BM25 Wins at Scale: A Scaling Study of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Paradigms

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) spans lexical and dense retrieval, graph-based indexing, and agentic search, but these paradigms are usually evaluated on different benchmarks at one corpus size, leaving their accuracy-cost scaling unclear. To bridge this gap, we present a controlled study that varies corpus size along 28 strictly nested tiers spanning roughly 450-fold, while holding questions and a fixed bedrock of relevant and adversarial documents unchanged. Under one reader model and one judging protocol, we measure official accuracy, construction and query tokens, and latency. The results reveal a scale-dependent crossover rather than an unconditional winner. File-System Agent leads at the smallest shared tiers, but its sequential exploration costs 39 times more query tokens at the bedrock and becomes less effective as the search space grows. Around 10 million corpus tokens, BM25 overtakes it and leads at every larger shared tier, with a margin approaching 20 points at full scale. BM25 also anchors the low-cost end of the Pareto frontier without LLM-based construction. Dense retrieval remains efficient but less accurate, whereas graph-based RAG encounters construction walls before deployment scale and its scalable variants remain below BM25 at shared tiers. Overall, corpus growth increasingly favors global candidate ranking: lexical retrieval is the strongest scalable default, while agentic reasoning works best after ranked discovery rather than in place of it.

Which RAG Paradigm Wins at Scale? A Scaling Study of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Paradigms

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods range from lexical and dense retrieval to graph-based indexing and agentic search. They are usually evaluated on different benchmarks at one corpus size, leaving their accuracy-cost scaling unclear. To bridge this gap, we present a controlled corpus-scaling study of these four paradigms. A ladder of 28 strictly nested tiers grows from roughly 1,000 to 512,000 documents while questions and a fixed bedrock of relevant and adversarial documents remain unchanged. Under one reader and judging protocol, we measure official accuracy, construction and query tokens, and latency. Our experimental results show that BM25 scales best in this controlled setting: it defines the low-cost end of the Pareto frontier at every measured tier and leads accuracy from mid-scale onward, without LLM-based construction. The File-System Agent matches or slightly exceeds BM25 at the smallest tiers but uses 39 times more query tokens per answer at the bedrock and falls nearly 20 points behind at full scale. A matched retrieval swap reverses this failure: Agent+BM25 scores 69.4 at full scale, versus 36.9 for raw-file agency and 54.8 for native BM25 on the same 150 questions. Graph-based RAG hits a construction wall: its heaviest builders use up to 24.6 generative LLM tokens per indexed corpus token yet stop within the first 2% of the full corpus, while scalable variants remain less accurate than BM25 at shared tiers.

LBTCap: A Lightweight Bilateral Transformer for Real-Time Remote Sensing Image Change Captioning

Remote sensing image change captioning (RSICC) generates natural-language descriptions of semantic changes between paired remote sensing images (RSIs), supporting applications such as urban planning, disaster response, and environmental monitoring. Although recent methods achieve strong captioning accuracy, most overlook computational efficiency and inference speed, which are essential for real-time deployment in practice. To this end, we propose LBTCap, a lightweight RSICC framework built on a bilateral Transformer that jointly models pre- and post-change features for efficient processing of paired RSIs. Specifically, we introduce a bilateral attention mechanism for paired inputs: the two temporal images are projected into separate queries and keys by the same query and key matrices shared across the two images, the value is formed from their concatenation, and the two resulting attention maps are combined by a learnable, structurally bilateral weighting instead of a fixed subtraction. This design keeps both temporal branches explicit while remaining compact, and, together with a truncated backbone and grouped-query attention, LBTCap uses only 39.99M parameters, of which the change-aware encoder accounts for just 2.78M. Extensive experiments on two public RSICC datasets show that LBTCap matches or closely approaches the accuracy of state-of-the-art methods while using far fewer parameters and running at markedly higher inference speed, with the benefit of the bilateral formulation most pronounced in the low-resource setting, demonstrating a favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-off for practical RSICC.

