Alert button
Picture for Ted Willke

Ted Willke

Alert button

Scope is all you need: Transforming LLMs for HPC Code

Aug 18, 2023
Tal Kadosh, Niranjan Hasabnis, Vy A. Vo, Nadav Schneider, Neva Krien, Abdul Wasay, Nesreen Ahmed, Ted Willke, Guy Tamir, Yuval Pinter, Timothy Mattson, Gal Oren

With easier access to powerful compute resources, there is a growing trend in the field of AI for software development to develop larger and larger language models (LLMs) to address a variety of programming tasks. Even LLMs applied to tasks from the high-performance computing (HPC) domain are huge in size (e.g., billions of parameters) and demand expensive compute resources for training. We found this design choice confusing - why do we need large LLMs trained on natural languages and programming languages unrelated to HPC for HPC-specific tasks? In this line of work, we aim to question design choices made by existing LLMs by developing smaller LLMs for specific domains - we call them domain-specific LLMs. Specifically, we start off with HPC as a domain and propose a novel tokenizer named Tokompiler, designed specifically for preprocessing code in HPC and compilation-centric tasks. Tokompiler leverages knowledge of language primitives to generate language-oriented tokens, providing a context-aware understanding of code structure while avoiding human semantics attributed to code structures completely. We applied Tokompiler to pre-train two state-of-the-art models, SPT-Code and Polycoder, for a Fortran code corpus mined from GitHub. We evaluate the performance of these models against the conventional LLMs. Results demonstrate that Tokompiler significantly enhances code completion accuracy and semantic understanding compared to traditional tokenizers in normalized-perplexity tests, down to ~1 perplexity score. This research opens avenues for further advancements in domain-specific LLMs, catering to the unique demands of HPC and compilation tasks.

Viaarxiv icon

Similarity search in the blink of an eye with compressed indices

Apr 07, 2023
Cecilia Aguerrebere, Ishwar Bhati, Mark Hildebrand, Mariano Tepper, Ted Willke

Figure 1 for Similarity search in the blink of an eye with compressed indices
Figure 2 for Similarity search in the blink of an eye with compressed indices
Figure 3 for Similarity search in the blink of an eye with compressed indices
Figure 4 for Similarity search in the blink of an eye with compressed indices

Nowadays, data is represented by vectors. Retrieving those vectors, among millions and billions, that are similar to a given query is a ubiquitous problem of relevance for a wide range of applications. In this work, we present new techniques for creating faster and smaller indices to run these searches. To this end, we introduce a novel vector compression method, Locally-adaptive Vector Quantization (LVQ), that simultaneously reduces memory footprint and improves search performance, with minimal impact on search accuracy. LVQ is designed to work optimally in conjunction with graph-based indices, reducing their effective bandwidth while enabling random-access-friendly fast similarity computations. Our experimental results show that LVQ, combined with key optimizations for graph-based indices in modern datacenter systems, establishes the new state of the art in terms of performance and memory footprint. For billions of vectors, LVQ outcompetes the second-best alternatives: (1) in the low-memory regime, by up to 20.7x in throughput with up to a 3x memory footprint reduction, and (2) in the high-throughput regime by 5.8x with 1.4x less memory.

Viaarxiv icon

Toward a Geometrical Understanding of Self-supervised Contrastive Learning

May 13, 2022
Romain Cosentino, Anirvan Sengupta, Salman Avestimehr, Mahdi Soltanolkotabi, Antonio Ortega, Ted Willke, Mariano Tepper

Figure 1 for Toward a Geometrical Understanding of Self-supervised Contrastive Learning
Figure 2 for Toward a Geometrical Understanding of Self-supervised Contrastive Learning
Figure 3 for Toward a Geometrical Understanding of Self-supervised Contrastive Learning
Figure 4 for Toward a Geometrical Understanding of Self-supervised Contrastive Learning

Self-supervised learning (SSL) is currently one of the premier techniques to create data representations that are actionable for transfer learning in the absence of human annotations. Despite their success, the underlying geometry of these representations remains elusive, which obfuscates the quest for more robust, trustworthy, and interpretable models. In particular, mainstream SSL techniques rely on a specific deep neural network architecture with two cascaded neural networks: the encoder and the projector. When used for transfer learning, the projector is discarded since empirical results show that its representation generalizes more poorly than the encoder's. In this paper, we investigate this curious phenomenon and analyze how the strength of the data augmentation policies affects the data embedding. We discover a non-trivial relation between the encoder, the projector, and the data augmentation strength: with increasingly larger augmentation policies, the projector, rather than the encoder, is more strongly driven to become invariant to the augmentations. It does so by eliminating crucial information about the data by learning to project it into a low-dimensional space, a noisy estimate of the data manifold tangent plane in the encoder representation. This analysis is substantiated through a geometrical perspective with theoretical and empirical results.

