We present a new framework, called adversarial projections, for solving inverse problems by learning to project onto manifolds. Our goal is to recover a signal from a collection of noisy measurements. Traditional methods for this task often minimize the addition of a regularization term and an expression that measures compliance with measurements (e.g., least squares). However, it has been shown that convex regularization can introduce bias, preventing recovery of the true signal. Our approach avoids this issue by iteratively projecting signals toward the (possibly nonlinear) manifold of true signals. This is accomplished by first solving a sequence of unsupervised learning problems. The solution to each learning problem provides a collection of parameters that enables access to an iteration-dependent step size and access to the direction to project each signal toward the closest true signal. Given a signal estimate (e.g., recovered from a pseudo-inverse), we prove our method generates a sequence that converges in mean square to the projection onto this manifold. Several numerical illustrations are provided.
Horizontal Federated learning (FL) handles multi-client data that share the same set of features, and vertical FL trains a better predictor that combine all the features from different clients. This paper targets solving vertical FL in an asynchronous fashion, and develops a simple FL method. The new method allows each client to run stochastic gradient algorithms without coordination with other clients, so it is suitable for intermittent connectivity of clients. This method further uses a new technique of perturbed local embedding to ensure data privacy and improve communication efficiency. Theoretically, we present the convergence rate and privacy level of our method for strongly convex, nonconvex and even nonsmooth objectives separately. Empirically, we apply our method to FL on various image and healthcare datasets. The results compare favorably to centralized and synchronous FL methods.
Federated Learning (FL) has become a popular paradigm for learning from distributed data. To effectively utilize data at different devices without moving them to the cloud, algorithms such as the Federated Averaging (FedAvg) have adopted a "computation then aggregation" (CTA) model, in which multiple local updates are performed using local data, before sending the local models to the cloud for aggregation. However, these schemes typically require strong assumptions, such as the local data are identically independent distributed (i.i.d), or the size of the local gradients are bounded. In this paper, we first explicitly characterize the behavior of the FedAvg algorithm, and show that without strong and unrealistic assumptions on the problem structure, the algorithm can behave erratically for non-convex problems (e.g., diverge to infinity). Aiming at designing FL algorithms that are provably fast and require as few assumptions as possible, we propose a new algorithm design strategy from the primal-dual optimization perspective. Our strategy yields a family of algorithms that take the same CTA model as existing algorithms, but they can deal with the non-convex objective, achieve the best possible optimization and communication complexity while being able to deal with both the full batch and mini-batch local computation models. Most importantly, the proposed algorithms are {\it communication efficient}, in the sense that the communication pattern can be adaptive to the level of heterogeneity among the local data. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithmic framework for FL that achieves all the above properties.
We consider the problem of minimizing a high-dimensional objective function, which may include a regularization term, using (possibly noisy) evaluations of the function. Such optimization is also called derivative-free, zeroth-order, or black-box optimization. We propose a new $\textbf{Z}$eroth-$\textbf{O}$rder $\textbf{R}$egularized $\textbf{O}$ptimization method, dubbed ZORO. When the underlying gradient is approximately sparse at an iterate, ZORO needs very few objective function evaluations to obtain a new iterate that decreases the objective function. We achieve this with an adaptive, randomized gradient estimator, followed by an inexact proximal-gradient scheme. Under a novel approximately sparse gradient assumption and various different convex settings, we show the (theoretical and empirical) convergence rate of ZORO is only logarithmically dependent on the problem dimension. Numerical experiments show that ZORO outperforms the existing methods with similar assumptions, on both synthetic and real datasets.
We study how to use unsupervised learning for efficient exploration in reinforcement learning with rich observations generated from a small number of latent states. We present a novel algorithmic framework that is built upon two components: an unsupervised learning algorithm and a no-regret reinforcement learning algorithm. We show that our algorithm provably finds a near-optimal policy with sample complexity polynomial in the number of latent states, which is significantly smaller than the number of possible observations. Our result gives theoretical justification to the prevailing paradigm of using unsupervised learning for efficient exploration [tang2017exploration,bellemare2016unifying].
Many applications require repeatedly solving a certain type of optimization problem, each time with new (but similar) data. Data-driven algorithms can "learn to optimize" (L2O) with much fewer iterations and with similar cost per iteration as general-purpose optimization algorithms. L2O algorithms are often derived from general-purpose algorithms, but with the inclusion of (possibly many) tunable parameters. Exceptional performance has been demonstrated when the parameters are optimized for a particular distribution of data. Unfortunately, it is impossible to ensure all L2O algorithms always converge to a solution. However, we present a framework that uses L2O updates together with a safeguard to guarantee convergence for convex problems with proximal and/or gradient oracles. The safeguard is simple and computationally cheap to implement, and it should be activated only when the current L2O updates would perform poorly or appear to diverge. This approach yields the numerical benefits of employing machine learning methods to create rapid L2O algorithms while still guaranteeing convergence. Our numerical examples demonstrate the efficacy of this approach for existing and new L2O schemes.
This paper targets solving distributed machine learning problems such as federated learning in a communication-efficient fashion. A class of new stochastic gradient descent (SGD) approaches have been developed, which can be viewed as the stochastic generalization to the recently developed lazily aggregated gradient (LAG) method --- justifying the name LASG. LAG adaptively predicts the contribution of each round of communication and chooses only the significant ones to perform. It saves communication while also maintains the rate of convergence. However, LAG only works with deterministic gradients, and applying it to stochastic gradients yields poor performance. The key components of LASG are a set of new rules tailored for stochastic gradients that can be implemented either to save download, upload, or both. The new algorithms adaptively choose between fresh and stale stochastic gradients and have convergence rates comparable to the original SGD. LASG achieves impressive empirical performance --- it typically saves total communication by an order of magnitude.
One of the key approaches to save samples when learning a policy for a reinforcement learning problem is to use knowledge from an approximate model such as its simulator. However, does knowledge transfer from approximate models always help to learn a better policy? Despite numerous empirical studies of transfer reinforcement learning, an answer to this question is still elusive. In this paper, we provide a strong negative result, showing that even the full knowledge of an approximate model may not help reduce the number of samples for learning an accurate policy of the true model. We construct an example of reinforcement learning models and show that the complexity with or without knowledge transfer has the same order. On the bright side, effective knowledge transferring is still possible under additional assumptions. In particular, we demonstrate that knowing the (linear) bases of the true model significantly reduces the number of samples for learning an accurate policy.
We propose XPipe, an efficient asynchronous pipeline model parallelism approach for multi-GPU DNN training. XPipe is designed to make use of multiple GPUs to concurrently and continuously train different parts of a DNN model. To improve GPU utilization and achieve high throughput, it splits a mini-batch into a set of micro-batches and allows the overlapping of the pipelines of multiple micro-batches, including those belonging to different mini-batches. Most importantly, the novel weight prediction strategy adopted by XPipe enables it to effectively address the weight inconsistency and staleness issues incurred by the asynchronous pipeline parallelism. As a result, XPipe incorporates the advantages of both synchronous and asynchronous pipeline model parallelism approaches. Concretely, it can achieve very comparable (even slightly better) model accuracy as its synchronous counterpart, while obtaining higher throughput than it. Experimental results show that XPipe outperforms other state-of-the-art synchronous and asynchronous model parallelism approaches.