Fast & Faithful Function Vectors

Function vectors (FVs) are task representations elicited during in-context learning that can be used to steer Large Language Models (LLMs). However, design choices in their formulation remain underexplored. In this work, we study the impact of varying FV definitions for instructions along two degrees of freedom: attention head selection and steering. For head selection, using gradient-based attributions with Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) substantially improves efficiency as well as accuracy. For FV steering, applying it in a distributed manner yields a higher accuracy compared to simple aggregation. Our code is publicly available.

The Case for Model Science: Verify, Explore, Steer, Refine

We argue that the AI community is now ready to move beyond benchmarking and consolidate scattered efforts in model analysis into a systematic discipline, a direction we term Model Science. Complex AI models now serve billions of users, yet our understanding of how they work lags far behind our ability to deploy them. Decades of benchmark-driven research have delivered remarkable progress: extensive leaderboards, a wide range of performance metrics, tracking capability gains across diverse tasks; yet this success has also revealed the limits of benchmarks as they tell us whether models perform but not why they succeed or fail, they miss critical failure modes, such as hallucinations or shortcuts. Precedents from established sciences point the way forward: cognitive science shows that understanding complex systems requires complementary levels of analysis; neuroscience demonstrates that deep study of single cases reveals what population studies miss; medicine teaches that specialised training must develop alongside research practice; and agriculture models how shared infrastructure and principles enable cumulative progress. These lessons inform three foundations for Model Science. First, we propose to consolidate research around four functional perspectives: Verify, Explore, Steer, and Refine that address complementary questions about model behaviour. Second, we discuss the required infrastructure for cumulative knowledge: catalogues of datasets, models and findings. Third, we highlight the need for deep analysis of individual model instances, not just model families, because single cases can reveal what population studies miss.

Playing the network backward: A Game Theoretic Attribution Framework

Attribution methods explain which input features drive a model's prediction, making them central to model debugging and mechanistic interpretability. Yet backward attribution methods, including gradients, LRP, and transformer-specific rules, lack a shared framework in which to compare the underlying backward calculations. We introduce such a framework by recasting backward attribution as a two-player game on an extended network graph, building on Gaubert and Vlassopoulos' ReLU Net Game. Gradients and the full alpha-beta-LRP family arise as integrals over game trajectories under specific equilibria, so attribution maps become projections of trajectory distributions rather than the primary object. Desired explanation properties, such as localisation focus, robustness to input noise, or stable attention routing, can be specified as game-theoretic concepts, including policy regularization, risk aversion, and extended action sets, and translate directly into novel adaptations of the well-known backward rules. On ViT-B/16, one such selected adaptation of alpha-beta-LRP outperforms prior transformer-specific backward methods across all considered localisation metrics.

Knowledge-Free Correlated Agreement for Incentivizing Federated Learning

We introduce Knowledge-Free Correlated Agreement (KFCA) to reward client contributions in federated learning (FL) without relying on ground truth, a public test set, or distribution knowledge. Under categorical reports and an honest majority, KFCA is strictly truthful, addressing the label-flipping vulnerability of Correlated Agreement (CA). We evaluate KFCA on federated LLM adapter tuning and a real-world PCB inspection task, showing efficient real-time reward computation suitable for decentralized and blockchain-based incentive designs.

Contrastive Semantic Projection: Faithful Neuron Labeling with Contrastive Examples

Neuron labeling assigns textual descriptions to internal units of deep networks. Existing approaches typically rely on highly activating examples, often yielding broad or misleading labels by focusing on dominant but incidental visual factors. Prior work such as FALCON introduced contrastive examples -- inputs that are semantically similar to activating examples but elicit low activations -- to sharpen explanations, but it primarily addresses subspace-level interpretability rather than scalable neuron-level labeling. We revisit contrastive explanations for neuron-level labeling in two stages: (1) candidate label generation with vision language models (VLMs) and (2) label assignment with CLIP-like encoders. First, we show that providing contrastive image sets to VLMs yields candidate labels that are more specific and more faithful. Second, we introduce Contrastive Semantic Projection (CSP), an extension of SemanticLens that incorporates contrastive examples directly into its CLIP-based scoring and selection pipeline. Across extensive experiments and a case study on melanoma detection, contrastive labeling improves both faithfulness and semantic granularity over state-of-the-art baselines. Our results demonstrate that contrastive examples are a simple yet powerful and currently underutilized component of neuron labeling and analysis pipelines.

From Weights to Activations: Is Steering the Next Frontier of Adaptation?