Viaarxiv icon

Procrustean Orthogonal Sparse Hashing

Jun 08, 2020
Mariano Tepper, Dipanjan Sengupta, Ted Willke

Figure 1 for Procrustean Orthogonal Sparse Hashing
Figure 2 for Procrustean Orthogonal Sparse Hashing
Figure 3 for Procrustean Orthogonal Sparse Hashing
Figure 4 for Procrustean Orthogonal Sparse Hashing

Hashing is one of the most popular methods for similarity search because of its speed and efficiency. Dense binary hashing is prevalent in the literature. Recently, insect olfaction was shown to be structurally and functionally analogous to sparse hashing [6]. Here, we prove that this biological mechanism is the solution to a well-posed optimization problem. Furthermore, we show that orthogonality increases the accuracy of sparse hashing. Next, we present a novel method, Procrustean Orthogonal Sparse Hashing (POSH), that unifies these findings, learning an orthogonal transform from training data compatible with the sparse hashing mechanism. We provide theoretical evidence of the shortcomings of Optimal Sparse Lifting (OSL) [22] and BioHash [30], two related olfaction-inspired methods, and propose two new methods, Binary OSL and SphericalHash, to address these deficiencies. We compare POSH, Binary OSL, and SphericalHash to several state-of-the-art hashing methods and provide empirical results for the superiority of the proposed methods across a wide range of standard benchmarks and parameter settings.

Viaarxiv icon

A View on Deep Reinforcement Learning in System Optimization

Sep 04, 2019
Ameer Haj-Ali, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Ted Willke, Joseph Gonzalez, Krste Asanovic, Ion Stoica

Figure 1 for A View on Deep Reinforcement Learning in System Optimization
Figure 2 for A View on Deep Reinforcement Learning in System Optimization
Figure 3 for A View on Deep Reinforcement Learning in System Optimization

Many real-world systems problems require reasoning about the long term consequences of actions taken to configure and manage the system. These problems with delayed and often sequentially aggregated reward, are often inherently reinforcement learning problems and present the opportunity to leverage the recent substantial advances in deep reinforcement learning. However, in some cases, it is not clear why deep reinforcement learning is a good fit for the problem. Sometimes, it does not perform better than the state-of-the-art solutions. And in other cases, random search or greedy algorithms could outperform deep reinforcement learning. In this paper, we review, discuss, and evaluate the recent trends of using deep reinforcement learning in system optimization. We propose a set of essential metrics to guide future works in evaluating the efficacy of using deep reinforcement learning in system optimization. Our evaluation includes challenges, the types of problems, their formulation in the deep reinforcement learning setting, embedding, the model used, efficiency, and robustness. We conclude with a discussion on open challenges and potential directions for pushing further the integration of reinforcement learning in system optimization.

Viaarxiv icon

Deep Reinforcement Learning in System Optimization

Aug 07, 2019
Ameer Haj-Ali, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Ted Willke, Joseph Gonzalez, Krste Asanovic, Ion Stoica

Figure 1 for Deep Reinforcement Learning in System Optimization
Figure 2 for Deep Reinforcement Learning in System Optimization
Figure 3 for Deep Reinforcement Learning in System Optimization

The recent advancements in deep reinforcement learning have opened new horizons and opportunities to tackle various problems in system optimization. Such problems are generally tailored to delayed, aggregated, and sequential rewards, which is an inherent behavior in the reinforcement learning setting, where an agent collects rewards while exploring and exploiting the environment to maximize the long term reward. However, in some cases, it is not clear why deep reinforcement learning is a good fit for the problem. Sometimes, it does not perform better than the state-of-the-art solutions. And in other cases, random search or greedy algorithms could outperform deep reinforcement learning. In this paper, we review, discuss, and evaluate the recent trends of using deep reinforcement learning in system optimization. We propose a set of essential metrics to guide future works in evaluating the efficacy of using deep reinforcement learning in system optimization. Our evaluation includes challenges, the types of problems, their formulation in the deep reinforcement learning setting, embedding, the model used, efficiency, and robustness. We conclude with a discussion on open challenges and potential directions for pushing further the integration of reinforcement learning in system optimization.

Viaarxiv icon