Beyond Pixel Diffs: Benchmarking Image Change Captioning for Web UI Visual Regression Testing

Visual regression testing (VRT) is a standard quality assurance step in modern software release pipelines. On every change, it re-renders user interface (UI) screenshots, compares each one against an approved baseline image, and routes any detected difference to a human reviewer who decides whether it is an intended update or an unintended regression. A widely used approach, especially in open-source and continuous-integration pipelines, is pixel-level comparison, which is semantically blind and treats rendering noise and genuine defects identically, producing large volumes of false positives that force developers and testers to spend substantial time and effort manually reviewing flagged differences at every release cycle. Industry tools apply machine learning to VRT, but lack public evaluation. More critically, no dataset or benchmark exists to support natural language descriptions of UI changes, a capability that tells testers what changed in words instead of leaving them to interpret a binary flag or a highlighted region. To address the gap, we propose a new task, Web UI Image Change Captioning (WUICC), which sits at the intersection of VRT and image difference captioning (IDC), and release WUICC-bench, its first dataset and benchmark for the task. We evaluate eleven representative IDC methods, together with two zero-shot general-purpose LLMs. We find that: (1) these methods tend to struggle in the Web UI domain due to its layout diversity, dense text, and fine-grained changes, and (2) yet the trained methods already suppress non-meaningful visual noise far more selectively than the pixel-level comparison VRT relies on, providing a solid foundation for future domain-specific research.

GUMP-Net: An interpretable model-data-driven intelligent algorithm for multi-class pelvic segmentation

Pelvic segmentation is one of the most important and fundamental research problems in precise and intelligent diagnosis and treatment, as well as surgical planning and navigation for pelvic fractures. By combining an improved geodesic active contour model with deep neural networks, we propose GUMP-Net, an interpretable model-data-driven intelligent algorithm for multi-class pelvic segmentation, in which three network modules are designed to constitute the overall segmentation framework together: the object detection module for automatic level set initialization, the edge detector module for learning an anatomy-aware edge detector function and the iteration module for deep level set evolution. Leveraging the advantages of level set representation and deep learning, GUMP-Net shows more accurate, robust and consistent segmentation performance, especially in small training data situation, compared to the state-of-the-art methods. Extensive experiments on pelvic datasets demonstrate the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. Further experiments extended to ankle dataset indicate broader applications to other anatomies. The proposed algorithm not only provides an efficient segmentation method for complex fracture reduction, but also gives an interpretable geometric perspective for understanding deep learning segmentation.

DailyReport: An Open-ended Benchmark for Evaluating Search Agents on Daily Search Tasks

Search Agents (SAs) typically leverage large language models (LLMs) to support complex information-seeking tasks by autonomously exploring web sources and synthesizing information into comprehensive responses. For SAs evaluation, prior benchmarks mainly focus on specialized tasks that are unlikely to arise in real-world user scenarios. Moreover, their reliance on coarse task-level rubrics often limits evaluation interpretability. To bridge this gap, we introduce DailyReport, an open-ended benchmark to evaluate SA capabilities on daily search tasks. It contains 150 open-ended tasks with 3,546 associated rubrics, capturing widely discussed and timely information demands of real-world users. Each task is decomposed into subtasks and evaluated with cascade rubrics across disentangled dimensions. Through cascade performance attribution and user-centric aggregation, we derive highly interpretable scores for each dimension, along with a user preference score. Our results on 17 agentic systems show that current systems still fall short of users' expectations. To facilitate future research, our dataset and code are made publicly available at https://github.com/AGI-Eval-Official/DailyReport.

Asuka-Bench: Benchmarking Code Agents on Underspecified User Intent and Multi-Round Refinement

Existing code-generation benchmarks score a single mapping from a complete prompt to a one-shot output. However, real web development is different. Users seldom write a full spec at the start; many requirements only become clear once they look at an intermediate result and react to it. We present Asuka-Bench, a benchmark that pairs underspecified user intent with multi-round refinement, grounded in browser-rendered behavior. Each task is resolved through a closed loop: a Code Agent generates a web project, a UI Agent executes test cases on the deployed site, and a User LLM turns evaluation outcomes into natural-language feedback for the next round. The benchmark comprises 50 web tasks with 784 evaluation criteria and 2402 expected outcomes. We benchmark 8 LLMs across 2 agent frameworks. The results separate models clearly: weighted Task Pass Rate varies by 38 percentage points and models also differ substantially in their ability to repair from feedback. Asuka-Bench is also far from saturated: even the strongest model completes only 52% of projects after three rounds.

