Off-Policy Evaluation from Logged Human Feedback

Learning from human feedback has been central to recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning. Since the collection of human feedback is costly, a natural question to ask is if the new feedback always needs to collected. Or could we evaluate a new model with the human feedback on responses of another model? This motivates us to study off-policy evaluation from logged human feedback. We formalize the problem, propose both model-based and model-free estimators for policy values, and show how to optimize them. We analyze unbiasedness of our estimators and evaluate them empirically. Our estimators can predict the absolute values of evaluated policies, rank them, and be optimized.

Cross-Validated Off-Policy Evaluation

In this paper, we study the problem of estimator selection and hyper-parameter tuning in off-policy evaluation. Although cross-validation is the most popular method for model selection in supervised learning, off-policy evaluation relies mostly on theory-based approaches, which provide only limited guidance to practitioners. We show how to use cross-validation for off-policy evaluation. This challenges a popular belief that cross-validation in off-policy evaluation is not feasible. We evaluate our method empirically and show that it addresses a variety of use cases.

Optimal Design for Human Feedback

Learning of preference models from human feedback has been central to recent advances in artificial intelligence. Motivated by this progress, and the cost of obtaining high-quality human annotations, we study the problem of data collection for learning preference models. The key idea in our work is to generalize optimal designs, a tool for computing efficient data logging policies, to ranked lists. To show the generality of our ideas, we study both absolute and relative feedback on items in the list. We design efficient algorithms for both settings and analyze them. We prove that our preference model estimators improve with more data and so does the ranking error under the estimators. Finally, we experiment with several synthetic and real-world datasets to show the statistical efficiency of our algorithms.

Experimental Design for Active Transductive Inference in Large Language Models

Transduction, the ability to include query-specific examples in the prompt at inference time, is one of the emergent abilities of large language models (LLMs). In this work, we propose a framework for adaptive prompt design called active transductive inference (ATI). We design the LLM prompt by adaptively choosing few-shot examples for a given inference query. The examples are initially unlabeled and we query the user to label the most informative ones, which maximally reduces the uncertainty in the LLM prediction. We propose two algorithms, GO and SAL, which differ in how the few-shot examples are chosen. We analyze these algorithms in linear models: first GO and then use its equivalence with SAL. We experiment with many different tasks and show that GO and SAL outperform other methods for choosing few-shot examples in the LLM prompt at inference time.

MADA: Meta-Adaptive Optimizers through hyper-gradient Descent

Since Adam was introduced, several novel adaptive optimizers for deep learning have been proposed. These optimizers typically excel in some tasks but may not outperform Adam uniformly across all tasks. In this work, we introduce Meta-Adaptive Optimizers (MADA), a unified optimizer framework that can generalize several known optimizers and dynamically learn the most suitable one during training. The key idea in MADA is to parameterize the space of optimizers and search through it using hyper-gradient descent. Numerical results suggest that MADA is robust against sub-optimally tuned hyper-parameters, and outperforms Adam, Lion, and Adan with their default hyper-parameters, often even with optimized hyper-parameters. We also propose AVGrad, a variant of AMSGrad where the maximum operator is replaced with averaging, and observe that it performs better within MADA. Finally, we provide a convergence analysis to show that interpolation of optimizers (specifically, AVGrad and Adam) can improve their error bounds (up to constants), hinting at an advantage for meta-optimizers.

Logic-Scaffolding: Personalized Aspect-Instructed Recommendation Explanation Generation using LLMs

The unique capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as the natural language text generation ability, position them as strong candidates for providing explanation for recommendations. However, despite the size of the LLM, most existing models struggle to produce zero-shot explanations reliably. To address this issue, we propose a framework called Logic-Scaffolding, that combines the ideas of aspect-based explanation and chain-of-thought prompting to generate explanations through intermediate reasoning steps. In this paper, we share our experience in building the framework and present an interactive demonstration for exploring our results.

Pre-trained Recommender Systems: A Causal Debiasing Perspective

Recent studies on pre-trained vision/language models have demonstrated the practical benefit of a new, promising solution-building paradigm in AI where models can be pre-trained on broad data describing a generic task space and then adapted successfully to solve a wide range of downstream tasks, even when training data is severely limited (e.g., in zero- or few-shot learning scenarios). Inspired by such progress, we investigate in this paper the possibilities and challenges of adapting such a paradigm to the context of recommender systems, which is less investigated from the perspective of pre-trained model. In particular, we propose to develop a generic recommender that captures universal interaction patterns by training on generic user-item interaction data extracted from different domains, which can then be fast adapted to improve few-shot learning performance in unseen new domains (with limited data). However, unlike vision/language data which share strong conformity in the semantic space, universal patterns underlying recommendation data collected across different domains (e.g., different countries or different E-commerce platforms) are often occluded by both in-domain and cross-domain biases implicitly imposed by the cultural differences in their user and item bases, as well as their uses of different e-commerce platforms. As shown in our experiments, such heterogeneous biases in the data tend to hinder the effectiveness of the pre-trained model. To address this challenge, we further introduce and formalize a causal debiasing perspective, which is substantiated via a hierarchical Bayesian deep learning model, named PreRec. Our empirical studies on real-world data show that the proposed model could significantly improve the recommendation performance in zero- and few-shot learning settings under both cross-market and cross-platform scenarios.

Pessimistic Off-Policy Multi-Objective Optimization

Multi-objective optimization is a type of decision making problems where multiple conflicting objectives are optimized. We study offline optimization of multi-objective policies from data collected by an existing policy. We propose a pessimistic estimator for the multi-objective policy values that can be easily plugged into existing formulas for hypervolume computation and optimized. The estimator is based on inverse propensity scores (IPS), and improves upon a naive IPS estimator in both theory and experiments. Our analysis is general, and applies beyond our IPS estimators and methods for optimizing them. The pessimistic estimator can be optimized by policy gradients and performs well in all of our experiments.

Efficient and Interpretable Bandit Algorithms

Motivated by the importance of explainability in modern machine learning, we design bandit algorithms that are \emph{efficient} and \emph{interpretable}. A bandit algorithm is interpretable if it explores with the objective of reducing uncertainty in the unknown model parameter. To quantify the interpretability, we introduce a novel metric of \textit{uncertainty loss}, which compares the rate of the uncertainty reduction to the theoretical optimum. We propose CODE, a bandit algorithm based on a \textbf{C}onstrained \textbf{O}ptimal \textbf{DE}sign, that is interpretable and maximally reduces the uncertainty. The key idea in \code is to explore among all plausible actions, determined by a statistical constraint, to achieve interpretability. We implement CODE efficiently in both multi-armed and linear bandits and derive near-optimal regret bounds by leveraging the optimality criteria of the approximate optimal design. CODE can be also viewed as removing phases in conventional phased elimination, which makes it more practical and general. We demonstrate the advantage of \code by numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world problems. CODE outperforms other state-of-the-art interpretable designs while matching the performance of popular but uninterpretable designs, such as upper confidence bound algorithms.

Logarithmic Bayes Regret Bounds

We derive the first finite-time logarithmic regret bounds for Bayesian bandits. For Gaussian bandits, we obtain a $O(c_h \log^2 n)$ bound, where $c_h$ is a prior-dependent constant. This matches the asymptotic lower bound of Lai (1987). Our proofs mark a technical departure from prior works, and are simple and general. To show generality, we apply our technique to linear bandits. Our bounds shed light on the value of the prior in the Bayesian setting, both in the objective and as a side information given to the learner. They significantly improve the $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ bounds, that despite the existing lower bounds, have become standard in the literature.