UltraEP: Unleash MoE Training and Inference on Rack-Scale Nodes with Near-Optimal Load Balancing

Large-scale expert parallelism (EP) is becoming pivotal for training and serving frontier MoE models, but it also amplifies device-level expert load imbalance into compute stragglers, token all-to-all bottlenecks, and activation-memory spikes. Existing balancers redistribute experts periodically based on historical load, which becomes unreliable for production deployments with non-stationary load patterns. We present UltraEP, the first exact-load, real-time balancer for large-EP MoE training and serving prefill on rack-scale nodes (RSNs). Built upon the extended scale-up connectivity of RSNs, UltraEP rebalances every microbatch and layer on critical paths, which requires nontrivial co-design of plan solving and expert replication communication to minimize exposed overhead. To this end, UltraEP eagerly reacts to post-gating load with efficient quota-driven planning, and executes the resulting irregular expert-state transfers with RSN-native persistent tile streaming and relay-based fan-out mitigation. Averaged across MoE models from 106B to 671B parameters in training and prefill, UltraEP achieves 94.3% of the force-balanced ideal throughput, delivering 1.49$\times$ improvement over non-balancing, while reducing the final inter-rank imbalance from 1.30$-$4.01 to 1.01$-$1.04. Additionally, we validate UltraEP's scalability and robustness in production MoE training with 2560 GPUs.

Heddle: A Distributed Orchestration System for Agentic RL Rollout

Agentic Reinforcement Learning (RL) enables LLMs to solve complex tasks by alternating between a data-collection rollout phase and a policy training phase. During rollout, the agent generates trajectories, i.e., multi-step interactions between LLMs and external tools. Yet, frequent tool calls induce long-tailed trajectory generation that bottlenecks rollouts. This stems from step-centric designs that ignore trajectory context, triggering three system problems for long-tail trajectory generation: queueing delays, interference overhead, and inflated per-token time. We propose Heddle, a trajectory-centric system to optimize the when, where, and how of agentic rollout execution. Heddle integrates three core mechanisms: trajectory-level scheduling using runtime prediction and progressive priority to minimize cumulative queueing; trajectory-aware placement via presorted dynamic programming and opportunistic migration during idle tool call intervals to minimize interference; and trajectory-adaptive resource manager that dynamically tunes model parallelism to accelerate the per-token time of long-tail trajectories while maintaining high throughput for short trajectories. Evaluations across diverse agentic RL workloads demonstrate that Heddle effectively neutralizes the long-tail bottleneck, achieving up to 2.5$\times$ higher end-to-end rollout throughput compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Agent KB: Leveraging Cross-Domain Experience for Agentic Problem Solving

As language agents tackle increasingly complex tasks, they struggle with effective error correction and experience reuse across domains. We introduce Agent KB, a hierarchical experience framework that enables complex agentic problem solving via a novel Reason-Retrieve-Refine pipeline. Agent KB addresses a core limitation: agents traditionally cannot learn from each other's experiences. By capturing both high-level strategies and detailed execution logs, Agent KB creates a shared knowledge base that enables cross-agent knowledge transfer. Evaluated on the GAIA benchmark, Agent KB improves success rates by up to 16.28 percentage points. On the most challenging tasks, Claude-3 improves from 38.46% to 57.69%, while GPT-4 improves from 53.49% to 73.26% on intermediate tasks. On SWE-bench code repair, Agent KB enables Claude-3 to improve from 41.33% to 53.33%. Our results suggest that Agent KB provides a modular, framework-agnostic infrastructure for enabling agents to learn from past experiences and generalize successful strategies to new tasks.

Autoformalize Mathematical Statements by Symbolic Equivalence and Semantic Consistency

Autoformalization, the task of automatically translating natural language descriptions into a formal language, poses a significant challenge across various domains, especially in mathematics. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have unveiled their promising capabilities to formalize even competition-level math problems. However, we observe a considerable discrepancy between pass@1 and pass@k accuracies in LLM-generated formalizations. To address this gap, we introduce a novel framework that scores and selects the best result from k autoformalization candidates based on two complementary self-consistency methods: symbolic equivalence and semantic consistency. Elaborately, symbolic equivalence identifies the logical homogeneity among autoformalization candidates using automated theorem provers, and semantic consistency evaluates the preservation of the original meaning by informalizing the candidates and computing the similarity between the embeddings of the original and informalized texts. Our extensive experiments on the MATH and miniF2F datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly enhances autoformalization accuracy, achieving up to 0.22-1.35x relative improvements across various LLMs and baseline methods.