From Words to Worlds: Benchmarking Cross-Cultural Cultural Understanding in Machine Translation

Culture-expressions, such as idioms, slang, and culture-specific items (CSIs), are pervasive in natural language and encode meanings that go beyond literal linguistic form. Accurately translating such expressions remains challenging for machine translation systems. Despite this, existing benchmarks remain fragmented and do not provide a systematic framework for evaluating translation performance on culture-loaded expressions. To address this gap, we introduce CulT-Eval, a benchmark designed to evaluate how models handle different types of culturally grounded expressions. CulT-Eval comprises over 7,959 carefully curated instances spanning multiple types of culturally grounded expressions, with a comprehensive error taxonomy covering culturally grounded expressions. Through extensive evaluation of large language models and detailed analysis, we identify recurring and systematic failure modes that are not adequately captured by existing automatic metrics. Accordingly, we propose a complementary evaluation metric that targets culturally induced meaning deviations overlooked by standard MT metrics. The results indicate that current models struggle to preserve culturally grounded meaning and to capture the cultural and contextual nuances essential for accurate translation. Our benchmark and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CulT-Eval-E75D/.

MAS-FIRE: Fault Injection and Reliability Evaluation for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems

As LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are increasingly deployed for complex tasks, ensuring their reliability has become a pressing challenge. Since MAS coordinate through unstructured natural language rather than rigid protocols, they are prone to semantic failures (e.g., hallucinations, misinterpreted instructions, and reasoning drift) that propagate silently without raising runtime exceptions. Prevailing evaluation approaches, which measure only end-to-end task success, offer limited insight into how these failures arise or how effectively agents recover from them. To bridge this gap, we propose MAS-FIRE, a systematic framework for fault injection and reliability evaluation of MAS. We define a taxonomy of 15 fault types covering intra-agent cognitive errors and inter-agent coordination failures, and inject them via three non-invasive mechanisms: prompt modification, response rewriting, and message routing manipulation. Applying MAS-FIRE to three representative MAS architectures, we uncover a rich set of fault-tolerant behaviors that we organize into four tiers: mechanism, rule, prompt, and reasoning. This tiered view enables fine-grained diagnosis of where and why systems succeed or fail. Our findings reveal that stronger foundation models do not uniformly improve robustness. We further show that architectural topology plays an equally decisive role, with iterative, closed-loop designs neutralizing over 40% of faults that cause catastrophic collapse in linear workflows. MAS-FIRE provides the process-level observability and actionable guidance needed to systematically improve multi-agent systems.

Vital Sign Monitoring in Dynamic Environment via mmWave Radar and Camera Fusion

Contact-free vital sign monitoring, which uses wireless signals for recognizing human vital signs (i.e, breath and heartbeat), is an attractive solution to health and security. However, the subject's body movement and the change in actual environments can result in inaccurate frequency estimation of heartbeat and respiratory. In this paper, we propose a robust mmWave radar and camera fusion system for monitoring vital signs, which can perform consistently well in dynamic scenarios, e.g., when some people move around the subject to be tracked, or a subject waves his/her arms and marches on the spot. Three major processing modules are developed in the system, to enable robust sensing. Firstly, we utilize a camera to assist a mmWave radar to accurately localize the subjects of interest. Secondly, we exploit the calculated subject position to form transmitting and receiving beamformers, which can improve the reflected power from the targets and weaken the impact of dynamic interference. Thirdly, we propose a weighted multi-channel Variational Mode Decomposition (WMC-VMD) algorithm to separate the weak vital sign signals from the dynamic ones due to subject's body movement. Experimental results show that, the 90${^{th}}$ percentile errors in respiration rate (RR) and heartbeat rate (HR) are less than 0.5 RPM (respirations per minute) and 6 BPM (beats per minute), respectively.

Dynamics-aware Adversarial Attack of Adaptive Neural Networks

In this paper, we investigate the dynamics-aware adversarial attack problem of adaptive neural networks. Most existing adversarial attack algorithms are designed under a basic assumption -- the network architecture is fixed throughout the attack process. However, this assumption does not hold for many recently proposed adaptive neural networks, which adaptively deactivate unnecessary execution units based on inputs to improve computational efficiency. It results in a serious issue of lagged gradient, making the learned attack at the current step ineffective due to the architecture change afterward. To address this issue, we propose a Leaded Gradient Method (LGM) and show the significant effects of the lagged gradient. More specifically, we reformulate the gradients to be aware of the potential dynamic changes of network architectures, so that the learned attack better "leads" the next step than the dynamics-unaware methods when network architecture changes dynamically. Extensive experiments on representative types of adaptive neural networks for both 2D images and 3D point clouds show that our LGM achieves impressive adversarial attack performance compared with the dynamic-unaware attack methods.