Post-training adaptation of language models is commonly achieved through parameter updates or input-based methods such as fine-tuning, parameter-efficient adaptation, and prompting. In parallel, a growing body of work modifies internal activations at inference time to influence model behavior, an approach known as steering. Despite increasing use, steering is rarely analyzed within the same conceptual framework as established adaptation methods. In this work, we argue that steering should be regarded as a form of model adaptation. We introduce a set of functional criteria for adaptation methods and use them to compare steering approaches with classical alternatives. This analysis positions steering as a distinct adaptation paradigm based on targeted interventions in activation space, enabling local and reversible behavioral change without parameter updates. The resulting framing clarifies how steering relates to existing methods, motivating a unified taxonomy for model adaptation.

From Attribution to Action: A Human-Centered Application of Activation Steering

Explainable AI (XAI) methods reveal which features influence model predictions, yet provide limited means for practitioners to act on these explanations. Activation steering of components identified via XAI offers a path toward actionable explanations, although its practical utility remains understudied. We introduce an interactive workflow combining SAE-based attribution with activation steering for instance-level analysis of concept usage in vision models, implemented as a web-based tool. Based on this workflow, we conduct semi-structured expert interviews (N=8) with debugging tasks on CLIP to investigate how practitioners reason about, trust, and apply activation steering. We find that steering enables a shift from inspection to intervention-based hypothesis testing (8/8 participants), with most grounding trust in observed model responses rather than explanation plausibility alone (6/8). Participants adopted systematic debugging strategies dominated by component suppression (7/8) and highlighted risks including ripple effects and limited generalization of instance-level corrections. Overall, activation steering renders interpretability more actionable while raising important considerations for safe and effective use.

Structural Compactness as a Complementary Criterion for Explanation Quality

In the evaluation of attribution quality, the quantitative assessment of explanation legibility is particularly difficult, as it is influenced by varying shapes and internal organization of attributions not captured by simple statistics. To address this issue, we introduce Minimum Spanning Tree Compactness (MST-C), a graph-based structural metric that captures higher-order geometric properties of attributions, such as spread and cohesion. These components are combined into a single score that evaluates compactness, favoring attributions with salient points spread across a small area and spatially organized into few but cohesive clusters. We show that MST-C reliably distinguishes between explanation methods, exposes fundamental structural differences between models, and provides a robust, self-contained diagnostic for explanation compactness that complements existing notions of attribution complexity.

Building Trust in PINNs: Error Estimation through Finite Difference Methods

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) constitute a flexible deep learning approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), which model phenomena ranging from heat conduction to quantum mechanical systems. Despite their flexibility, PINNs offer limited insight into how their predictions deviate from the true solution, hindering trust in their prediction quality. We propose a lightweight post-hoc method that addresses this gap by producing pointwise error estimates for PINN predictions, which offer a natural form of explanation for such models, identifying not just whether a prediction is wrong, but where and by how much. For linear partial differential equations, the error between a PINN approximation and the true solution satisfies the same differential operator as the original problem, but driven by the PINN's PDE residual as its source term. We solve this error equation numerically using finite difference methods requiring no knowledge of the true solution. Evaluated on several benchmark PDEs, our method yields accurate error maps at low computational cost, enabling targeted and interpretable validation of PINNs.

X-SYS: A Reference Architecture for Interactive Explanation Systems

The explainable AI (XAI) research community has proposed numerous technical methods, yet deploying explainability as systems remains challenging: Interactive explanation systems require both suitable algorithms and system capabilities that maintain explanation usability across repeated queries, evolving models and data, and governance constraints. We argue that operationalizing XAI requires treating explainability as an information systems problem where user interaction demands induce specific system requirements. We introduce X-SYS, a reference architecture for interactive explanation systems, that guides (X)AI researchers, developers and practitioners in connecting interactive explanation user interfaces (XUI) with system capabilities. X-SYS organizes around four quality attributes named STAR (scalability, traceability, responsiveness, and adaptability), and specifies a five-component decomposition (XUI Services, Explanation Services, Model Services, Data Services, Orchestration and Governance). It maps interaction patterns to system capabilities to decouple user interface evolution from backend computation. We implement X-SYS through SemanticLens, a system for semantic search and activation steering in vision-language models. SemanticLens demonstrates how contract-based service boundaries enable independent evolution, offline/online separation ensures responsiveness, and persistent state management supports traceability. Together, this work provides a reusable blueprint and concrete instantiation for interactive explanation systems supporting end-to-end design under operational constraints.