While entity-oriented neural IR models have advanced significantly, they often overlook a key nuance: the varying degrees of influence individual entities within a document have on its overall relevance. Addressing this gap, we present DREQ, an entity-oriented dense document re-ranking model. Uniquely, we emphasize the query-relevant entities within a document's representation while simultaneously attenuating the less relevant ones, thus obtaining a query-specific entity-centric document representation. We then combine this entity-centric document representation with the text-centric representation of the document to obtain a "hybrid" representation of the document. We learn a relevance score for the document using this hybrid representation. Using four large-scale benchmarks, we show that DREQ outperforms state-of-the-art neural and non-neural re-ranking methods, highlighting the effectiveness of our entity-oriented representation approach.
Conversational Information Seeking stands as a pivotal research area with significant contributions from previous works. The TREC Interactive Knowledge Assistance Track (iKAT) builds on the foundational work of the TREC Conversational Assistance Track (CAsT). However, iKAT distinctively emphasizes the creation and research of conversational search agents that adapt responses based on user's prior interactions and present context. The challenge lies in enabling Conversational Search Agents (CSA) to incorporate this personalized context to efficiency and effectively guide users through the relevant information to them. iKAT also emphasizes decisional search tasks, where users sift through data and information to weigh up options in order to reach a conclusion or perform an action. These tasks, prevalent in everyday information-seeking decisions -- be it related to travel, health, or shopping -- often revolve around a subset of high-level information operators where queries or questions about the information space include: finding options, comparing options, identifying the pros and cons of options, etc. Given the different personas and their information need (expressed through the sequence of questions), diverse conversation trajectories will arise -- because the answers to these similar queries will be very different. In this paper, we report on the first year of TREC iKAT, describing the task, topics, data collection, and evaluation framework. We further review the submissions and summarize the findings.
Sparse and dense pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) approaches perform poorly on challenging queries due to low precision in first-pass retrieval. However, recent advances in neural language models (NLMs) can re-rank relevant documents to top ranks, even when few are in the re-ranking pool. This paper first addresses the problem of poor pseudo-relevance feedback by simply applying re-ranking prior to query expansion and re-executing this query. We find that this change alone can improve the retrieval effectiveness of sparse and dense PRF approaches by 5-8%. Going further, we propose a new expansion model, Latent Entity Expansion (LEE), a fine-grained word and entity-based relevance modelling incorporating localized features. Finally, we include an "adaptive" component to the retrieval process, which iteratively refines the re-ranking pool during scoring using the expansion model, i.e. we "re-rank - expand - repeat". Using LEE, we achieve (to our knowledge) the best NDCG, MAP and R@1000 results on the TREC Robust 2004 and CODEC adhoc document datasets, demonstrating a significant advancement in expansion effectiveness.
Recent studies show that Generative Relevance Feedback (GRF), using text generated by Large Language Models (LLMs), can enhance the effectiveness of query expansion. However, LLMs can generate irrelevant information that harms retrieval effectiveness. To address this, we propose Generative Relevance Modeling (GRM) that uses Relevance-Aware Sample Estimation (RASE) for more accurate weighting of expansion terms. Specifically, we identify similar real documents for each generated document and use a neural re-ranker to estimate their relevance. Experiments on three standard document ranking benchmarks show that GRM improves MAP by 6-9% and R@1k by 2-4%, surpassing previous methods.
Pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) is a classical approach to address lexical mismatch by enriching the query using first-pass retrieval. Moreover, recent work on generative-relevance feedback (GRF) shows that query expansion models using text generated from large language models can improve sparse retrieval without depending on first-pass retrieval effectiveness. This work extends GRF to dense and learned sparse retrieval paradigms with experiments over six standard document ranking benchmarks. We find that GRF improves over comparable PRF techniques by around 10% on both precision and recall-oriented measures. Nonetheless, query analysis shows that GRF and PRF have contrasting benefits, with GRF providing external context not present in first-pass retrieval, whereas PRF grounds the query to the information contained within the target corpus. Thus, we propose combining generative and pseudo-relevance feedback ranking signals to achieve the benefits of both feedback classes, which significantly increases recall over PRF methods on 95% of experiments.
Current query expansion models use pseudo-relevance feedback to improve first-pass retrieval effectiveness; however, this fails when the initial results are not relevant. Instead of building a language model from retrieved results, we propose Generative Relevance Feedback (GRF) that builds probabilistic feedback models from long-form text generated from Large Language Models. We study the effective methods for generating text by varying the zero-shot generation subtasks: queries, entities, facts, news articles, documents, and essays. We evaluate GRF on document retrieval benchmarks covering a diverse set of queries and document collections, and the results show that GRF methods significantly outperform previous PRF methods. Specifically, we improve MAP between 5-19% and NDCG@10 17-24% compared to RM3 expansion, and achieve the best R@1k effectiveness on all datasets compared to state-of-the-art sparse, dense, and expansion models.