History Matters: Temporal Knowledge Editing in Large Language Model

The imperative task of revising or updating the knowledge stored within large language models arises from two distinct sources: intrinsic errors inherent in the model which should be corrected and outdated knowledge due to external shifts in the real world which should be updated. Prevailing efforts in model editing conflate these two distinct categories of edits arising from distinct reasons and directly modify the original knowledge in models into new knowledge. However, we argue that preserving the model's original knowledge remains pertinent. Specifically, if a model's knowledge becomes outdated due to evolving worldly dynamics, it should retain recollection of the historical knowledge while integrating the newfound knowledge. In this work, we introduce the task of Temporal Knowledge Editing (TKE) and establish a benchmark AToKe (Assessment of TempOral Knowledge Editing) to evaluate current model editing methods. We find that while existing model editing methods are effective at making models remember new knowledge, the edited model catastrophically forgets historical knowledge. To address this gap, we propose a simple and general framework termed Multi-Editing with Time Objective (METO) for enhancing existing editing models, which edits both historical and new knowledge concurrently and optimizes the model's prediction for the time of each fact. Our assessments demonstrate that while AToKe is still difficult, METO maintains the effectiveness of learning new knowledge and meanwhile substantially improves the performance of edited models on utilizing historical knowledge.

ArcMMLU: A Library and Information Science Benchmark for Large Language Models

In light of the rapidly evolving capabilities of large language models (LLMs), it becomes imperative to develop rigorous domain-specific evaluation benchmarks to accurately assess their capabilities. In response to this need, this paper introduces ArcMMLU, a specialized benchmark tailored for the Library & Information Science (LIS) domain in Chinese. This benchmark aims to measure the knowledge and reasoning capability of LLMs within four key sub-domains: Archival Science, Data Science, Library Science, and Information Science. Following the format of MMLU/CMMLU, we collected over 6,000 high-quality questions for the compilation of ArcMMLU. This extensive compilation can reflect the diverse nature of the LIS domain and offer a robust foundation for LLM evaluation. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals that while most mainstream LLMs achieve an average accuracy rate above 50% on ArcMMLU, there remains a notable performance gap, suggesting substantial headroom for refinement in LLM capabilities within the LIS domain. Further analysis explores the effectiveness of few-shot examples on model performance and highlights challenging questions where models consistently underperform, providing valuable insights for targeted improvements. ArcMMLU fills a critical gap in LLM evaluations within the Chinese LIS domain and paves the way for future development of LLMs tailored to this specialized area.

Iteratively reweighted least squares for robust regression via SVM and ELM

The measure of most robust machine learning methods is reweighted. To overcome the optimization difficulty of the implicitly reweighted robust methods (including modifying loss functions and objectives), we try to use a more direct method: explicitly iteratively reweighted method to handle noise (even heavy-tailed noise and outlier) robustness. In this paper, an explicitly iterative reweighted framework based on two kinds of kernel based regression algorithm (LS-SVR and ELM) is established, and a novel weight selection strategy is proposed at the same time. Combining the proposed weight function with the iteratively reweighted framework, we propose two models iteratively reweighted least squares support vector machine (IRLS-SVR) and iteratively reweighted extreme learning machine (IRLS-ELM) to implement robust regression. Different from the traditional explicitly reweighted robust methods, we carry out multiple reweighted operations in our work to further improve robustness. The convergence and approximability of the proposed algorithms are proved theoretically. Moreover, the robustness of the algorithm is analyzed in detail from many angles. Experiments on both artificial data and benchmark datasets confirm the validity of the proposed methods.