ArcFlow: Unleashing 2-Step Text-to-Image Generation via High-Precision Non-Linear Flow Distillation

Diffusion models have achieved remarkable generation quality, but they suffer from significant inference cost due to their reliance on multiple sequential denoising steps, motivating recent efforts to distill this inference process into a few-step regime. However, existing distillation methods typically approximate the teacher trajectory by using linear shortcuts, which makes it difficult to match its constantly changing tangent directions as velocities evolve across timesteps, thereby leading to quality degradation. To address this limitation, we propose ArcFlow, a few-step distillation framework that explicitly employs non-linear flow trajectories to approximate pre-trained teacher trajectories. Concretely, ArcFlow parameterizes the velocity field underlying the inference trajectory as a mixture of continuous momentum processes. This enables ArcFlow to capture velocity evolution and extrapolate coherent velocities to form a continuous non-linear trajectory within each denoising step. Importantly, this parameterization admits an analytical integration of this non-linear trajectory, which circumvents numerical discretization errors and results in high-precision approximation of the teacher trajectory. To train this parameterization into a few-step generator, we implement ArcFlow via trajectory distillation on pre-trained teacher models using lightweight adapters. This strategy ensures fast, stable convergence while preserving generative diversity and quality. Built on large-scale models (Qwen-Image-20B and FLUX.1-dev), ArcFlow only fine-tunes on less than 5% of original parameters and achieves a 40x speedup with 2 NFEs over the original multi-step teachers without significant quality degradation. Experiments on benchmarks show the effectiveness of ArcFlow both qualitatively and quantitatively.

WildGraphBench: Benchmarking GraphRAG with Wild-Source Corpora

Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) organizes external knowledge as a hierarchical graph, enabling efficient retrieval and aggregation of scattered evidence across multiple documents. However, many existing benchmarks for GraphRAG rely on short, curated passages as external knowledge, failing to adequately evaluate systems in realistic settings involving long contexts and large-scale heterogeneous documents. To bridge this gap, we introduce WildGraphBench, a benchmark designed to assess GraphRAG performance in the wild. We leverage Wikipedia's unique structure, where cohesive narratives are grounded in long and heterogeneous external reference documents, to construct a benchmark reflecting real-word scenarios. Specifically, we sample articles across 12 top-level topics, using their external references as the retrieval corpus and citation-linked statements as ground truth, resulting in 1,100 questions spanning three levels of complexity: single-fact QA, multi-fact QA, and section-level summarization. Experiments across multiple baselines reveal that current GraphRAG pipelines help on multi-fact aggregation when evidence comes from a moderate number of sources, but this aggregation paradigm may overemphasize high-level statements at the expense of fine-grained details, leading to weaker performance on summarization tasks. Project page:https://github.com/BstWPY/WildGraphBench.

Wiki Live Challenge: Challenging Deep Research Agents with Expert-Level Wikipedia Articles

Deep Research Agents (DRAs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in autonomous information retrieval and report generation, showing great potential to assist humans in complex research tasks. Current evaluation frameworks primarily rely on LLM-generated references or LLM-derived evaluation dimensions. While these approaches offer scalability, they often lack the reliability of expert-verified content and struggle to provide objective, fine-grained assessments of critical dimensions. To bridge this gap, we introduce Wiki Live Challenge (WLC), a live benchmark that leverages the newest Wikipedia Good Articles (GAs) as expert-level references. Wikipedia's strict standards for neutrality, comprehensiveness, and verifiability serve as a great challenge for DRAs, with GAs representing the pinnacle of which. We curate a dataset of 100 recent Good Articles and propose Wiki Eval, a comprehensive evaluation framework comprising a fine-grained evaluation method with 39 criteria for writing quality and rigorous metrics for factual verifiability. Extensive experiments on various DRA systems demonstrate a significant gap between current DRAs and human expert-level Wikipedia articles, validating the effectiveness of WLC in advancing agent research. We release our benchmark at https://github.com/WangShao2000/Wiki_Live_Challenge