors containing artifacts; while a state-of-the-art 3D neural network suffered from a significant detriment of performance ($\kappa_w$ from 0.852 to 0.084) on the same test set. We showed that instances with unseen artifacts can be identified with OOD detection and their contribution to the bag-level predictions can be reduced, improving reliability without the need for retraining on new data. This potentially increases the applicability of artificial intelligence models to data from other scanners than the ones for which they were developed.

* 17 pages, 7 figures, 5 tables 
Viaarxiv icon

On Retrospective k-space Subsampling schemes For Deep MRI Reconstruction

Jan 23, 2023
George Yiasemis, Clara I. Sánchez, Jan-Jakob Sonke, Jonas Teuwen

Figure 1 for On Retrospective k-space Subsampling schemes For Deep MRI Reconstruction
Figure 2 for On Retrospective k-space Subsampling schemes For Deep MRI Reconstruction
Figure 3 for On Retrospective k-space Subsampling schemes For Deep MRI Reconstruction
Figure 4 for On Retrospective k-space Subsampling schemes For Deep MRI Reconstruction

$\textbf{Purpose:}$ The MRI $k$-space acquisition is time consuming. Traditional techniques aim to acquire accelerated data, which in conjunction with recent DL methods, aid in producing high-fidelity images in truncated times. Conventionally, subsampling the $k$-space is performed by utilizing Cartesian-rectilinear trajectories, which even with the use of DL, provide imprecise reconstructions, though, a plethora of non-rectilinear or non-Cartesian trajectories can be implemented in modern MRI scanners. This work investigates the effect of the $k$-space subsampling scheme on the quality of reconstructed accelerated MRI measurements produced by trained DL models. $\textbf{Methods:}$ The RecurrentVarNet was used as the DL-based MRI-reconstruction architecture. Cartesian fully-sampled multi-coil $k$-space measurements from three datasets with different accelerations were retrospectively subsampled using eight distinct subsampling schemes (four Cartesian-rectilinear, two Cartesian non-rectilinear, two non-Cartesian). Experiments were conducted in two frameworks: Scheme-specific, where a distinct model was trained and evaluated for each dataset-subsampling scheme pair, and multi-scheme, where for each dataset a single model was trained on data randomly subsampled by any of the eight schemes and evaluated on data subsampled by all schemes. $\textbf{Results:}$ In the scheme-specific setting RecurrentVarNets trained and evaluated on non-rectilinearly subsampled data demonstrated superior performance especially for high accelerations, whilst in the multi-scheme setting, reconstruction performance on rectilinearly subsampled data improved when compared to the scheme-specific experiments. $\textbf{Conclusion:}$ Training DL-based MRI reconstruction algorithms on non-rectilinearly subsampled measurements can produce more faithful reconstructions.

* 25 pages, 13 figures, 5 tables 
Viaarxiv icon

A deep learning framework for the detection and quantification of drusen and reticular pseudodrusen on optical coherence tomography

Apr 05, 2022
Roy Schwartz, Hagar Khalid, Sandra Liakopoulos, Yanling Ouyang, Coen de Vente, Cristina González-Gonzalo, Aaron Y. Lee, Robyn Guymer, Emily Y. Chew, Catherine Egan, Zhichao Wu, Himeesh Kumar, Joseph Farrington, Clara I. Sánchez, Adnan Tufail

Figure 1 for A deep learning framework for the detection and quantification of drusen and reticular pseudodrusen on optical coherence tomography
Figure 2 for A deep learning framework for the detection and quantification of drusen and reticular pseudodrusen on optical coherence tomography
Figure 3 for A deep learning framework for the detection and quantification of drusen and reticular pseudodrusen on optical coherence tomography
Figure 4 for A deep learning framework for the detection and quantification of drusen and reticular pseudodrusen on optical coherence tomography

Purpose - To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) framework for the detection and quantification of drusen and reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) on optical coherence tomography scans. Design - Development and validation of deep learning models for classification and feature segmentation. Methods - A DL framework was developed consisting of a classification model and an out-of-distribution (OOD) detection model for the identification of ungradable scans; a classification model to identify scans with drusen or RPD; and an image segmentation model to independently segment lesions as RPD or drusen. Data were obtained from 1284 participants in the UK Biobank (UKBB) with a self-reported diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and 250 UKBB controls. Drusen and RPD were manually delineated by five retina specialists. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), kappa, accuracy and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results - The classification models performed strongly at their respective tasks (0.95, 0.93, and 0.99 AUC, respectively, for the ungradable scans classifier, the OOD model, and the drusen and RPD classification model). The mean ICC for drusen and RPD area vs. graders was 0.74 and 0.61, respectively, compared with 0.69 and 0.68 for intergrader agreement. FROC curves showed that the model's sensitivity was close to human performance. Conclusions - The models achieved high classification and segmentation performance, similar to human performance. Application of this robust framework will further our understanding of RPD as a separate entity from drusen in both research and clinical settings.

