Identifying the Key Attributes in an Unlabeled Event Log for Automated Process Discovery

Process mining discovers and analyzes a process model from historical event logs. The prior art methods use the attributes of case-id, activity, and timestamp hidden in an event log as clues to discover a process model. However, a user needs to manually specify them, and this can be an exhaustive task. In this paper, we propose a two-stage key attribute identification method to avoid such a manual investigation, and thus this is toward fully automated process discovery. One of the challenging tasks is how to avoid exhaustive computation due to combinatorial explosion. For this, we narrow down candidates for each key attribute by using supervised machine learning in the first stage and identify the best combination of the in the second stage. Our computational complexity can be reduced from $\mathcal{O}(N^3)$ to $\mathcal{O}(k^3)$ where $N$ and $k$ are the numbers of columns and candidates we keep in the first stage, and usually $k$ is much smaller than $N$. We evaluated our method with 14 open datasets and showed that our method could identify the key attributes even with $k = 2$ for about 20 seconds for many datasets.

Decentral and Incentivized Federated Learning Frameworks: A Systematic Literature Review

The advent of Federated Learning (FL) has ignited a new paradigm for parallel and confidential decentralized Machine Learning (ML) with the potential of utilizing the computational power of a vast number of IoT, mobile and edge devices without data leaving the respective device, ensuring privacy by design. Yet, in order to scale this new paradigm beyond small groups of already entrusted entities towards mass adoption, the Federated Learning Framework (FLF) has to become (i) truly decentralized and (ii) participants have to be incentivized. This is the first systematic literature review analyzing holistic FLFs in the domain of both, decentralized and incentivized federated learning. 422 publications were retrieved, by querying 12 major scientific databases. Finally, 40 articles remained after a systematic review and filtering process for in-depth examination. Although having massive potential to direct the future of a more distributed and secure AI, none of the analyzed FLF is production-ready. The approaches vary heavily in terms of use-cases, system design, solved issues and thoroughness. We are the first to provide a systematic approach to classify and quantify differences between FLF, exposing limitations of current works and derive future directions for research in this novel domain.