* 26 pages, 7 figures 
Viaarxiv icon

Recurrent Variational Network: A Deep Learning Inverse Problem Solver applied to the task of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction

Nov 18, 2021
George Yiasemis, Clara I. Sánchez, Jan-Jakob Sonke, Jonas Teuwen

Figure 1 for Recurrent Variational Network: A Deep Learning Inverse Problem Solver applied to the task of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction
Figure 2 for Recurrent Variational Network: A Deep Learning Inverse Problem Solver applied to the task of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction
Figure 3 for Recurrent Variational Network: A Deep Learning Inverse Problem Solver applied to the task of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction
Figure 4 for Recurrent Variational Network: A Deep Learning Inverse Problem Solver applied to the task of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction

Magnetic Resonance Imaging can produce detailed images of the anatomy and physiology of the human body that can assist doctors in diagnosing and treating pathologies such as tumours. However, MRI suffers from very long acquisition times that make it susceptible to patient motion artifacts and limit its potential to deliver dynamic treatments. Conventional approaches such as Parallel Imaging and Compressed Sensing allow for an increase in MRI acquisition speed by reconstructing MR images by acquiring less MRI data using multiple receiver coils. Recent advancements in Deep Learning combined with Parallel Imaging and Compressed Sensing techniques have the potential to produce high-fidelity reconstructions from highly accelerated MRI data. In this work we present a novel Deep Learning-based Inverse Problem solver applied to the task of accelerated MRI reconstruction, called Recurrent Variational Network (RecurrentVarNet) by exploiting the properties of Convolution Recurrent Networks and unrolled algorithms for solving Inverse Problems. The RecurrentVarNet consists of multiple blocks, each responsible for one unrolled iteration of the gradient descent optimization algorithm for solving inverse problems. Contrary to traditional approaches, the optimization steps are performed in the observation domain ($k$-space) instead of the image domain. Each recurrent block of RecurrentVarNet refines the observed $k$-space and is comprised of a data consistency term and a recurrent unit which takes as input a learned hidden state and the prediction of the previous block. Our proposed method achieves new state of the art qualitative and quantitative reconstruction results on 5-fold and 10-fold accelerated data from a public multi-channel brain dataset, outperforming previous conventional and deep learning-based approaches. We will release all models code and baselines on our public repository.

* 16 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables 
Viaarxiv icon

Deep MRI Reconstruction with Radial Subsampling

Aug 20, 2021
George Yiasemis, Chaoping Zhang, Clara I. Sánchez, Jan-Jakob Sonke, Jonas Teuwen

Figure 1 for Deep MRI Reconstruction with Radial Subsampling
Figure 2 for Deep MRI Reconstruction with Radial Subsampling
Figure 3 for Deep MRI Reconstruction with Radial Subsampling
Figure 4 for Deep MRI Reconstruction with Radial Subsampling

In spite of its extensive adaptation in almost every medical diagnostic and examinatorial application, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is still a slow imaging modality which limits its use for dynamic imaging. In recent years, Parallel Imaging (PI) and Compressed Sensing (CS) have been utilised to accelerate the MRI acquisition. In clinical settings, subsampling the k-space measurements during scanning time using Cartesian trajectories, such as rectilinear sampling, is currently the most conventional CS approach applied which, however, is prone to producing aliased reconstructions. With the advent of the involvement of Deep Learning (DL) in accelerating the MRI, reconstructing faithful images from subsampled data became increasingly promising. Retrospectively applying a subsampling mask onto the k-space data is a way of simulating the accelerated acquisition of k-space data in real clinical setting. In this paper we compare and provide a review for the effect of applying either rectilinear or radial retrospective subsampling on the quality of the reconstructions outputted by trained deep neural networks. With the same choice of hyper-parameters, we train and evaluate two distinct Recurrent Inference Machines (RIMs), one for each type of subsampling. The qualitative and quantitative results of our experiments indicate that the model trained on data with radial subsampling attains higher performance and learns to estimate reconstructions with higher fidelity paving the way for other DL approaches to involve radial subsampling.

* 9 pages, 7 figures, 1 table 
Viaarxiv icon